ADVERTISEMENT

no one is watching this charade EXCEPT: RayGravesGhost

They won't let anyone testify that doesn't fit the narrative.

Who from trumpworld has wanted to testify and hasn't been alllowed?



Don't for one second act like all of these witnesses that have testimony that will exonerate Trump are refusing to testify. In a Stalinist show trial you're watching a movie, it's scripted and the conclusion is written before it even starts. They just have to pull the right pieces together to make you think it was an honest and open trial.

Who are the witnesses that have exonerating testimony ?

Where are they? Why haven't they testifed?


When Pelosi wouldn't let McCarthy select people like Jim Jordan the goal of this "committee" was obvious.

Jim Jordan is a material witness of the investigation

Can't be judge or on the jury when you're involved



And deep down you know that, you're just too hyperpartisan to admit it.

When you start coming up with something worth debating we can actually have a debate

Right now you just posting nothingness


You're as empty headed as the two chicks in this video

 
Last edited:
The Washington Examiner isn't exactly a fount of liberalism. It's a conservative paper with a conservative editorial board. Which is what makes what that editorial board wrote about Donald Trump in the wake of Tuesday's House January 6 committee hearing all the more striking.

‘Hutchinson's testimony confirmed a damning portrayal of Trump as unstable, unmoored, and absolutely heedless of his sworn duty to effectuate a peaceful transition of presidential power. Considering the entirety of her testimony, it is unsurprising that Hutchinson said she heard serious discussions of Cabinet members invoking the 25th Amendment that would have at least temporarily evicted Trump from office.

Ouch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
The Washington Examiner isn't exactly a fount of liberalism. It's a conservative paper with a conservative editorial board. Which is what makes what that editorial board wrote about Donald Trump in the wake of Tuesday's House January 6 committee hearing all the more striking.

‘Hutchinson's testimony confirmed a damning portrayal of Trump as unstable, unmoored, and absolutely heedless of his sworn duty to effectuate a peaceful transition of presidential power. Considering the entirety of her testimony, it is unsurprising that Hutchinson said she heard serious discussions of Cabinet members invoking the 25th Amendment that would have at least temporarily evicted Trump from office.

Ouch.
What part of debunked, not credible testimony have you missed? 😂 😂
 
The Washington Examiner isn't exactly a fount of liberalism. It's a conservative paper with a conservative editorial board. Which is what makes what that editorial board wrote about Donald Trump in the wake of Tuesday's House January 6 committee hearing all the more striking.

‘Hutchinson's testimony confirmed a damning portrayal of Trump as unstable, unmoored, and absolutely heedless of his sworn duty to effectuate a peaceful transition of presidential power. Considering the entirety of her testimony, it is unsurprising that Hutchinson said she heard serious discussions of Cabinet members invoking the 25th Amendment that would have at least temporarily evicted Trump from office.

Ouch.
I don't give a tin shit, the testimony was third hand, which makes it inadmissible as hearsay, she lied about writing a note, which is perjury, and there are witnesses who can refute her testimony the presidential SUV driver and the ss detail. I expect this kind of horseshit from RayGravesGhost because he's a moron.

You do better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
The Washington Examiner isn't exactly a fount of liberalism. It's a conservative paper with a conservative editorial board. Which is what makes what that editorial board wrote about Donald Trump in the wake of Tuesday's House January 6 committee hearing all the more striking.

‘Hutchinson's testimony confirmed a damning portrayal of Trump as unstable, unmoored, and absolutely heedless of his sworn duty to effectuate a peaceful transition of presidential power. Considering the entirety of her testimony, it is unsurprising that Hutchinson said she heard serious discussions of Cabinet members invoking the 25th Amendment that would have at least temporarily evicted Trump from office.

Ouch.
Safe to assume this was written before we learned she made up the whole thing?
 
I don't give a tin shit, the testimony was third hand, which makes it inadmissible as hearsay, she lied about writing a note, which is perjury, and there are witnesses who can refute her testimony the presidential SUV driver and the ss detail. I expect this kind of horseshit from RayGravesGhost because he's a moron.

You do better.

Funny how detailed a moron who claims he hasn't watched the hearings is about what's been testified to...

You keep worrying about Hutchinson's testimony but ignore all of the WH lawyers who have admitted to the coup planning

Yeah but a person that trump says is unimportant and "got the soda for us" is the important testimony to focus on

What Bill Barr & the WH lawyers and staff have testified to under oath...THAT? That doesn't matter
 
And this guy is watching too...


4500.jpg
Is this the X SCJ?? Looks like a pu$$y to me
 
Funny how detailed a moron who claims he hasn't watched the hearings is about what's been testified to...

