Now, can we get multiple receivers that can catch the dagum ball on a consistent basis?
Last edited:
Now, can we get multiple receivers that can catch the dagum all on a consistent basis?
That and try and make curfew the night before a game.Now, can we get multiple receivers that can catch the dagum all on a consistent basis?
I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Franks start by the UT game next year.
Look who wants the moon!
Lol...or stare at for several seconds as he ran wide open.Everyone says that D-Rob would have made a difference in the game, and I agree. There would have been an extra receiver for him to overthrow.
He's an EE and I imagine they will ease him in by giving him PT in the first few games. Right now the only other options are Del Rio and Harris.Lets hope not. We need to get out of this seemingly perpetual cycle of playing QB's before they're ready in shitty situations. 100k on the road for a first start? That has disaster written all over it. If he's gonna start they need to ease him in.
That is funny, but it hurts to laugh about it.Everyone says that D-Rob would have made a difference in the game, and I agree. There would have been an extra receiver for him to overthrow.
Yes. He has talent. Big arm, nice over the top release, etc. He's not my preferred QB take though, as if that matters. He's just not athletic enough for my liking. I want a QB who is a passer first but can also make plus outside the pocket. They're much harder to defend and even the NFL is trending that direction with QB's. Guys who are primarily pocket passers put way too much pressure on the oline to protect them, also gives the defense and easy it when rushing because they know where he'll be every down.
I have no issue with Franks. It's just all a matter of preference. I'd like the commit a whole lot better if they were letting Trask go though and getting a second QB with some top notch athleticism. Then let them battle it out and may the best man win.
A verbal commitment is not Official. There's a lot of time between now and signing day and these young kids and their egos can be very fickle. Franks was "official" to LSU last week, right? And the CB Meyers was "official" to UF until today. The coaches seem to be putting together a pretty good class, but we won't how good until national signing day and even then the true quality won't be known for 2-3 years. As for the QB situation, I expect Luke Del Rio to be the opening day starter. It's just too much to expect a kid still playing high school ball to come in and start. I know it's happened, but the better bet is on an older guy who's already played some. How good he will be, only time will tell. Our schedule next year is very favorable, especially considering how tough they normally are. At Tennessee & At Arkansas, plus LSU at home and At FSU are the games I see as most challenging. The other 3 OOC games are true cupcakes.
Franks is now pissed that we are heavily pursuing Eason. Again our staff better be careful. I wouldn't risk losing Franks myself to chase a longshot from the other side of the country.
Meh, whatever. One thing I've always agreed with Spurrier on is not treating the QB position different from any other position. Stack the roster and mah the best man win. It's like that at EVERY single position, why should QB be any different? Especially since QB is the most important position on the field. Missing on one guy can set you back years. None of these QB's have proven anything. It's in Mac's best interest to get as much talent on the team as possible, not worry about one dudes feelings.
"Feleipe Franks committed to Florida a few days ago, and he isn’t thrilled about reports that Jacob Eason, the longtime UGA commit, will take an official visit with the Gators, beginning today.
Franks, a 4-star QB from Wakulla High School (Crawfordville, Fla.), was asked how he felt about Eason visiting Florida.
“Not good,” Franks told SEC Country."
Want to agree ooze, but times are sifferent. Not often do two top QBs in the same class go to the same school, and like Paco said, don't want just Trask in this class. I wiuld keep Franks because IMO he wants to be here, and because he is Macs choice and the other two are Nuss guys.
All that said I Would trade Trask, Franks, Eason and Allen combined for the kid Tennessee has coming in or Haskins. Now if Richt went to MD and Eason followed, could we nab Haskins?
I just can't be bothered to care; regardless of who the QB is. I understand why they want it that way, only one of them can play at a time. It's in their best interest to be the only guy in their class. But that type of recruiting is what eff programs if that one kid doesn't work out. See Texas for an example. To hell with that. Compete or bounce. We need all the talent we can. We can't afford to miss on a QB with our current situation. So we need to stack the deck in our favor.
Two top rated QBs don't sign with the same school in the same year, it just doesn't happen. So if Eason chooses the Good Guys he needs to be an EE imho. With our dire situation at quarterback, I don't want to lose a guy as talented as Franks who wants to be here for some kid who may change his mind on NSD. ijs
With that said, why in the hell are we giving a scholly to a kid who can't even start on his on damn team. I mean come on Mac...!![]()
After seeing his performance all year, what school would let Harris transfer to them???
I agree with Ooz on this. We need to take both top guys and then let the chips fall.
LOL. That would be great if you think by just saying "take both top guys" means it's gonna happen. Not one person is saying that wouldn't be great. BUT We aren't going to get both Eason and Franks. Forget it! Mac just better not lose Franks by chasing after a kid that has never been on our radar until Richt got fired.I agree with Ooz on this. We need to take both top guys and then let the chips fall.