that star is now faded. Good coach but not sold that he's the next great thing either that some on here claim.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh Dear.I think we are being overboard critical of Herman. Isn't our coaches best season 10-3 at Colorado State? And Herman did beat Big Game Bob and his Sooners? Not sure thats not a bigger win than anything Mac has done as a HBC to this point.
Oh Dear.
Remind us again, which team has McElwain lost to, when his team was a favorite. Because I can count two games Jimbo lost to vastly inferior teams in this year alone.
I think we are being overboard critical of Herman. Isn't our coaches best season 10-3 at Colorado State? And Herman did beat Big Game Bob and his Sooners? Not sure thats not a bigger win than anything Mac has done as a HBC to this point.
No longer on the Jimbo wagon?hhhmmm....that sounds awfully familiar.
Mac is 14-0 against teams he was favored to beat at UF. What is Herman against teams they were favored to beat this season?
YOU are the one that made the comparisons between the two, based upon your perception of the signature wins of each. You wrote that feel better about Herman because YOU perceive his signature wins to be more impressive than McElwain's signature wins.So we feel better that Mac is terrible against quality opponents because Tom Herman lost a game he was favored to win?!?!?! I see the logic here
YOU are the one that made the comparisons between the two, based upon your perception of the signature wins of each. You wrote that feel better about Herman because YOU perceive his signature wins to be more impressive than McElwain's signature wins.
Live with your own logic
No longer on the Jimbo wagon?
Predictions against Clemson?
For whom?
BTW, as schizophrenic as Jimbo's teams sometimes are, it would not surprise me to see FSU beat Clemson. Plus the fact that the Tigers have been playing less than stellar football as of late.
YOU are the one that made the comparisons between the two, based upon your perception of the signature wins of each. You wrote that feel better about Herman because YOU perceive his signature wins to be more impressive than McElwain's signature wins.
Live with your own logic
Hard to say. I guess the signature wins for McElwain are Ole Miss, UT and UGA? All last year. For Herman they are OU and FSU? One this year and one last year.MJ, do you think McElwain has a better win than Herman v. OU or FSU? Herman has worse losses, although he is at Houston. I don't know who McElwain lost to at CSU.
Hard to say. I guess the signature wins for McElwain are Ole Miss, UT and UGA? All last year. For Herman they are OU and FSU? One this year and one last year.
Which set of wins are more impressive depends on what a fan likes in a team. The UF wins against UT and UGA had a lot riding on them, conference wise. I think conference wins against reasonably tough opponents are harder to come by than non conference wins against tough opponents. Houston's game against FSU was a bowl game and FSU wase not ready to play, or did not give a damn. Much like our game against Michigan. OU no longer plays much defense, which gave Houston a clear advantage in that game.
Which set of signature wins is more impressive is not clear cut. It is a matter of opinion. I might be able to be talked into either position.
But I DO know that McElwain has not have any "wtf?" losses while at Florida. Herman has at least two this year alone. To be sure, some of McElwain's wins were "wtf we should have beaten them by more" kinds of wins. But those ugly wins are far better than ugly losses.
Most Gator fans would rather a 44-38 kind of win compared to a 13-7 kind of win. But both are the same margin of victory. Both count the same. In most cases, many of us would rather a Herman kind of coach. Offense. Lots of scoring. I understand that. I love good offenses too.
No longer on the Jimbo wagon?
Hard to say. I guess the signature wins for McElwain are Ole Miss, UT and UGA? All last year. For Herman they are OU and FSU? One this year and one last year.
Which set of wins are more impressive depends on what a fan likes in a team. The UF wins against UT and UGA had a lot riding on them, conference wise. I think conference wins against reasonably tough opponents are harder to come by than non conference wins against tough opponents. Houston's game against FSU was a bowl game and FSU wase not ready to play, or did not give a damn. Much like our game against Michigan. OU no longer plays much defense, which gave Houston a clear advantage in that game.
Which set of signature wins is more impressive is not clear cut. It is a matter of opinion. I might be able to be talked into either position.
But I DO know that McElwain has not have any "wtf?" losses while at Florida. Herman has at least two this year alone. To be sure, some of McElwain's wins were "wtf we should have beaten them by more" kinds of wins. But those ugly wins are far better than ugly losses.
Most Gator fans would rather a 44-38 kind of win compared to a 13-7 kind of win. But both are the same margin of victory. Both count the same. In most cases, many of us would rather a Herman kind of coach. Offense. Lots of scoring. I understand that. I love good offenses too.
