ADVERTISEMENT

Snopes busted for lying about Maricopa Audit

fatman76

Bull Gator
Jun 15, 2007
11,655
21,644
113
As well as CNN, but I don't think it's "news" that CNN lies and spins.

 
Bombshell!!!!
Breaking!!
,*may" have been recovered.

You people are nuts.
 
As well as CNN, but I don't think it's "news" that CNN lies and spins.

So let's see if I have this straight....

1 - CNN and Snopes lied about what the guy said
2 - Guy issues a statement saying CNN and Snopes lied, and clarified what he actually said
3 - CNN and Snopes continue to lie about the guy said.
4 - Sheep continue to believe CNN and Snopes blindly, cause both sites tell them the lie they want to hear


Is that about it?
 
So let's see if I have this straight....

1 - CNN and Snopes lied about what the guy said
2 - Guy issues a statement saying CNN and Snopes lied, and clarified what he actually said
3 - CNN and Snopes continue to lie about the guy said.
4 - Sheep continue to believe CNN and Snopes blindly, cause both sites tell them the lie they want to hear


Is that about it?
Yep, pretty much sums it up.

I wonder why Snopes and CNN are so dead set against telling their audience that someone wiped the data off the servers and voting machines? It feels like that’s important news.

But don’t listen to me, I’m nuts.
 
Yep, pretty much sums it up.

I wonder why Snopes and CNN are so dead set against telling their audience that someone wiped the data off the servers and voting machines? It feels like that’s important news.

But don’t listen to me, I’m nuts.
Calling people nuts/crazy/conspiracy theorist etc....is a tactic. It's weak sauce. just fight things with facts.
 
As well as CNN, but I don't think it's "news" that CNN lies and spins.

Agnostic Snopes would never lie? lol
 
I wonder why Snopes and CNN are so dead set against telling their audience that someone wiped the data off the servers and voting machines? It feels like that’s important news.

But don’t listen to me, I’m nuts.
Seems like Snopes and CNN aren't engaging in spreading the truth, but rather in spreading propaganda.

I keep going back to what the media told us about Mueller's probe into Russia-Trump collusion. The media and dems always told us 'If Trump did nothing wrong, then he shouldn't care if Mueller investigates him'.

And to his credit, Pres Trump never stopped the investigation, although he could have at any moment.

And when Mueller finished, he had to announce to the world that he found nothing.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, and the media and dems want no part of an investigation into whether or not the 2020 election was rigged.

Ask yourself why. Not talking to the sheep, for obvious reasons.
 
Seems like Snopes and CNN aren't engaging in spreading the truth, but rather in spreading propaganda.

I keep going back to what the media told us about Mueller's probe into Russia-Trump collusion. The media and dems always told us 'If Trump did nothing wrong, then he shouldn't care if Mueller investigates him'.

And to his credit, Pres Trump never stopped the investigation, although he could have at any moment.

And when Mueller finished, he had to announce to the world that he found nothing.

Now the shoe is on the other foot, and the media and dems want no part of an investigation into whether or not the 2020 election was rigged.

Ask yourself why. Not talking to the sheep, for obvious reasons.
"Want no part"!?

They spent crazy money (4 big time law firms and a non-profit, litigating for weeks) trying to stop the audit before it started, and now "Republican" county officials went to the state Senate to throw a temper tantrum claiming it's not in line with AZ law...and all the while the media is carrying their water.

How many times have we seen interviews on MSNBC and CNN where pundits argued that these audits are fueling distrust in our elections and are dangerous to democracy?

So a forensic audit that could prove absolutely nothing was wrong with the election is a threat?

Keep in mind the likelihood that these same media members/outlets were convinced Putin pulled Trump across the finish line against Hillary....and argued for years that foreign interference was enough to change the outcome of a Presidential election.

But don't listen to me, I'm nuts.
 
"Want no part"!?

They spent crazy money (4 big time law firms and a non-profit, litigating for weeks) trying to stop the audit before it started, and now "Republican" county officials went to the state Senate to throw a temper tantrum claiming it's not in line with AZ law...and all the while the media is carrying their water.

How many times have we seen interviews on MSNBC and CNN where pundits argued that these audits are fueling distrust in our elections and are dangerous to democracy?

So a forensic audit that could prove absolutely nothing was wrong with the election is a threat?

