Snopes busted for lying about Maricopa Audit
- Thread starter fatman76
- Start date
Not when it comes to politics, but I have read others opinions that have changed my views on other topics. All you can do is make a well-reasoned argument and hope it is compelling enough to change minds ...
You didn't even click the link. It's a summary of fraud cases. Doesn't mention party (unless it's part of the case). I scrolled and didn't see Trump or Biden mentioned.
You made up your mind based on the source. Clearly you're using your critical thinking muscles and coming to your own conclusions based on facts.
I said that. I'm sure it's accurate but I wouldn't be surprised if it's slanted. The heritage group doesn't lie about their intentions.
Wait...so you read a claim in a story and then seek out additional information to support or refute it?
Amazing concept.
"Tell me you're a conservative without telling me you're a conservative".
BS-C911, I don't 'believe' in aliens, I know about UFO's/UAP's by way of my own personal 'Top Secret' military experiences. I've been waiting for over 50 years (1969) for 'Full Disclosure' to finally happen, and it's finally begun.
Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
AATIP has left us with many unanswered questions. Where is the UFO material that was recovered? Two of the Senators who founded the program are no longer alive.
heavy.com
So what any ignorant twit 'believes' or doesn't believe, makes no real difference to reality in an 'Infinite Unverse.'
The election audits going on right now have already and will continue to show that a massive fraud has been perpetrated on the American electorate. Joe and the Ho need to be removed from the WH before they can further destroy our Constitutional Republic and replace it with Socialism. All of those involved in the fraud need to be prosecuted and then given their just deserts...
Last edited:
Average to low. The bright always sees a test as a challenge.
The bright always seeks answers for questions they can't answer. The slow often labels questions they can't answer as stupid, dumb or trick.
jfegaly doesn't need to tell Ghost an opponent is stupid. The opponent shouts it to the world through the internet.
I sometimes read opinions that prompt me to research, sometimes changing my view.
Snarky comments about UFO's/UAP's and the Infinite Universe are cute when being thrown back and forth between the ignorant twits, but that's all they are.
Here's a quick look at a piece of the small bank of info that we have accumulated so far.
Most of the twits can't bear to watch and learn, they are only comfortable living in their very limited universe. They are the equivalent of those that are or were the 'Flat Earth' advocates.
Here's a quick look at a piece of the small bank of info that we have accumulated so far.
Most of the twits can't bear to watch and learn, they are only comfortable living in their very limited universe. They are the equivalent of those that are or were the 'Flat Earth' advocates.
If you seriously don't know who Snopes is, sadly you are on the spreadsheet as a "low information voter". Not a good look for you Kal, no, not at all. I had higher hopes for you. See, this is why Hidin got several hundred legitimate votes. Ignorance. The rest was pure fraud.No idea who snopes is but I saw this on my local news.
Then i saw this recently.
Colorado man suspected in wife's death cast ballot for Donald Trump on her behalf, court documents show
Barry Morphew said “all these other guys are cheating,” and he thought his wife would have voted for Trump anyway, according to an arrest warrant.www.usatoday.com
I was just messing with you. I know you’re right leaning by your posts on The Main Board.
Tough but fair.
As far as Snopes is concerned, the may be left leaning but to just dismiss their research out of hand is a mistake IMO. Disagree with their conclusions if you wish, but don’t ignore the facts they present.
Facts are always ignored immediately if it's by a link they don't like. That's was Trump speciality, discredit the media when you don't like the story.
They were considered at one time the most credible source of validation but now they have proven they are narrative-driven, IMO.
I don't even mind them being narrative-driven, all media is.
My problem is they have multiple times been busted outright LYING about their claims.
That matters to honest people. Compare that to the posters ITT that don't see it as a big deal, and there you go.
Yes, they are without a doubt a discredited source. IMO, a research sourcing agent should be completely non-biased.
What doesn't Snopes lie about or twist to claim its likely false. They refused for years to admit that mined nuclear material sold to Russia with Hillary signing off on the sale could leave the US or Canada and it had already been proven some of it went to Asia using the shipping rights of a different company.
Yep. What they do is find a few conclusions out of thousands that they disagree with, so that they can then say all of their info is wrong. They then quote the most unreliable sources as fact. Those Trumpers are very dishonest, but I think its merely a coping mechanism for being real life losers.
There's no such thing as being completely unbiased. Do you have some sources that prove the black swan theory? If so, what are they?
You can research the author and find many investigative clues as to their reputation and history of reliable reporting, sir.
Haha, on tMB, my posts are WAY right. I let the fur fly there and am extremely sarcastic. Different hat.
Over the years I have specifically noticed Snopes co-opting any narrative they were able to put a liberal spin on. They do so with impunity and it has been laughable. After about 10 of those experiences, I started dismissing them out of hand ...
No doubt. I do find them useful, but as with all sources, you have to evaluate the facts presented. Im sure they’ve made some errors, but overall they seem as reliable as any source.
Snopes has been known as a left wing shill for years. And it's not even close.
For you faux "independents" 😂
independentstream.com
SNOPES EXPOSED – Heavily financed by George Soros
4 Years AgoSNOPES EXPOSED
Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.For you faux "independents" 😂
SNOPES EXPOSED - Heavily financed by George Soros - Independent Stream
I’ve received a lot of flack about this article so I did additional research and further discovered what I already knew was true. Snopes.com is a fraud – plain and simple plus a multi-media forum for brainwashing an unsuspecting public. SNOPES EXPOSED Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed...
independentstream.com
LOL. A four year old opinion Piece. Full of conjecture. If they we so in the bag for Obama, why did they award him the lie of the year one time?Snopes has been known as a left wing shill for years. And it's not even close.
SNOPES EXPOSED – Heavily financed by George Soros
4 Years Ago
SNOPES EXPOSED
Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.
For you faux "independents" 😂
SNOPES EXPOSED - Heavily financed by George Soros - Independent Stream
I’ve received a lot of flack about this article so I did additional research and further discovered what I already knew was true. Snopes.com is a fraud – plain and simple plus a multi-media forum for brainwashing an unsuspecting public. SNOPES EXPOSED Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed...
Dems ITT: "What??? You linked to Gateway Pundit???? Everyone knows they are biased for Trump!"
Same Dems ITT: "Look, I don't care if Snopes gets it wrong and is biased. Who isn't? I like em so I'm gonna keep reading them."
Same Dems ITT: "Look, I don't care if Snopes gets it wrong and is biased. Who isn't? I like em so I'm gonna keep reading them."
"Tell me you're a critical thinker, without telling me you're a critical thinker".
I think there is a market / great need for such a source, but have yet to see anything close to it, which is unfortunate. The reality is that opinions generate clicks ...
Liars lie to me. I have very little spare time for liars...as in none.
Tell me a hard truth, an easy truth or STFU. I have no time for snopes.
Of course.you don’t. Righties hate fact checkers.
And everybody lies. You included. Whether intentionally or not.
Lying requires intent genius.
And yes, everyone lies. Telling a fat girl she looks good in her new jeans /= misrepresenting easily discernable facts in a political discussion.
And I would absolutely love an honest fact checking website. It would help me be more lazy...and I could do with a bit more lazy.
Its crazy the twisting of things and the outright lies that places like Snopes and Politifact do.
Does it? Tell a falsehood under oath and see where it gets you. See General Flynn.
And how do you determine intent. So if Snopes makes an incorrect conclusion, but it was unintentional, then you wouldn’t call it a lie?
Don’t lie now.
