ADVERTISEMENT

God Bless President Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Biden economic miracle continues.


Stocks rose to record levels Thursday as investors digested another batch of key economic data and an announcement from President Joe Biden that he had reached a bipartisan infrastructure agreement with Senate lawmakers.

yap yap yap 💤💤💤💤💤

more tiring #fakeeconomic news by buddy @BSC911

this is more Mugabe print and spend economics that will produce high high inflation while bankrupting generations to come. 🤯
 
E4xWmc2WYAABI8O
Not a single dem here even mentioned it. If Trump had done this, they all would be screaming to invoke the 25th Amendment immediately.

And they would have a strong case. Such hypocrisy from the sheep...
 
He said officials in high crime areas can hire more law-enforcement personnel using coronavirus relief funding.


Announcing his five-point strategy at the White House on Wednesday, the president urged cities and states to use $350bn (£250bn) of funding from a Covid-19 relief bill on public safety efforts, including adding more police officers, even beyond pre-pandemic levels.
"It means more police officers, more nurses, more counsellors, more social workers or community violence interrupters to help resolve issues before they escalate into crimes," the president said.

[Emphasis Added]

Sounds like he’s merely encouraging state and local officials to tap into unused funds, not proposing some grand transformational policy that will make a meaningful difference. We’ll see….
True. But a marked change from the defund the police narrative, after catering to the BLM crowd.
 
Not a single dem here even mentioned it. If Trump had done this, they all would be screaming to invoke the 25th Amendment immediately.

And they would have a strong case. Such hypocrisy from the sheep...
Maybe that's because we don't read redstate.com?

I do know that this group has completely ignored the fact that Trumpski is about to be criminally charged in New York (and possibly Georgia down the road):


And that you have also COMPLETELY IGNORED the ongoing House investigation into the corrupt DOJ under Trump:


But if this were Biden, you would be all over it like flies on crap.

You live in a glass house, bub, I wouldn't be casting stones if I were you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uniformed_ReRe
Maybe that's because we don't read redstate.com?

I do know that this group has completely ignored the fact that Trumpski is about to be criminally charged in New York (and possibly Georgia down the road):



And that you have also COMPLETELY IGNORED the ongoing House investigation into the corrupt DOJ under Trump:



But if this were Biden, you would be all over it like flies on crap.

You live in a glass house, bub, I wouldn't be casting stones if I were you.
You know what’s rich about both these articles? The CIA and FBI did the exact same thing to Trump as a candidate and president, you screamed Russian traitor for 3.5 years.

Adam Schiff did the exact same thing with members of Congress… not a peep

Obama used the IRS to go after his political adversaries, dubbed the greatest president of all.

Trump does exactly what your party has done for decades, Trump is going to prison

Have you not learned anything yet @LizardGrad89? Both parties suck, both parties do not care about you, you are worthless to them, you are nothing, your life means nothing to them. All they want is your vote because in our current government, they have to have it to keep the charade going.
 
So you’re saying Biden lied to get elected?

Are you surprised or are you still slurping his BS?
I don’t believe any candidates campaign promises. They all say stuff just to get elected.

If you believe everything a politician says, then you are even dumber than I realized.
 
Are you? Are you really?

Yes. And yes again.


I really have to question many of you all’s definition of smart.

That's fine...but it's unlikely that you would understand the answer.

FTR, this isn't really about my intelligence. It's more about your lack thereof.

You like attention. You are pretty bright in how you go about seeking it. Sometimes to your own detriment but I digress.
 
I don’t believe any candidates campaign promises. They all say stuff just to get elected.

If you believe everything a politician says, then you are even dumber than I realized.
I think we both know where we both stand on the IQ test. I can pass @Sunburnt Indian tests, you cannot.

It’s really that simple bud
 
Yes. And yes again.




That's fine...but it's unlikely that you would understand the answer.
Feel free to think whatever you wish, but my
FTR, this isn't really about my intelligence. It's more about your lack thereof.

You like attention. You are pretty bright in how you go about seeking it. Sometimes to your own detriment but I digress.
Sorry, but I don’t really feel the need to validate my intelligence to a bunch of dorks on a message board. Feel free to think whatever you want, but my history suggests otherwise. Like a lot of ignorant people, you presume anyone who disagrees with your partisanship to be less intelligent. Which is, quite frankly, a sign of stupidity.
 
