In before the gun confiscation NUTS.....
- Thread starter Capt Ron 1
- Start date
Then not the brightest bulb in the box still I see.....
No one has ever stolen a single gun from me,,, because I don't leave them lying around to be stolen.
So maybe you should have paid more attention to those who know and understand what logic is....
=====
> "Americans have the Right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people (sovereign citizens) with arms." James Madison with Quote taken from The Federalist Papers #46 @ 243-244
> "I ask you sir, what is the Militia? It is the whole people (sovereign citizens), except for a few public officials."
George Mason, 3 Elliott Debates at 425-426
> "The people (sovereign citizens) are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possessipon of them."
Zachariah Johnson 3 Elliott Debates at 646
POLITICS: The art of appearing open, while concealing as much as possible.
Last edited:
Constitution say anything about how fast I can drive? Or have any power over me driving at all?
Moron.
Totally worth the ban.
With you, I've honestly reached a point where it's boring. You clearly have an irrational fear of guns. I have no idea why, my guess is some past trauma in your life involving guns.I know but that normally doesn't stop you guys.
No clue. Regardless, hope you get closure in whatever area you need it.
When y'all's 'logic' has been totally destroyed, you always fall back on 'shall not be infringed'.
Can you explain to the rest of us what the definition of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED means?
'Infringed' means like violated. Like you can't infringe/violate some rule or agreement.
Either someone or he shot himself in his genitals. I'd be pissed off at guns if that happened to me.
Here's a friendly suggestion to you gun fanatics:
Quit going through all sorts of convoluted histrionics trying to defend guns.
Just say this: "I love guns, I want unlimited access and I don't care if they're causing problems."
That would be honest and you'd avoid having to twist yourself in knots trying to debate.
❤️
Quit going through all sorts of convoluted histrionics trying to defend guns.
Just say this: "I love guns, I want unlimited access and I don't care if they're causing problems."
That would be honest and you'd avoid having to twist yourself in knots trying to debate.
❤️
That agreement would be the basis of the government that we the SOVEREIGN citizens set forth to rule and control the federal government (our public SERVANTS, not us) that we all agreed to when we set forth the Constitution.
Without the Constitution, there is no federal government and everything falls back to the states AND the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS....
Last edited:
I love certain people, not inanimate objects. Nor do I try to blame inanimate object for the evil acts of some people.
Only twits or the village idiots would do that imo.
And my FDLE permit is a WEAPONS permit, not a gun permit.
Weapons includes a very long list of inanimate object, but the most important weapon is located between my ears.
In your case, that place seems to be empty airspace....
They have amendments for a reason. Sometimes, things change and laws need to change.
See, if you'd follow my suggestion, you wouldn't have to propose silliness like calling guns 'inanimate objects'. You wouldn't have to piece together bits of data from history or other countries trying to defend guns.
