ADVERTISEMENT

Trump dominates another Poll

jfegaly

Bull Gator
Feb 1, 2006
7,638
12,713
113
I do find it interesting that a self proclaimed minority is here cheering on a one sided hearing. I wonder how many criminals would be convicted if prosecutors didn’t hsve defense attorneys on the other side?

looking at you @kalimgoodman

You a big fan of trials with no defense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
I do find it interesting that a self proclaimed minority is here cheering on a one sided hearing. I wonder how many criminals would be convicted if prosecutors didn’t hsve defense attorneys on the other side?

looking at you @kalimgoodman

You a big fan of trials with no defense?
Republicans had a chance to form a Committee but didn’t want to. It’s what you guys wanted.
 
Republicans had a chance to form a Committee but didn’t want to. It’s what you guys wanted.
No, you don’t get revisionist history. This isn’t CNN. Pelosi kicked off the Pub choices, so pubs saw the writing on the wall. The writing? This was nothing more than a clown show that nance was only going to allow one outcome. This was never about getting to the truth, because there would be dems behind bars if that were the case.

 
When is Kamala getting charged? Or you going to go full hypocrite?

I noticed you said charged, because everyone knows there is actually nothing criminal to convict.

I mean, we all know Garland will play politics. It’s what dems do, politics over everything.
I get you love the man but he asked a man to find him votes on tape. That is a crime.

Charged Kamala too (not sure what) but idc. Just make sure Garland charge Trump but sticking to your thread, 79% is impressive in any poll.

I didn't say convict because Garland has zero power over that. That's the American people job, but you know that 😏.
 
No, you don’t get revisionist history. This isn’t CNN. Pelosi kicked off the Pub choices, so pubs saw the writing on the wall. The writing? This was nothing more than a clown show that nance was only going to allow one outcome. This was never about getting to the truth, because there would be dems behind bars if that were the case.

She kicked off the 2 guys that was involved with Jan 6th. Please add FULL context. Jordan was literally subpoenaed to testify.
 
No, you don’t get revisionist history. This isn’t CNN. Pelosi kicked off the Pub choices, so pubs saw the writing on the wall. The writing? This was nothing more than a clown show that nance was only going to allow one outcome. This was never about getting to the truth, because there would be dems behind bars if that were the case.

According to the Washington post-


Hope for comity wasn’t dead yet early in the year, and a bipartisan agreement was hammered out in May by the leaders of the House Homeland Security Committee to create an independent commission that was modeled on the panel that investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
But it was rejected by most House Republicans and subsequently blocked by Senate Republicans

 
She kicked off the 2 guys that was involved with Jan 6th. Please add FULL context. Jordan was literally subpoenaed to testify.
GTFO with that. You and I both know why she kicked them off. This has never been about truth. And if we are talking about things that were recorded….we got biden literally on video with quid pro quo.

Lastly, it’s interesting you mention context but only want to discuss a brief portion of Trumps call.
 
According to the Washington post-


Hope for comity wasn’t dead yet early in the year, and a bipartisan agreement was hammered out in May by the leaders of the House Homeland Security Committee to create an independent commission that was modeled on the panel that investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
But it was rejected by most House Republicans and subsequently blocked by Senate Republicans

Derp. They blocked the commission because they knew it would give us what we have now. A committee where nancy removed Republican nominated members so she could just choose her own committee. They were proven correct. So why go along with anything? So nsnce could say, pubs approved of this process? Goodness, you new to politics?

You do understand that don’t you? Th for helping to prove my point. There is a reason dems didn’t want another independent investigation ala Mueller. They wanted to play politics. Pure and simple.
 
According to the Washington post-


Hope for comity wasn’t dead yet early in the year, and a bipartisan agreement was hammered out in May by the leaders of the House Homeland Security Committee to create an independent commission that was modeled on the panel that investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
But it was rejected by most House Republicans and subsequently blocked by Senate Republicans

Swamp Talk still sending us their best and brightest, I see.

79%. Eat it.
 
I get you love the man but he asked a man to find him votes on tape. That is a crime.

Charged Kamala too (not sure what) but idc. Just make sure Garland charge Trump but sticking to your thread, 79% is impressive in any poll.

I didn't say convict because Garland has zero power over that. That's the American people job, but you know that 😏.
Love how you say “not sure what”. Because no one can be watching these fake hearings and point to any actual crime
 
The people on board the boat keeps getting smaller and smaller @goldmom keeps telling us. That being said, getting tired of Foxnews making a point in every article to imply the 2020 election was legit.

Jan 6th hearings are making him more popular than ever. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
No shit, which is why you getting upset about it was such a dumb comment LOL

79%. Eat it, soy-boy.
No. The Republican electorate will want someone sensible and actually effective like ron desantis. Republicans aren’t as far right as some of the goons in attendance of cpac such as “dc draino” or “baked Alaska” or something
 
GTFO with that. You and I both know why she kicked them off. This has never been about truth. And if we are talking about things that were recorded….we got biden literally on video with quid pro quo.

Lastly, it’s interesting you mention context but only want to discuss a brief portion of Trumps call.
We don't have Biden saying anything, once again add context. You guys always leave out stuff to promote your position. Biden was acting on the Europeans, Obama and others.

So you would be ok with a committee investigating Hunter with Clyburn or Schiff on it? Or Booker investigating Harris? Some of this is self explanatory.

Brief portion is all you need to commit a crime. Not sure what difference that make.
 
Love how you say “not sure what”. Because no one can be watching these fake hearings and point to any actual crime
I just don't know what Harris did but I'm sure the deep right got some talking point and conspiracy theory that you believe.
 
No. The Republican electorate will want someone sensible and actually effective like ron desantis. Republicans aren’t as far right as some of the goons in attendance of cpac such as “dc draino” or “baked Alaska” or something
Derp again. Trump by double digits in all the national polls.




 
We don't have Biden saying anything, once again add context. You guys always leave out stuff to promote your position. Biden was acting on the Europeans, Obama and others.

So you would be ok with a committee investigating Hunter with Clyburn or Schiff on it? Or Booker investigating Harris? Some of this is self explanatory.

Brief portion is all you need to commit a crime. Not sure what difference that make.
@instaGATOR show this dim the quid pro quo sir.
 
Incited riots that lead to thousands of injuries, many deaths, and billions in damage. But hey, it’s cool if you want to be a hypocrite?
So you're saying Trump did commit a crime but Kamala did too? I could care less about Kamala. Charge them all!
 
So you're saying Trump did commit a crime but Kamala did too? I could care less about Kamala. Charge them all!
No, their actions were completely different. Trump told people to go home in peace on the day of of the protests. Kamala told folks to keep it up during the riots. She antagonized it for 2 months.

one encouraged people to stop, the other encouraged people to continue
 
No. The Republican electorate will want someone sensible and actually effective like ron desantis. Republicans aren’t as far right as some of the goons in attendance of cpac such as “dc draino” or “baked Alaska” or something
LMAO! No they don't, Trump leads DeSantis by 20-30% in every poll any organization has done.

Again, just a dumb comment. It would be like being surprised that the KKK thinks a racist like Hiden is a great president. No shit lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
I just don't know what Harris did but I'm sure the deep right got some talking point and conspiracy theory that you believe.
This is from the guy that once started a thread claiming that Trump was EATING classified documents.

Thank goodness you don't fall for hoaxes like us Trump goobs LOL
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jfegaly
No, their actions were completely different. Trump told people to go home in peace on the day of of the protests. Kamala told folks to keep it up during the riots. She antagonized it for 2 months.

one encouraged people to stop, the other encouraged people to continue
Not entirely accurate based on sworn testimony. He was forced and Pence had to call in the National guard because he wouldn't. Trump was even happy about what they were doing.

Seems like you need to watch the hearings because you're fill with misinformation 😉.
 
Not entirely accurate based on sworn testimony. He was forced and Pence had to call in the National guard because he wouldn't. Trump was even happy about what they were doing.

Seems like you need to watch the hearings because you're fill with misinformation 😉.
You do know Trump called in the National Guard beforehand and the black dem mayor of DC told them to stand down, right?

Seriously, where are you getting your information from? The dems that post here literally believe in a world that does not exist. 99% of the stuff you hate Trump over NEVER HAPPENED.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT