Proprietary COVID-19 and Vaccine thread
- Thread starter FresnoGator
- Start date
Why are you so angry all the time lol? It’s just a chat board. Lighten up…
I just recently took you off of ignore. I already told you that. I don’t care if you fake ignore or not that’s your choice. You do you.
If there is a topic you’d like to discuss relative to COVID/Vaccine, go for it.
Maybe you can teach the board how you interpret emotion of text. Quite the skill, for a “scientist”. You know, someone who relies on “facts” rather than ASSumption.
Just sayin, you have beaten the horse past death. Seems like maybe you and Numero Cincuenta could continue your echo chamber via PM?
Makes perfect sense. I commented that you have beaten the topic to death. What I didn’t mention? My stance on propaganda, yet somehow you drew a conclusion on my stance on propaganda from me saying good grief your stuck on this topic.
So yes, you must need some help comprehending what you read.
🦩
Consolidating for brevity sake.
Just so ya know, I will continue to talk about whatever I see fit. My comments aren't directed at you, feel free to skip over. If you think it's beating a dead horse, great. I don't care.
Now, with a modicum of maturity, is there anything else you'd like to discuss? Pick a worthy topic. I'd actually enjoy a decent conversation if you can muster it without getting all angry.
We are discussing the topic I want to discuss. The topic: the psychology behind your need to beat this horse to death, 🦩, and your ability to read emotion from text. Where does one obtain that skill? Is there science behind it?
Now now, I said you had to have a modicum of maturity and you already screwed that up. Try again, or I will pick for you.
Isn’t the leadership of UC health just as crazy and evil?
Denying a kidney over vax status is evil, crazy and senseless.
Novavax is a standard vaccine.
I fear they will never let it see the light of day. And if one person gets a hangnail from it they’ll pull it due to “safety concerns”.
Evil? Maybe so depending on the circumstances, and they should never just let anyone die.
Crazy.. shooting your brother and his wife is a bit crazier to me.
No way. He’s waaaay to busy saving lives in hospitals in 10 states.
Both cause death. Both are senseless. I guess you could argue one is lack of action and the other is a violent act, but the result is the same.
All Hail Catturd!
Again????? And they can't understand why no one trusts what they post here.
Smdh. 🦩
Last I recall. I have yet to get upset enough to run to mod.
🦩gonna🦩 I suppose.
It seems to be about as effective as the other shots on the market, without most of the danger signs
I want to learn more, but that's the first shot I've heard of that seems like it might have promise.
And you're right. that likely means it will never be made available. Sheep will never question.
Ok back on topic: @SORT14 and @gator1776
For the two that put all their FAITH in men and science. Let’s discuss the science behind determining emotional state based on text.
Things to consider: has one ever run to a mod because they are triggered? Put anyone on ignore? Called someone a “piece of shit”?
Good news. I can answer no to all three.
Counting on @SORT14 because he said he would discuss anything I would like to discuss .
Ready……Go!
For the two that put all their FAITH in men and science. Let’s discuss the science behind determining emotional state based on text.
Things to consider: has one ever run to a mod because they are triggered? Put anyone on ignore? Called someone a “piece of shit”?
Good news. I can answer no to all three.
Counting on @SORT14 because he said he would discuss anything I would like to discuss .
Ready……Go!
Last edited:
Apparently. Yes, they both wonder why they have no credibility.
This one is easy. I don’t put all my faith in men of science. I use science as a method of thought and reasoning. I’ve never asked a mod to ban or punish anyone. I’ve only ignored two (you included) who ignored me first. I’ve never called anyone a POS on here (at least not that I recall, but if I did, I don't do it often).
I've also been decent and measured with you well beyond what I should be. You don't trigger me at all. You just seem triggered all the time. I rarely pay attention to you unless you tag me or reply to one of my posts.
So, why are you even on this thread? You want to talk smack and attack users, but you don't show any interest in discussing COVID/vaccines at an adult level at all.
Go ahead and deflect (again) and make some juvenile personal attack (again)...
Alright. Lets stick to the facts.
I didn’t ask if you asked a mod to ban or punish. Just if you complained to one?
Second, I have NEVER ignored anyone, including you. So you’re sentence about ignoring only two users who ignored you first is patently false.
Third, decent and measured ehh? You literally have been nothing more than a cheerleader for every single post numero cincuenta makes. Many of which, I would have to conclude you didn’t read, Afterall, if you were being measured and decent, how would you like some if them? You do realize what it means to like a comment, don’t you?
Lastly, I will leave you with this…heres your more recent “measured and decent” responses
“There's definitely a lack of self-awareness going on there.“
Yes, let's stick to the facts. I asked a mod about forum etiquette and used your juvenile behavior as an example. That mod told me that the open forums don't have the same level of restrictions as the paid forums. I was perfectly ok with that because I wanted to understand what is allowable and what wasn't. I got my answer and I was good with it.
I thought you ignored me along with @GhostOfMatchesMalone so I ignored you because it doesn't make sense to me to be tagging and trying to converse a one sided conversations. If you didn't ignore me, then I was mistaken. But I haven't done any 'fake ignore' stuff you keep talking about.
I don't care if you have issues with @gator1776 - that is between you and him. And if I agree with a post, then I will like it. Get over it. You like every post ghost puts out and are just as much a cheerleader for him as anyone can be. Don't be such a hypocrite.
Yes, that is decent and measure compared to the things you've said. Get off your high horse. And I am under no obligation to be decent. I have just chosen to so far.
Now, care to discuss COVID/vaccines instead of constantly trying to make everything personal (about people you don't even know)? Or are you just running from the adult side of the conversation?
A laugh emoji = you’re not ready to be an adult
Last edited:
So….yes to two of the three indicators of getting triggered/being angry.
Glad we got that settled.
Now, back to the discussion. Please explain your scientific methodology for determining “angry” text.
Thanks in advance
What do you do for a living Jeff? Just in general. You don’t need to be specific.
Retired. I come to this board and have fun. Why do you keep calling me names? Jeff?
There’s another poster on here who likes to know what people do for a living. This is getting interesting
Would like to know why this is important to you? The other guy likes to ask this right before….well I am a doctor don’t question me.
My last career was business owner. But I was multiple over the course of career. Will wait to see where you’re going before we consummate our relationship.
And seriously….for someone telling others to “lighten up,
it’s a message board”, it might be a good idea to not get offended enough to run to mods or ignore folks. You know how I ignore? I read it and move to next post. Mentally strong enough to read it all and laugh. Its a message board
Lol, no that’s fine. I am a veteran and ex cop.
The reason I’m on this thread is because two of my cop friends died from COVID. I research the psychology of misinformation.
Last edited:
Veteran as well. Post military I spent 22 years in message board bullshit detection, message board bravado evidentiary discovery, and the countries most renowned expert of message board self glorification detection. The last few years I have spent running our business until I retired, and now I am a message board consultant that helps moderators discover sock accounts, determine policy and root out trolls.
I am doing my job at the highest of levels.
A consulting area I never considered… Bravado and self-glorification are overlapping concepts. Which operational definition of bullshit? I subscribe to a particular definition.
Yes, they are overlapping concepts but in my field it’s required to cover a broader scope. One is for evidence discovery and analysis of bravado, the other is just detection of self glorification. Maybe one day they will combine the fields. As for the particular operational definition of bullshit, Again….I have to be able to cover all at my level. You don’t become the country’s renowned expert by limiting the bullshit scope.
My bullshit detectors have been on overload on this board.
🦩
Last edited:
Andrew Wiggins response:
"It's none of your business"
"It's my problem, not yours "
1:20 mark
Similar threads
