Ping Lil Dicky
- Thread starter NavigatorII
- Start date
The USA Today article in the OP is a misdirection play to minimize what really happened leading up to the election. I suggest you read the actual text thread that Matt Taino (sp?) generated late last week…. Its eye opening.
Kind of hard to argue with libs about dic pics...they actauuly KNOW this subject very well. I will take a back seat here
The point is that the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story wasn't about suppressing his ding-dong pics, obviously.
The question is, do you actually believe everything Fox and far right media tells you? That's the biggest issue in the US in regards to information. If the right tell you something and you believe it. The left says something and you automatically dismiss it.
Perfect example; you think Russia is hoax. The Republican led Senate said that Russia did interfere to help Trump win. The Mueller Report conclude the same BUT because the right and Trump called it a hoax or a lie, you just agreed. I bet you never read the reports yourself, you just took the right wing media analysis and made it facts. The Senate concluded no collusion but they also concluded Russia fed Trump campaign information to help him win with Russia officers. See below;
"It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary."
"But the report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identified as a “Russian intelligence officer.”"
That article was. You guys are mixing things up. This particular instance was about a dick pic.
We have the dumbest trolls on the internet.
He said that BOTH campaigns reached out to Twitter to get things taken for violation of Twitter rules, which Twitter agreed. They never really discussed what Trump campaign asked to be removed, they just discussed what Biden campaign asked to be removed which was dick picks of Hunter.
Your OPINION means ZERO to me. Trump was cleared 100% AND the FBI lied on the FISA, and used evidence from the F'ing CLINTON campaign, son. Do you know this? It is NOT FNC...EVERYONE knows this. Do you? Tell me you are not this oblivious?? The RUSSIA hoax was a SET UP...by the FBI and Clinton campaign. The WORLD knows this. EVERY news outlet knows this...even though your commie channels refuse to report it. This is not a guess...it is FACTS. PLEASE tell me you are just trolling?
The suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story was not about suppressing pictures of his ding-a-ling.
I cannot be any clearer than this. You want to focus on one specific article? Fine...and unsurprising. However...
NOT AGAINST THE LAW. You wrote 3 paragraphs of NOTHING Russia WAS orchestrated by the Clinton campaign . It was MADE UP...and helped along by the FBI. End of story. A political campaign SPIED on the other campaign, using OUR FBI. THAT is the facts. The dossier was a LIE...and the FBI knew it BEFORE they obtained many FISA warrants. That is CRIMINAL.
Gaslighting. And he will blame whomever mentioned the article...while continuing to focus on it...despite @ghost_of_ukalum1988 's clarification.
They still believe Russia russia russia was REAL!! LOLOL MY GOD....please help these poor people think!
We truly post in the Outer Limits here. Don't adjust the vertical, don't adjust the horizontal. 😂
Like I said. You guys think it's a lie because Trump said so. Evidence says otherwise
Dude..... The overarching issue in this whole sorry saga is the authenticity of Hunter's laptop. The FBI was already aware of the existence of Hunter's laptop, and proactively "pre-debunked" its authenticity to Twitter and Facebook in the weekly meetings with those two social media companies.
The false narrative of "Russian disinformation" regarding Hunter's laptop was sown by the 50+ members of the National Security / Intelligence community that were virulently anti-Trump. Of course the authenticity of the laptop has since been verified.
Attempts by the New York Post to publicize the existence of the laptops were subsequently quashed by Twitter and Facebook - and not because of concerns about pornography. They, in concert with the FBI / DOJ / national security / intelligence communities didn't want the public to know about the contents of the laptop: Hunter's shady business dealing which included the "Big Guy", etc.
In Matt Taibbi's thread, Trump WH Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany simply tweeted about the NYP story and Hunter's laptop and got the ban hammer. Do you think this was because Twitter was so concerned about people seeing pics of Hunter's junk? Is that the explanation you're going to stick with?
I don't give a hoot in hell what Trump said about this..... You can read Twitter's internal emails and find the truth for yourself.
Pedo Peter? 10% for the Big Guy? Sis, I won't make you kick up trib like pop's does me?
Nah............. 😂
WTH are you talking about? I haven't heard a word about ding-dong pic suppression from Trump. I'm sure he is laughing at this new narrative but I haven't heard it.
I don't want him to be POTUS. How many times must I say this before it sinks in for you? So go ahead and dismiss what I say because you're too stubborn to ever actually hear what someone else is saying.
It's ridiculous. But to answer your question, yes...kalim is willing to swallow any amount of BS for the
Apparently that was the attempted spin from the left. @kalimgoodman is just parroting the talking points he is fed, as always.
Of course that narrative blew up yesterday when we learned that Twitter general council (and formerly same role for the FBI) James Baker was so worried about 'nothing burger' Twitter Files that he EDITED THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE MUSK GOT THEM.
