ADVERTISEMENT

In before the gun confiscation NUTS.....

You don't support cancer. Do you?

You support abortion.

Abortion kills far more than guns do.

But you obsess over guns, and support abortion.

Explain yourself.
I think abortion needs to be an option in certain situations.

I obsess over guns? Shouldn't that be WE obsess over guns?
 
Only one thing.

The guns are a sacred cow.
You are free to have that opinion but that's what y'all should say instead of stupid stuff like "guns can't hurt anyone, they're inanimate".

Y'all should say "we support unlimited gun sales and we don't care what problems it causes." That would be honest.
 
You are free to have that opinion but that's what y'all should say instead of stupid stuff like "guns can't hurt anyone, they're inanimate".

Y'all should say "we support unlimited gun sales and we don't care what problems it causes." That would be honest.
I was being glib, but since guns are the only inanimate object enshrined in the constitution, it would qualify, no?

I will paraphrase what you said to reflect what I mean.

I support unlimited gun sales to persons not prohibited because that was the founder's intent and any problems that result are a necessary evil and burden that results from being free men.

Your options are to change the constitution or leave it be.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: BamaFan1137
You are free to have that opinion but that's what y'all should say instead of stupid stuff like "guns can't hurt anyone, they're inanimate".

Y'all should say "we support unlimited gun sales and we don't care what problems it causes." That would be honest.
This is a 100% FACTUAL statement. A gun that is not touched by human hands is 100% safe. Cannot harm even the smallest flies. My many guns in my safe prove this every day. Even the ones hidden around my house never seem to hurt anyone. I wonder if I own "good" guns? I am confused as to why MY guns are harmless? Theo...can you help here?
 
I was being glib, but since guns are the only inanimate object enshrined in the constitution, it would qualify, no?

I will paraphrase what you said to reflect what I mean.

I support unlimited gun sales persons not prohibited because that was the founders intent and any problems that result are a necessary evil and burden that results from being free men.

Your options are to change the constitution or leave it be.
1. Just because something is a law doesn't mean it's right or that it will never change.

2. It's certainly within reason to say that gun violence is part of the cost of being free. But say that instead of wildly spinning to try showing that guns aren't a problem.
 
1. Just because something is a law doesn't mean it's right or that it will never change.

2. It's certainly within reason to say that gun violence is part of the cost of being free. But say that instead of wildly spinning to try showing that guns aren't a problem.
Can you show PROOF that guns are the problem? Or are they YOUR problem Teo? Because they are protection!
 
I think abortion needs to be an option in certain situations.

I obsess over guns? Shouldn't that be WE obsess over guns?
No. You obsess over guns. I obsess over reducing violent deaths.

You obsess over inanimate objects. That's why you are terrified by violent deaths via guns, but violent deaths via abortion doesn't bother you.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mdfgator
No. You obsess over guns. I obsess over reducing violent deaths.

You obsess over inanimate objects. That's why you are terrified by violent deaths via guns, but violent deaths via abortion doesn't bother you.
Right. You're almost never in gun discussions. I guess you really don't care that much.
 
Right. You're almost never in gun discussions. I guess you really don't care that much.
I care greatly about reducing violent deaths. I also care that birdbrains who focus on guns and not the criminals using the guns lead to MORE violent deaths.

You make the problem worse. That's why I care.
 
1. Just because something is a law doesn't mean it's right or that it will never change.
As I said, amend the Constitution then.


2. It's certainly within reason to say that gun violence is part of the cost of being free. But say that instead of wildly spinning to try showing that guns aren't a problem.
I'm reasonably sure I have said precisely that on more than one post in this thread.
 
Why were guns invented? Someone felt the need to target practice?

The guns I'm referring to were absolutely built and designed for target practice from blueprint to the factory. Your comparison of these guns to Samuel Colt's equalizer is just ignorant.

Watching you dig your heels in is entertaining as hell fwiw. I knew you would when I brought this up. Thank you for not disappointing. 😂
 
I was being glib, but since guns are the only inanimate object enshrined in the constitution, it would qualify, no?

I will paraphrase what you said to reflect what I mean.

I support unlimited gun sales to persons not prohibited because that was the founder's intent and any problems that result are a necessary evil and burden that results from being free men.

Your options are to change the constitution or leave it be.

💯
 
1. Just because something is a law doesn't mean it's right or that it will never change.

2. It's certainly within reason to say that gun violence is part of the cost of being free. But say that instead of wildly spinning to try showing that guns aren't a problem.
When you change the law, what is the plan for getting the existing guns? How are you going to get my guns out of my safe? You gonna send men with guns?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
When you change the law, what is the plan for getting the existing guns? How are you going to get my guns out of my safe? You gonna send men with guns?
Well, let's say you had 10 guns and my new law limited you to 5. If you didn't do anything, you'd be in possession of illegal weapons. If you played your cards right, probably no one would ever know.

But, you would be breaking the law and you wouldn't want to get caught because my punishment for illegal weapons wouldn't be all warm and fuzzy. ;)
 
Well, let's say you had 10 guns and my new law limited you to 5. If you didn't do anything, you'd be in possession of illegal weapons. If you played your cards right, probably no one would ever know.

But, you would be breaking the law and you wouldn't want to get caught because my punishment for illegal weapons wouldn't be all warm and fuzzy. ;)
Hilarious. So this is an exercise in virtue signaling. You just want unenforceable laws on the books cause it makes you feel morally superior
 
Well, let's say you had 10 guns and my new law limited you to 5. If you didn't do anything, you'd be in possession of illegal weapons. If you played your cards right, probably no one would ever know.

But, you would be breaking the law and you wouldn't want to get caught because my punishment for illegal weapons wouldn't be all warm and fuzzy. ;)
You'd have to leave your porch to change the law. We'll be ok.
 
How would you catch them?
They could get caught with an unregistered gun. Someone could tattle. Maybe some guns sales database would lead us to them. Like I said, if they took reasonable precautions, their illegal weapons may never be found.
 
They could get caught with an unregistered gun. Someone could tattle. Maybe some guns sales database would lead us to them. Like I said, if they took reasonable precautions, their illegal weapons may never be found.
I guess that what I’m saying. What you are proposing wouldn’t curtail anything. It’s virtue signaling so the morons who don’t know anything about guns could feel good inside. A database would only lead you to people who are foolish enough to go thru a license arms dealer. I have not filled out federal paperwork for a firearm in years.
 
Last edited:
I guess that what I’m saying. What you are proposing wouldn’t curtail anything. It’s virtue signaling so the morons who don’t know anything about guns could feel good inside. A database would only lead you to people who are foolish enough to go thru a license arms dealer. I have not filled out federal paperwork for a firearm in years.
You'd keep illegal weapons? I figured you for respecting the law.
 
They could get caught with an unregistered gun. Someone could tattle. Maybe some guns sales database would lead us to them. Like I said, if they took reasonable precautions, their illegal weapons may never be found.
IOW your plan will have zero bearing on criminal gun ownership. What a surprise.
 
I really dont like when I am on the side of monkeys without the ability to think for themselves. I guess a stopped clock really is right occasionally
 
Last edited:
So really, the 2nd amendment is just a convenience to you. If it went away, you wouldn't change your attitude on guns at all.
Now you are catching on. My rights come from the Creator, the piece of paper simply acknowledge them. I would just as well put your eyes out with a hot fireplace poker than submit to your tyranny
 
Why do you dislike guns so much?
Well, I think that the number of guns in America is causing us problems but I don't mind qualified people having guns for protection or hunting or whatever.

I also think that gun nuts are on par with any other nutty group you can think of. They are so focused on defending guns they can't think straight.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT