Recap of where things stand

[jfegaly]

I believe the voting was real and sufficiently accurate to name Biden President.

From Politico:
Turnout in Milwaukee County was 80 percent in 2016. Turnout in Milwaukee County this year was 84 percent. That’s a very modest increase, especially relative to the rest of Wisconsin, where some rural red counties saw turnout boom as much as 15 percent. This is the inherent flaw with the GOP’s charge of mass voter fraud. Participation rates spiked more in Republican areas than in Democratic ones; Trump won more votes in cities like Milwaukee and Detroit than he did four years ago. There is no pattern in the data to suggest anything except a high-intensity, high-turnout election all the way around, and in many cases, particularly down-ballot, Republicans were the beneficiary.

...

Because the Department of Justice has not (yet) inserted itself into any of the fracases that have sprung up in various states, the burden falls on Trump’s campaign to substantiate their allegations of wrongdoing. That’s a heavy lift — one made heavier by the fact that, despite this being the most scrutinized election in memory, there is thus far zero evidence of any scalable fraud. This should be considered a triumph for Trump’s campaign: Over the past few months, I’ve had numerous local GOP officials boast about their poll-watching program, describing its sophistication, exuding confidence that they would have eyes and ears in every room as votes were being counted. “The Trump campaign is on it like white on rice. They’re watching everything,” Matt Albert, chair of the Outagamie County GOP in Wisconsin, told me last month. If anyone tried to cheat, Albert emphasized, they wouldn’t stand a chance.

This is what's cute about all of you. The narrative changes almost daily, and you pivot with it and accept anything you read as gospel truth as long as it fits your world view. Literally, tweets like "A poll worker told me there were uncounted Trump ballots in a box." Is to all of you, proof of massive nationwide fraud. But it's really not.

You all need to stop being so damn credulous. You have brains, try using them. Critical thinking can be your friend.

speaking of critical thinking, you know the saying....when you point the finger at someone u got 3 pointing right back at ya

Pollster: It's Curious How Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton In Every City...Except These Four. - Geller Report

Curious? Or impossible?

gellerreport.com

 

[nail1988]

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

View embedded media

According to the WaPost wannabe Waco Tribune-Herald Trump is exactly right. The Pub Sec of State says a hand recount will show little change. The GA Dem Gov says CROOKED.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

Not only that but what ever other rules that are used to validate ballots like post marks and address verification.

This process can only decrease votes. And it will mostly reduce Bidens numbers because that is where his "win" came from. And primaries in some states showed a 10% failure rate by stupid dembot voters.

Remove 10% of mail-ins and Trump wins every contested state.

 

[BamaFan1137]

I believe the voting was real and sufficiently accurate to name Biden President.

From Politico:
Turnout in Milwaukee County was 80 percent in 2016. Turnout in Milwaukee County this year was 84 percent. That’s a very modest increase, especially relative to the rest of Wisconsin, where some rural red counties saw turnout boom as much as 15 percent. This is the inherent flaw with the GOP’s charge of mass voter fraud. Participation rates spiked more in Republican areas than in Democratic ones; Trump won more votes in cities like Milwaukee and Detroit than he did four years ago. There is no pattern in the data to suggest anything except a high-intensity, high-turnout election all the way around, and in many cases, particularly down-ballot, Republicans were the beneficiary.

...

Because the Department of Justice has not (yet) inserted itself into any of the fracases that have sprung up in various states, the burden falls on Trump’s campaign to substantiate their allegations of wrongdoing. That’s a heavy lift — one made heavier by the fact that, despite this being the most scrutinized election in memory, there is thus far zero evidence of any scalable fraud. This should be considered a triumph for Trump’s campaign: Over the past few months, I’ve had numerous local GOP officials boast about their poll-watching program, describing its sophistication, exuding confidence that they would have eyes and ears in every room as votes were being counted. “The Trump campaign is on it like white on rice. They’re watching everything,” Matt Albert, chair of the Outagamie County GOP in Wisconsin, told me last month. If anyone tried to cheat, Albert emphasized, they wouldn’t stand a chance.

This is what's cute about all of you. The narrative changes almost daily, and you pivot with it and accept anything you read as gospel truth as long as it fits your world view. Literally, tweets like "A poll worker told me there were uncounted Trump ballots in a box." Is to all of you, proof of massive nationwide fraud. But it's really not.

You all need to stop being so damn credulous. You have brains, try using them. Critical thinking can be your friend.

You freaking suck at answering direct questions. Try again.

So you believe Biden outperformed Obama because Biden inspired more confidence than Obama? People, Democrats specifically, felt more kinship to Biden than Obama?

Answer that question and that question only....if you can. If you can't then I think we agree, whether you will admit it or not.

 

[BamaFan1137]

This is what's cute about all of you. The narrative changes almost daily, and you pivot with it and accept anything you read as gospel truth as long as it fits your world view. Literally, tweets like "A poll worker told me there were uncounted Trump ballots in a box." Is to all of you, proof of massive nationwide fraud. But it's really not.

BTW, I will kiss your ass in the middle of any street you choose while wearing Biden-Harris gear if you can show me where I have done what you described above.

We've had this discussion numerous times but YOU keep charging at retarded windmills. Put down the large paint brush you freaking clown.

 

[gator1776]

According to the WaPost wannabe Waco Tribune-Herald Trump is exactly right. The Pub Sec of State says a hand recount will show little change. The GA Dem Gov says CROOKED.

Wait, how can you know before you do a recount that the hand recount won’t make any difference?

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

Wait, how can you know before you do a recount that the hand recount won’t make any difference?

Because recounts historically never produce a significant difference in the count.

 

[gator1776]

Because recounts historically never produce a significant difference in the count.

So you just don’t do the recount? Just because it hasn’t made a difference in the past we just don’t do one? Is this bizarro world?

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

So you just don’t do the recount? Just because it hasn’t made a difference in the past we just don’t do one? Is this bizarro world?

They are doing a recount.

 

[gator1776]

They are doing a recount.

Yeah but they’re not doing it according to the law. I think any real recounts gonna have to take into consideration the dominion software. Provided they find proof of what they are alleging.