I love that IDs are free. Also glad that signature matching is gone. Way too subjective.They also removed signature matching, and IDs are free now.
I love that IDs are free. Also glad that signature matching is gone. Way too subjective.They also removed signature matching, and IDs are free now.
Don’t feel bad for him. The best way to stop a Democrat is put an American flag in their face. It’s like sunlight to vampires 😂😂😂Manchin is funny. The democrats is after him. I saw that Warren is coming at him now. Poor guy 😄.
Naw Bill, that was just a hypothetical question my friend. You can make it 10% hahaNot arguing but is 40% a number you threw out there as a guess or is there numerical fact behind it?
What amazes me was an estimated 200K black folks were just wandering around Georgia with no legal form of identification.I love that IDs are free. Also glad that signature matching is gone. Way too subjective.
Just curious because if the percentage was that high then I’d question the voting law alsoNaw Bill, that was just a hypothetical question my friend. You can make it 10% haha
I'm actually not shocked but I'm glad that it's free. Takes away the "excuses ".What amazes me was an estimated 200K black folks were just wandering around Georgia with no legal form of identification.
Well guess what? I was close and I was making up a number 😄. Now Georgia didn't prevent it but now you see the racial correlation?Just curious because if the percentage was that high then I’d question the voting law also
I don’t have a dog in the fight and I’m definitely not saying the numbers are wrong. What I question is the source of information, aka New York Times.Well guess what? I was close and I was making up a number 😄. Now Georgia didn't prevent it but now you see the racial correlation?
"Black voters made up roughly 37 percent of those who voted early on Sunday in Georgia, while the Black population of Georgia is about 32 percent".
![]()
In Georgia, Republicans Take Aim at Role of Black Churches in Elections (Published 2021)
New proposals by the G.O.P.-controlled Legislature have targeted Sunday voting, part of a raft of measures that could reduce the impact of Black voters in the state.www.nytimes.com
There are definitely other articles with numbers but this thread isn't about that stuff. I will say this is the beauty/danger of attacking the press.I don’t have a dog in the fight and I’m definitely not saying the numbers are wrong. What I question is the source of information, aka New York Times.
When your entire news business shifts from actual news to lies, propaganda, and race bailing, I’d question the source.
No offense but the Democrat's idea of "souls to polls Sundays" is like marching people from Alcoholics Anonymous and drug rehab clinics to the polls to vote for free alcohol and drugs. The ministers are straight out of the 60's and in the pocket of entrenched Democrats. If the Democrat Party endorsed slavery again those ministers would be preaching halleluah!You think it's reasonable to ban/limit Sunday voting that directly impacts black people "souls to the polls"?
HR1 is too big but something should be done on a national level.
If Manchin had a brain he'd switch parties or run as an Indy. He'd be in office in WV as long as he wanted to put his name on the ballot and never have to campaign. I think he likes the attention by being someone who has to be wooed, that gets him headlines every time a vote comes up.Manchin is funny. The democrats is after him. I saw that Warren is coming at him now. Poor guy 😄.
I don’t see the danger in questioning a news source who lies. You can play the boy who cried wolf card for so long before you lose all credibility and the NYT has been doing exactly for a long long time.There are definitely other articles with numbers but this thread isn't about that stuff. I will say this is the beauty/danger of attacking the press.
When something like this is posted it gets downplayed from people because they don't respect the source and the source they do respect will never post something like that because it goes against their views/brand/belief. So things like this becomes a divided topic because only one said has information on it. This can be said about immigration, abortion, race, vaccines, etc. It's truly sad.
I am not even talking about the article or that topic. Just saying that its tough to get news to both sides because one side will always not report that news or give a complete story.I don’t see the danger in questioning a news source who lies. You can play the boy who cried wolf card for so long before you lose all credibility and the NYT has been doing exactly for a long long time.
Take the article you posted, is it really about voting on Sunday or is it more about another opportunity to push race busting and pandering to the 5 readers they have left?
As someone who has a grandfather (RIP) who was a preacher for like 40 years and worked with souls to polls, i can say that is not true and very sad that you think of black religious democrats that way. The program was started as a way to get black people to vote because black people were disenfranchised for so long that plenty of them gave up on voting but whatever.No offense but the Democrat's idea of "souls to polls Sundays" is like marching people from Alcoholics Anonymous and drug rehab clinics to the polls to vote for free alcohol and drugs. The ministers are straight out of the 60's and in the pocket of entrenched Democrats. If the Democrat Party endorsed slavery again those ministers would be preaching halleluah!
If Manchin had a brain he'd switch parties or run as an Indy. He'd be in office in WV as long as he wanted to put his name on the ballot and never have to campaign. I think he likes the attention by being someone who has to be wooed, that gets him headlines every time a vote comes up.
You're actually close here, but still missing the truth.There are definitely other articles with numbers but this thread isn't about that stuff. I will say this is the beauty/danger of attacking the press.
When something like this is posted it gets downplayed from people because they don't respect the source and the source they do respect will never post something like that because it goes against their views/brand/belief. So things like this becomes a divided topic because only one said has information on it. This can be said about immigration, abortion, race, vaccines, etc. It's truly sad.
It's absolutely true, get out of here with your gaslighting bullshit LOLAs someone who has a grandfather (RIP) who was a preacher for like 40 years and worked with souls to polls, i can say that is not true and very sad that you think of black religious democrats that way.
My IQ and my bank account put my mind at ease. As hominem attacks on individuals is not a good strategy, by the way, in influencing people to join your side.Ur really not that bright are u? Ghost hit the nail on the head idiot. Wtfu! College idiots had nothing to do with the election. Once u wake up to the reality that Biden stole the election with fake mail in ballots n corrupt voting machine the better u will be. No one votes for an idiot who didn’t leave his basement.
Apparently ur not familiar with me. I’m not here to influence others to join any said. That’s a snowflake tactic before they go to cancel culture. So ur not as bright as ur so called bank account and IQ suggests. LolMy IQ and my bank account put my mind at ease. As hominem attacks on individuals is not a good strategy, by the way, in influencing people to join your side.
My wife, (masters), her sister (lawyer), her other sister (PhD), their mother (masters), and nearly all of their friends voted for Biden. Why? They hated his demeanor and his handling of the pandemic. You may view them as short sighted or other, but they legally voted for Biden. Those are facts.
might there have been fraud? Sure. We had an unprecedented level of mail in voting and ballot harvesting. Let’s continue to find the evidence parallel to what is being done at the lab leak. When the MSM media says and repeats. “baseless”, my view is “how do we really know, for certain?
you will find I have quite an open mind on a broad range of topics and am suspicious of quick answers, inflammatory dialogue on both sides, and most importantly, concentrations of power.
There are definitely other articles with numbers but this thread isn't about that stuff. I will say this is the beauty/danger of attacking the press.
When something like this is posted it gets downplayed from people because they don't respect the source and the source they do respect will never post something like that because it goes against their views/brand/belief. So things like this becomes a divided topic because only one said has information on it. This can be said about immigration, abortion, race, vaccines, etc. It's truly sad.
So your theory that college-educated white women cost Trump the election is simply due to how the college-educated women in your family voted?My IQ and my bank account put my mind at ease. As hominem attacks on individuals is not a good strategy, by the way, in influencing people to join your side.
My wife, (masters), her sister (lawyer), her other sister (PhD), their mother (masters), and nearly all of their friends voted for Biden. Why? They hated his demeanor and his handling of the pandemic.
I walked outside, and saw 15 squirrels. My analysis? There will be an acorn shortage next winter.So your theory that college-educated white women cost Trump the election is simply due to how the college-educated women in your family voted?
LOL. Ok then.
I don't care for what you think, ill just say that the data on sunday voting from black and brown people is there.No. The danger is the press lying, and manipulating the news for a political agenda. Once they do that, which has been proven, everything they do is in question. Just like the article you posted. I can rip it apart if you like?
The sad part is you put the responsibility on people reading fakenews and calling it out instead of the media. Unreal
And they wanted trump!I don't care for what you think, ill just say that the data on sunday voting from black and brown people is there.
There are definitely other articles with numbers but this thread isn't about that stuff. I will say this is the beauty/danger of attacking the press.
When something like this is posted it gets downplayed from people because they don't respect the source and the source they do respect will never post something like that because it goes against their views/brand/belief. So things like this becomes a divided topic because only one said has information on it. This can be said about immigration, abortion, race, vaccines, etc. It's truly sad.
Men lie, woman lie, numbers don't?
I agree but have we really proven that people are purposely lying? It's more of people looking for gotcha moments. The media will never be perfect and never was perfect. So some of you holding them to a perfect standard is ridiculous. We all lie, it's human nature.Agree with everything you said. However, it's entirely the medias fault. If they want to be trusted then they should tell the truth, always and completely.
If you tell me 99 truths and 1 purposeful lie, do you know what that makes you?
...and I don't mean you-you...I mean them you 😂
So you're saying they can make the math fit their narrative?Well...they do if the men and woman that do the math lie.
"Stats don't lie, statisticians do"
You didn't know that? @LizardGrad89 you want to chime in on data analysis?So you're saying they can make the math fit their narrative?
It’s not about any of that. The news was created for the purpose of keeping the government in check so the people know what they are doing whether it’s good or bad. Both sides have turned into a circus of propaganda and opinion. For me, just give me the damn truth.I agree but have we really proven that people are purposely lying? It's more of people looking for gotcha moments. The media will never be perfect and never was perfect. So some of you holding them to a perfect standard is ridiculous. We all lie, it's human nature.
It's our fault too. We have bias views. Like I'm assuming you trust Tucker Carlson. Now what if he went to go work for CNN, would you automatically stop trusting him? Is the lack of trust with the writer/reporter? Or the site/company? It's all a political game.
I agree but have we really proven that people are purposely lying? It's more of people looking for gotcha moments. The media will never be perfect and never was perfect. So some of you holding them to a perfect standard is ridiculous. We all lie, it's human nature.
It's our fault too. We have bias views. Like I'm assuming you trust Tucker Carlson. Now what if he went to go work for CNN, would you automatically stop trusting him? Is the lack of trust with the writer/reporter? Or the site/company? It's all a political game.
So you're saying they can make the math fit their narrative?
lol. No one is holding the media to some perfect standard. Wake up. We just want a media that doesn’t pick sides and reports the truth the best way it can. Not hard to ask. Just like all this so called racist crap which ends up not being about race. They report what they want to sell news verses sell the truth. You want to bring up Tucker.. let’s chat about him. What has he reported that wasn’t backed up with data that was false? I understand u will have biased spins but he’s not report the race of cops and criminals as a reason for action as the left is such as cnn and the majority of the MSM which happen to be on the left. So it’s not ridiculous to expect some truth from those who control what the majority sees. It shapes the view ppl have. Just as they are trying to get the uneducated to believe we have systemic racism. Ridiculous!I agree but have we really proven that people are purposely lying? It's more of people looking for gotcha moments. The media will never be perfect and never was perfect. So some of you holding them to a perfect standard is ridiculous. We all lie, it's human nature.
It's our fault too. We have bias views. Like I'm assuming you trust Tucker Carlson. Now what if he went to go work for CNN, would you automatically stop trusting him? Is the lack of trust with the writer/reporter? Or the site/company? It's all a political game.
He's already being branded as a racist if he doesn't go along.Manchin is funny. The democrats is after him. I saw that Warren is coming at him now. Poor guy 😄.
Kalim, here is what you apparently don't understand or forget. It is the network who sets the tone and substance of what get's reported, not the individual reporter. CNN would no way allow Tucker Carlson to report what he reports now. Why do you think CNN just fired Rick Santorum but they will keep an unethical Chris Cuomo and welcome back a pervert like Jeffrey Toobin? Why do you think the NY Times have fired who they have fired over the last 12 months? Why do you think Lara Logan left CBS? As far as the media lying or playing down the truth, explain to me how MSNBC can have a reporter last summer telling his audience the protests are mostly peaceful, while the reporter is standing in a location with a building on fire in the background. Who is the reporter trying to convince?. I would expect to see that juxtaposition on an SNL skit, not real life.I agree but have we really proven that people are purposely lying? It's more of people looking for gotcha moments. The media will never be perfect and never was perfect. So some of you holding them to a perfect standard is ridiculous. We all lie, it's human nature.
It's our fault too. We have bias views. Like I'm assuming you trust Tucker Carlson. Now what if he went to go work for CNN, would you automatically stop trusting him? Is the lack of trust with the writer/reporter? Or the site/company? It's all a political game.
They don't allow Sunday voting here in Maryland, but people of all colors still seem to find a way to vote.You think it's reasonable to ban/limit Sunday voting that directly impacts black people "souls to the polls"?
HR1 is too big but something should be done on a national level.
Can't they schedule "Souls to the Polls" on a Saturday or a Tuesday?Souls to the polls is in person voting. It's not an unattended voting drop-off. It's early in person voting. Starting to sound like you're just defending because the Republicans are doing it.
That's literally what HR1 is designed to do, have one voting practices state wide. Lisa murkowski and Manchin is trying to work on a bipartisan edition now. I'm all for having it on a federal level because you can't trust states.
Black people will find a way to vote. We always do but nobody should have to overcome so much to vote.
This is the weird stuff to me. People seem to ok with states making all of these weird rules when it comes to voting which is a constitution right but the same people are not ok when people try to do the same with obtaining a gun another constitution right.
See how this works when you are a dem?I agree but have we really proven that people are purposely lying? It's more of people looking for gotcha moments. The media will never be perfect and never was perfect. So some of you holding them to a perfect standard is ridiculous. We all lie, it's human nature.
Yes I saw people calling Manchin a racist, I've been defending him alot on twitter. He is also being called a sexist.He's already being branded as a racist if he doesn't go along.
Kalim, here is what you apparently don't understand or forget. It is the network who sets the tone and substance of what get's reported, not the individual reporter. CNN would no way allow Tucker Carlson to report what he reports now. Why do you think CNN just fired Rick Santorum but they will keep an unethical Chris Cuomo and welcome back a pervert like Jeffrey Toobin? Why do you think the NY Times have fired who they have fired over the last 12 months? Why do you think Lara Logan left CBS? As far as the media lying or playing down the truth, explain to me how MSNBC can have a reporter last summer telling his audience the protests are mostly peaceful, while the reporter is standing in a location with a building on fire in the background. Who is the reporter trying to convince?. I would expect to see that juxtaposition on an SNL skit, not real life.
They don't allow Sunday voting here in Maryland, but people of all colors still seem to find a way to vote.
Can't they schedule "Souls to the Polls" on a Saturday or a Tuesday?
Pressing who? Trump could have fired Mueller at any moment, he didn't have to convince anyone HE is the guy that made the call.Remember people said CNN was lying on Trump about pressing to fire Mueller? Well Trump's lawyer confirmed it this week.
Fv€king white libtards and how they view black voters.Hiden told us blacks are monolithic and can't think for themselves, but added that unlike blacks 'the hispanic community is incredibly diverse!'