Does it still take a super majority of 67 votes in the senate to throw out a president? If so, why is there such hand wringing over what a few senators like Collins, Murkowski, etc are going to do? What am I not understanding?
Need help in understanding impeachment votes
- Thread starter Orangeclad
- Start date
67 is required. If witnesses are called this could be long and drug out which might favor Dimms. Calling Bidens and Mack Daddy as witnesses might favor Pubs. Dimms will fight Mack Daddy being called. Many Dimms will throw Bidens under the Caterpillar.
Murkowski, Collins and Romney are sleazy Trump hating RINOs. Romney son was tied up with sleazy Ukrainian gas company.
Murkowski, Collins and Romney are sleazy Trump hating RINOs. Romney son was tied up with sleazy Ukrainian gas company.
A point that is often overlooked. Trump wanted corruption in the Ukraine cleaned up, quite interesting who objected.
Need a Super Majority of 67 to remove Trump from office.
But only a simple majority to decide if more witnesses will be called.
Demorats need 4 Pubs to vote with them to get more witnesses and extend the Senate debate.
The House is responsible to 1st have a vote to begin an inquiry.
They did not. Instead Pil-O-see did that on her own without the House's authority.
All subpoenas issued before a full house vote were invalid.
The Demorats put together their excuse for evidence and presented it to the Senate.
The Senates job is to hear he evidence provided by the House and vote.
They are not responsible for the House's ineptitude on what they have presented.
The correct thing to do is to end this fiasco on the basis of what was presented to the Senate by the (no-bipartisan) House Demorats when they voted to impeach.
Last edited:
Democrats are ALWAYS in lockstep. Republicans NEVER are. Hence Collins, Murkowskki and Romney types.
These types are more worried about being career politicians, than serving their voters. So they play up to the establishment in an effort to stay in DC. Even if they are voted out of office, they will still be taken care of.
In answering my own question, I guess it would be the same managers who questioned witnesses on the house side.
Actually that's incorrect, just nearly true...
For Impeachment in the House vote, ONLY Demorats voted YES.
The NO vote was bipartisan, but in the minority in total votes.
Only Demorats voted YES.
PS
JMOHO, but Rino Romney is one of the biggest lying, backstabbing, 'pieces of chit' in the Senate. I wouldn't vote for his sorry azz for dog-catcher....
Oh, look whose repeating Hannity talking points. Nothing from OANN?Actually that's incorrect, just nearly true...
For Impeachment in the House vote, ONLY Demorats voted YES.
The NO vote was bipartisan, but in the minority in total votes.
Only Demorats voted YES.
PS
JMOHO, but Rino Romney is one of the biggest lying, backstabbing, 'pieces of chit' in the Senate. I wouldn't vote for his sorry azz for dog-catcher....
Well this is their last Presidential election so they are gonna try to take the whole process down with them.
The LAWYERS do the questioning. It's not a senate heating, it's a TRIAL. The JURY doesn't get to ask questions.
You really are something.
Still trying to get people to believe Dewlilly's report is going to end the largest and oldest political party in America. smh
No idea who Dewilly is. I do know you sound like one.
John Durham's report is due late Spring, early Summer per AG Barr.
It will NOT be what takes down the democratic party. Keep watching.
Who's Hannity? I have never heard him speak...
And BTW, as I've challenged you before, when you diss on OANN, please give evidence of any mistakes that they have made in reporting the news.
Who's Hannity? I have never heard him speak...
And BTW, as I've challenged you before, when you diss on OANN, please give evidence of any mistakes that they have made in reporting the news.
They have a stated mission to push only the conservative agenda. They cater to the rubes. They aren’t to be taken seriously as a serious news organization.
Its just funny that you repeated Hannity right after he said the same thing. You guys must all have the same talking points.
Those are just your own biased and ignorant opinions, not actual facts.
OAN has two 1 Hr conservative editorials, the Daily Ledger and Tipping Point.
They are proud to say that they push a conservative point of view, but they do it with correct facts, not with lies and bigotry like the MSM.
The rest is factual news programming that they have never had to retract, unlike the 'Fake News' swamp sludge that you willing suck down every day.
OANN - On Direct TV at 347 -- For news you can trust (for a change).
Their ratings continue to soar, while the MSM's credibility continues to fall.
The swamp is not made up of just Demorat Politicians. It's also their career bureau-rats and the constantly discredited MSM that continues to push their corrupt agendas (alone with the tools like you).
Similar threads
