You’re fighting a losing battle. The Dems have no morals so they are willing to cheat to win.
God Bless President Biden
- Thread starter BSC911
- Start date
- Status
@BSC911, Biden is 55% in a conservative leaning poll 😁
www.rasmussenreports.com
Biden Approval Index History - Rasmussen Reports®
bahahah....sheep gonna sheep. and BS Cuck, and Kalimbadlib up in this beeeeatch!!!@BSC911, Biden is 55% in a conservative leaning poll 😁
Biden Approval Index History - Rasmussen Reports®
Go ahead and give me the deets on the poll. Breakdown the demographics for me.
That's the same poll the dems here rejected when it had Trump with a higher approval rating than obama.
Dems have no shame.
If you don’t wish to have responses in a public forum, maybe you should send yourself, Errr BS Cuck private messages. Otherwise, everyone can respond
Ok, kalimbadlib.
He’s just a weak troll. Losers like him flame those of us successful people as a way of making themself feel better about their miserable life.
Last edited:
you're posting in a public forum. Where everyone is conversing back and forth. If you wish to only have your doppelganger respond....private message yourself.
BS cuck alert. Time to fire up the fryer.
I hear you but you're ignoring how much you reply to me. It's weird. It's like you seek me out. Find someone else, you're not my type 😂
It's clear that he's seeking me out to make himself feel good about himself. It doesn't work because I have great self confidence. He's more annoying than anything. He sucks at trolling.
It’s almost as if kalimbadlib is talking to himself up in here.
And the topic is how another poster isn't worth talking about.
Not the best and brightest this country has to offer...
I always seek out those who are any of the following.
1. Disingenuous
2. Frauds
3. No morals
4. Liars
5. Socks
Now....
Say my name
LOL. He just sucks up to Ghost, yet not a word about him being a welcher.
Pitiful. Just keep doing your thing and ignore that loser.
Kalimbadlib in da house. Keep doing you....even though you aren't being you.
I have never said that I hope Sidney wins or loses her defamation lawsuit. I said that it’s outcome will confirm if either:
a) she was right, there was systemic fraud, and thus her comments represent confirmed behavior and the suit is dismissed
B) it’s not defamation because, “no reasonable person” should have taken her accusations seriously and she is dismissed
C) she provides no evidence, her accusations were meant to be taken seriously and she is found guilty and is forced to pay a very significant financial penalty
I have no issue in another audit. Sidney needs it for the evidence per #1 above. Democrats are trying to make hay out of the “big lie” (their term) to sway centrists to vote Democratic and paint the right as untethered from reality and move the discussion away from crime, inflation, border crisis, Israel, deficits, etc. I don’t think they are worried about the results, but I have no idea. I don’t speak with Stacey Abrams or the DNC. 😉
….to your question, I watched it. she is answering a procedural question on what would happen if systematic fraud is shown and the results of the six states changed were swung back to Trump.
This may surprise you, but I really do not care one way or the other. I want the facts presented, those facts reviewed appropriately, a decision made and for us to move past this. If the evidence is on her side and the judge rules for her, then appropriate legal steps need to be taken.
The worst outcome, in my view, is that she is exonerated because she argues in her briefs the "no reasonable person would believe...".
What I do care about is moving past partisan positioning and constant rhetorical vitriol and to us being better and more cohesive as a society and more efficient and impactful both in the private and public sectors.
I am indeed the consummate moderate Republican. I am socially liberal and believe that government can have a positive moderate role. I distrust concentrations of power - whether it be teachers unions to hold back communities of color, police unions to protect Chauvin, Amazon, or Facebook to de-platform Trump. I am for a strong position on crime, but believe that misdemeanors such as Marijuana use (which I will not use, and frankly hate) are not worth criminalizing. I believe in strong borders.
What you describe is absolutely what is wrong in politics and the tone of the day. Antifa? The mayors of Portland and Seattle should be ashamed of what they have left their city become. Never-Trumpism blinded the NYT and others to over-look the lab leak theory. On BLM, I think this country has left our black brothers and sisters behind. On the other hand, BLM is founded on Marxist theory which again, goes DIRECTLY against my distrust of concentration of power. What Republicans should do is call out, consistently and relentlessly those items. People in the center watch.
I think Trump and Steve Bannon reframed much of today's politics. For example, Trump called out China as the existential threat.
My consistent critique on Trump was that he was undisciplined. He alienated many in the center who if you take out, Ghost, to your point, "the mean Tweets", would be a Trump supporter. It was completely unnecessary. He could have had all of the impact without it.
Where Ghost and I mainly differ is what is easier to do: ask one guy, Trump, to be more disciplined, or ask 10M+ people (or in this case 45,000 would would have flipped the election) to "get over it (it = Mean Tweets)?"
Ghost - you continue, rightly, to focus on the practical considerations. Here is a practical consideration: what is easier - convincing 10M people or just one, Trump?
If you want to know where my politics are, look at DeSantis and Tim Scott. I voted for John James for Senate in Michigan over Gary Peters.
People in Antifa who commit crimes should be in jail. The rioters in the summer should be in jail. George Floyd was a tragedy, but in no way, excused $320M in property damage. When Don Lemon excused it, he should have been temporarily suspended from CNN. He and Cuomo finally in mid-August condemned it after they saw Biden's poll numbers drop.
Navigator - respectfully, there was a lot in there for you to agree with, but yet you chose to ignore that all, quote Stalin and infer that I am in part or in full a "useful idiot".
I also did not say, but have in the past, that when Hillary called Trump supporters a "basketful of deplorables", she committed the same error and paid deeply on election day. She lost a ton of votes that day - both in the center and especially in the working class.
If you don't want to play "nice in the sandbox" with fellow citizens, then it leaves you with few choices. You and I may differ significantly on points. Assuming you have a respectful discussion (which you are, to your credit), I will "play nice in the sandbox" and be open to your ideas.
That type of sentiment and ethos goes a long way.
Where again did I say that I "hate Trump"?
In the end, all of these discussion points are moot because you believe, firmly and consistently, that the election was stolen. That is fine, but it cuts off all further discussion until audits or other, overturn what has already been decided and litigated to this point.
...and yes, I think he won the electoral college by 45,000 votes. For example, if there was massive "fraud" in California, that was going to Democratic anyways.
You don't want to debate, but you jump into my exchange with Navigator. Next time, just don't jump in. It is your choice.
I don't say things, but you infer those things are there.
Fraud is not explicitly proven (at least yet), but again, you infer and declare, with certainty, those activities took place.
Perhaps you will be proven explicitly correct. The Lab Leak theory evolution shows that electoral fraud may indeed be proven, in turn, to be correct and move from inference to empirical deduction.
Until then, and you are right, this is not a productive exchange.
I don't say things, but you infer those things are there.
Fraud is not explicitly proven (at least yet), but again, you infer and declare, with certainty, those activities took place.
Perhaps you will be proven explicitly correct. The Lab Leak theory evolution shows that electoral fraud may indeed be proven, in turn, to be correct and move from inference to empirical deduction.
Until then, and you are right, this is not a productive exchange.
If I were McConnell, I would pair the independent January 6th commission with a bi-partisan audit and review of the six states voting and if there truly fraud. Those things are inextricably linked.
Let the facts, for both, play out.
McConnell is not interested in an audit, his wife has connections to the CCP.
I know you believe our government is inherently good but the facts are right in front of you to show you they don’t give two squirts of piss about you and will do everything in their power to remain in power.
What sick sick SOB 🤬
redstate.com
Joe Biden Goes Full Leroy Jenkins in a Race-Baiting Speech, Creeps on Young Girls Again
Joe Biden Goes Full Leroy Jenkins in a Race-Baiting Speech, Creeps on Young Girls Again
What is with his obsession with getting ice cream with young girls?
redstate.com
Ah contraire. I‘m always happy when the market is up. Especially energy stocks which are crushing it today.
- Status
