But if your goal is protecting your family, how many guns do you need? One? Two? Is more than that even realistic? What real world scenario would require more guns? You think a gang is going to attack your house and stick around for a lengthy gun battle?
If the goal is protecting your family, you aren't concerned with the number of guns it takes, you are concerned with...protecting your family.
Theo, you aren't a moderate. You lean left on the whole, but when it comes to guns, you are as far left as any poster here. You are a radical on this topic.
I'm just asking a question. I realize gun nuts are trained not to give an honest answer.
You simply don't recognize moderate. If someone is not a gun nut or trumper, they must be at the other extreme.
You might want to check the polls: Being a Trump fan is Middle America right now.
I don't even own a gun. See how radical you are? Anyone who doesn't 100% agree with your position is a 'nut'.
A gun nut is someone who will totally believe ANYTHING that makes guns look good. If someone on twitter claimed that their gun cured cancer, gun nuts would see it as proven science.
Common sense seems to be back to some degree but, as we've seen over and over in the past, republicans don't know how to handle prosperity. They'll drive middle America right back to the democrats.
No I am not worried about some gang attacking my house. Where I live inner city gangs wouldn't get close to.
IOW, you are trying to make the people who disagree with you appear to be radical, so it makes your own radical positions seem more centrist?
But there could be a limit on guns and you'd still be able to 'protect your family', hunt or whatever. There is no legitimate need for unlimited guns.....unless you're a gun company wanting to sell as many as possible.
That's true enough. Is that due to stupidity or corruption?
Is there a legitimate need to worry about someone having the ability to buy unlimited guns?
BTW, us pointing out that a gun is an inanimate object flies all over you, doesn't it?
Politicians have done very well for themselves. Trump is definitely rocking that boat.
We are a civilized country, we are flooded with guns and we have a ton of gun violence.
I'm sure you do wonder that.
The ultimate goal is to follow the law of the land. In Amer, that is the Constitution. Do I need to type out the 2nd for you, or have you learned it by now? Quit trying to use your highest level of education on us. 6th grade civics will not help your cause.
That's what I'm saying. From your perspective, if they're not all in on Trump, they're democrats.
That's another great gun nut insanity. More guns equals less gun violence.
Thats what you said, and because of so many ridiculous takes you have...no one cares. Start FOLLOWING and believing in our Constitution FIRST...then I may attention to your "takes". My perspective is only this....you are not a moderate. Moderates believe in our form of government, and do not pick and choose which part of the Constitution they decide is accurate or not. DEMOCRATS do that.
I can easily prove you wrong. If you are a smart criminal...would you go try to rob an ARMED person...or an UNARMED person?
Theo how many guns would you need to own before you started committing gun violence?
Of course, but, when we have hundreds of millions of guns floating around, we make it easy for the bad guys.
AGAIN...you are WRONG. We want people who WANT to own firearms to be able to without leftist commie POS's trying to restrict us. In other words...we expect the United States Constitution to be FOLLOWED, until someone changes it LEGALLY.
I want law-abiding citizens to have every opportunity to own as many guns as they want.
He is too emotionally attached to this issue. He admits there are hundreds of millions of guns out there, but his solution is we need to reduce that number.
Experience? The Marine Corps is mostly grunts, and grunts is not a career that courts longevity.
