ADVERTISEMENT

BREYER TO RETIRE FROM SC

I wonder who will take his place??

My picks

1 .Corn Pop
2. Crack head son as he's the smartest person Dementia Joe has ever met
3. Wild Card... Whoever the CCP tells him to nominate

Whoever it is they will have to put the name on the teleprompter as there is no chance this mentally challenged moron will remember it on the 15 foot walk to the podium
Unfortunately the democrats force racism in EVERYTHING they do, so the most qualified person will not get the job...just EXATLY like what happened with our 15 dollar whore VP
 
If Mitch is really savvy, he will let this one go quickly and let Biden fulfill a campaign promise. Zero reason to die on this hill and if anything it will cement long held perceptions against Mitch.

Let the Democrats nominate their person, the top two are Ivy League graduates and interns to the SC. Regardless of whether they are ideal or not is not important. A 6-3 split will still hold.

Dying on the hill will only cement Mitch as an obtuse, obstructionist. No reason to do that.
I actually think he will. Zero reason to fight this.
 
Precisely. It's an EASY way to show that Republican party can be accomodating and let the President fulfill his/er remit. It also set a respectful bar for when, the D, go into the minority in 2022.
Why play nice in the sandbox with the Dimtards? FTS. They are the dirtiest, most underhanded political party in the western hemisphere. All of that happy horseshit impeaching Trump (once, for outing Biden's crimes and the other, for just being office when Pelosi refused to call in the National Guard on her watch).

Nay!
 
This from the guy who couldn't even pull a correct number from an electoral map and made several posts off a completely bullshit number that was pretty obvious to everyone else. Ya, that's the guy who is going to point out a typo, LOL

Your wrong here and you know it. So does the rest of the world. But, just as the countless number of other times you have been wrong you will never admit it. Yup, your that guy.
That's not a typo. You made up a word.

And I grabbed a wrong number from a website, and am not hiding from it (but my point was still valid). If that's what you're using to prove your point here, it's clear you don't have one.

Unless your argument is that the systems of checks and balances that have been the cornerstone of our Representative Republic since inception should be thrown out...but that's a much bigger discussion.
 
Yes let's show the dems we can be accommodating. It's always worked before.
1AERPW8.gif
 
That's not a typo. You made up a word.

And I grabbed a wrong number from a website, and am not hiding from it (but my point was still valid). If that's what you're using to prove your point here, it's clear you don't have one.

Unless your argument is that the systems of checks and balances that have been the cornerstone of our Representative Republic since inception should be thrown out...but that's a much bigger discussion.
I assumed you were just tricking @Illegal-shift into helping you prove that lefty site Politico is garbage on facts.

Well that's what happened, regardless of intention. Good one, @Illegal-shift!
 
Why play nice in the sandbox with the Dimtards? FTS. They are the dirtiest, most underhanded political party in the western hemisphere. All of that happy horseshit impeaching Trump (once, for outing Biden's crimes and the other, for just being office when Pelosi refused to call in the National Guard on her watch).

Nay!
Why is simple - look reasonable to independents who are leaving the democrats in spades. Keep them in the exodus.

Focus on the prize: winning the 2022 elections. This is not worth fighting - Schumer has all of the votes. Keep the powder dry for other thing like BBB, Part 38 (or whatever version it is).
 
Why play nice in the sandbox with the Dimtards? FTS. They are the dirtiest, most underhanded political party in the western hemisphere. All of that happy horseshit impeaching Trump (once, for outing Biden's crimes and the other, for just being office when Pelosi refused to call in the National Guard on her watch).

Nay!
...and by the way, people are seeing this across the spectrum which is why Biden's approval rating is imploding.

Imploding.
 
The irony in this is the fact that because Obama nominated a boring and second rate intellect, progressive liberals took offense and didn't feel overly compelled to put more heat on their Senators to debate Garland's nomination.

FIFY. Garland has shown himself to be less than a stellar legal mind during his testimony as AG. The country dodged a bullet. Sotomayor fills the dimwit slot on the Court. One is all we can afford.
 
...and by the way, people are seeing this across the spectrum which is why Biden's approval rating is imploding.

Imploding.
And people are sick of being lied to and lying about what the dems are.

That's why Trump was the most popular president in the history of the Republican party. People want honesty.
 
Why is simple - look reasonable to independents who are leaving the democrats in spades. Keep them in the exodus.

Focus on the prize: winning the 2022 elections. This is not worth fighting - Schumer has all of the votes. Keep the powder dry for other thing like BBB, Part 38 (or whatever version it is).
You have your opinion, I have mine. Actually it's the GOP who is flocking to independent in droves. Why? Because the GOP has proven time and again when they get the power they are little better than a castrated donkey. We are going to have a rebirth within the GOP, the America First faction replacing the old Tea Party. There are RINOs retiring in big numbers. They know it's coming.
 
Why is simple - look reasonable to independents who are leaving the democrats in spades. Keep them in the exodus.

Focus on the prize: winning the 2022 elections. This is not worth fighting - Schumer has all of the votes. Keep the powder dry for other thing like BBB, Part 38 (or whatever version it is).
Agree with this. Unless Biden is foolish enough to nominate someone who is grossly incompetent and/or a hard-core left-wing ideologue culture warrior, fighting the nomination when it's a (assumed) liberal replacing an existing liberal is a battle probably not worth fighting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
Agree with this. Unless Biden is foolish enough to nominate someone who is grossly incompetent and/or a hard-core left-wing ideologue culture warrior, fighting the nomination when it's a (assumed) liberal replacing an existing liberal is a battle probably not worth fighting.
Spot on. Biden's top two nominees have impeccable education qualifications. But some of the 2nd and 3rd tier candidates would be questionable, at best.
 
You have your opinion, I have mine. Actually it's the GOP who is flocking to independent in droves. Why? Because the GOP has proven time and again when they get the power they are little better than a castrated donkey. We are going to have a rebirth within the GOP, the America First faction replacing the old Tea Party. There are RINOs retiring in big numbers. They know it's coming.
Bingo. The Trump haters will NEVER admit this, but Trump saved the republican party. The majority of the pubs were THIS close to bailing on the party for the reasons you said. Every election we were told by the pubs "give us power, and we will fix DC!"

First we gave them the House. Then they said they needed the Senate.

Then we gave them the Senate. Then they said give us the White House, give us Jeb Bush and then we can finally stop the dems!

That's when we said eff you and went with Trump.

Now the same RINOs are back to telling us to please compromise for the good of the party.

'Appeal to the independents!' LOL

Today's true independents were Republicans in 2016. 'Reaching across the isle' is why they left the pubs in the first place.
 
Who are his top 2 nominees?

Ketanji Jackson from the DC Circuit, and some woman from the California Supreme Court who is an incrementalist

I hope Biden goes with Ketanji. She has bonafide credentials, federal law experience and actually has rulings with reasonable deliberations ….. even though she’s on the liberal side of the fence. She’s head and shoulders above anyone else Biden is likely to nominate
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
Ketanji Jackson from the DC Circuit, and some woman from the California Supreme Court who is an incrementalist

I hope Biden goes with Ketanji. She has bonafide credentials, federal law experience and actually has rulings with reasonable deliberations ….. even though she’s on the liberal side of the fence. She’s head and shoulders above anyone else Biden is likely to nominate
Both are fine judges, impeccable credentials and have opinions rooted in law, although an activist bent. The country also breaks the color barrier with a female woman which symbolically is important. I would much rather have her and accomplish something than say, Merrick G. who is the worst form of milquetoast one could imagine.

Now, I do not want of them, but replacing Ketanji for Breyer is actually a step ahead for the country.
 
Precisely. It's an EASY way to show that Republican party can be accomodating and let the President fulfill his/er remit. It also set a respectful bar for when, the D, go into the minority in 2022.
It will be interesting to hear the filibuster arguments changes stripes once the republicans have control of congress again.

The question is will they overplay their hand like usually happens. Like the dems just did with BBB. Or will they finally realize that whoever is in power only has a small majority......so you need to govern with that reality. Instead of the normal "we have a mandate" mentality that usually results in losing power back.
 
Last edited:
It will be interesting to hear the filibuster arguments changes stripes once the republicans have control of congress again.

The big question for me is will they overplay their hand like usually happens. Like the dems just did with BBB. Or will they finally realize that whoever is in power only has a small majority......so you need to govern with that realization. Instead of the normal "we have a mandate" mentality that usually results in losing power back.
That is spot on. They should get "quick wins" and then highlight "if you like this, give us more power and control". Dems thought that the failing of 2010 was that they did not "go big enough" and tried to push a massive bill ($6.5T) where a small subset of that failed to pass. Had they focused on $500B and some targeted programs with a plea of "give us more control", they would be viewed as having momentum versus being a total flop.

Try to hold Biden accountable to fix the border, fix crime, fix inflation and pass some common sense crime bills and then re-tee up in 2024. Keep it rolling each year.
 