Keep in mind the likelihood that these same media members/outlets were convinced Putin pulled Trump across the finish line against Hillary....and argued for years that foreign interference was enough to change the outcome of a Presidential election.

But don't listen to me, I'm nuts.
Yep. You don't really think they are going to find fraud, do you? I know you source The Gateway Pundit conspiracy site, but you aren't that dumb, are you?

Lololol
 
Anyone that truly believes that there was no fraud in the 2020 elections is not nutts, they just don't have any nutts, nor any brains, nor any integrity nor honor imo.
BS-C911 is the prime example of this....

Election Fraud actually endangers our Constitutional Republic.
America is not a democracy, and it never has been, nor was it ever intended to be.

Mob rule, such as lynch mobs, are what a pure democracy looks like up close.
The Founding Fathers specifically Did Not want a democracy because it fails to protect the minority from an overbearing majority.

The American Indian 'Trail of Tears' was run by the Rats.
Every slave in America was owned by a Dim-moe-RAT at the start of the Civil War.
Lincoln was a Republican, not a Rat version of a 'privileged white man.'
Portuguese sailors bought black Africans from their own people that had enslaved them.
Then they brought them to American and the Rats bought them and used them.
Conservative White Christians ended slavery in the UK and in the US.
Slavery still exists in black Africa, in the Middle East and in Asia, areas that are not controlled by those terrible privileged white conservatives....

Reparations? Every Confederate state had black slave owners, both white and black Rats.

The KKK was the political THUG arm of the Rats, and it mostly still is.
The misnamed ANTIFA is a Socialist Soros funded Rat modern addition to the KKK.
Stop being totally ignorant,,, read 'The Big Lie' by Dinesh D'Souza
BLM is a communist based Racist organization that Socialist-U welcomes on campus.

Black Lives Matter has terrorist and communist inspirations, but liberal (fake news) media doesn’t care. (and apparently, neither does Socialist-U)

 
Anyone that truly believes that there was no fraud in the 2020 elections is not nutts, they just don't have any nutts, nor any brains, nor any integrity nor honor imo.
BS-C911 is the prime example of this....

Election Fraud actually endangers our Constitutional Republic.
America is not a democracy, and it never has been, nor was it ever intended to be.

Mob rule, such as lynch mobs, are what a pure democracy looks like up close.
The Founding Fathers specifically Did Not want a democracy because it fails to protect the minority from an overbearing majority.

The American Indian 'Trail of Tears' was run by the Rats.
Every slave in America was owned by a Dim-moe-RAT at the start of the Civil War.
Lincoln was a Republican, not a Rat version of a 'privileged white man.'
Portuguese sailors bought black Africans from their own people that had enslaved them.
Then they brought them to American and the Rats bought them and used them.
Conservative White Christians ended slavery in the UK and in the US.
Slavery still exists in black Africa, in the Middle East and in Asia, areas that are not controlled by those terrible privileged white conservatives....

Reparations? Every Confederate state had black slave owners, both white and black Rats.

The KKK was the political THUG arm of the Rats, and it mostly still is.
The misnamed ANTIFA is a Socialist Soros funded Rat modern addition to the KKK.
Stop being totally ignorant,,, read 'The Big Lie' by Dinesh D'Souza
BLM is a communist based Racist organization that Socialist-U welcomes on campus.

Black Lives Matter has terrorist and communist inspirations, but liberal (fake news) media doesn’t care. (and apparently, neither does Socialist-U)

Preach.

BLM has also recently come out publicly supporting Palestine in the latest conflict.

And there were slaves in North America before it was ever "discovered".
 
So I'm confused....if The Gateway Pundit is often wrong, wouldn't that be more reason to let them run with their investigation of fraud?

Funny how when push comes to shove, the dems want NO part of ANY investigation into whether or not they rigged the election.

Tells you that they know they did. This isn't that hard.
 
Just curious what makes Gateway Pundit any better than CNN? We know CNN embellished the facts. Is it possible GP is doing so here? Are you embellishing the facts by endorsing this story?
 
Snopes was outed as a leftist organization, run by ultra libs, many years ago. Believe anything they say at your own peril, same with CNN ...

giphy.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NavigatorII
Just curious what makes Gateway Pundit any better than CNN? We know CNN embellished the facts. Is it possible GP is doing so here? Are you embellishing the facts by endorsing this story?
You have to watch GP. They put opinion in most
of what they do, and rarely try to hide it…

However, they also post videos and legal documents in many of their “stories” (it’s really not traditional journalism, it’s sort of like super long form Twitter).

So if you have a brain and can think for yourself, GP is actually a decent place to find some interesting videos and facts. I see posts from them I disagree with and think is total BS. But I get to make that decision and feel like it’s more bad than good.

And it’s obviously biased, just like most media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
I would guess there was fraud, I would also guess it will never be proven. Move on and get a better message.
 
Anyone that truly believes that there was no fraud in the 2020 elections is not nutts, they just don't have any nutts, nor any brains, nor any integrity nor honor imo.
BS-C911 is the prime example of this....

Election Fraud actually endangers our Constitutional Republic.
America is not a democracy, and it never has been, nor was it ever intended to be.

Mob rule, such as lynch mobs, are what a pure democracy looks like up close.
The Founding Fathers specifically Did Not want a democracy because it fails to protect the minority from an overbearing majority.

The American Indian 'Trail of Tears' was run by the Rats.
Every slave in America was owned by a Dim-moe-RAT at the start of the Civil War.
Lincoln was a Republican, not a Rat version of a 'privileged white man.'
Portuguese sailors bought black Africans from their own people that had enslaved them.
Then they brought them to American and the Rats bought them and used them.
Conservative White Christians ended slavery in the UK and in the US.
Slavery still exists in black Africa, in the Middle East and in Asia, areas that are not controlled by those terrible privileged white conservatives....

Reparations? Every Confederate state had black slave owners, both white and black Rats.

The KKK was the political THUG arm of the Rats, and it mostly still is.
The misnamed ANTIFA is a Socialist Soros funded Rat modern addition to the KKK.
Stop being totally ignorant,,, read 'The Big Lie' by Dinesh D'Souza
BLM is a communist based Racist organization that Socialist-U welcomes on campus.

Black Lives Matter has terrorist and communist inspirations, but liberal (fake news) media doesn’t care. (and apparently, neither does Socialist-U)

I don’t believe in Aliens either. But if you were actually able to prove it by evidence, rather than supposition, then I might change my mind. I’m nothing but open minded.

But like many conspiracy theories, there is NOTHING that could ever convince you nut jobs that there wasn’t fraud, since it’s difficult to prove a negative. But the burden of proof is in your hands, so get to it.
 
You have to watch GP. They put opinion in most
of what they do, and rarely try to hide it…

However, they also post videos and legal documents in many of their “stories” (it’s really not traditional journalism, it’s sort of like super long form Twitter).

So if you have a brain and can think for yourself, GP is actually a decent place to find some interesting videos and facts. I see posts from them I disagree with and think is total BS. But I get to make that decision and feel like it’s more bad than good.

And it’s obviously biased, just like most media.
That’s fair. As long as you‘re not presenting GP as the “truth“ and completely dismiss all left wing media.
 
Just curious what makes Gateway Pundit any better than CNN? We know CNN embellished the facts. Is it possible GP is doing so here? Are you embellishing the facts by endorsing this story?
Actually we know CNN has lied about stories.

Repeatedly.

TGP is a homer site, but we don't have a long history of them lying about stories, as we do with CNN.

When TGP starts routinely lying about stories as CNN has, then your post will have merit.

Till then, we have to ask....why do you keep watching CNN if they keep lying to you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunburnt Indian
I would guess there was fraud, I would also guess it will never be proven. Move on and get a better message.
Again, why are dems so desperate for everyone to 'move on' from this story?

If the dems really didn't rig the election, then they should be pushing this story far more than the American patriots are.

This is the dems' grand chance, once and for all, to prove that they are honest, don't cheat AND that Trump supporters are idiots and possibly a danger to this country.

This is the dems' chance to validate EVERYTHING they have said about both themselves, and Trump supporters. And to make Trump and his supporters COMPLETELY irrelevant at worst.

And yet...we need to move on.

Sounds like the cheaters WANT us to move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
Snopes was outed as a leftist organization, run by ultra libs, many years ago. Believe anything they say at your own peril, same with CNN ...
Here's the bias on this board. What the hell is a gatewaypundit site? Never heard of it. Yet when it benefits the right, nobody questions the site but if I post from the salon then people question the site including you. I expect better from you FresnoGator 😉.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: FresnoGator
Is this according to snopes?
No idea who snopes is but I saw this on my local news.


Then i saw this recently.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mdfgator
Wait...are the socks now attacking the mod? LMAO!

The hallmark of fascism: Attempt to silence anyone sharing information you don't want to hear.

Maybe you guys need to move on...
 
  • Like
Reactions: FresnoGator
Hey, stay out of this. You’re supposed to remain independent.
My opinion based on independent research. Too many people are conditioned to believe that Snopes is a non-partisan independent fact checker. That is pure folly. If some sites on the right did the same, I'd call them out on it as well.

And as I see it, I'm supposed to not play favorites and treat everyone fairly, as a mod. You are welcome to call me out if and when I cross that line ...
 
Last edited:
Here's the bias on this board. What the hell is a gatewaypundit site? Never heard of it. Yet when it benefits the right, nobody questions the site but if I post from the salon then people question the site including you. I expect better from you FresnoGator 😉.
I don't know anything about gatewaypundit. If they establish the same type of track record as Salon or Vox or Mother Jones, I will call them on it as well.

When I read yahoo sports and come across Shalice Manza Young or something like that, I know they disable the comments section because she comes across as insane. Some sources have a long history of incredibility ...
 
Last edited:
Again, why are dems so desperate for everyone to 'move on' from this story?

If the dems really didn't rig the election, then they should be pushing this story far more than the American patriots are.

This is the dems' grand chance, once and for all, to prove that they are honest, don't cheat AND that Trump supporters are idiots and possibly a danger to this country.

This is the dems' chance to validate EVERYTHING they have said about both themselves, and Trump supporters. And to make Trump and his supporters COMPLETELY irrelevant at worst.

And yet...we need to move on.

Sounds like the cheaters WANT us to move on.
A glorious chance for the Dimms to make complete fools of we the nut cases. Forensic audits. But the Dimms adamantly refuse. Let me guess why.
 
I don't know anything about gatewaypundit. If they establish the same type of track record as Salon or Vox or Mother Jones, I will call them on it as well ...
I don't know either way but it's clear that only certain sites is being "verified". Haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: FresnoGator
Did we notice that two posters, who both claim to be independents, are the only ones that had a problem with a mod stating what is widely known about Snopes?

It is indeed run by two liberals. The site has a long track record of being wrong in their 'fact checks', as well as outright lying in their claims.

Not open to debate. A true independent voter knows Snopes is propaganda for the left, and dismisses it as such.
 
Verified sites are verified by whom? I will continue to read and draw my own conclusions ...
By the people on this board. People are always criticizing the links because they don't like the story. Somebody just criticized my link for politico, because the gatewaypundit is better 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSC911
No idea who snopes is but I saw this on my local news.


Then i saw this recently.

So you found two stories and that means "mostly" to you? No bias there.

Let me know what party benefitted from these fraud cases. Therein lies the issue with coming to conclusions from anecdotes.

 
By the people on this board. People are always criticizing the links because they don't like the story. Somebody just criticized my link for politico, because the gatewaypundit is better 🙄
Well, that is their opinion. If you disagree, use your powers of persuasion to change their mind ...
 
Politico has a proven track record of lying. CNN has a proven track record of lying. The NYT has a proven track record of lying. WaPo has a proven track record of lying.

So as an honest thinker, I don't listen to anything they say. Even if they say something I want to hear, I assume it COULD be a lie, because they have a history of being caught lying.

Jim Hoff is a homer. Sean Hannity is a homer. Both have proven track records of being homers.

Neither has been caught lying as CNN, Politico, WaPo and the NYT have.

I ignore the commentary from Hoff and Hannity because I know they are homers. If they post some interesting facts, I check into them.

Sheep believe what they want, and discredit anyone that publishes facts they don't want to hear.

Then they come here and claim others are doing the very thing they are.

This is why these posters can leave the board for weeks, and no one notices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
So you found two stories and that means "mostly" to you? No bias there.

Let me know what party benefitted from these fraud cases. Therein lies the issue with coming to conclusions from anecdotes.

I don't try to be fair to Trump. Not a fan

The Heritage foundation is a known group that finds republicans, funds republicans and provides them with policies. This could be completely accurate data but I have no doubt that some info is omitted that would show the Rs in a negative light. They also provided names of conservative judges to nominate. Safe to say where they stand. The same can be said for ACTBlue with the Left. Reading those sites, you have to know you're getting one side of the story.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT