I'm not sure if this is all the tapes or not. There was some talk that 5% was held back due to 'security concerns'.
I'm not sure if this is all the tapes or not. There was some talk that 5% was held back due to 'security concerns'.
All the frenzy over the 'insurrection' is BS.
BUT, the protesters shouldn't have acted up like they did.
I don't mind anyone who caused a problem on 1/6 being punished but I'd like to see the same thing happen with all the other protests/riots/looting.
I think every person putting the law before their politics would agree with this.All the frenzy over the 'insurrection' is BS.
BUT, the protesters shouldn't have acted up like they did.
I don't mind anyone who caused a problem on 1/6 being punished but I'd like to see the same thing happen with all the other protests/riots/looting.
Yes, burning state and federal buildings to the ground was much worse than this demonstration. Plus, looting billions of dollars from retailers was despicable and basically unpunished to a large degree.All the frenzy over the 'insurrection' is BS.
BUT, the protesters shouldn't have acted up like they did.
I don't mind anyone who caused a problem on 1/6 being punished but I'd like to see the same thing happen with all the other protests/riots/looting.
@Uniformed_ReRe @Illegal-shift @sadgator did we ever figure out who the real villains are? Who is really destroying this country?
@Uniformed_ReRe @Illegal-shift @sadgator did we ever figure out who the real villains are? Who is really destroying this country?
Nope. Same posters that literally had a panic attack in real time on Jan 6th here, now saying nothing once we learn THEIR SIDE is mostly responsible.
You and I watched this whole thing on PBS live that day. Remember that? I was laughing my ass off. Guards and "terrorists" were high fiving each other. I'll never forget that. 😂Nope. Same posters that literally had a panic attack in real time on Jan 6th here, now saying nothing once we learn THEIR SIDE is mostly responsible.
When they thought it was Trump supporters trying to overthrow the US government, no punishment was too great.
Now that they know that it was mostly scripted by their side....well.....let's just move on.
Yep. We were laughing our asses off, @Uniformed_ReRe watching the same reporting and having a heart attack.You and I watched this whole thing on PBS live that day. Remember that? I was laughing my ass off. Guards and "terrorists" were high fiving each other. I'll never forget that. 😂
When you make the decision to enter an area that is secured by people carrying loaded weapons, you're rolling the dice. Sometimes, you're going to lose.
That's besides the point.When you make the decision to enter an area that is secured by people carrying loaded weapons, you're rolling the dice. Sometimes, you're going to lose.
It's sad but she put herself into a bad position.
I have heard that it also shows that some of the officers lied about what happened.
And most of those people, 2+ years later, are STILL sitting in DC jails awaiting for their speedy trial.
It's no more beside the point than considering what some stupid criminal was doing when the cops 'unfairly' shot them.That's besides the point.
I'd like to have a look at the use of force guidelines for the capitol police, because generally you can't shoot unarmed suspects without some justification. I rather doubt they have a standing order to repel boarders with extreme prejudice, as it were.
The secret service might be able to get away with this, but I suspect this was not lawful.
I am not absolving Ms Babbit of responsibiliy for her actions, I'm demanding the officer be held responsible for his.It's no more beside the point than considering what some stupid criminal was doing when the cops 'unfairly' shot them.
FAAFO goes both ways.
I'm not against the guard being treated according to the established rules.I am not absolving Ms Babbit of responsibiliy for her actions, I'm demanding the officer be held responsible for his.
I believe that an investigation is warranted in light of new evidence. If he followed procedure then yes, she wrote the check and he cashed it.
Indeed.I'm not against the guard being treated according to the established rules.
I just think the story brings out the hypocrisy in a lot of people on both sides.
I am not absolving Ms Babbit of responsibiliy for her actions, I'm demanding the officer be held responsible for his.
I believe that an investigation is warranted in light of new evidence. If he followed procedure then yes, she wrote the check and he cashed it.
And that's a sound justification.I'm hypothesizing here but I don't know how an investigation would not have taken place. When a homicide takes place, justified or otherwise, the case is presented to a grand jury. I cannot imagine a loophole.
IMHO, he had protectees that he was responsible for. If that crowd comes through, he cannot protect them. Whether or not Babbitt was armed, or whether any in the fairly large crowd with her were armed, if he reasonably believes that his protectees are in peril, the shoot is justified. That's my take.