I think we both know where we both stand on the IQ test. I can pass @Sunburnt Indian tests, you cannot.

It’s really that simple bud
LOL. Anyone can claim anything on the internet.

And if you really think Sunburnt‘s silly quizzes are an IQ test, you really are stupid.

Where does a circle begin and end? What is the simplest equation? Sorry, those aren’t IQ questions.
 
Sorry, but I don’t really feel the need to validate my intelligence to a bunch of dorks on a message board.

😂...well, good for you sparky. Because I don't believe you could if you felt that need.


Like a lot of ignorant people, you presume anyone who disagrees with your partisanship to be less intelligent. Which is, quite frankly, a sign of stupidity.

...and straight to the logic fail. Ask some of the smarter people on this board with whom I often disagree.

If I disagree with someone based on principle, or based on a different view of a similar logic point, we simply agree to disagree. Don't believe me...ask them (@LizardGrad89 , @gator1776 , @sadgator , ect.)

It's different with you (and maybe one other). Ask yourself, why is that? When it stumps you, just ask me and I'll tell you the answer.
 
😂...well, good for you sparky. Because I don't believe you could if you felt that need.




...and straight to the logic fail. Ask some of the smarter people on this board with whom I often disagree.

If I disagree with someone based on principle, or based on a different view of a similar logic point, we simply agree to disagree. Don't believe me...ask them (@LizardGrad89 , @gator1776 , @sadgator , ect.)

It's different with you (and maybe one other). Ask yourself, why is that? When it stumps you, just ask me and I'll tell you the answer.
It’s 100% true. When he disagreed with me he started to cry like a four-year-old child and complained to his mother.
 
Last edited:
You know what’s rich about both these articles? The CIA and FBI did the exact same thing to Trump as a candidate and president, you screamed Russian traitor for 3.5 years.

Adam Schiff did the exact same thing with members of Congress… not a peep

Obama used the IRS to go after his political adversaries, dubbed the greatest president of all.

Trump does exactly what your party has done for decades, Trump is going to prison

Have you not learned anything yet @LizardGrad89? Both parties suck, both parties do not care about you, you are worthless to them, you are nothing, your life means nothing to them. All they want is your vote because in our current government, they have to have it to keep the charade going.
Both parties suck. You spoke a truth there.

I choose the lesser of 2 evils. And yes, I know we disagree on which one is the lesser of two evils.

I would like to see us move to more of a European style republic, where there are multiple parties that form coalitions, and if things go to crap they can just call for a new election. But we can't get there, because 1)Americans have "us vs. them" ingrained in the culture, 2) none of us trust the other side enough to think they wouldn't try to pull a fast one, and 3) Those in power now would never accept a change that would dilute that power.

But a fella can dream.
 
Both parties suck. You spoke a truth there.

I choose the lesser of 2 evils. And yes, I know we disagree on which one is the lesser of two evils.

I would like to see us move to more of a European style republic, where there are multiple parties that form coalitions, and if things go to crap they can just call for a new election. But we can't get there, because 1)Americans have "us vs. them" ingrained in the culture, 2) none of us trust the other side enough to think they wouldn't try to pull a fast one, and 3) Those in power now would never accept a change that would dilute that power.

But a fella can dream.
The problem with a European style government is there are maybe 3 degrees of separation between the parties and so to find a party for one to line up to is extremely tough. We would also have to change the winner take all structure to mimimic Europe’s elections.

These morons in DC would never go for it. Honestly, I’d settle for term limits to rid the government of the McConnell’s and Pelosi’s of the world. Both are extremely out of touch and have been in office for far too long.
 
The problem with a European style government is there are maybe 3 degrees of separation between the parties and so to find a party for one to line up to is extremely tough. We would also have to change the winner take all structure to mimimic Europe’s elections.

These morons in DC would never go for it. Honestly, I’d settle for term limits to rid the government of the McConnell’s and Pelosi’s of the world. Both are extremely out of touch and have been in office for far too long.
A European style government is far from perfect, but I think it's a bit better than the current 2 party system. But yeah, the morons in DC would never go for it.

