Updates on Kari Lake trial
- Thread starter GhostOfMatchesMalone
- Start date
You do realize the exact same geofencing was used to round up the J6 protestors, right?
Was it a fraudulent investigation tactic there as well?
And the murder they helped solve with it….it’s good enough for a murder investigation but it’s a “mockumentary” if it’s election fraud?
I’m sorry the cameras were off, footage deleted, poor quality, etc but that doesn’t mean the geofencing wasn’t solid evidence.
Election fraud could sit on your face and you’d say it didn’t exist.
Put down the hooch.
I do find it interesting that you thought Lake was a great candidate prior to the elction. It wasn’t until after the election that you decided she was a bad candidate.
Makes me question your judgement on Ron.
That said, it makes sense that he is a good fit for you. You both seem to be all over the place on your stances. Whatever is politically convenient from what I can tell.
It’s almost like some Republicans are Mitt Romney disciples. Then they wonder why some of us aren’t on Team “as long as it’s a Republican”. Why aren’t we? Because a Rino can do more damage than a dem.
We have to stop voting based on an R next to their name and based n what they do.
Perfect example of how much damage an R can do is the debt bill. Done in the name of conservatism. Now people think that’s what a conservative is. Love the smirks here when Chip mentions Mitt. Although I am not a fan of Chip either.
And Dinesh D’Souza could post a video of a janitor sweeping up after hours, and you'd be convinced it was some kind of secret ballot shredding operation.
We have already discussed “2000 Mules” ad nauseam. Geofencing might be able to identify that a person was at a given location at a certain time, but that’s it. Nothing in those videos proved any election fraud.
It's obvious that there were some irregularities.
Here's what I don't understand: AZ is generally a pretty red state, right? Why wouldn't those people be raising holy hell? Was the fraud inconsequential? Do they dislike Trump so much they don't care?
Surely the courts out there have plenty of conservatives, right? Are they all 'rinos'?
They knew the locations of the dem PAC’s and non profits where the ballots came from. They knew where the dropboxes were. The threshold for how many dropboxes and ballot locations that had to be visited were much higher than they needed to be. There’s no chance the paths of these mules was a coincidence (which is why they set the burden of proof so high).
You didn’t watch or understand what your watched - you read an Axios article.
And D’Souza wasn’t the source.
And that’s ignoring the video evidence ITT. You break the seals the machines have to be recertified. Full stop.
Man that movie was made for gullible goobers lol
It's always amusing to me to see democrats here try to project their bad behavior onto others.
Democrats are notorious for blindly believing sources that they agree with. The rest of us usually don't do that. If we did, all Trump supporters would have been 'vaccinated' by late 2020 as soon as they were available and Trump told us to get our shot. All conservatives would still be watching Fox.
But we aren't so devoted to our politics that we blindly believe and parrot any claim that we believe supports a story that we want to be true.
That's what dems like you do.
And here we have the wise old ghost spewing judgemental garbage as usual it’s exhausting, boy you better wake up and back up from casting lies, you know your gonna be held accountable, but something tells me you really don’t care
Last edited:
And yET you put people who generally agree with you on ignore for making a single statement that doesn't align exactly with your worldview, hypocrite.
If I type it slowlyyyyy maybe you’ll get it...
Before the election she said certain things - mostly about the MSM - that I thought were on point.
Her reaction and statements after the election were such borderline delusional and conspiratorial sour grapes that I said WHOA maybe it’s best for AZ that she didn’t prevail.
Got it?
And to piggy back on this, she said welp, time to make some fundraising cash! Lieeeee to folks and get the money flowing! It’s a win win for her she’s not upset just plays the role
All he and his slow suckups have is to call someone a RINO, a libbie, a Liz Cheney supporter or some buzzword.
It’s funny because I go on another board and they call me a far right fascist and an idiot because I’m a REPUBLICAN.
Yet over here I’m attacked because I don’t support Trump.
Nobody said it was easy to be right. 😎
I will respond slowly.
That’s not what you said, but nice try. You said she was a great candidate DURING the election. POST election you said she was a bad candidate, and that’s why she lost.
You got caught waffling, again. You loved her and thought she was a great candidate during the election.
Now, you are doing what dems do. Revisionist history in an attempt to justify the narrative you want. Simple as that.
If you wanted to say you were wrong initially, and now in retrospect you think AZ dodged bullet, then that’s what you should have said. But the fact is, as a CANDIDATE prior to election day, you thought she was a GREAT candidate.
Maybe go enjoy a nice bath.
Last edited:
So basically everyone but "Independents" and RINOs like you are blind sheep??
Got it. Convenient how that works.
Not really. Give us specific examples of what she said after the election that you found so offensive. I'm pretty sure I follow her statements at least as closely as you do, and I've seen zero deviation from before and after the election. In fact her consistency on political issues is one of her most agreeable traits.
I wonder if the “moderates” err…Rinos, enjoy being so close in principle to the left that cheers them on.
It makes me laugh seeing how closely aligned they really are.
In my opinion, hard core extremists are the sheep. They will follow their leaders.
Moderates/independents generally realize the extremists are FOS.
So you spend half the day on a board with mostly libs posting as a pub, then spend the other half of the day on this board of mostly conservatives, posting as a dem?
What an amazing life you must lead.
Horseshit. People hide their crazy well.I will respond slowly.
That’s not what you said, but nice try. You said she was a great candidate DURING the election. POST election you said she was a bad candidate, and that’s why she lost.
You got caught waffling, again. You loved her and thought she was a great candidate during the election.
Now, you are doing what dems do. Revisionist history in an attempt to justify the narrative you want. Simple as that.
If you wanted to say you were wrong initially, and now in retrospect you think AZ dodged bullet, then that’s what you should have said. But the fact is, as a CANDIDATE prior to election day, you thought she was a GREAT candidate.
Maybe go enjoy a nice bath.
She seemed normal, now she seems unhinged. Is that really a stretch for you?
That is not my view, something hinky went on in AZ, starting with a candidate being in charge of the election she was running in.
Ghost her downfall was jumping on Trumps coattails that killed her and cost her big time
Don’t fool yourself. Leftists are fools, liars & scumbags. They lie to themselves as part of their dogma!
That's like saying moderate republicans might as well be Trumpers. Moderates of both parties recently have been left with choosing the lesser of two evils.
And still, that’s not what meemaw said. So theres that.
Maybe meemaw needs to slow it down for you?
Again. She was a great candidate. According to meemaw. Post election meemaw thinks she is nuts. That still means, she was a great candidate. This isn’t hard.
I think a tough part of the issue is, the way I understand it, the states can pretty much run things however they want. I think there needs to be some national requirements but maybe that's unconstitutional.
It is when you add a layer of emotional attachment/detachment toward certain posters.
It doesn’t matter. In this instance the state isn’t even following their own laws that would invalidate an election. And they do not deny it.
The Constitution is very clear - the State Legislature is the governing body for elections.
That was a prima facie problem with 2020 - you had SOS's and Gov's changing election laws by executive fiat. That alone made any election that didn't follow the laws put in place by the Legislature unconstitutional and invalid.
So no one in AZ cares (besides Lake)? Surely there are some rational people in positions of influence there. It's been a pretty reddish state, right? How did the democrats get totally in control?
It gets tricky, to be honest. I'd love to see some sort of basic standard, but I believe, as you said, that's unconstitutional.
I'm not sure if recuse is the correct term but anyone with any sense knows you have to step back or down in the interests of fairness. But she didn't and that's suspicious at the very least.
OK, so no one cares? Were the moderate republicans so anxious to get rid of Trump they just let the cheating slide?
It's hard to fathom all the rampant cheating and the only people who care are hardcore Trump supporters.
