More info on the steal
- Thread starter DCandtheUTBand
- Start date
@GatorTheo - are you starting to see the issue with resolving election fraud through the courts?
And moments like this are why people keep pushing for what’s right. He just got the cross examining attorney to admit Raffensperger is corrupt.
And moments like this are why people keep pushing for what’s right. He just got the cross examining attorney to admit Raffensperger is corrupt.
Obviously, people in India aren't helpless vegetables.
There it is! The twitter proof we've been waiting for. I can't wait for those scoundrels to get in trouble.
I hope you realize that's not the point.
And I get this is your sarcastic way of pointing out the courts suck at fixing election fraud, but it's a tired bit.
What's a tired bit? I was tagged about some more twitter proof. Was that a tired bit too?
The democrats could sure use him as a voter for the past 30 years.
No, because the evidence is always new but your response never is.
And it’s not “Twitter proof” any more than you hearing something on your cell phone and calling it “Verizon information”.
It’s a conduit, not a source.
You agree that, if you want proof of anything, you can find it on twitter, right?
So because there is misinformation on Twitter you can’t believe anything you see there?
Do you see the folly with this argument in light of your desire to get rid of guns?
Seems to me, a lot of messageboard politicians simply pull stuff off twitter that supports their side and expects it to be treated like supporting evidence.
Both sides do it.
Seems to me you’re fine blaming the conduit for the content. Twitter doesn’t make any content, assuming there’s no truth shared there is just bias.
Yes there is crap on Twitter. There is also solidly sourced content.
Twitter and the like, make it VERY easy to publish professional looking BS. The overall quality of info is poor.
There are legit sources but people still pick and choose the segments of information with which they agree.
You, and many others, are getting your information from people who say what you want to hear.
Again, both sides do it.
Again, nothing you said makes 100% of information on Twitter inaccurate.
Thats the point - you have the same lame ass reaction to anything that comes from a platform that’s open and free. It’s a tired bit.
So let’s turn your question around - is 100% of all information on Twitter false or misleading?
I thought the only reason democrats do not want voter ID's is because it is racist?
Similar threads
