The trump House of Cards Begins To Crumble...
- Thread starter RayGravesGhost
- Start date
@RayGravesGhost did the house of cards come down yet? Was Trump put in jail? If not, when will this happen?
Last edited:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ginni-thomas-admitted-she-had-221852819.html
Ginni Thomas Admitted She Had No Evidence Of Fraud After 2020 Election
Sara Boboltz
Fri, December 30, 2022 at 5:18 PM EST·4 min read
Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the conservative activist married to controversial Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, admitted in a deposition held earlier this year that she did not have any evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 presidential election, a transcript revealed Friday.
Ginni Thomas spent weeks working behind the scenes around the time of the election to boost then–President Donald Trump. Text messages previously released by the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack showed how Thomas sowed doubt about the election’s legitimacy in direct conversations with Mark Meadows, Trump’s chief of staff at the time.
The Jan. 6 committee managed to secure testimony from Thomas in September, nearly two years after the last presidential election.
Asked about the strongest evidence she had of the alleged fraud, Thomas responded: “I can’t say that I was familiar at that time with any specific evidence.”
Instead, she said she had been relying on “news reports” and “friends on the ground” who visited polling places and “found things suspicious.”
Ginni Thomas Admitted She Had No Evidence Of Fraud After 2020 Election
Sara Boboltz
Fri, December 30, 2022 at 5:18 PM EST·4 min read
Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the conservative activist married to controversial Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, admitted in a deposition held earlier this year that she did not have any evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 presidential election, a transcript revealed Friday.
Ginni Thomas spent weeks working behind the scenes around the time of the election to boost then–President Donald Trump. Text messages previously released by the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack showed how Thomas sowed doubt about the election’s legitimacy in direct conversations with Mark Meadows, Trump’s chief of staff at the time.
The Jan. 6 committee managed to secure testimony from Thomas in September, nearly two years after the last presidential election.
Asked about the strongest evidence she had of the alleged fraud, Thomas responded: “I can’t say that I was familiar at that time with any specific evidence.”
Instead, she said she had been relying on “news reports” and “friends on the ground” who visited polling places and “found things suspicious.”
Nothing like being under oath to reveal some truth...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hope-hicks-said-look-domestic-175157287.html
Hope Hicks said 'we all look like domestic terrorists now' after January 6 and that another White House aide was a 'genius' for getting out early
Kelsey Vlamis
Mon, January 2, 2023 at 12:51 PM EST·3 min read
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hope-hicks-said-look-domestic-175157287.html
Hope Hicks said 'we all look like domestic terrorists now' after January 6 and that another White House aide was a 'genius' for getting out early
Kelsey Vlamis
Mon, January 2, 2023 at 12:51 PM EST·3 min read
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fearless-special-counsel-jack-smith-184458500.html
'Fearless' Special Counsel Jack Smith arrives in Washington to lead Trump probes
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Jack Smith, the U.S. special counsel named to investigate Republican former President Donald Trump, has a reputation for winning tough cases against war criminals, mobsters and crooked police officers.
Behind the scenes, however, Smith's former colleagues say he is just as tenacious in his pursuit to get criminal charges dropped for the innocent as he is to win convictions against the guilty.
When Smith isn't busy competing as a triathlete in Ironman races, they said, he is working as a dogged investigator who is open-minded and not afraid to pursue the truth.
"If the case is prosecutable, he will do it," said Mark Lesko, an attorney at Greenberg Traurig LLP who worked with Smith when both were prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York City's Brooklyn. "He is fearless."
'Fearless' Special Counsel Jack Smith arrives in Washington to lead Trump probes
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Jack Smith, the U.S. special counsel named to investigate Republican former President Donald Trump, has a reputation for winning tough cases against war criminals, mobsters and crooked police officers.
Behind the scenes, however, Smith's former colleagues say he is just as tenacious in his pursuit to get criminal charges dropped for the innocent as he is to win convictions against the guilty.
When Smith isn't busy competing as a triathlete in Ironman races, they said, he is working as a dogged investigator who is open-minded and not afraid to pursue the truth.
"If the case is prosecutable, he will do it," said Mark Lesko, an attorney at Greenberg Traurig LLP who worked with Smith when both were prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York City's Brooklyn. "He is fearless."
How long will Ray go into hiding after nothing happens again
No one will really care why...the lack of copy and paste will be appreciated, however.
Ray ray is giddy cause Yahoo told him Jeffries would be Speaker.
Tomorrow will be another rough day for him LOL
Is that the best you have? LOL
malone devoid of anything resembling a real talking point continues to repeat nonsense....kinda like a parrot 🤣
Maybe he can go report something to Yahoo again ....or go cry to Jason
Its what Karens like malone are good at 🤣
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-lawyers-questioned-nevada-2020-215712459.html
Trump lawyers questioned Nevada’s 2020 vote, records show
WASHINGTON (AP) — Nevada's most populous county has provided the U.S. Justice Department special counsel with correspondence that shows lawyers for then-President Donald Trump raising concerns about the integrity of the 2020 voting process that were later deemed baseless, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.
Trump's allies also demanded information about workers who were tasked with counting the votes, a request the county registrar sought to delay out of fear for the workers' safety.
The correspondence was provided by Clark County to Jack Smith, the special counsel tasked with investigating efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the results of the election, in response to a subpoena seeking communications between Trump associates and county officials. Smith has issued similar subpoenas to officials in other battleground states, including Arizona, Michigan and Wisconsin, as prosecutors examine a pressure campaign aimed at keeping Trump in power.
The AP obtained the documents Tuesday through a public records request to Clark County, which includes Las Vegas and which — along with Nevada more generally — became a hotbed for conspiracy theories stemming from false claims of election fraud.
Trump lawyers questioned Nevada’s 2020 vote, records show
WASHINGTON (AP) — Nevada's most populous county has provided the U.S. Justice Department special counsel with correspondence that shows lawyers for then-President Donald Trump raising concerns about the integrity of the 2020 voting process that were later deemed baseless, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.
Trump's allies also demanded information about workers who were tasked with counting the votes, a request the county registrar sought to delay out of fear for the workers' safety.
The correspondence was provided by Clark County to Jack Smith, the special counsel tasked with investigating efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the results of the election, in response to a subpoena seeking communications between Trump associates and county officials. Smith has issued similar subpoenas to officials in other battleground states, including Arizona, Michigan and Wisconsin, as prosecutors examine a pressure campaign aimed at keeping Trump in power.
The AP obtained the documents Tuesday through a public records request to Clark County, which includes Las Vegas and which — along with Nevada more generally — became a hotbed for conspiracy theories stemming from false claims of election fraud.
Right after Jefferies is named House Speaker? 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Yeah, it was a lie then....still a lie now
Just like the Ruby Freeman stuff you guys are still obsessed about 🤣
What does that have to do with you disappearing before reappearing on a cut and paste frenzy?
And nothing is more important to a liberal like Ray than a talking point. Like a good little soldier, he runs with his non-stop after his betters inform him what his is.
Sheep.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-05/donald-trump-s-troubles-mount-as-special-counsel-gets-new-jan-6-evidence?leadSource=uverify wall
Trump’s Troubles Mount as Special Counsel Gets New 2020 Evidence
ByChris Strohm and Zoe Tillman
January 5, 2023 at 11:12 AM EST
- Election officials in disputed states produce document trove
- At two-year anniversary, focus passes from Jan. 6 panel to DOJ
The special counsel investigating Donald Trump has new emails, letters and other documents from election officials in battleground states, as the federal probe accelerates into whether the former president should face criminal charges for efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Two years after the US Capitol attack and with the 2024 election cycle looming, Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of Justice Department prosecutors are combing through new testimony and evidence. He’s set to make critical decisions about whether to bring charges, possibly in a matter of weeks, according to people familiar with the matter.
Officials in several states confirmed they have complied with an early round of grand jury subpoenas from Smith’s office. One set of material reviewed by Bloomberg from a key battleground in Nevada shows Trump’s 2020 campaign representatives lobbing accusations of fraud and mismanagement at local officials in the days after the election.
Attorneys working under Smith are also poring over dozens of interview transcripts from the congressional panel that just wrapped up its own Jan. 6 probe, said people familiar with the investigation, who asked not to be named to discuss information not yet public. That includes testimony from White House aides who said Trump knew he lost the election and at least one Republican official who linked the former president to efforts to seat alternate slates of electors in some states he lost.
“You can tell that it’s moving quickly,” said Brian Kidd, a former federal prosecutor who served under Smith at the Just
That's what helium boy Brian Stelter said about Trump during Mueller's investigation.
It's not new evidence. We were discussing that here over 2 years ago.
The media and dems are literally lying to the sheep. And the sheep are dumb enough to believe it. Hell ray ray thinks Jeffries is gonna be Speaker cause Yahoo told him so 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-05/donald-trump-s-troubles-mount-as-special-counsel-gets-new-jan-6-evidence?leadSource=uverify wall
Trump’s Troubles Mount as Special Counsel Gets New 2020 Evidence
ByChris Strohm and Zoe Tillman
January 5, 2023 at 11:12 AM EST
- Election officials in disputed states produce document trove
- At two-year anniversary, focus passes from Jan. 6 panel to DOJ
The special counsel investigating Donald Trump has new emails, letters and other documents from election officials in battleground states, as the federal probe accelerates into whether the former president should face criminal charges for efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Two years after the US Capitol attack and with the 2024 election cycle looming, Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of Justice Department prosecutors are combing through new testimony and evidence. He’s set to make critical decisions about whether to bring charges, possibly in a matter of weeks, according to people familiar with the matter.
Officials in several states confirmed they have complied with an early round of grand jury subpoenas from Smith’s office. One set of material reviewed by Bloomberg from a key battleground in Nevada shows Trump’s 2020 campaign representatives lobbing accusations of fraud and mismanagement at local officials in the days after the election.
Attorneys working under Smith are also poring over dozens of interview transcripts from the congressional panel that just wrapped up its own Jan. 6 probe, said people familiar with the investigation, who asked not to be named to discuss information not yet public. That includes testimony from White House aides who said Trump knew he lost the election and at least one Republican official who linked the former president to efforts to seat alternate slates of electors in some states he lost.
“You can tell that it’s moving quickly,” said Brian Kidd, a former federal prosecutor who served under Smith at the Just
New talking point or a retread? I don't read your copy and pastes so I have no idea.
But providing a talking point was an excellent rebuttal to my post, goofball.
There isn’t a good rebuttal by him, he doesn’t have independent thought, it’s regurgitated talking points, copy and paste, rinse and repeat.
You were discussing it...because you believed the Big Lie to be true. It wasn't.
Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of Justice Department prosecutors are combing through new testimony and evidence.
Officials in several states confirmed they have complied with an early round of grand jury subpoenas from Smith’s office. One set of material reviewed by Bloomberg from a key battleground in Nevada shows Trump’s 2020 campaign representatives lobbing accusations of fraud and mismanagement at local officials in the days after the election.
Another day in court...another trump crime family defeat
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-trump-aide-peter-navarro-164015241.html
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Thursday ordered former Donald Trump aide Peter Navarro to hand the National Archives 200 to 250 emails that he sent during his time in the Trump administration using a private email account instead of his White House email.
In August 2022, the Department of Justice filed a civil lawsuit against Navarro to compel him to hand over the emails after he refused to do so without first being granted immunity. Lawyers for Navarro alleged the Justice Department was using the Presidential Records Act, which requires that official White House records be preserved, as a way to gather evidence against him in his ongoing criminal contempt of Congress case. They argued that forcing Navarro to produce the emails could violate his 5th amendment right against self-incrimination.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-trump-aide-peter-navarro-164015241.html
Ex-Trump aide Peter Navarro ordered to turn over hundreds of emails to the National Archives
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Thursday ordered former Donald Trump aide Peter Navarro to hand the National Archives 200 to 250 emails that he sent during his time in the Trump administration using a private email account instead of his White House email.
In August 2022, the Department of Justice filed a civil lawsuit against Navarro to compel him to hand over the emails after he refused to do so without first being granted immunity. Lawyers for Navarro alleged the Justice Department was using the Presidential Records Act, which requires that official White House records be preserved, as a way to gather evidence against him in his ongoing criminal contempt of Congress case. They argued that forcing Navarro to produce the emails could violate his 5th amendment right against self-incrimination.
in Washington is all you need to know. These are all Owebama
appointed Judges, Prosecutors and leftist hacks.
Other than getting her background 100% completely wrong.... 🤣
She wasn't an Obama appointed judge...she was a Clinton nominee to the District DC court
She was confirmed by a republican majority Senate in 1997
She was appointed to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia by Ronald Reagan
She was appointed to the FISA court by William Rehnquist (Republican conservative)
trump has been out of office for a little over 2 years and he's already up to his eyeballs in lawsuits, investigations, and grand jury indictments
And very soon he'll become the 1st POTUS ever to be criminally indicted
https://www.yahoo.com/news/doj-memo-sets-two-potential-085704838.html
Mon, March 6, 2023 at 3:57 AM EST·5 min read
When the Department of Justice took the position this week that former President Donald Trump acted improperly by urging his followers to attack Congress in 2021, prosecutors did more than open the door to a potential flood of civil lawsuits from police officers who were injured on Jan. 6.
What they actually did, according to legal scholars, is lay the groundwork for a potential criminal indictment against Trump for inciting the insurrection.
“If they took the position that the president was absolutely immune, then they wouldn’t be able to bring a criminal prosecution,” said one person familiar with the DOJ’s ongoing investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Legal scholars have come to the same conclusion.
“Had DOJ concluded that incitement unprotected by the First Amendment could nevertheless be within the president’s official functions, that could conceivably have impacted criminal charging decisions related to the same speech,” said Mary B. McCord, a former federal prosecutor now teaching at Georgetown University Law Center.
And very soon he'll become the 1st POTUS ever to be criminally indicted
https://www.yahoo.com/news/doj-memo-sets-two-potential-085704838.html
How a New DOJ Memo Sets Up Two Potential Trump Indictments
Jose PaglieryMon, March 6, 2023 at 3:57 AM EST·5 min read
When the Department of Justice took the position this week that former President Donald Trump acted improperly by urging his followers to attack Congress in 2021, prosecutors did more than open the door to a potential flood of civil lawsuits from police officers who were injured on Jan. 6.
What they actually did, according to legal scholars, is lay the groundwork for a potential criminal indictment against Trump for inciting the insurrection.
“If they took the position that the president was absolutely immune, then they wouldn’t be able to bring a criminal prosecution,” said one person familiar with the DOJ’s ongoing investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Legal scholars have come to the same conclusion.
“Had DOJ concluded that incitement unprotected by the First Amendment could nevertheless be within the president’s official functions, that could conceivably have impacted criminal charging decisions related to the same speech,” said Mary B. McCord, a former federal prosecutor now teaching at Georgetown University Law Center.
trump has been out of office for a little over 2 years and he's already up to his eyeballs in lawsuits, investigations, and grand jury indictments
And very soon he'll become the 1st POTUS ever to be criminally indicted
https://www.yahoo.com/news/doj-memo-sets-two-potential-085704838.html
How a New DOJ Memo Sets Up Two Potential Trump Indictments
Jose Pagliery
Mon, March 6, 2023 at 3:57 AM EST·5 min read
When the Department of Justice took the position this week that former President Donald Trump acted improperly by urging his followers to attack Congress in 2021, prosecutors did more than open the door to a potential flood of civil lawsuits from police officers who were injured on Jan. 6.
What they actually did, according to legal scholars, is lay the groundwork for a potential criminal indictment against Trump for inciting the insurrection.
“If they took the position that the president was absolutely immune, then they wouldn’t be able to bring a criminal prosecution,” said one person familiar with the DOJ’s ongoing investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Legal scholars have come to the same conclusion.
“Had DOJ concluded that incitement unprotected by the First Amendment could nevertheless be within the president’s official functions, that could conceivably have impacted criminal charging decisions related to the same speech,” said Mary B. McCord, a former federal prosecutor now teaching at Georgetown University Law Center.
"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,"
He also said...
"If they don't fight, we have to primary the hell out of the ones that don't fight," Trump said. "You primary them. We're going to let you know who they are."
He also said he and the crowd would "walk down to the Capitol" to "cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women."
This is incitement?
You seem to ignore the mountains of evidence that trump planned for an insurrection months/years prior
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ald-trump-doj-january-6-lawsuits/11381509002/
DOJ to appeals court: Donald Trump can be sued over role in Jan. 6 Capitol riot
The three lawsuits were filed about two years ago by House Democrats and Capitol Police against Trump, his allies and extremist groups.
WASHINGTON – The Justice Department said Thursday former President Donald Trump doesn't deserve absolute immunity from three civil lawsuits accusing him of inciting the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021.
"No part of a President’s official responsibilities includes the incitement of imminent private violence," department lawyers said in an appeals court filing. "By definition, such conduct plainly falls outside the President’s constitutional and statutory duties."
A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will decide whether to allow the lawsuits to continue. The panel heard oral arguments about whether to dismiss the cases in December, but asked the Justice Department to weigh in.
Search for: What is required to prove incitement?
What did the Schenck case established?
United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) If speech is intended to result in a crime, and there is a clear and present danger that it actually will result in a crime, the First Amendment does not protect the speaker from government action.
What was Schenck accused of doing?
Facts of the case
Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of 1917 by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment. Schenck and Baer were convicted of violating this law and appealed on the grounds that the statute violated the First Amendment.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ald-trump-doj-january-6-lawsuits/11381509002/
DOJ to appeals court: Donald Trump can be sued over role in Jan. 6 Capitol riot
The three lawsuits were filed about two years ago by House Democrats and Capitol Police against Trump, his allies and extremist groups.
WASHINGTON – The Justice Department said Thursday former President Donald Trump doesn't deserve absolute immunity from three civil lawsuits accusing him of inciting the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021.
"No part of a President’s official responsibilities includes the incitement of imminent private violence," department lawyers said in an appeals court filing. "By definition, such conduct plainly falls outside the President’s constitutional and statutory duties."
A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will decide whether to allow the lawsuits to continue. The panel heard oral arguments about whether to dismiss the cases in December, but asked the Justice Department to weigh in.
Search for: What is required to prove incitement?
What did the Schenck case established?
United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) If speech is intended to result in a crime, and there is a clear and present danger that it actually will result in a crime, the First Amendment does not protect the speaker from government action.
Schenck v. United States :: 249 U.S. 47 (1919) - Justia US Supreme Court
What was Schenck accused of doing?
Facts of the case
Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of 1917 by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment. Schenck and Baer were convicted of violating this law and appealed on the grounds that the statute violated the First Amendment.
Schenck v. United States - Oyez
You're beating your head bloody against a brick wall my man.
That one there wouldn't be satisfied if you admitted to everything he accused you of and then shot yourself in the face.
That one there wouldn't be satisfied if you admitted to everything he accused you of and then shot yourself in the face.
And yet the cases continued to move forward...as have all of the cases against donald
Again, can someone remind us of the last case trump "won"?
Again, can someone remind us of the last case trump "won"?
Similar threads