You keep worrying about Hutchinson's testimony but ignore all of the WH lawyers who have admitted to the coup planning

Yeah but a person that trump says is unimportant and "got the soda for us" is the important testimony to focus on

What Bill Barr & the WH lawyers and staff have testified to under oath...THAT? That doesn't matter
Fetch me the post where I said I hadn't watched the hearings. I'll wait.
 
I don't give a tin shit, the testimony was third hand, which makes it inadmissible as hearsay, she lied about writing a note, which is perjury, and there are witnesses who can refute her testimony the presidential SUV driver and the ss detail. I expect this kind of horseshit from RayGravesGhost because he's a moron.

You do better.
The PresidentiAl SUV is the least important part of the whole story. Focus on the bigger picture. Her testimony is extremely damaging, unless you think she made it ALL up.

This is not a criminal trial so her testimony, much of it first hand, is completely admissible. Feel free to have Trump and his cronies testify, but they won’t. They are afraid of what will happen.
 
The PresidentiAl SUV is the least important part of the whole story. Focus on the bigger picture.

This is not a criminal trial so her testimony, much of it first hand, is completely admissible. Feel free to have Trump and his cronies testify, but they won’t. They are afraid of what will happen.
Yeah, and that's proven by how willing Bill & Hillary, Pelosi, Shumer, Nadler, Schiff, Waters, Harris, Joe & Hunter, were all willing to come forward and testify under oath to a totally Republican commission....

SMDH
😏 and then LMFAO... 😂 🤣 😂
 
The PresidentiAl SUV is the least important part of the whole story. Focus on the bigger picture. Her testimony is extremely damaging, unless you think she made it ALL up.

This is not a criminal trial so her testimony, much of it first hand, is completely admissible. Feel free to have Trump and his cronies testify, but they won’t. They are afraid of what will happen.
Why would I believe anything she said? It's all third hand. And she lied about writing that note, a previous witness already said he wrote it.

IF there is a criminal trial, people will be compelled to testify or take the fifth.

This is bread and circuses to take the attention of the great unwashed off the mysterious food plant destruction, rampant inflation, high gas prices, and most importantly, the bloodbath that is coming in November.
 
  • Like
Reactions: instaGATOR
Why would I believe anything she said? It's all third hand. And she lied about writing that note, a previous witness already said he wrote it.

IF there is a criminal trial, people will be compelled to testify or take the fifth.

This is bread and circuses to take the attention of the great unwashed off the mysterious food plant destruction, rampant inflation, high gas prices, and most importantly, the bloodbath that is coming in November.
That might be true but she is a Pub. You don’t have to believe her, but very few have refuted what she testified. Don’t fall for the trap of ignoring everything based on a few minor inconsistencies. And it’s not like she is the only one who is saying these things. It’s the same MO, attack anyone who shines light on Trumps doings, just like a Indian, Bolton, etc.

Regardless, it makes good theater but if it only serves to show what Trump knew and supported, that’s a good thing. The guy is a threat to democracy.
 
That might be true but she is a Pub. You don’t have to believe her, but very few have refuted what she testified. Don’t fall for the trap of ignoring everything based on a few minor inconsistencies. And it’s not like she is the only one who is saying these things. It’s the same MO, attack anyone who shines light on Trumps doings, just like a Indian, Bolton, etc.

Regardless, it makes good theater but if it only serves to show what Trump knew and supported, that’s a good thing. The guy is a threat to democracy.
Bolton is the only one of the people you mention that has ANY integrity. Him, and Mattis.

And maybe I've been around Marines and convicts too long, but if you lie about one thing, you'll lie about anything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
Why would I believe anything she said? It's all third hand. And she lied about writing that note, a previous witness already said he wrote it.

IF there is a criminal trial, people will be compelled to testify or take the fifth.

This is bread and circuses to take the attention of the great unwashed off the mysterious food plant destruction, rampant inflation, high gas prices, and most importantly, the bloodbath that is coming in November.


https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...n-anonymous-sources-cassidy-hutchinson-2022-7
2 Secret Service sources told CNN that Trump angrily demanded to be taken to the Capitol on January 6, partly confirming Cassidy Hutchinson's explosive testimony
Jake Lahut Jul 1, 2022, 4:33 PM


https://www.salon.com/2022/07/25/se...-testimony-lawyer-up-refuse-to-testify-panel/
Secret Service agents who tried to torpedo Hutchinson testimony lawyer up, refuse to testify: panel
Anonymous news reports said Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel were willing to testify under oath. Now, not so much
By IGOR DERYSH
PUBLISHED JULY 25, 2022 9:21AM (EDT)


https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/21/cri...on-of-secret-service-jan-6-text-messages.html
Criminal probe opened into deletion of Secret Service Jan. 6 text messages, sources say
PUBLISHED THU, JUL 21 20221:56 PM EDTUPDATED THU, JUL 21 20226:31 PM EDT
Dan Mangan
 
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...n-anonymous-sources-cassidy-hutchinson-2022-7
2 Secret Service sources told CNN that Trump angrily demanded to be taken to the Capitol on January 6, partly confirming Cassidy Hutchinson's explosive testimony
Jake Lahut Jul 1, 2022, 4:33 PM


https://www.salon.com/2022/07/25/se...-testimony-lawyer-up-refuse-to-testify-panel/
Secret Service agents who tried to torpedo Hutchinson testimony lawyer up, refuse to testify: panel
Anonymous news reports said Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel were willing to testify under oath. Now, not so much
By IGOR DERYSH
PUBLISHED JULY 25, 2022 9:21AM (EDT)


https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/21/cri...on-of-secret-service-jan-6-text-messages.html
Criminal probe opened into deletion of Secret Service Jan. 6 text messages, sources say
PUBLISHED THU, JUL 21 20221:56 PM EDTUPDATED THU, JUL 21 20226:31 PM EDT
Dan Mangan
Not honoring your ban bet. Shocked. Welcome back sawky.

Good to see you still only use far left eing news souces to confirm your ignorance, I mean bias.
 
Still getting hoodwinked I see. Yawn


jfegaly "logic"...

Biden is lawyering up because he's guilty of breaking the law
Secret Service is lawyering up because they haven't broken the law

Now which one of these two are actually the target of a criminal investigation?
 
jfegaly "logic"...

Biden is lawyering up because he's guilty of breaking the law
Secret Service is lawyering up because they haven't broken the law

Now which one of these two are actually the target of a criminal investigation?
 
why any american patriot would defend jan 6th is beyond me.
I will explain.I know that you are slow. When a party tries unsuccessfully to overthrow an election like the democrats did in 2016, by using our own government agencies to do so, THEN STEALS the 2020 election...PATRIOTS do what Patriots do...try to protect their country. And I PROMISE...1/6 was NOTHING as to what we are RWA to do. Remember who has ALL of the guns...and knows how to use them, and WHY the second amendment was created. Your little "man" bun will NOT protect you. (directed at every sissy lib)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mdfgator
Trumpanzee Spoiler Alert: FNC lost every time the Jan 6 hearings were aired


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/ratings-msnbc-tops-jan-6-203114217.html
Cable News Ratings: MSNBC Tops Jan. 6 Hearings in Total Viewers – But CNN Takes the Demo
Katie Campione
Fri, July 22, 2022 at 4:31 PM·6 min read


MSNBC has proven to be top dog among the cable news networks when it comes to the U.S. House special committee hearings on the Jan. 6 insurrection. The network has consistently scored the highest in terms of total viewers, but has battled it out with CNN for the largest audience in the key advertiser-coveted 25-54 year old news demographic.

The eighth hearing — which is the final hearing until September — aired in primetime across ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN and MSNBC on Thursday to 17 million total viewers. MSNBC once again had the most total viewers among the cable news networks with 4.7 million, according to preliminary data from Nielsen. However, its 584,000 demo viewers couldn’t beat CNN’s 727,000. Addtionally, CNN attracted 2.9 million total viewers.

Fox News Channel decided not to stray from its traditional primetime lineup of shows from non-news hosts Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson. It managed 2.6 million total viewers during the time the hearing was airing, with a demo showing of 348,000. The hearings did air live on FOX Business Network and Fox Nation.

Across all eight hearings, MSNBC averaged about 3 million live plus same day viewers per hearing, compared to CNN’s 2 million and Fox News’ 978,000. In the key demo, MSNBC averaged 370,000 viewers, while CNN had 390,000. FNC brought in 151,000. You can find a breakdown of viewership across each hearing for the three major cablers below.

The first hearing aired in primetime on June 9 to about 20 million total viewers across 12 networks. It remains the most-watched hearing to date, and it had the largest audience among the cablers as well until the eighth hearing. In general, the hearings have bolstered television viewing during months that typically are some of the lowest. After a steep decline from hearings 1 and 2, CNN and MSNBC both rebounded quite a bit leading up to the eighth hearing.

MSNBC secured 4.3 million total viewers during the initial hearing, including 616,000 in the demo. CNN drew about 2.7 million, once again besting its competition in the demo with 745,000. Fox News opted out of airing the first hearing, but it had about 3.1 million people tuning in during that time. The network did air hearings 2-7, which were not during primetime. But ratings show that FNC’s audience hasn’t been particularly interested in the hearings, anyway.

MSNBC gained its second-largest audience of 3.4 million (and 446,000 demo viewers) for the sixth hearing on June 28, which included testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former top White House aide who described a “furious” former President Donald Trump who physically tussled with his own security who refused to drive him to the Capitol building as the riot was getting underway. CNN also posted its second best viewership for this hearing, with 2.6 million people tuning in. In the demo, CNN came out on top for this hearing as well with 573,000.

While FNC was lambasted for opting not to air the two primetime hearings, it appears the move might have been a solid one in terms of ratings, considering the network has barely topped a million total viewers for the hearings it did air in their entirety.

After the second hearing, which was the first to air on FNC and featured allegations of Trump campaign-donor fraud and tales of a drunken Rudy Giuliani on Election night, hearing viewership didn’t again break into the seven digits for the network. Demo viewership tanked after hearing 2, barely managing to surpass 200,000.

Fox News is consistently the most-watched cable news network for any major national event, making the lack of interest from its viewers for these hearings even more apparent. The network garnered 7.2 million viewers for the most recent State of the Union address, compared to CNN’s 4.8 million and MSNBC’s 4.1 million. On Election night, Fox News drew 13.6 million viewers, topping CNN’s 9.1 million and MSNBC’s 7.3 million.

Across the seven days that these hearings have aired, FNC has taken home a total-day average of 1.5 million viewers, which still beats MSNBC (1.4 million) and CNN (801,000). For FNC, this is also fairly on-par with a week where there are no hearings.

Meanwhile, CNN and MSNBC have both benefitted from a boost in total-day viewership due to the hearings. On the week of July 4, which was the only week without a hearing since they began on June 9, MSNBC averaged 666,000 total-day viewers. CNN had an average of 538,000.

These eight hearings wrap up the committee’s summer session, but they aren’t completely done yet. More hearings will be scheduled for as soon as September to consider even more new evidence and testimony, the committee said Thursday.

Here’s how the cable news networks fared across each of the hearings:

Hearing 1:
MSNBC – 4.3 million total viewers; 616,000 demo viewers
CNN – 2.7 million total viewers; 745,000 demo viewers
FNC – 3.1 million total viewers; 546,000 demo viewers (not airing live broadcast)

Hearing 2:
MSNBC – 2.15 million total viewers; 317,000 demo viewers
CNN – 1.34 million total viewers; 349,000 demo viewers
FNC – 1.2 million total viewers; 181,000 demo viewers

Hearing 3:
MSNBC – 3 million total viewers; 309,000 demo viewers
CNN – 1.5 million total viewers; 280,000 demo viewers
FNC – 748,000 total viewers; 119,000 demo viewers

Hearing 4:
MSNBC – 3 million total viewers; 357,000 demo viewers
CNN – 2.1 million total viewers; 374,000 demo viewers
FNC – 722,000 total viewers; 125,000 demo viewers

Hearing 5:
MSNBC – 3.2 million total viewers; 368,000 demo viewers
CNN – 2.4 million total viewers; 433,000 demo viewers
FNC – 732,000 total viewers; 91,000 demo viewers

Hearing 6:
MSNBC – 3.5 million total viewers; 446,000 demo viewers
CNN – 2.6 million total viewers; 573,000 demo viewers
FNC – 980,000 total viewers; 132,000 demo viewers

Hearing 7:
MSNBC – 3.3 million total viewers; 438,000 demo viewers
CNN – 2.6 million total viewers; 430,000 demo viewers
FNC – 847,000 total viewers; 127,000 demo viewers

Hearing 8:
MSNBC – 4.7 million total viewers; 584,000 demo viewers
CNN – 2.9 million total viewers; 727,000 demo viewers
FNC – 2.6 million total viewers; 348,000 demo viewers (not airing live broadcast)
 
I will explain.I know that you are slow. When a party tries unsuccessfully to overthrow an election like the democrats did in 2016, by using our own government agencies to do so, THEN STEALS the 2020 election...PATRIOTS do what Patriots do...try to protect their country. And I PROMISE...1/6 was NOTHING as to what we are RWA to do. Remember who has ALL of the guns...and knows how to use them, and WHY the second amendment was created. Your little "man" bun will NOT protect you. (directed at every sissy lib)
in 2016 there was massive russian collusion, in 2020 there didnt appear to be.
 
Oooohhhh! And Bob Mueller was sooooo prepared to take Trump down.
Just like this ghey video Stephen Colbert came up with. The comments section is worth reading.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT