Joe did not get paid millions. That is a LIE.
BREAKING: Sen Chuck Grassley releases FD-1023 form that details $5,000,000 bribe payment to Joe Biden and another to Hunter Biden
- Thread starter GhostOfMatchesMalone
- Start date
What an independent take.
You voted for a traitor that sold out his country for profit. We begged you to listen.
So this is Jason asking you to post more? "Don't be shy I would love to read your recruiting thoughts and any other member on the board."
You did read the "any other member on the board" part right?
Don't confuse support with welcomes. You know that is his job right? To start forums to gather differing opinions on subjects. He does a pretty darn good job too. Don't put words in other people's mouths or keyboards for self aggrandizement.
You have just galvanized the fact you twist other people's words and writings to mislead others. In short you have the dubious honor of being a first rate liar.
Last edited:
Sounds like Devon Archer disagrees with your take.
So now that you’ve heard from Shokin himself and Devon Archer, are we on the same page that not only was Joe involved in Hunter’s business dealings but Shokin was actually fired because he was a threat to Burisma, and by proxy Hunter?
He even admits the “Shokin is an asset” was a narrative fed to the board,
I don’t know how you can spin this, but I’m sure you’ll try, but it doesn’t change the fact you’re wrong on this.
Devon Archer says one Democratic claim about Biden business is ‘categorically false’ - Washington Examiner
Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s former business partner, pushed back on claims by Democrats that President Joe Biden was never involved in his son’s foreign businesses in any way.“That’s categorically false,” Archer told Tucker Carlson in a lengthy interview published Friday. “He was aware of...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s former business partner, pushed back on claims by Democrats that President Joe Biden was never involved in his son’s foreign businesses in any way.
“That’s categorically false,” Archer told Tucker Carlson in a lengthy interview published Friday. “He was aware of Hunter’s business. He met with Hunter’s business partners.”
—————————————————————-
Democrats have tried in recent days to claim that Shokin was not investigating the company, and therefore Joe Biden’s successful efforts to get Shokin fired could not have been intended to help his son’s company.
“Shokin was considered a threat to the business,” Archer said during the interview.
“Shokin was taking a close look at Burisma,” he said. “He was a threat. He ended up seizing assets of Nikolai [Zlochevsky].”
Archer was referring to the head of Burisma, who faced legal peril at the time.
“Then he was fired, and then somehow, Burisma was let off the hook,” Archer said. “I mean, that’s what the story was.”
But Archer said that “the narrative that was fed to the board” was effectively the opposite: that Shokin posed no threat because he’d been privately persuaded to leave Burisma alone and that the appointment of a new prosecutor would only deepen Burisma’s legal troubles.
Guys, it's happening. We are currently watching the final Preview of Coming Attractions and the Feature Presentation starts in 30 seconds.
Grab your popcorn now.
Grab your popcorn now.
We’ve also tried to explain money laundering about 10 times to him.
He still hasn’t come up with the spin explaining why Joe and family have 20 shell companies.
And in getting Shokin fired, Joe cemented Hunter's value to Burisma. It was money well spent, obviously. That's why he was worth $90k per month...a real value.
Do you trust his testimony or his Tucker interview? His words are in the transcript.Sounds like Devon Archer disagrees with your take.
So now that you’ve heard from Shokin himself and Devon Archer, are we on the same page that not only was Joe involved in Hunter’s business dealings but Shokin was actually fired because he was a threat to Burisma, and by proxy Hunter?
He even admits the “Shokin is an asset” was a narrative fed to the board,
I don’t know how you can spin this, but I’m sure you’ll try, but it doesn’t change the fact you’re wrong on this.
Devon Archer says one Democratic claim about Biden business is ‘categorically false’ - Washington Examiner
Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s former business partner, pushed back on claims by Democrats that President Joe Biden was never involved in his son’s foreign businesses in any way.“That’s categorically false,” Archer told Tucker Carlson in a lengthy interview published Friday. “He was aware of...
Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s former business partner, pushed back on claims by Democrats that President Joe Biden was never involved in his son’s foreign businesses in any way.
“That’s categorically false,” Archer told Tucker Carlson in a lengthy interview published Friday. “He was aware of Hunter’s business. He met with Hunter’s business partners.”
—————————————————————-
Democrats have tried in recent days to claim that Shokin was not investigating the company, and therefore Joe Biden’s successful efforts to get Shokin fired could not have been intended to help his son’s company.
“Shokin was considered a threat to the business,” Archer said during the interview.
“Shokin was taking a close look at Burisma,” he said. “He was a threat. He ended up seizing assets of Nikolai [Zlochevsky].”
Archer was referring to the head of Burisma, who faced legal peril at the time.
“Then he was fired, and then somehow, Burisma was let off the hook,” Archer said. “I mean, that’s what the story was.”
But Archer said that “the narrative that was fed to the board” was effectively the opposite: that Shokin posed no threat because he’d been privately persuaded to leave Burisma alone and that the appointment of a new prosecutor would only deepen Burisma’s legal troubles.
If it's incorrect, then he lied to congress.
Or it was taken out of context.
I’ll have to go back to the transcript but my guess was he was explaining the official narrative given to the board and the quotes were cherry picked to tell a story.
I was right, he was explaining a narrative, not the truth, but he confirms Shokin was investigating and it was applying "pressure" Burisma...then he goes on to describe the fake narrative being spun.
