Reference posts # 17 and 19 for remarks lamenting many lives lost. I hope your doctor does not reflexively treat based on the current fad or on one or two articles. Remember, this is just one article. There are others that have shown no benefit with hcq. I understand you are pointing out that it is sad this has become more of a political rather than a medical issue. There I agree with you. I wonder who is responsible for that? Perhaps if Mr. Trump took the spotlight off himself and let his staff do their work it would not have been so.Who are you quoting? I will wait. I have seen the question “how many” lives were lost. You don’t see what? Lives that could have been lost due to the politicization of a drug that in moderate doses that is safe, and according to the studies has efficacy in both reducing viral shedding, reducing the longevity of illness and had shown to reduce mortality rates. Glad you aren’t my doc, seems you still want to play politics above all else. FWIW, you don’t have to “see it”. The research, shows it.
SMDH. You are blinded by TDS. That much is obvious. Yes, there are other studies supporting use of hcq as well. As for posts 17 and 19 let me help you. They both ask exactly what I stated, not what you stated. They both ask, “how many lives were lost?” I am guessing this is why you referenced post numbers instead of quoting. As for the spotlight being on Trump, the nerve of him. I mean, I cannot imagine him being in the spotlight as POTUS. Again, your TDS panties are showing. Again, thankful you aren’t my doc.Reference posts # 17 and 19 for remarks lamenting many lives lost. I hope your doctor does not reflexively treat based on the current fad or on one or two articles. Remember, this is just one article. There are others that have shown no benefit with hcq. I understand you are pointing out that it is sad this has become more of a political rather than a medical issue. There I agree with you. I wonder who is responsible for that? Perhaps if Mr. Trump took the spotlight off himself and let his staff do their work it would not have been so.
You asked who I was quoting and I told you.SMDH. You are blinded by TDS. That much is obvious. Yes, there are other studies supporting use of hcq as well. As for posts 17 and 19 let me help you. They both ask exactly what I stated, not what you stated. They both ask, “how many lives were lost?” I am guessing this is why you referenced post numbers instead of quoting. As for the spotlight being on Trump, the nerve of him. I mean, I cannot imagine him being in the spotlight as POTUS. Again, your TDS panties are showing. Again, thankful you aren’t my doc.
You asked who I was quoting and I told you.
He could have been one of the greatest presidents if he had not been so self absorbed. Didn’t he at one point come off sounding like he recommended drinking disinfectants? I don’t think that’s what he meant but he would say stuff like that and not retract or explain it. A leader should sometimes step back and delegate and have his staff deliver the message. A leader would have attempted to work with both sides. Imagine if he compromised even slightly. He could have swayed a few more independent votes to his side. (You do not believe me but I do lean more conservative than liberal. I had high hopes when he was elected.)
Your goalposts keep moving. First it was no studies done. Now its randomized studies. Perhaps you can read the conclusion and get back. Lives could have been saved had the media not gone into hysterics trying to remove trump. Period. You are being obtuse and ignorant if you’re unwilling to acknowledge the a bunch of people a hell of alot smarter than yourself have concluded that 1. It helped people if given in early stages to recover faster and 2. Taking HCQ resulted in lower mortality rates. The media lied, people died. Those were there conclusions, yet you want to clutch those pearls. I know what it is, its the 8 masks not allowing enough oxygen to your brain
playing a semantics game with studies vs randomized study is a joke. The only truly respected study is a double blind fully random. one.. not done in this case. It was noted that some Dr. had success with HCQ... it is also noted that AMA, CDC, WHO found it killed some people. Overall deemed not worth the risk. Those are the smarter people I choose to believe, not unproven, anecdotal studies. The demon sperm lady sure liked her HCQ though. You unscientific types make me laugh sometimes. Oh yeah and that "study" by Dr. Z in NY that turned out he didn't actually test all his patients he cured cured. Good studies. bet your lifr e on them over the AMA, CDC< WHO etc. BUt sure the media listened to them, and not bleach boy, so it was the media's fault. ROTFLMAO.
Really? Have any proof of that? Lol. I will wait. I’m sure it will be a while.
You never read any links so do your own Google for proof. Hint: try Feb. 24th 2017 for the Press Sec Spicer censorship bans, and Jan. 24th 2017 for the EPA social media censorship ban. Of course, like most Fascist playbook scripts we have Trump' Feb. 17th tweet claiming NTY, NBS news, ADC, CBS and CNN were "enemies of the American people".
Show me the data with the estimated numbers of lives that could have been saved. By not using hydroxychloroquin other drug regimens were used. They may have been more effective than hydroxychloroquin. There is no way to quantify that.
I gave an educated opinion. Not sure your point here. I stated my opinion based on my experience. Many here claimed how upset they are at the “many lives lost”. I just don’t see it.
Reference posts # 17 and 19 for remarks lamenting many lives lost. I hope your doctor does not reflexively treat based on the current fad or on one or two articles. Remember, this is just one article. There are others that have shown no benefit with hcq. I understand you are pointing out that it is sad this has become more of a political rather than a medical issue. There I agree with you. I wonder who is responsible for that? Perhaps if Mr. Trump took the spotlight off himself and let his staff do their work it would not have been so.
You asked who I was quoting and I told you.
you seriously have no clue wtf you’re talking or you’re being disingenuous. Or the third option is, you don’t know hiw to differentiate between the differentiate between the applications being discussed. The studies you are referencing refer to late stage treatment. ffs
Here’s some links snowflake! Lol. Censorship my ass! Stopping face news more like it.
- https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/24/media-blocked-white-house-briefing-sean-spicer
- https://phys.org/news/2017-01-trump-admin-epa-media-blackout.html
- helps when u do ur hw snowflake! Lol
Ur typical! Such a DA and once again u can’t back up ur bs! Lol
This isn't about truth for him. It's all about his TDS. Without that he has absolutely nothing to say.
Actually they don’t but not surprised on how u would see it. Lol. Read the facts snowflake! LolYour links just proved exactly the censorship I had claimed. Thanks. I'm proud that you were able to prove to yourself the veracity of my claims. You're not very good at this. LOL
Ahh yes, still emotionally damage by Trumpy bear.And your post was brimming with pertinent info on the topic. You guys with the tin foil hats protecting you from the mean media that controlled Trump's CDC, NIH, and FDA? It's as grand a conspiracy as stealing the election... with the same amount of evidence. LOL
WTF are you babbling about now? Tell us, what Trump policies were bad for America, and why?And your post was brimming with pertinent info on the topic. You guys with the tin foil hats protecting you from the mean media that controlled Trump's CDC, NIH, and FDA? It's as grand a conspiracy as stealing the election... with the same amount of evidence. LOL
WTF are you babbling about now? Tell us, what Trump policies were bad for America, and why?
🍿
Read the thread title skippy . Trump's gone, his policies are gone as well. The thread title was false info and the poster referenced me. I do know about a half million people that don't like his pandemic response.
Read the thread title skippy . Trump's gone, his policies are gone as well. The thread title was false info and the poster referenced me. I do know about a half million people that don't like his pandemic response.
And your post was brimming with pertinent info on the topic. You guys with the tin foil hats protecting you from the mean media that controlled Trump's CDC, NIH, and FDA? It's as grand a conspiracy as stealing the election... with the same amount of evidence. LOL
WTF are you babbling about now?
Read the thread title skippy . Trump's gone, his policies are gone as well. The thread title was false info and the poster referenced me. I do know about a half million people that don't like his pandemic response.
And why is the media focusing on baby doc Cuomo's sexual assaults instead of his nursing home mandates?How many lives lost, that could have been saved, that are directly contributed to Dr. FVK Face, leftist media and Rat politicians propaganda campaign against HCQ ?? .. all to defeat Trump
Blood on their pathetic hands.