What was he trying to hide? @kalimgoodman has no idea, cause his lefty sites are telling him this is all about someone wanting to see Hunter's wee wee.
Do you even know if he has said anything? I honestly do not know.
Operation Mockingbird cc @BillCutting4585
Freaking sheep...trying to lecture us about parroting others? LOL
Same stuff most of us are saying, it's outrageous, confirms what we suspected, etc. He did say something about we need a new election and extraordinary cheating calls for extraordinary solutions, and the media spun that he was saying that the Constitution should be thrown out the door.
Which led to this interesting tweet from Elon:
The left went all in on this tweet cause they saw it as a dig against Trump.
Elon was clarifying that the Constitution is more important than the OFFICE of President.
Sounds like foreshadowing to me.
Pedo Peter? 10% for the Big Guy? Sis, I won't make you kick up trib like pop's does me?
Nah............. 😂
"Pedo Peter" ? WTF are you talking about?
"10% for the big guy"? isn't from the laptop investigation
Get the popcorn- James Baker ex FBI general counsel and general counsel for Twitter got fired for vetting the release of the twitter emails..
HTF did you think those emails got discovered?????
In an email to Hunter, Jim and other partners on May 13, 2017, Gilliar outlined an equity breakdown in which 10% of the lucrative CEFC joint venture would be held by Hunter “for the big guy.”
That email, which was previously revealed by The Post, was found on the laptop Hunter abandoned at a Delaware repair shop in April 2019.
Here let me help the mentally challenged since the DOJ investigation of Hunter Biden actually started under Obama's DOJ and for 2 years nothing has criminally implicated Joe Biden
So by using the navigator "must be innocent then and its a witch hunt" rule then this laptop investigation is completely a political hoax ... 😎
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/us/politics/hunter-biden-tax-bill-investigation.html
Hunter Biden Paid Tax Bill, but Broad Federal Investigation Continues
The Justice Department inquiry into the business dealings of the president’s son has remained active, with a grand jury seeking information about payments from around the world.
So by using the navigator "must be innocent then and its a witch hunt" rule then this laptop investigation is completely a political hoax ... 😎
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/us/politics/hunter-biden-tax-bill-investigation.html
Hunter Biden Paid Tax Bill, but Broad Federal Investigation Continues
The Justice Department inquiry into the business dealings of the president’s son has remained active, with a grand jury seeking information about payments from around the world.
IF Elon has access to what Baker tried to delete from the first batch of Twitter Files, then I suspect he will release it in the NEXT batch. I suspect that's what he's digging for right now.
If he does that, don't be shocked if Trump is arrested immediately. The media will need a distraction.
Some trivia for dullards.
John Paul Mac Isaac, the owner of the Wilmington repair shop, has said he received the 13-inch MacBook Pro on April 12, 2019, when Hunter Biden asked him to recover data from the computer because it had been damaged by liquid.
Both Green and Williams agreed on the authenticity of the emails that carried cryptographic signatures, though there was variation in which emails Green and Williams were able to verify using their forensic tools. The most reliable cryptographic signatures, they said, came from leading technology companies such as Google, which alone accounted for more than 16,000 of the verified emails.
Green and Williams said the only realistic way to fake Google’s DKIM signatures would be to hack the company’s own secure servers and steal private cryptographic keys — something they considered unlikely even for nation-state-level hackers using the most advanced techniques.
This has ZERO to do with the IRS investigation, and came later in 2020. Additionally the .GOV is hiding 150 SARS transactions from view. 😂
GOP: Treasury ‘runs cover’ for Hunter Biden as it withholds banking docs
The US Treasury Department has formally rejected a Republican lawmaker’s bid to examine “suspicious activity reports” on first son Hunter Biden.
nypost.com
Some more trivia for malone... 🤣
I’ve reported on the WaPo story on the security review of the disk drive commonly referred to as the “Hunter Biden” “laptop” a bunch of times.
But in advance of ripping apart this James Comer fan-fiction about Hunter Biden and before the Twitter thread I did disappears into the Elmo dumpster fire, I wanted to repeat it here. The WaPo asked security experts Matt Green (who worked with his Johns Hopkins students) and Jake Williams to review the drive to see what they could authenticate.
They discovered that people had kept adding content to the “laptop,” making it impossible to say what was on the “laptop” when it was provided to the blind computer repairman.
Still more important: some of the forensic data that would be necessary to authenticate the drive itself had been deleted.
Williams was able to authenticate fewer than 10% of the files on the drive, though that included some emails involving CEFC China Energy.
The “Big Guy” email could not be authenticated.
There were authenticated emails from Burisma, but if Burisma was hacked (as a security company, Area 1 Security, said it was before the laptop was disclosed), hackers could have faked cryptographic signatures, including on those from Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi that have been the focus of a lot of attention.
Note, as I understand the timing, these emails could have been altered only if the laptop reaccessed the Burisma server after the hack.