I am not against term limits per se, but I do have some reservations about constantly having rookies trying to run the country. I get the idea of wanting to get the old cronies out, I do, but to set up a system that replaces people just when they are starting to get the hang of things, I don't think that's better. Also, if the concern is that people are taking advantage of the system for personal gain, all that term limits would do is make people be much more aggressive in vote selling, etc, because they only have a short time frame in which to make their money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uniformed_ReRe
A European style government is far from perfect, but I think it's a bit better than the current 2 party system. But yeah, the morons in DC would never go for it.

I am not against term limits per se, but I do have some reservations about constantly having rookies trying to run the country. I get the idea of wanting to get the old cronies out, I do, but to set up a system that replaces people just when they are starting to get the hang of things, I don't think that's better. Also, if the concern is that people are taking advantage of the system for personal gain, all that term limits would do is make people be much more aggressive in vote selling, etc, because they only have a short time frame in which to make their money.

The real question. You still in favor of illegal voting?
 
I'm calling bullshit on this. Nobody spends this much time with people they dislike.
I do enjoy the banter. But most of these guys are pretty dorky.

I mean, I've never seen people brag so much about how smart they are, but then say such stupid stuff. They are like the kids that wore pocket protectors in school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mdfgator
😂...well, good for you sparky. Because I don't believe you could if you felt that need.




...and straight to the logic fail. Ask some of the smarter people on this board with whom I often disagree.

If I disagree with someone based on principle, or based on a different view of a similar logic point, we simply agree to disagree. Don't believe me...ask them (@LizardGrad89 , @gator1776 , @sadgator , ect.)

It's different with you (and maybe one other). Ask yourself, why is that? When it stumps you, just ask me and I'll tell you the answer.
Obviously its because I am on a higher level than the rest of you. You seek my approval, yet don't know how to earn it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BamaFan1137
I find it hilarious that @BSC911 and @LizardGrad89 still haven't figured out that the test is as much about their REACTION to the questions as it is their answers.
The reaction, when you are smart, is "why are you asking such silly little questions?" The reaction, when you are borderline moron, is "why are you asking such tough questions?"

Anyone who isn't borderline moron understands this. Which is why you, and Sunburnt, do not.

Note: Just for your edification, IQ tests do not have a component where your reaction to the question is part of your score. I mean, good God, that's just STUPID.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mdfgator
The real question. You still in favor of illegal voting?
I'm in favor of you taking a long walk off a short pier.

The thing that's irritating is your continued attempt to take a complex issue and boil it down to basically nothing. Of course, I understand why you would do that, being dumber than the dog, you can't deal with nuance.
 
Last edited:
What one says and especially how one says it defines one. This is a golden rule for the administrator about to administer intelligence quotient testing. In 10 minute interviews, the administrator can always predict scoring order.

The bright see tests as a challenge. The slow sees tests as silly quizzes. The bright seeks answers for questions they can't answer. The slow labels questions they can't answer as stupid, dumb and trick.

I didn't arrive here and label anyone stupid. The stupid among us shouted their status to me and most of us. They continue to do so regularly.
Did you think you were gone long enough for people to forget how badly you were exposed as nothing more than a teacher with the answer key? Here's a hint: You weren't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mdfgator
I do enjoy the banter. But most of these guys are pretty dorky.

I mean, I've never seen people brag so much about how smart they are, but then say such stupid stuff. They are like the kids that wore pocket protectors in school.
Fair enough. The distilled essence of my observation, based on my high school education and my trade school degree, are that none of you are as smart as you believe yourselves to be.
 
Last edited:
I'm in favor of you taking a long walk off a short pier.

The thing that's irritating is your continued attempt to take a complex issue and boil it down to basically nothing. Of course, I understand why you would do that, being dumber than the dog, you can't deal with nuance.

The thing that’s funny (you don’t irritate anyone because everyone knows you have NO morals) is that you take a simple issue and make it complicated in an attempt to cover up your horrible values. You were asked a simple question.

Do you support:

1. Count every vote or
2. Count every LEGAL vote

You chose number 1, and everyone saw it. For months you had an opportunity to recant and didn’t. Only after getting hammered for about 2 months by everyone about your crappy morals did you try and come up with some lame (in your head, complex) excuse. It’s a simple issue. Only a morally bankrupt human would try to convince folks illegal voting versus legal voting is a complex issue. It’s not.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT