Goodbye Omar. 218-211

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Again, that's not a crime, but don't play the victim if I call it out. Conservatives are extremely concerned the Federal Gov't is trying to create a one-party system (or, at the very least, move both parties closer to a top-down socialist state).

Anyone with a room temperature IQ should be concerned about it.

Obviously, if we only have one party in charge, that only benefits you if your values and beliefs are 100% aligned with the one party in charge.

And that's not going to be the case.

 

[NavigatorII]

I signed this petition but didn't donate.

Demanding An Investigation IN Rep. Ilhan Omar - Judicial Watch

www.judicialwatch.org

 

[kalimgoodman]

It wasn't random. It was acquired by professional private investigators. The Conservative PAC founder (who turned out to be a pederast) spent "hundreds of thousands of dollars" following them around the world to get the samples.

You said there was "no evidence". I strongly beg to differ and I produced at least more context to the backstory from a legitimare investigative journalist.

You think it's shady how the DNA was acquired but you're silent on the FBI being totally unwilling to look into the matter at all, and the fact the guy is most likely her brother. Again, unless they lied and submitted Omar's own DNA to the lab I don't know how someone would adulterate a sample to get a 99.99998% match. But I don't work in biotech R&D. Feels like it's at least worth the FBI's time to dig in and see if there's anything going on...

This is how you gaslight - you focus on one point over and over, and you never want to get into the broader issue at hand. Here the broader issue is: more proof of FBI hyper partisanism, more proof of an asymmetrical justice system and more proof the three-letter agencies are weaponized against conservatives. We've seen it over and over, but you're OK with it because they are always in line with your political beliefs.

Again, that's not a crime, but don't play the victim if I call it out. Conservatives are extremely concerned the Federal Gov't is trying to create a one-party system (or, at the very least, move both parties closer to a top-down socialist state).

Evil explained why the FBI wouldn't use it. He said a 1st yr law student would get that tossed. No matter what is said to you, you will be stuck on your belief. Which is your right.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Evil explained why the FBI wouldn't use it. He said a 1st yr law student would get that tossed. No matter what is said to you, you will be stuck on your belief. Which is your right.

Who is Evil? Is he the writer for The Daily Beast that told you that Trump ate classified documents?

 

[fatman76]

Evil explained why the FBI wouldn't use it. He said a 1st yr law student would get that tossed. No matter what is said to you, you will be stuck on your belief. Which is your right.

You're like a dog with a bone. This is the last time I'll try to explain to you the bigger issue is FBI political bias.

@EvilWayz pointed out the evidence wouldn't hold up in a court of law, what a good lawyer would do with it. I'm not even qualified to make a judgement on that, but IMO I'm pretty sure he's right given his credentials.

But that's not the same thing as the FBI reviewing the evidence and deciding the issue had enough merit to start their own investigation. Evidence gathered through that investigation would obviously carry more weight, and any law enforcement agency uses tips to guide investigations. But they don't care, they'd rather work on things like raiding MLG with no warning, while politely telling Biden they were going to do a search than ever risk potentially exposing a democrat for fraud.

In almost everything the FBI does these days you can find an asymmetrical application of force along political lines. This isn't about DNA on a straw.

It's a systemic problem in the agency, if you'd pay attention to recent FBI whistleblowers like Kyle Seraphin you'd know that. But again, it's all fine with you because they support your "side".

30 ex-FBI agents stand up to support whistleblower who exposed agency’s political bias

“It’s time to stop the FBI from being the enforcer of a political party’s ideology,” says Ernie Tibaldi, a retired agent from San Francisco.

nypost.com

 

[Dr. Curmudgeon]

Evil explained why the FBI wouldn't use it. He said a 1st yr law student would get that tossed. No matter what is said to you, you will be stuck on your belief. Which is your right.

True^^^just as you have the right to willful ignorance.

 

[EvilWayz]

I questioned the methodology, the reasoning is sound.

 

[kalimgoodman]

You're like a dog with a bone. This is the last time I'll try to explain to you the bigger issue is FBI political bias.

@EvilWayz pointed out the evidence wouldn't hold up in a court of law, what a good lawyer would do with it. I'm not even qualified to make a judgement on that, but IMO I'm pretty sure he's right given his credentials.

But that's not the same thing as the FBI reviewing the evidence and deciding the issue had enough merit to start their own investigation. Evidence gathered through that investigation would obviously carry more weight, and any law enforcement agency uses tips to guide investigations. But they don't care, they'd rather work on things like raiding MLG with no warning, while politely telling Biden they were going to do a search than ever risk potentially exposing a democrat for fraud.

In almost everything the FBI does these days you can find an asymmetrical application of force along political lines. This isn't about DNA on a straw.

It's a systemic problem in the agency, if you'd pay attention to recent FBI whistleblowers like Kyle Seraphin you'd know that. But again, it's all fine with you because they support your "side".

30 ex-FBI agents stand up to support whistleblower who exposed agency’s political bias

“It’s time to stop the FBI from being the enforcer of a political party’s ideology,” says Ernie Tibaldi, a retired agent from San Francisco.

nypost.com

I digress

 

[fatman76]

I digress

You do realize that it’s required that you say something to actually digress, right? To digress is to temporarily leave the main point, only to return to it a short time later.

I think the word you’re looking for is “ignore”.

BTW, you dialed into the hearing on Capitol Hill today re: political bias in the FBI? Or are you “digressing” on that too?

 

[Dr. Curmudgeon]

I retard.