In any case, the “laptop” is a completely unreliable shitshow precisely because Rudy Giuliani and Steve Bannon were in such a rush to make it a political scandal.
And yet the new Republican majority in Congress is sure it is “real.
WHAT THAT REPORT PURPORTEDLY AUTHENTICATING THE “HUNTER BIDEN” “LAPTOP” REALLY SAID
November 18, 2022/52 Comments/in 2016 Presidential Election, 2022 Mid-Term Election /by emptywheelI’ve reported on the WaPo story on the security review of the disk drive commonly referred to as the “Hunter Biden” “laptop” a bunch of times.
But in advance of ripping apart this James Comer fan-fiction about Hunter Biden and before the Twitter thread I did disappears into the Elmo dumpster fire, I wanted to repeat it here. The WaPo asked security experts Matt Green (who worked with his Johns Hopkins students) and Jake Williams to review the drive to see what they could authenticate.
They discovered that people had kept adding content to the “laptop,” making it impossible to say what was on the “laptop” when it was provided to the blind computer repairman.
Still more important: some of the forensic data that would be necessary to authenticate the drive itself had been deleted.
Williams was able to authenticate fewer than 10% of the files on the drive, though that included some emails involving CEFC China Energy.
The “Big Guy” email could not be authenticated.
There were authenticated emails from Burisma, but if Burisma was hacked (as a security company, Area 1 Security, said it was before the laptop was disclosed), hackers could have faked cryptographic signatures, including on those from Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi that have been the focus of a lot of attention.
Note, as I understand the timing, these emails could have been altered only if the laptop reaccessed the Burisma server after the hack.
In any case, the “laptop” is a completely unreliable shitshow precisely because Rudy Giuliani and Steve Bannon were in such a rush to make it a political scandal.
And yet the new Republican majority in Congress is sure it is “real.
And on the issue of SARS...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/business/deutsche-bank-trump-kushner.html
Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts
By David Enrich
The transactions, some of which involved Mr. Trump’s now-defunct foundation, set off alerts in a computer system designed to detect illicit activity, according to five current and former bank employees. Compliance staff members who then reviewed the transactions prepared so-called suspicious activity reports that they believed should be sent to a unit of the Treasury Department that polices financial crimes.
But executives at Deutsche Bank, which has lent billions of dollars to the Trump and Kushner companies, rejected their employees’ advice. The reports were never filed with the government.
The nature of the transactions was not clear. At least some of them involved money flowing back and forth with overseas entities or individuals, which bank employees considered suspicious.
Real estate developers like Mr. Trump and Mr. Kushner sometimes do large, all-cash deals, including with people outside the United States, any of which can prompt anti-money laundering reviews. The red flags raised by employees do not necessarily mean the transactions were improper. Banks sometimes opt not to file suspicious activity reports if they conclude their employees’ concerns are unwarranted.
But former Deutsche Bank employees said the decision not to report the Trump and Kushner transactions reflected the bank’s generally lax approach to money laundering laws. The employees — most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to preserve their ability to work in the industry — said it was part of a pattern of the bank’s executives rejecting valid reports to protect relationships with lucrative clients.
“You present them with everything, and you give them a recommendation, and nothing happens,” said Tammy McFadden, a former Deutsche Bank anti-money laundering specialist who reviewed some of the transactions. “It’s the D.B. way. They are prone to discounting everything.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/business/deutsche-bank-trump-kushner.html
Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts
By David Enrich
- May 19, 2019
- 7 MIN READ
The transactions, some of which involved Mr. Trump’s now-defunct foundation, set off alerts in a computer system designed to detect illicit activity, according to five current and former bank employees. Compliance staff members who then reviewed the transactions prepared so-called suspicious activity reports that they believed should be sent to a unit of the Treasury Department that polices financial crimes.
But executives at Deutsche Bank, which has lent billions of dollars to the Trump and Kushner companies, rejected their employees’ advice. The reports were never filed with the government.
The nature of the transactions was not clear. At least some of them involved money flowing back and forth with overseas entities or individuals, which bank employees considered suspicious.
Real estate developers like Mr. Trump and Mr. Kushner sometimes do large, all-cash deals, including with people outside the United States, any of which can prompt anti-money laundering reviews. The red flags raised by employees do not necessarily mean the transactions were improper. Banks sometimes opt not to file suspicious activity reports if they conclude their employees’ concerns are unwarranted.
But former Deutsche Bank employees said the decision not to report the Trump and Kushner transactions reflected the bank’s generally lax approach to money laundering laws. The employees — most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to preserve their ability to work in the industry — said it was part of a pattern of the bank’s executives rejecting valid reports to protect relationships with lucrative clients.
“You present them with everything, and you give them a recommendation, and nothing happens,” said Tammy McFadden, a former Deutsche Bank anti-money laundering specialist who reviewed some of the transactions. “It’s the D.B. way. They are prone to discounting everything.”
