I'm very upset that the gun nuts are in a frenzy. It's not funny to me at all.
In before the gun confiscation NUTS.....
- Thread starter Capt Ron 1
- Start date
Gun nuts are in a frenzy anytime ANY of our Constitutional rights are threatened.
Byproduct of being awake. And being a patriot.
Zzzzzzzzzz.....
How does a person who cannot protect his own family decide what A REAL MAN gets to do? I do not think that would work out very well for us Theo!
You live your life in fear while the gun companies count their money.
Is @GatorTheo actually accusing someone else of living in fear?
Better to have and not need than need and not have.
And the right is guaranteed by the document which defines us as a nation. That's the end of the debate.
If you guys want a gunless country, go start one elsewhere.
That's the end of the debate? I think probably not. The 18th amendment certainly wasn't the end of the debate, was it?
Simple answer. Yes. That’s the end of the debate.
The 18th wasn't in the Bill of Rights, was it? If you think you, and like minded people, can overturn the 2nd and then successfully impose a new law banning firearms, have at it. I hope each of you will be willing to knock on doors and demand those guns after that great achievement.
Yes, it's the end of the debate. The Bill of Rights trumps your opinion. As I said earlier, found your own country and do all of this crap...but stop trying to "fundamentally change" this one.
If the debate is over, in your opinion, why do you keep talking about it? Shouldn't you just drop out of the discussion?
Imagine the fear ANYONE would feel if they were afraid of guns...and some people crashed through their door and were going to harm their family...and BECAUSE they had a Diment'd take on firearms, they could not defend their loved ones.
So I am confused...is it the guns you hate, or our capitalistic society? Gun companies are SUPPOPSED to make money, Theo.
Your best post ever.... I would add that "because OUR Country will not take away our Constitutional rights.
The gun companies have convinced you people that, at any minute, people will be breaking down your door. You'd better go buy another gun right now so you can defend your family even better!
No Theo...YOU should. YOU are the person resisting the laws of our land...our very own CONSTITUTION. Does it man anything to you...or just conveinantly?
What an idiotic statement. In my life...I have never had contact with ANYONE..not ONE person from a gun company...in fact, 90% of my guns were bought from individuals. So that just DESTROYED that ridiculous garbage you are spewing, son.
Oh...and are you saying home invasions do not happen? Please expound, and inform the rest of us what My Theo would do if it happened at his residence!! I will check back for your answer....
Just to educate you on a subject you have ZERO clue about...there are 1
65 MILLION home invasions per year. So dooing the math in my head, you stand a 1 in 200 chance for it to happen to YOU. Like those odds? Are you a bad azz and can protect your family without a gun?
I don't hate guns or capitalism but I'm also not blinded to the problems they cause.
Of course they happen. It's just so rare that I don't fret about it. A plane could land on my house too but I don't wear a helmet.
The Debate being over isn’t an opinion.
And no.
How is the Lincoln Project going for you?
Just the solutions. Right?
Let’s not get any of these issues twisted. The second Amendment is there to protect against a tyrannical Gov.
That’s THE reason people want to get rid of it. Same reason folks want to get rid of the 1st Amendment.
In his mind, he's safer if he doesn't have a gun. Probably right in his case, if he had to touch it he would probably panic and drop it and shoot his foot off.
I could start a rebuttal with the words, "The anti-gun lobby has convinced you...." and I'm certain that my statement would be as meaningless to you as yours is to me each time you type it out.
The debate is in fact over. We can discuss why you are wrong and how your views trample on the Bill of Rights along with the document that literally defines America but that in no way means that debate isn't over.
You have the right to not own a gun. I will defend your right not to own one. It would be great if you were willing to defend my rights...but I'd settle if you'd just stop trying to take them away.
1 in 200 chance is RARE? LOLOL That is just home invasions! I feel much differently than you do about my duty to protect my loved ones. I could not live with myself if someone broke in to my house and did harm to my loved ones while I stood by and watched. I would not just watch...and at 62 yrs old, I cannot kick everyones azz like I used to be able to do. So to me...it's like carrying a jack in your car in case of a flat. Do you do that? Probably have better odds needing a gun than a jack. Do you carry a jack, Theo..you know...just in case. The STUPID person is NOT someone having a gun and never needing it. The STUPID person is the person who NEEDS a gun, but does not have it. You could agree with that Mr Theo?
I don't care what the anti-gun lobby or the pro-gun lobby have to say. I realize they both have agendas. I also realize the rational answer is in the middle. We shouldn't disarm citizens but they shouldn't have unfettered access to killing machines either.
You're frightened of home invaders so you want a gun. I'm fine with that as long as you are a responsible owner.
At any time have I said you shouldn't be able to have a gun to defend yourself?
Your killing machine is our self defense device. And regardless of what you call it, access to getting it is insanely regulated, and getting worse every day.
You are arguing a strawman and wasting everyone's time.
LOL! A gun nut should NEVER complain about strawmen! Do you even know what a strawman is?
Here is a strawman example to help you understand:
Arguing against taking away all guns when no one is saying take away all guns. A 'strawman' is when you argue against a point no one is making.
No one has unfettered access to guns. You are making a strawman argument. And now you are getting pissed cause I called you out on it.
How many times have I heard "what don't you understand about 'shall not be infringed'?"
The Constitution gives us the Right to Bear Arms. It does not grant us Unfettered Access to Arms.
Another strawman.
So maybe we agree. If you're allowed two guns, then you are 'bearing arms' so you can be constitutionally cut off from further weapons.
The Constitution gives you the Right to Bear Arms. Not the Right to Bear Two Arms, But That's It.
Your strawmen are getting weaker.
But if you have two weapons, maybe even just one, you are bearing arms so your constitutional right has been satisfied.