There is definitely a rebirth of the GOP. It's america first, populist and distrustful of global powers. Strong borders, strong police, fiscal discipline and dignity of the individual.
Trolling?

America 1st is a lie
Populist is the biggest lie
Fiscal discipline is a lie
Wtf is dignity of the individual?

They are only strong on borders and with police.
 
It will be interesting to hear the filibuster arguments changes stripes once the republicans have control of congress again.

The question is will they overplay their hand like usually happens. Like the dems just did with BBB. Or will they finally realize that whoever is in power only has a small majority......so you need to govern with that reality. Instead of the normal "we have a mandate" mentality that usually results in losing power back.
I mentioned this before. I expect politics to play it part with the filibuster. I truly think it won't be around in 5-10 years.
 
The Republicans should just phone the hearing in because even tough but fair questions of the nominee will be met by the dems and media (same thing) as racist. The dems are hoping for a fight. Don't give them one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
The Republicans should just phone the hearing in because even tough but fair questions of the nominee will be met by the dems and media (same thing) as racist. The dems are hoping for a fight. Don't give them one.
I hope they ask tough questions for America purpose. This is a lifetime appointment. No free ride.
 
Someone on Fox Business told me one of the top 3 picks is a defund police advocate. Will Brandon pick such?
It's Sherrilyn Ifill.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunburnt Indian
Someone on Fox Business told me one of the top 3 picks is a defund police advocate. Will Brandon pick such?
Ifill is bad news. She's a racist, plain and simple. And unaware - at least in 2107 - that Fox News is not dependent on the FTC for a license to operate.
Judge Jackson appears to be the best choice.
 
The Republicans should just phone the hearing in because even tough but fair questions of the nominee will be met by the dems and media (same thing) as racist. The dems are hoping for a fight. Don't give them one.
And dems will set the tone for the hearings. saying republicans better rise above their base instincts and treat the black woman with the respect they deserve.

You know, like the dems do...

 
Trolling?

America 1st is a lie
Populist is the biggest lie
Fiscal discipline is a lie
Wtf is dignity of the individual?

They are only strong on borders and with police.
America 1st is a lie? WTF? Let's allow 3rd world countries to overrun and invade us? Let's let China dictate our economy? Our labor force?:mad:
Populist is a lie? Do I GAF or care what Kommiefornia, the west coast, and New York thinks?
Fiscal discipline is 6 trillion in free shit????
Dignity of the individual damned sure isn't Freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, war is peace.

Our enemy isn't Russia or China. It's the efftard socialists living within our own borders. No, socialism won't work this time either. :mad::mad::mad:
 
It's Sherrilyn Ifill.


Ifill is bad news. She's a racist, plain and simple. And unaware - at least in 2107 - that Fox News is not dependent on the FTC for a license to operate.
Judge Jackson appears to be the best choice.
Brandon left off Marxist part when he announced his intention to pick a judge. He likely left out many, many black judges. We'll see.
 
America 1st is a lie? WTF? Let's allow 3rd world countries to overrun and invade us? Let's let China dictate our economy? Our labor force?:mad:
Populist is a lie? Do I GAF or care what Kommiefornia, the west coast, and New York thinks?
Fiscal discipline is 6 trillion in free shit????
Dignity of the individual damned sure isn't Freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, war is peace.

Our enemy isn't Russia or China. It's the efftard socialists living within our own borders. No, socialism won't work this time either. :mad::mad::mad:
I'm saying it's a lie that Republicans stand for it. Not saying the democrats do either. They both say these stupid catch phrases and get people to believe but if you actually look at the facts/data it's bs. Democrats say they are for the people, that's a lie. Republicans believe in limited government, that's a lie. They both lie and we get played.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CFAGator
Brandon left off Marxist part when he announced his intention to pick a judge. He likely left out many, many black judges. We'll see.
Let's see how it plays out. No need to get your panties in a bunch over something that we have no idea is true or even likely.
 
The next SC justice will be picked solely on race and gender. Will that justice have to recuse themselves from any case involving race and gender?? It only seems fair.
 
The next SC justice will be picked solely on race and gender. Will that justice have to recuse themselves from any case involving race and gender?? It only seems fair.
Reagan picked a judge because of gender (Day-O'Connor). Bush picked a judge because of race (Thomas). Trump picked judges to overturn a ruling (Kavanaugh, Gorsch, ACB).

Did you want them to recuse themselves when cases involving those topics came up? Or only this bother you?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT