K. Harris Interview on Fox with Baier: Thoughts?

[Capt Ron 1]

IMHO, an important part of being a President is being a leader for the entire country. Like Reagan & others. They led people from both sides.

Trump failed miserably at leading the country. He kept pounding divisiveness most of his term. Trumpers loved him....no one else did. If he knew how to act, he would have crushed Biden.

You are dumber than a red brick, son. So uninformed or just plain slow. Please tell me when FJB reached out for unity? You want to win, or lose in this battle for America? Puss*** do not need to be making decisions, and THANK GOD Trump is, and you are not.

 

[fatman76]

IMHO, an important part of being a President is being a leader for the entire country. Like Reagan & others. They led people from both sides.

Trump failed miserably at leading the country. He kept pounding divisiveness most of his term. Trumpers loved him....no one else did. If he knew how to act, he would have crushed Biden.

He took Biden out in one debate. The eff you talking about?

Can you provide 3 examples of how he “pounded divisiveness”?

It would be a shame if you were just throwing shit at the wall.

 

[treygator29]

They’ll just spin it as an unfair interview from right wing Fox

 

[GatorTheo]

They’ll just spin it as an unfair interview from right wing Fox

And she was so brave being interviewed by Fox.....but nothing about Trump facing liberal moderators in the debates.

 

[GatorTheo]

Nein. Trump isn't a shit taker, he hit back. Democrats spent the entirety of his term trying to convict and impeach him. The TDS is strong with the commie socialists. Trump told them to fondle themselves where the sun doesn't shine. Good on him. 😂

I get it. Trump can do no wrong in your eyes.

 

[BCGator29]

That's a tired and worn out excuse that goes back to Dubya. Bush was about as soft spoken as you can get and he still got the hate from the usual suspects. No more Mr Nice Guy, no more Mr Clean. No more Mr Nice Guy, Dimtards are sick and obscene.

Agreed. It’s funny to hear Dems I know asking ‘where are the McCains and Romneys of the Republican Party?!’, because at the time those guys were vilified too. (And if you liked them so much, democrats, why didn’t you vote for them? 😜)

 

[Gator Fever]

Yes, the usual suspects. The lefties and MSM are always going to attack republicans. I'm talking about regular people. Political moderates. Suburban women, etc. Trump NEEDS them to win but he drives them away with his act. He hurts himself and it's totally unnecessary.

Most single unmarried white women are too brainwashed by the lefty media and schools etc. It's why many are Karens.

 

[BillytheC]

She was 15+ minutes late- she was combative and did not answer the questions and seemed thrown off that Baer would ask a follow up question- she got angry at the end- it was not a good look at all

 

[gatordad3]

 

[gatordad3]

She was 15+ minutes late- she was combative and did not answer the questions and seemed thrown off that Baer would ask a follow up question- she got angry at the end- it was not a good look at all

What's more pathetic is Bret Baier is a Trump hater.

 

[gatordad3]

 

[JimGaster]

Comrade Harris is a historically bad candidate because she’s a terrible person.

Anyone who can’t see this is stupid.

 

[BillytheC]

There’s a reason why Kamala ran for cover whenever Bret Baier asked a question - The Daily Bo Snerdley

Vice President Kamala Harris’ Fox News interview with Bret Baier last night is one of her most deceitful and least transparent interviews thus far. It has been 88 days since Harris became the Democratic nominee and she has yet to iver the transparency and authenticity the American people are...

thedailybs.com

 

[gatordad3]

 

[fatman76]

She was 15+ minutes late- she was combative and did not answer the questions and seemed thrown off that Baer would ask a follow up question- she got angry at the end- it was not a good look at all

Her rant about Trump locking up anyone who doesn't vote for him was the most ridiculous and desperate thing I've ever seen from a politician.

She's literally flailing trying to grab onto anything that she thinks might help stop the bleeding.

Is she the worst candidate in the history of the country?

 

[fatman76]

They’ll just spin it as an unfair interview from right wing Fox

Correct.

She was "sharp as a tack" and "testy" and Baier was a "misogynist".

 

[gatordad3]

Her rant about Trump locking up anyone who doesn't vote for him was the most ridiculous and desperate thing I've ever seen from a politician.

She's literally flailing trying to grab onto anything that she thinks might help stop the bleeding.

Is she the worst candidate in the history of the country?

View embedded media

We all thought Whoremala couldn't be worse in 2020, yet here we are in 2024.

 

[gatordad3]

View embedded media

I forgot to add that Bret needs to lay off the botox. Just look at his fuched up face.

 

[FresnoGator]

IMHO, an important part of being a President is being a leader for the entire country. Like Reagan & others. They led people from both sides.

Trump failed miserably at leading the country. He kept pounding divisiveness most of his term. Trumpers loved him....no one else did. If he knew how to act, he would have crushed Biden.

I'm sorry, but that's simply not true. Any divisiveness started with Obama, who jailed his opponents like Dinesh D'Souza and sent the IRS after the rest of them. He pushed racial issues every single chance he got, he was a divisiveness machine. Trump did none of this, all he did was take shit from the left nonstop with the help of the complicit leftist media who gave him no credit for anything that he did that was good.

You have got to be kidding with the divisiveness argument, or you were just too partisan to see anything else.

I do not believe that Trump can do no wrong, But your comments are ridiculous. The left protested him from the word go and never stopped even after he left the office. The media is very different now than they were under Reagan. Under Reagan, they were just liberals., now they are card carrying communists, or at least 93% of them I identify as being on the left, which is much more left than it's ever been before.

I gave you a solid reasonable answer and this is what you respond with? I am disappointed ...

 

[Gator Fever]

I'm sorry, but that's simply not true. Any divisiveness started with Obama, who jailed his opponents like Dinesh D'Souza and sent the IRS after the rest of them. He pushed racial issues every single chance he got, he was a divisiveness machine. Trump did none of this, all he did was take shit from the left nonstop with the help of the complicit leftist media who gave him no credit for anything that he did that was good.

You have got to be kidding with the divisiveness argument, or you were just too partisan to see anything else.

I do not believe that Trump can do no wrong, But your comments are ridiculous. The left protested him from the word go and never stopped even after he left the office. The media is very different now than they were under Reagan. Under Reagan, they were just liberals., now they are card carrying communists, or at least 93% of them I identify as being on the left, which is much more left than it's ever been before.

I gave you a solid reasonable answer and this is what you respond with? I am disappointed ...

The Dems won't stop the lawfare as long as Reps never do it back to them with bogus charges.

 

[BillytheC]

to dims silence is approval

 

[JimGaster]

She’s a terrible candidate

 

[nail1988]

She’s a terrible candidate

 

[FresnoGator]

View embedded media

She's a terrible person and a terrible boss, which is why 94% of her staff quit ...

 

[fatman76]

I'm sorry, but that's simply not true. Any divisiveness started with Obama, who jailed his opponents like Dinesh D'Souza and sent the IRS after the rest of them. He pushed racial issues every single chance he got, he was a divisiveness machine. Trump did none of this, all he did was take shit from the left nonstop with the help of the complicit leftist media who gave him no credit for anything that he did that was good.

You have got to be kidding with the divisiveness argument, or you were just too partisan to see anything else.

I do not believe that Trump can do no wrong, But your comments are ridiculous. The left protested him from the word go and never stopped even after he left the office. The media is very different now than they were under Reagan. Under Reagan, they were just liberals., now they are card carrying communists, or at least 93% of them I identify as being on the left, which is much more left than it's ever been before.

I gave you a solid reasonable answer and this is what you respond with? I am disappointed ...

He can't help himself.

Anyone who owns a gun or defends the 2a is a "gun nut" and anyone who is happy to support Trump "worships him and he can do no wrong".

He's kinda like one of those button boards people give to their dogs so they can say words.

 

[gatordad3]

She's a terrible person and a terrible boss, which is why 94% of her staff quit ...

Even the biggest ass kisser as well as a race baiter, Symone Sanders, was one of, if the first, staffers to quit early during her administration.

 

[NavigatorII]

Even the biggest ass kisser as well as a race baiter, Symone Sanders, was one of, if the first, staffers to quit early during her administration.

We are not seeing defense of the commie whore are we? There's a reason why. There is no defense period, "Independent Kal is on a milk carton. Doreen's Small Hill is out of commission. Lying POS commie whores.

 

[gator1776]

He can't help himself.

Anyone who owns a gun or defends the 2a is a "gun nut" and anyone who is happy to support Trump "worships him and he can do no wrong".

He's kinda like one of those button boards people give to their dogs so they can say words.

Proud gun nut!!!

 

[fatman76]

She's a terrible person and a terrible boss, which is why 94% of her staff quit ...

*92% as VP

Highest staff turnover and lowest approval rating for a VP in modern history.

 

[GatorTheo]

I'm sorry, but that's simply not true. Any divisiveness started with Obama, who jailed his opponents like Dinesh D'Souza and sent the IRS after the rest of them. He pushed racial issues every single chance he got, he was a divisiveness machine. Trump did none of this, all he did was take shit from the left nonstop with the help of the complicit leftist media who gave him no credit for anything that he did that was good.

You have got to be kidding with the divisiveness argument, or you were just too partisan to see anything else.

I do not believe that Trump can do no wrong, But your comments are ridiculous. The left protested him from the word go and never stopped even after he left the office. The media is very different now than they were under Reagan. Under Reagan, they were just liberals., now they are card carrying communists, or at least 93% of them I identify as being on the left, which is much more left than it's ever been before.

I gave you a solid reasonable answer and this is what you respond with? I am disappointed ...

Obama was divisive too but he was a smooth communicator. He didn't constantly call his opponents childish names. He knew how to act in public.

Moderates didn't think he was an a-hole.

There is no question the media/left vilified Trump like they do all conservatives but he fed into it.

IMHO, if Trump's demeanor had been more like Obama's, he'd be finishing up his second term.

 

[GatorTheo]

He can't help himself.

Anyone who owns a gun or defends the 2a is a "gun nut" and anyone who is happy to support Trump "worships him and he can do no wrong".

He's kinda like one of those button boards people give to their dogs so they can say words.

Not true.

A 'gun nut' is someone who will believe ANYTHING, no matter how ridiculous, as long as it supports guns.

If someone tells you that guns don't kill because they are inanimate, you got yourself a gun nut.

You gun nuts just need to be honest. Dispense with all the BS spin. Just say you don't care how many people die, you want unlimited access to guns.

 

[gator1776]

Not true.

A 'gun nut' is someone who will believe ANYTHING, no matter how ridiculous, as long as it supports guns.

If someone tells you that guns don't kill because they are inanimate, you got yourself a gun nut.

You gun nuts just need to be honest. Dispense with all the BS spin. Just say you don't care how many people die, you want unlimited access to guns.

Yeah, but guns don’t pull the trigger by themselves. If somebody killed somebody with a hammer, do you blame the hammer? I’ve never followed this logic.

And I am definitely not a gun nut, lol

 

[GatorTheo]

Yeah, but guns don’t pull the trigger by themselves. If somebody killed somebody with a hammer, do you blame the hammer? I’ve never followed this logic.

And I am definitely not a gun nut, lol

No one thinks guns act on their own. No one. You all just try to frame it that way because you think it defends guns.

Would you ever say that cars don't transport people because they are inanimate objects? Of course you wouldn't because that would be ridiculous.

 

[fatman76]

Not true.

A 'gun nut' is someone who will believe ANYTHING, no matter how ridiculous, as long as it supports guns.

If someone tells you that guns don't kill because they are inanimate, you got yourself a gun nut.

You gun nuts just need to be honest. Dispense with all the BS spin. Just say you don't care how many people die, you want unlimited access to guns.

So anyone who makes the most critically logical argument is a crazy person?

That's some scale you've got there.

 

[fatman76]

Yeah, but guns don’t pull the trigger by themselves. If somebody killed somebody with a hammer, do you blame the hammer? I’ve never followed this logic.

And I am definitely not a gun nut, lol

It's like blaming spoons for the obesity epidemic.

 

[fatman76]

No one thinks guns act on their own. No one. You all just try to frame it that way because you think it defends guns.

Would you ever say that cars don't transport people because they are inanimate objects? Of course you wouldn't because that would be ridiculous.

Spoons don't feed people. Cars don't drive themselves. Keyboards don't warrior on their own.

Humans have to engage with all of these nouns to get them to verb.

It's something a 3rd grader understands.

 

[BillytheC]

theo you are free to surrender your guns but you are not free to demand we do so

 

[LordofallSocks]

Not true.

A 'gun nut' is someone who will believe ANYTHING, no matter how ridiculous, as long as it supports guns.

If someone tells you that guns don't kill because they are inanimate, you got yourself a gun nut.

You gun nuts just need to be honest. Dispense with all the BS spin. Just say you don't care how many people die, you want unlimited access to guns.

I don't care how many people die, I am guaranteed unlimited access to guns, unless I commit a felony or am declared mentally incompetentby a judge.

 

[gator1776]

No one thinks guns act on their own. No one. You all just try to frame it that way because you think it defends guns.

Would you ever say that cars don't transport people because they are inanimate objects? Of course you wouldn't because that would be ridiculous.

You all?
Now you’re just lumping us all together?
Starting to wonder about you, man lol

 

[LordofallSocks]

You all?
Now you’re just lumping us all together?
Starting to wonder about you, man lol

You catch on quick, sir.