ADVERTISEMENT

What's bugging me about the analysis of the UK game

PacoGator19

Ring of Honor
Gold Member
Aug 8, 2006
62,654
31,905
113
Alternate outcome:
3rd and 1 on the 5 I'm pretty sure we had a run play called judging by the actions of the players on the field.
We run and make a first down.
We're now 1st and goal at the 4 or closer.
We now have 4 plays to score from the 4 or inside.
We score with little or no time left on the clock.
...this is a likely scenario, is it not?
kind of takes away the idea that UK "gave" us the game.
 
Last edited:
Hard to argue with a team not covering a receiver 2 different times. Especially that long one.
 
As a Nole, I did not shed a tear when Stoops left.

He calls a passive defensive scheme, and always had head scratching substitution mistakes during a game.

And not putting an extra d lineman in against Muschamps run the ball every down offense in 2012 still pisses me off !:mad:
 
Good game, they are a program on the rise. I wouldn't say they gave us anything other than a good fight. That said I know we won't be beating Georgia or any heavyweight program if that's all we have. Forget about getting Calloway and the others back. This is our team and with DelRio as the guy I don't see us lighting up the scoreboard on anyone.
 
As a Nole, I did not shed a tear when Stoops left.

He calls a passive defensive scheme, and always had head scratching substitution mistakes during a game.

And not putting an extra d lineman in against Muschamps run the ball every down offense in 2012 still pisses me off !:mad:

Muschamp was in heaven the 2nd half of that game with that Jumbo package stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: g8rbass94
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT