In before the gun confiscation NUTS.....
- Thread starter Capt Ron 1
- Start date
I don't believe I have. I did state Britain has cucked themselves to the arab invasion and knives, bombs, and vehicles are being used against them for homicides. A few more muskets and things might be different. I also said Australian laws and New Zealand are unique, there won't be any caravans on foot invading them. Quite honestly IDGAF anyway. Not my problem, they don't vote here.
Something else, the NWO would love us to lay down our guns. There's some BS treaty the Obozo or Biden signed with regard to that but it has no weight or teeth. Evilz probably knows what I thinking about, I'm not looking it up.
Maybe not you but I lump all you crazies together for expedience.
Here it is. Trump killed any pretense of this. Biden hasn't done anything regarding agreeing to it. Furthermore, Congress has never ratified it.
The idea of an international agreement on trade in conventional arms has been rattling around for a while. In 2006 and 2008, the U.N. General Assembly voted on resolutions to pursue such a treaty. Both times the U.S. was the lone vote against. On Oct. 28, 2009, after Obama became president, the U.S. joined 152 other nations in voting to move forward with a conference in 2012.
FactCheck.org also points out that "two weeks before the 2009 General Assembly vote, Secretary of State Clinton stated a key condition of U.S. approval and made sure the caveat made it into the resolution: The 2012 conference must make its decisions by 'consensus,' she said.
In practical terms, that means every country has veto power on the negotiated agreement, and it won't go into effect without the approval of all. In short, no treaty will take effect if the U.S. does not agree."
First and foremost, the right to bear arms is protected by the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
And as FactCheck.org reports, the Supreme Court upheld that right in 2008 when it ruled, "Enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices off the table. These include the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."
Other countries definitely think we're all gun nuts. I remember that back when Reagan was president.
Also he had a gun on him. He decided the diesel and fertilizer was more efficient.
You can't get blood from a turnip. Minds are made up either way. Thankfully the Constitution is in place. Every inanimate object is a potential weapon. With the best of the best, it's merely feet and hands. There's no changing hearts and minds, so beat them to death with logic and facts. 😂
Gun violence happens every day all across America.
A couple of decades ago, someone committed a horrible act without guns.
Besides just being a red herring, what's the point supposed to be? Guns are somehow not so bad because you can kill people in other ways?
One of y'all's silliest 'points'.
Guns are designed to kill. They're not just some tool sitting around the workshop.
Correct. Guns aren't bad at all. Some people are. That's been the point the entire time.
That and even if you believe that inanimate objects like guns are bad, when you have more guns than people, you can't get them away from bad people even if you try really, really hard.
You can possibly disarm good people though. Even that isn't a sure thing.
Every post you've left so far on this page.
Not a single post about the criminals. You've posted more about the NWO wrestling faction than you have the criminals.
Holy crap...what about Chuck Norris?
Norris was actually a student of Bruce Lee's. Can't remember off hand which one of his movies they had the fight scene in.
Nobody's doing backflips trying to defend criminals.
I'd imagine, for the most part, we agree on criminals.
How many people were killed in Chicago over the weekend with knives, clubs or swords?
Look how long it's taken to reduce the number of smokers. Decades. Think of how hooked people were but it's gotten a lot better.
Let me guess, the reason Cook County gun control doesn't work is the rest of the State of Illinois isn't insane. Because spotty gun control doesn't work.
It's like trying to have one dry county in a state. It's not going to work very well, right?
It doesn't work well because criminals don't follow laws.
Then why have any laws at all? Why have a law against murder? I mean, criminals don't follow laws, right?
Show me the county in the state of Illinois that has lax gun regulations and an equal or higher rate of gun violence.
I'll wait.
I'll go further. No gun stores, you can't conceal carry and the entire state required a state ID specifically to buy your one firearm a month. The only people in Chicago that should have guns are the police. But they aren't shooting children and old people in the street or at parks or at barbecues. That's pretty much all gang violence and they don't seem to have a problem getting guns even though it's illegal for them to have them.
How is that possible?
They can 'only' buy 12 firearms each year? That's really cracking down! 😂
How long have these 'restrictive' laws been in place? Common sense gun laws would take decades to bear significant results because America is flooded with guns.
Answer the question. Why are people who are prohibited from owning or purchasing firearms not only possessing firearms but using them in the commission of felonies?
Don't they know it's against the law?
Cook County has had restrictive gun laws since Prohibition for obvious reasons. The no gun stores in city limits and firearm card are new.
Because we make it easy. We are flooded with guns in America. I believe we're the only country with more guns than people and it's not even close.
Why do we have so many illegal immigrants when it's illegal? Because we make it easy.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Military chopper crashes into airliner....terrorism or crazy accident?
- Latest: Hotlanta_Bill