You either lied about reading the whole thing or you have 6th grade level reading comprehension, but he's clearly not laying out a fact pattern, he's explaining a "narrative that was spun to me".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q Are you aware that Vadym had told Blue Star that one of the issues/pressures that he was facing was related to Shokin and the investigation into Burisma?
A So -- yes. I was -- the narrative that was spun to me, quite frankly, just to be -- and I remember this because, obviously, it's -- the narrative that was spun to me was that Shokin was under control and that whoever the next person that was brought in was -- you know, the fact that he was -- this is the total, this is the narrative spun to me, that Shokin being fired was a -- was not good, because he was like under control as relates to Mykola. I have no way to verify that. And that was spun to me from various folks in D.C., not Hunter specifically, but that was what I was led to believe. Whether it's true or not, I cannot speculate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So try to follow along as he answers the question to the most salient point:
Q: ....one of the issues/pressures that he was facing was related to Shokin and the investigation into Burisma?
A So -- yes. I was
So he confirmed the Vadym was complaining about pressure being applied as a direct result of the investigation...so he did not lie. He just passed over that fact and liberals pounced. So, he went on Tucker and clarified.
The only person lying is the liberal journalist that wrote that article.
Lastly, none of it comports with your original assertion that Shokin was being fired to "clean up corruption". You've had several different theories on why Joe didn't leverage Ukraine with $1B of our tax dollars to keep his son and son's company out of hot water...I can't wait to see the next one.
I 100% agree with this..because I know who pulls all of the strings. It is NOT us.
I disagree with what you are saying. You think they can immediately remove him. No...they are not in a hurry, and know who takes over when he leaves. These people are NOT stupid...they just hate America
Hard proof Joe is a liar. Now don’t “make any excuses”, we wouldn’t want you to be a hypocrite. We know how much you hate excuses.
Last edited:
and @kalimgoodman will defend him endlessly while questioning why anyone would listen to a "known liar" in Tucker...
Liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds
Last edited:
So question....does THIS show Brandon lied? And if you were not doing anything wrong...WHY LIE??
www.foxnews.com
Hunter Biden’s longtime business partner visited the Obama WH, VP residence more than previously known
Eric Schwerin's cozy relationship with the Obama White House will likely make him the next target of the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into Hunter Biden’s business dealings.
Hunter Biden’s longtime business partner visited the Obama WH, VP residence more than previously known
Eric Schwerin's cozy relationship with the Obama White House will likely make him the next target of the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into Hunter Biden’s business dealings.
He's a lost cause. He's been shown the proof. You cannot make him see, however.
AMEN!
If Donald Trump is elected president, or any Republican for that matter, a special counsel must be immediately appointed, with all the power Jack Smith has used and abused, to immediately undertake an investigation into Joe Biden's massive corruption. There will be no executive privilege, since Biden and Chutkin have already denied it to Trump. Moreover, every DOJ/FBI official involved in interfering in this election, with dozens of indictments, venue violations, attorney-client privilege denials, and the rest, must be investigated for any possible crimes they may have committed. There needs to be a complete and comprehensive search of all data files, including if necessary, home searches for any government documents, etc., witness testimony before a grand jury (no need to use a grand jury in DC, as Garland-Smith have shown us, pick a grand jury in West Virginia.) These bastards must understand that they've unleashed a monster, and that monster will be unleashed on them. Then, perhaps, this will never happen again.
Don't mind how the corrupt Democrat Party media respond. They've sold out their constitutional role a long time ago.
If Donald Trump is elected president, or any Republican for that matter, a special counsel must be immediately appointed, with all the power Jack Smith has used and abused, to immediately undertake an investigation into Joe Biden's massive corruption. There will be no executive privilege, since Biden and Chutkin have already denied it to Trump. Moreover, every DOJ/FBI official involved in interfering in this election, with dozens of indictments, venue violations, attorney-client privilege denials, and the rest, must be investigated for any possible crimes they may have committed. There needs to be a complete and comprehensive search of all data files, including if necessary, home searches for any government documents, etc., witness testimony before a grand jury (no need to use a grand jury in DC, as Garland-Smith have shown us, pick a grand jury in West Virginia.) These bastards must understand that they've unleashed a monster, and that monster will be unleashed on them. Then, perhaps, this will never happen again.
Don't mind how the corrupt Democrat Party media respond. They've sold out their constitutional role a long time ago.
Last edited:
I think even our slower witted snowflakes have to see that we have been 100% right..and they have been 100% wrong here. I would REALLY appreciate them dropping by and eating some crow...WE TOLD YOU SO THREE years ago, snowflakes. You harm our Country because you ALL(this means EVERY ONE OF YOU) are too dumb, and put politics ahead of what is best for our Country. But you also do that because not one of you really love America. So PLEASE...drop your comment of exactly how you like your crow cooked...and grab a bite.
That's a helluva NIL deal, amirite @kalimgoodman ?
Maybe they just have not seen this so far? Cmon girls...STEP UP for your CROW meal right here!!!
They are lurking, too chicken sh!t to actually try to defend what's going on right now.
They CANNOT defend it anymore. They need to MAN UP and come admit that they were 100% wrong.
The wrong is so massive, they spent so much time ignoring what was right in their face, they'll never admit anything
Similar threads
