ADVERTISEMENT

In before the gun confiscation NUTS.....

Are you pulling my leg or are you really having a tough time?

Posting BS from an anti-gun source has exactly the same value as posting BS from a pro-gun source.

The difference between you and me is, I recognize both sources as BS, you believe everything from pro-gun sources.
So you're admitting that you are intentionally posting 'BS' information here?
Yes. I'm hoping it will help you understand how partisan people provide slanted information.
So you're admitting to posting inaccurate information here. That's the definition of being a troll. @FresnoGator am I wrong?
 
So you're admitting to posting inaccurate information here. That's the definition of being a troll. @FresnoGator am I wrong?
I'm posting slanted information. I didn't read it but I'm sure there are carefully chosen and manipulated facts included.....just like you should recognize from the pro-gun sources.

You really need to understand what 'troll' means. A 'troll' posts comments intended to fire up specific targets. 'Inaccurate' has nothing to do with it.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: nail1988
I'm posting slanted information. I didn't read it but I'm sure there are carefully chosen and manipulated facts included.....just like you should recognize from the pro-gun sources.

You really need to understand what 'troll' means. A 'troll' posts comments intended to fire up specific targets. 'Inaccurate' has nothing to do with it.
Neither of you is worth dealing with. Frankly your continued consumption of oxygen offends me.
 
So in your mind laws have an expiration date? Or just the ones you dislike?

Actually, you've just claimed that what you post here is BS, so I guess I should assume you know what you are posting now is BS too?
Laws need to keep up with the times. I'm sure you'll agree other than the 2nd.
 
I'm posting slanted information. I didn't read it but I'm sure there are carefully chosen and manipulated facts included.....just like you should recognize from the pro-gun sources.

You really need to understand what 'troll' means. A 'troll' posts comments intended to fire up specific targets. 'Inaccurate' has nothing to do with it.
And the troll knows that the fastest way to fire up specific targets is to lie.
 
Laws need to keep up with the times. I'm sure you'll agree other than the 2nd.
A statute is different than a constitutional amendment codifying a right. The latter has a much higher bar to cross. It would be nice if you spent time defending rights and freedoms. The amendments that need repeal are the 16th and 17th amendments. The former makes all of us serfs and the latter destroyed real federalism.

The fix is simple. People who are too dangerous to own a gun because of their prior actions should be institutionalized: Either jail or an asylum.

That will probably fix 95%+ of it.
 
I disagree. A 'troll' can simply post a fact that he believes will ignite people's emotions
You aren't admitting that you post facts, you are admitting that you post in your words 'BS' and slanted information.

You just believe that people who oppose your positions are lying and you want to call them 'trolls'.
Dude you mocked jb and claimed he couldn't see that YOU were posting 'BS'. I even asked you to clarify that's what you did, and you happily agreed.

THEN I tagged a mod, and suddenly you start backtracking. Now you are posting 'facts', not BS. Now anyone that calls you a troll just disagrees with you.

Everyone sees what you are doing. Everyone.
 
A statute is different than a constitutional amendment codifying a right. The latter has a much higher bar to cross. It would be nice if you spent time defending rights and freedoms. The amendments that need repeal are the 16th and 17th amendments. The former makes all of us serfs and the latter destroyed real federalism.

The fix is simple. People who are too dangerous to own a gun because of their prior actions should be institutionalized: Either jail or an asylum.

That will probably fix 95%+ of it.
Statutes and amendments are both rules written by men because they sounded good at the time.

You like the 2nd but not the 16th and 17th. Some would have you believe that you shouldn't question anything in the constitution.
 
You aren't admitting that you post facts, you are admitting that you post in your words 'BS' and slanted information.


Dude you mocked jb and claimed he couldn't see that YOU were posting 'BS'. I even asked you to clarify that's what you did, and you happily agreed.

THEN I tagged a mod, and suddenly you start backtracking. Now you are posting 'facts', not BS. Now anyone that calls you a troll just disagrees with you.

Everyone sees what you are doing. Everyone.
Tag mods all you want. They can read.
 
Statutes and amendments are both rules written by men because they sounded good at the time.

You like the 2nd but not the 16th and 17th. Some would have you believe that you shouldn't question anything in the constitution.
Does it enhance the liberty (not licentiousness) of the individual or does it empower gubmint over the individual? Amendments are hard for a reason.
 
He thinks we're all one person here in the "echo chamber".

DC posted he doesn't like the 16th (which made federal taxes possible) or the 17th (which allowed states to directly elect Senators).

Since DC doesn't like those, EVERY Trumper doesn't like those.

This is the troll, he's assigning opinions to you based on what others say so you'll engage with him. Same reason he ignores logical arguments about guns...I bet he couldn't care less about guns. He is just taking a position, putting all of us into a basket of deplorables, and posting things that will almost certainly result in a reply that he'll ignore (assuming it's a logical argument).

This his entire schtick. It's a ploy to get people to engage...play "the middle" against partisans and bolt as soon as the argument gets factual and real. But at least someone paid attention to him.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT