ADVERTISEMENT

Someone tried to kill Trump at rally...

We'll just go with our guy is a lot less despicable than your guy (Pedolph, Man of International Grifter Intrigue) and has good policies that run circles around Marxist Dementia Joe.........mkkkkk?
LOL, You are a R, so, you would dislike Biden policies.
 
I never said that he is a Trump supporter. If you just stopped defending your party and look at the info from his neighbors and friends, you'll be convinced that he was a Republican.
That wore his mask at school 2 extra years?

You don't shoot the nominee of your party if you're really a member of that party.

But keep trolling. It's all you know.
 
I’m concerned that they are setting up the next shoe to drop. FBI / DHS putting out a bulletin that warns of follow up attacks on trump AND retaliation attacks from trump supporters against libbies. Getting a very bad feeling they are gonna take another bite at the apple here. The tactics we have used in other countries to foment revolution and civil war are being used on us.

Crooks a patsy ?

 
I don’t know. It’s been my gut feeling from jump street that he’s a patsy. The absurd nature of the miss on that roof top. Now the Iranian threat. I think they put out a bulletin on follow ups on trump and retaliatory against the other side. I personally would feel shook if I was trump and all the sudden they are “ beefing up security all around me”. Does that mean longer shifts for existing agents or are we introducing new members to the security team? I wouldn’t feel thrilled about a whole bunch of new faces on the team to be honest
 
I don’t know. It’s been my gut feeling from jump street that he’s a patsy. The absurd nature of the miss on that roof top. Now the Iranian threat. I think they put out a bulletin on follow ups on trump and retaliatory against the other side. I personally would feel shook if I was trump and all the sudden they are “ beefing up security all around me”. Does that mean longer shifts for existing agents or are we introducing new members to the security team? I wouldn’t feel thrilled about a whole bunch of new faces on the team to be honest
I read that once he is the official nominee that there are additional funds allocated to his protection team.
 
That's the Republican talking point, but when you add facts, you look silly (shocker). He registered in like 2021 and didn't even vote in the primary. He voted in the midterm as guess what?...A REPUBLICAN.
I have seen you post on the football boards before they ran you off(you ere NEVER right about ANYTHING and got called out for it.) You are doing the same thing here on this board. You NEVER get anything right. (are you possibly related to FJB?)
BTW...who will win the debate? (oh...forgot..you got that wrong too)
 
Maybe Trump needs to hire that Seal Team that was forced to resign, because they refused to take the Communist Red Chinese Kung Flu fake vaccine (poison) shot, to replace or to at least enhance his already 'demonstrated incompetent' Secret Service security team???

And here's what Trump needs to move around in now-daze....

The U.S. built, General Dynamics Land Systems Stryker is built to survive 14.5mm armored piercing rounds through its air-tight protection system. The undercarriage of the Stryker is strengthened enough to make it survive a mine blast and has an optional 12.7 mm (.50 Cal) machine gun or 40 mm (1.6") automatic grenade launcher that are both controlled remotely from inside.

 
And a YUGE Trump supporter, obviously.

He took the "killing them with kindness" thing to a whole nother level.
Let em have his ignorant argument as if it means a lot. It's actions not registration. And Adam Kingzinger is a Republican too. But the biggest joke of all which should be the closer is that KalimGoodman calls himself an Independent. Yea, that really shows doesn't it.
 
Let em have his ignorant argument as if it means a lot. It's actions not registration. And Adam Kingzinger is a Republican too. But the biggest joke of all which should be the closer is that KalimGoodman calls himself an Independent. Yea, that really shows doesn't it.
He rarely ever cites his sources but when he does it’s Vanity Fair (or Vogue, can’t recall) and MSNBC.
 
He has no clue. MSNBC marching orders didn't specify. 😂
His talking points also forgot the fact that some insane libs register for the other party to alter their mid terms - knowing they can vote for their candidate in the general.

Voter registration means almost nothing.

Trying to kill a candidate for POTUS is a bit more telling, if you have a brain.
 
His talking points also forgot the fact that some insane libs register for the other party to alter their mid terms - knowing they can vote for their candidate in the general.

