My guess is it's the double standard that pisses people off. Obama, like many other presidents, have done similar things and the FBI never came knocking.
That's a problem. It's a problem for all of us btw.
The Gestapo raids Trump's house
- Thread starter NavigatorII
- Start date
My guess is it's the double standard that pisses people off. Obama, like many other presidents, have done similar things and the FBI never came knocking.
That's a problem. It's a problem for all of us btw.
Think in terms of Saban with a young Spurrier as his OC. That's a Trump DeSantis ticket.
Agree with much of this even though you don't. I wouldn't have listed "fox, cnn and catholic" however.
It's impossible, as far as I'm concerned, to walk this earth untethered.
i have been arrested 3 times, for nonsensical rules. i do however, stand with law enforcement.
This post makes less sense than most of your posts do. And that's saying something.
posting from a sock? is that supposed to be clever? try harder. i support law enforcement, why does that trigger you people.
Oh my Lord!! @jfegaly @BamaFan1137
Can you boys kindly pull up the spreadsheet of Sybil's psychotic posting history regarding lack of trust in law enforcement? I just don't have the energy right now.
He's just being a troll. An extremely obvious one. A little embarrassing imho.
is this the three or four wrongs make a right argument? does not work for 6 year olds fyi..
Do I understand correctly you think the laws you broke were bullshit but you take responsibility for breaking them?
That's acceptable.
And they were, of course, "nonsensical rules" because they got you arrested, right?
You're no different in this respect from almost every person I've ever arrested. Almost all of them believed their arrest was stupid for one reason or another. That's human nature. People always have a justification for why they violated the law and in their heads, that justification validates their actions.
...but it doesn't mean that their thinking isn't ridiculous.
Last edited:
Trump/Pompeo in 2024.
If Trump wants, he can likely get back his first term and run again in 2028. But I doubt he would. Likely hand off to DeSamtis/Noems in 2028.
The FBI didn't find anything. You guys got hoodwinked. Again.
you have never met anyone even close to me, dont flatter yourself. yes i think they were nonsensical, they were, not all laws are great....many are to lay traps to raise revenue...that said, i stand firmly with law enforcement.
He was out of office 2 years ago. There is no reason to not have items returned yet. Nobody will be given or should be 2 years to return items that was taken. Sometimes this things are simple.
Did Obama take classified documents to Chicago and 2 years later still was "negotiating" the potential return of those documents?
3D chess if true.
I'm not saying, I'm just saying....
Also - this sets a precedent doesn't it?
If you can raid one former President's home it's alot less crazy when it happens again.
Strawman much?
What if there was nothing taken, nothing to return and nothing found? You're assuming something you don't know to be true and going back to past administrations to prove it.
Weird tactic.
Last edited:
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
(b)
Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
Narcissism much?
And here you double down. Just pretending to meet someone of your greatness would serve to flatter me?
Ok. 😂
Again, this is human nature. My actions were ok because _______. You can fill in that blank with a great deal of BS. And people do, it's very common. That doesn’t make you special; it makes you common.
I was going to pay the ticket but...
My license is revoked but I have to....
It's a small amount of ______ and everyone does it
Yes I stole his ______ but he never paid me for ______ so screw him
She's hit me before so yea, I hit her this time
I was drunk
I was high
I've been doing ______ for years and it was never a problem before
I didn't know I was supposed to be in court. It's their fault for not making sure that I knew.
I didn't know it was against the law
The list, like all excuses, is endless.
Nothing in his post was anti law enforcement. That makes it factual. Perhaps you don't know what factual means.
You can settle this by linking the portion of his post that you believe was anti law enforcement.
FFS, he was asking a question.
This is from the NYT. So it’s not as cut and dry as it appears.
—————————————-
On its face, then, if Mr. Trump were to be charged and convicted of removing, concealing or destroying government records under that law, he would seem to be ineligible to become president again.
But there was reason for caution: The law briefly received a close look in 2015, after it came to light that Hillary Clinton, then widely anticipated to be the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, had used a private email server to conduct government business while secretary of state.
Some Republicans were briefly entranced with whether the law could keep Mrs. Clinton out of the White House, including Michael Mukasey, a former attorney general in the administration of George W. Bush. So was at least one conservative think tank.
But in considering that situation, several legal scholars — including Seth B. Tillman of Maynooth University in Ireland and Eugene Volokh of the University of California, Los Angeles — noted that the Constitution sets eligibility criteria for who can be president, and argued that Supreme Court rulings suggestCongress cannot alter them. The Constitution allows Congress to disqualify people from holding office in impeachment proceedings, but grants no such power for ordinary criminal law.
Not that facts will matter to you on this subject but Trump hasn't been out of office for 2 years.
Also, why 2 years? Would the actual 18 months he's been out of office be acceptable? If not...give me a number??? 12 months, 6 months, 3???
This is so goofy. Why am I wasting my time?
But you’ve said you hate cops and their authority needs to be limited because you’ve had bad experiences?
Didn’t that lead to @GhostOfMatchesMalone to assume you’re much younger than you claim to be?
I swear we have the dumbest trolls on Al Gore’s glorious internet.
I don't know where he took them. I also don't believe that he has ever returned them. Maybe he has??? How long did he have them?
Here's one thing that I know for sure. You DGAF about what Obama had or when/if he returned them because his name isn't Trump and he isn't orange.
But you don't want a Dan Quayle if he gets assassinated. And these cowards are stupid enough to do it.
Why was this never a problem before? Why do we care so much now whereas we never GAF before when nearly every president committed the crime that you listed above?
If it's an issue, let's go back and charge them all. The living ones and the dead. Sound good to you?
I do not know..but Hilary took TROVES of classified documents, emails(and deleted them while under Federal investigation) WITHOUT any security clearance. Do you have any tough questions?
Sigh. Trump took nothing to MAL. A lefty blog told you that.
Remember when you started a thread claiming Trump *ATE* the classified documents???? A lefty blog told you that as well.
Honest question: Does it bother you that these lefty blogs can manipulate you so easily? Almost as easily as they manipulate @sadgator. You both believe in a world that literally does not exist.
Correct. We actually have evidence of hildabeast doing what @kalimgoodman's lefty blogs told him Trump did.
No FBI raid on hildabeast. Equal justice for all???
Obama apparently did this too...as have nearly all Presidents. Apparently it's very common. But muh Trump so, here we are with an FBI raid.
I am getting the feeling that Trump was 100% prepared for this...and they got NOTHING. I can not believe that the DOJ has not commented on this yet. That is VERY telling
