There are articles linked in this very thread that refute that. 😂Ones that had knowledge about Pelosi's refusal to properly secure the Capitol - this is a lie. The people in charge confirmed this already.
![maury-that-was-a-lie.gif](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fc.tenor.com%2FFYqbeRsj--AAAAAC%2Fmaury-that-was-a-lie.gif&hash=acf1983215bb68795889f4a06bb21805)
There are articles linked in this very thread that refute that. 😂Ones that had knowledge about Pelosi's refusal to properly secure the Capitol - this is a lie. The people in charge confirmed this already.
The people who would be contacted to provide protection or assistance. This has been confirmed as a right wing talking point that isn't true. The right wing even said that Trump called the national guard and homeland security. That was also a lie. Pence called them. There are text of Meadows telling people to lie and say it was Trump to make Trump look good. Yet, I'm sure you guys know this already 🙄.The people in charge...what a curious turn of phrase.
😂🤣😂
Why wouldn't the committee have called Pelosi as a witness to be questioned about Capitol Security? Before you answer, here's mine. Because the committee didn't want anything close to a FAIR hearing.
And that was a subject that they didn't want to be broached.
There is a reason Pelosi and crew aren’t calling all the witnesses to the events. You’re also getting caught up in things that don’t matter (aren’t criminal acts). But as a hardcore lib, we can all see the cheese you’re gobbling. You’re one of the 20 million. ROFLMAO!The people who would be contacted to provide protection or assistance. This has been confirmed as a right wing talking point that isn't true. The right wing even said that Trump called the national guard and homeland security. That was also a lie. Pence called them. There are text of Meadows telling people to lie and say it was Trump to make Trump look good. Yet, I'm sure you guys know this already 🙄.
The people who would be contacted to provide protection or assistance. This has been confirmed as a right wing talking point that isn't true. The right wing even said that Trump called the national guard and homeland security. That was also a lie. Pence called them. There are text of Meadows telling people to lie and say it was Trump to make Trump look good. Yet, I'm sure you guys know this already 🙄.
What we also know is that President Trump wanted to make sure that the people that came, that there was a safe environment for that kind of assembly,” former President Donald Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows told Fox News’s Sean Hannity.
Liberal “fact-checkers” like The Washington Post and PolitiFact argued the claim about National Guard assistance coming from Meadows and other top Trump administration officials was false, but an official timeline of the events leading up to Jan. 6 apparently shows differently.And I’ve said that publicly before — the 10,000 National Guard troops that he wanted to make sure that everything was safe and secure," Meadows said. "Obviously having those National Guards available, actually the reason they were able to respond when they did, was because President Trump had actually put them on alert.
Wow! The stupidity is STRONG in this one too! The people in charge confirmed nothing as such because they know this is nothing but their own kangaroo court set-up to keep Trump from running for office in 2024! Not to mention the entire incident was an elaborate false-flag set up ny Pelosi and FBI Director Christopher Wray to entrap and eventually imprison Trump supporters! How about you look up this one guy who's name and presence alone would DESTROY the entire Jan. 6 Committee itself and bring the light to the entire incident.Ones that had knowledge about Pelosi's refusal to properly secure the Capitol - this is a lie. The people in charge confirmed this already.
He's not going read either of our posts. He's frantically googling to self validate an uneducated opinion. Confirmation bias, it's real yo!Wow! The stupidity is STRONG in this one too! The people in charge confirmed nothing as such because they know this is nothing but their own kangaroo court set-up to keep Trump from running for office in 2024! Not to mention the entire incident was an elaborate false-flag set up ny Pelosi and FBI Director Christopher Wray to entrap and eventually imprison Trump supporters! How about you look up this one guy who's name and presence alone would DESTROY the entire Jan. 6 Committee itself and bring the light to the entire incident.
Ray Epps.
Mayor Bowser also refused. And noone, Pelosi, the Turtle or either Sargeant at Arms has explained why, when knowing that large crowds were expected, the Capital Police detail was not fully staffed that day. Or why they were removing barracades and holding doors open?????????I just found the use of that phrase funny.
IMO, and that clearly means my opinion, you fall victim to confirmation bias a good bit. When you hear something that confirms what you want to believe, the debate is over for you.
When you hear something that confirms something that you don't want to believe, you scramble for a different source or you obfuscate.
We all do that to varying degrees. It's something that we should fight against...if we're actually searching for truth.
FTR, I absolutely do believe that Pelosi and her Sargeant at Arms refused the added security.
This is stupid.There is a reason Pelosi and crew aren’t calling all the witnesses to the events. You’re also getting caught up in things that don’t matter (aren’t criminal acts). But as a hardcore lib, we can all see the cheese you’re gobbling. You’re one of the 20 million. ROFLMAO!
what percentage of 330 million is 20 million? What percentage of 81 million is 20 million?
You can no longer claim to be an independent if you are one of the 20 million extremists.
It's impossible to breakthrough a cult....do you@kalimgoodman
The truth will set you free!
WASHINGTON (TND) — A Capitol Police timeline of the days and weeks surrounding Jan. 6 shows former President Donald Trump’s Department of Defense (DOD) offered the National Guard’s assistance in the days leading up to the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol, validating claims from Trump administration officials that were said to be false by liberal fact-checkers.
Liberal “fact-checkers” like The Washington Post and PolitiFact argued the claim about National Guard assistance coming from Meadows and other top Trump administration officials was false, but an official timeline of the events leading up to Jan. 6 apparently shows differently.
Within 24-hours of the new assessment’s circulation, then-chief of the Capitol Police Steve Sund changed course and began requesting permission to deploy National Guard troops from the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms – both of whom report to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democrat Leader Chuck Schumer, respectively.
As Sund’s requests were denied, the Trump administration continued working on getting then-President Trump to formally authorize the deployment of as many as 20,000 National Guard troops to the Capitol ahead of the Jan. 6 rally, according to Just The News, which conducted interviews with then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller and his Chief of Staff Kash Patel.
![]()
Trump admin was ready to deploy National Guard on Jan 6, Capitol Police timeline shows
A Capitol Police timeline of the days and weeks surrounding Jan. 6 shows former President Donald Trump’s Department of Defense (DOD) offered the National Guard’s assistance in the days leading up to the violent attack on the U. S. Capitol, validating claims from Trump administration officials...mynbc15.com
He/she is so flustered that the composition of a single sentence is too much to handle.????????
![]()
LIAR (I will respond to your lies...or posts(same thing) any time I want, son)Ones that had knowledge about Pelosi's refusal to properly secure the Capitol - this is a lie. The people in charge confirmed this already.
ObsessedLIAR (I will respond to your lies...or posts(same thing) any time I want, son)
She lied.It is sworn testimony and cross examination isn't a thing in congressional hearings. It's clear that you don't know anything other then the talking points that right wing tells you. Congressional hearing is just people giving their accounts of what happened, what they heard, or what they did. An actual trial is when you get cross examination.
The steering wheel is irrelevant to anything as is Trump throwing a plate. The FBI agents did testimony already. Once again she said that she was told that, she never said she witnessed that. Yes, it was hearsay, hence why it's allowed at a congressional hearing and not a trial 😉.
This is a PERFECT example of someone running their gums without ANY knowledge of what they are saying/typing. In other words...your every day leftyNo. The Republican electorate will want someone sensible and actually effective like ron desantis. Republicans aren’t as far right as some of the goons in attendance of cpac such as “dc draino” or “baked Alaska” or something
Yep.This is a PERFECT example of someone running their gums without ANY knowledge of what they are saying/typing. In other words...your every day lefty
Not at all. He is FAR "make America GREAT"Yep.
Thing is Trump isn't even that far right. It's just the Left has pulled the middle their direction so far.