Hard to say. I guess the signature wins for McElwain are Ole Miss, UT and UGA? All last year. For Herman they are OU and FSU? One this year and one last year.
Which set of wins are more impressive depends on what a fan likes in a team. The UF wins against UT and UGA had a lot riding on them, conference wise. I think conference wins against reasonably tough opponents are harder to come by than non conference wins against tough opponents. Houston's game against FSU was a bowl game and FSU wase not ready to play, or did not give a damn. Much like our game against Michigan. OU no longer plays much defense, which gave Houston a clear advantage in that game.
Which set of signature wins is more impressive is not clear cut. It is a matter of opinion. I might be able to be talked into either position.
But I DO know that McElwain has not have any "wtf?" losses while at Florida. Herman has at least two this year alone. To be sure, some of McElwain's wins were "wtf we should have beaten them by more" kinds of wins. But those ugly wins are far better than ugly losses.
Most Gator fans would rather a 44-38 kind of win compared to a 13-7 kind of win. But both are the same margin of victory. Both count the same. In most cases, many of us would rather a Herman kind of coach. Offense. Lots of scoring. I understand that. I love good offenses too.
Ita not logical. Its not fair. But its what I told Danny when we had Chump. Less pressure goes on a coach at 8-4 with an exciting offense than a coach at 10-2 with the shit we have watched for years. Like I said, not logical, not fair, but at the end of the day football is entertainment.
If I thought 10 wins is sustainable playing the way we have, I'd be good with it. But my concern is that the defense is going to degrade as Muschamp's players leave. We hired this guy to bring in an offense, like Spurrier and like Meyer, and to this point I have not seen it. But I admit he was not left much to work with on offense. 15-5 is pretty good. I would like to see us start showing up against the big boys. We'll have some opportunities later this year. LSU, FSU, Arkansas and UGA are talented teams that are nonetheless beatable. I'd like to see us at least split.
I think we are being overboard critical of Herman. Isn't our coaches best season 10-3 at Colorado State? And Herman did beat Big Game Bob and his Sooners? Not sure thats not a bigger win than anything Mac has done as a HBC to this point.
Agree with a lot of this. I think most fans prefer to have he offense taken care of, because you feel like you can coach up defense like Spurrier bringing n Stoops.
Overreaction much? He's had two bad losses, no excuses. But he went 13-1 year one and will probably win 10 games again this year. And his side of the ball that he was hired to fix (offense) has been elite from day 1 with a QB who played receiver for 3 years before he got there. Always baffles me how people here judge other coaches with much less talent so harshly while making every excuse in the book for our coaches when we don't perform. Like how it was raining.
I may be wrong but the team they lost too this weekend was a confernce opponent. Houston has much more talent than SMU. So he didn't have less talent this weekend than the team that they were favored to beat by 22 points.Overreaction much? He's had two bad losses, no excuses. But he went 13-1 year one and will probably win 10 games again this year. And his side of the ball that he was hired to fix (offense) has been elite from day 1 with a QB who played receiver for 3 years before he got there. Always baffles me how people here judge other coaches with much less talent so harshly while making every excuse in the book for our coaches when we don't perform. Like how it was raining.
I may be wrong but the team they lost too this weekend was a confernce opponent. Houston has much more talent than SMU. So he didn't have less talent this weekend than the team that they were favored to beat by 22 points.
Don't forget they were favored to beat Navy by 15 points and lost that game as well.
Herman is a good coach but I'm not crowning him yet and putting him in the elite category like some appear to be doing.
Remember some were doing the same thing over Rich Rodriguez.
Houston's 2 losses this year are to conference opponents in the AAC, not to any P5 schools. As of right now there is a good chance that Houston won't even make the AAC conference championship game.I agree.
I know Houston was "favored," but that could just mean that Houston was overrated and the other team was underrated. It's hard to gauge a "bad" loss until the end of the season.
He still deserves credit for getting our expectations so high that two losses seems like a huge let-down. Don't forget that Houston isn't even a P5 team.
I tend to agree with this.Ita not logical. Its not fair. But its what I told Danny when we had Chump. Less pressure goes on a coach at 8-4 with an exciting offense than a coach at 10-2 with the shit we have watched for years. Like I said, not logical, not fair, but at the end of the day football is entertainment.
Kind of like how some Gator fans harshly judge McElwain's offense, even though the talent level he inherited was pretty damn bad. Ammirite?Always baffles me how people here judge other coaches with much less talent so harshly while making every excuse in the book for our coaches when we don't perform. Like how it was raining.