Voter registration means almost nothing.

Trying to kill a candidate for POTUS is a bit more telling, if you have a brain.
I made that case twice on this forum already. He ignored it twice. I gave examples, like Florida in 2016, also we don't know how people lean in PA for local elections. I still strongly feel he was not a lone wolf, he was a patsy. There's evidence from testimony from the crowd there was a second shooter. Either way, the SS should hang their heads in shame, what a shitshow in the most basic security, a day that almost lived in infamy. Kal's crowd is only sorry because he missed. All I can say is WOW. Eff em all. :mad:
 
I made that case twice on this forum already. He ignored it twice. I gave examples, like Florida in 2016, also we don't know how people lean in PA for local elections. I still strongly feel he was not a lone wolf, he was a patsy. There's evidence from testimony from the crowd there was a second shooter. Either way, the SS should hang their heads in shame, what a shitshow in the most basic security, a day that almost lived in infamy. Kal's crowd is only sorry because he missed. All I can say is WOW. Eff em all. :mad:
The bottom line is this - anyone who doesn’t understand political donations and assassination attempts override a box checked on a form isn’t worth engaging.
 
I am so proud most of you libs make NO SENSE to me. Let me dumb it down for you since you seem to have reading comprehension. YOUR side is evil...my side is not. God is NOT on evils side. THE END. Read in to that whatever you want. But please do not twist my words...worry more about yours.
You are probably a nice guy and I like you posts in The Swamp forum. But just look at what you are saying. Your words here suggest that you are the prototypical holier than thou bigot. You label me a Dem and you do not know me or my voting history. (I have voted republican most of my 47 voting years. Not until last election did I not. It has been Trump that soured me on the so called republican party.) I believe that god is fair for all people. I cannot believe he picks sides in an election and I find it very hard to believe God would vote for your "savior."
 
You are probably a nice guy and I like you posts in The Swamp forum. But just look at what you are saying. Your words here suggest that you are the prototypical holier than thou bigot. You label me a Dem and you do not know me or my voting history. (I have voted republican most of my 47 voting years. Not until last election did I not. It has been Trump that soured me on the so called republican party.) I believe that god is fair for all people. I cannot believe he picks sides in an election and I find it very hard to believe God would vote for your "savior."
One side:
- wants endless wars to enrich the industrial military complex
- hates religion with very few exceptions
- feels sexuality is a “social construct” and supports pride parades with open sexual content and drag queen story hours with kids
- has been responsible for assassination attempts on the last 3 presidents
- violently riots when they don’t get their way (Trump 2016 election, Floyd riots)
- supports top down governmental control (socialism and eventually communism), an ideology that has left tens of millions of dead in its wake

And the other wants religion and prayer back in schools, is hardly ever violent, and favors individual independence and freedom over governmental control. It’s also grounded in Natural law.

Which one do you think more closely aligns with Christian values?
 
One side:
- wants endless wars to enrich the industrial military complex
- hates religion with very few exceptions
- feels sexuality is a “social construct” and supports pride parades with open sexual content and drag queen story hours with kids
- has been responsible for assassination attempts on the last 3 presidents
- violently riots when they don’t get their way (Trump 2016 election, Floyd riots)
- supports top down governmental control (socialism and eventually communism), an ideology that has left tens of millions of dead in its wake

And the other wants religion and prayer back in schools, is hardly ever violent, and favors individual independence and freedom over governmental control. It’s also grounded in Natural law.

Which one do you think more closely aligns with Christian values?
Poor guy. Baby Tebow weeps for him.
 
More just pure evil from Biden.

The “bloodbath comment”, for the few liberals that are still here, was in reference to employment in the domestic auto industry if Biden’s EV mandates came to fruition. That’s who Trump was speaking to and that was the issue at hand.

Fvck him for lying about that less than 3 days from an assassination attempt on his political opponent. And all we heard from the MSM was the right needs to “tamp down the rhetoric”.

I want peace. No more violence. No more riots. No more demonization. Hyperbole and puffery are politics, stay away from talk that makes crazy people do crazy things.

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT