ADVERTISEMENT

Breaking: Smoking gun. Biden’s secret Emails exposed

BillCutting4585 said:
If his son wasn’t being investigated, why would Biden need to threaten Ukraine?
Click to expand...

It wasn’t just Biden. The prosecutor was under fire by the international community for refusing to investigate corruption.

Biden, allies, pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases
www.google.com

Explainer: Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases

Trump has claimed Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor in order to benefit his son. Former diplomats say the prosecutor wasn't doing his job.
www.google.com
 
instaGATOR said:
Joe Biden’s Burisma Denial Falling Apart – Yet To Apologize

A Senate committee is now investigating the recently obtained emails from Hunter Biden, in which the Democrat nominee’s son appeared to introduce his father to a top executive at Ukrainian energy firm Burisma. One America’s Chanel Rion has more on this report from Washington.

https://www.oann.com/tag/chanel-rion/
Click to expand...

They already did.


The FBI supposedly had the data last year, so it’s unlikely that the senators have not already seen it.

The claim that Hunter Biden would drop off incriminating data at a computer shop right after the allegations against him blew up, and then not bother to pick it up is a little hard to believe. Also, his drives weren’t encrypted? Unlikely for a high profile figure involved in sensitive work. No amount of crack smoking would lead to that.

I don’t doubt that he got a plumb job due to his father’s position, but the claim that he was paid tens of millions is probably BS and would be trivial for the FBI (and a senate committee with political motives) to trace.
 
Uniformed_ReRe said:
This article explains the myriad problems with this story:

www.google.com

Suspect provenance of Hunter Biden data cache prompts skepticism and social media bans | TechCrunch

A cache of emails and other selected data purportedly from a laptop owned by Hunter Biden were published today by the New York Post. Ordinarily a major
www.google.com www.google.com
Click to expand...

Good grief that article is hogwash. For me it starts and ends with this. Replace the name biden with trump and trump jr. would the same outlets be so patient to publish and allow that content?

I mean, the same folks ran with the steel dossier for how long?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137, Sunburnt Indian, IrishPokerDog and 1 other person
has the Biden campaign come out and denied these emails or called them fabricated? I’ve seen Democrats and Biden Fanboys trying to push that this isn’t real but is there any official denial by Biden or at least his staff yet?
 
“Mr. Shokin attempted to continue the investigations but on or around June or July of 2015, the U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt told him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves, which according to Mr. Shokin, that implied do nothing,” the notes from the interview stated. The notes also claimed Shokin was told Biden had held up U.S. aid to Ukraine over the investigation.
(that fact is proven by Corrupt Joe's own words on the CFR video)

Biden, who has been seeking to unseat President Trump in 2020, once famously boasted on camera that when he was vice president and spearheading the Obama administration’s Ukraine (Anti-Corruption) policy, he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin who was the top prosecutor at the time. He had been investigating the founder of Burisma Holdings, where Hunter Biden had a lucrative role on the board. Hunter was actually being paid as a lobbyist for insider access to his corrupt VP father. 🤓

www.independent.co.uk

The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal

Donald Trump said Ukraine’s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his son’s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
Uniformed_ReRe said:
It wasn’t just Biden. The prosecutor was under fire by the international community for refusing to investigate corruption.

Biden, allies, pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases
www.google.com

Explainer: Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases

Trump has claimed Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor in order to benefit his son. Former diplomats say the prosecutor wasn't doing his job.
www.google.com
Click to expand...

Okay, then why not let Ukraine handle their business in house?

From Biden’s own words, “fire the prosecutor or you’re not getting the one billion”. That statement leads me to believe that had Biden not said anything, the prosecutor would still be employed at the time of the transfer of money. If that’s the case, then by Biden stepping in only amounts to hiding something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137, GhostOfMatchesMalone and Sunburnt Indian
BillCutting4585 said:
Okay, then why not let Ukraine handle their business in house?

From Biden’s own words, “fire the prosecutor or you’re not getting the one billion”. That statement leads me to believe that had Biden not said anything, the prosecutor would still be employed at the time of the transfer of money. If that’s the case, then by Biden stepping in only amounts to hiding something.
Click to expand...

And that's the Quid-Pro-Co / Bribery that should have resulted in the Impeachment of VP Biden, instead of the fraudulent partisan attempt at Impeachment of the President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunburnt Indian and jfegaly
BillCutting4585 said:
1. I remember Swami and Passovergator at one point. I know Paco is the new moderator.

2. BONG = Big Ol’ Nasty Gator. He doesn’t post anymore due to an epic meltdown.
Click to expand...
Well, done Nikita. Your handlers came through for you.

But seriously, how can you remember those guys and have never posted. I hope you stick around. . It’s all in fun. Well, mostly anyway.
 
BillCutting4585 said:
Okay, then why not let Ukraine handle their business in house?

From Biden’s own words, “fire the prosecutor or you’re not getting the one billion”. That statement leads me to believe that had Biden not said anything, the prosecutor would still be employed at the time of the transfer of money. If that’s the case, then by Biden stepping in only amounts to hiding something.
Click to expand...
Because the IMF funding was depending on them cleaning up corruption. That’s not Biden. That’s an independent agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uniformed_ReRe
BSC911 said:
Because the IMF funding was depending on them cleaning up corruption. That’s not Biden. That’s an independent agency.
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO at your desperate attempt, and acting like you don’t know how the world works. Nevermind, I forgot that you don’t know how the world works
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunburnt Indian
Uniformed_ReRe said:
So, a guy calling himself “Hunter Biden” drops off a laptop at a computer store filled with incriminating data right around the same time that Hunter’s Ukraine dealings were being scrutinized? That’s a remarkable coincidence!

And then “Hunter Biden” doesn’t even bother to pick up the laptop that he knows is filled with sensitive info? How convenient!

Finally, the copy of the incriminating data is sent to Guiliani, someone well known to the FBI as the target of (and possible knowing participant in) Russian disinformation projects.
Click to expand...

So you're surprised that a known crackhead would make bad decisions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IrishPokerDog
fsumc said:
has the Biden campaign come out and denied these emails or called them fabricated? I’ve seen Democrats and Biden Fanboys trying to push that this isn’t real but is there any official denial by Biden or at least his staff yet?
Click to expand...

Hillary never denied the wikileaks emails either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsumc
jfegaly said:
ROFLMAO at your desperate attempt, and acting like you don’t know how the world works. Nevermind, I forgot that you don’t know how the world works
Click to expand...
Wrong. I’m actually quite worldly.
 
Last edited:
Uniformed_ReRe said:
It’s being taken out of context. It’s true that Biden pressured Ukraine to fire the guy. But, the video is being twisted to make it look like it was to protect his son.

Biden wouldn’t be publicly bragging about getting the guy fired if it was about that.
Click to expand...

LOL Well that sounds logical.

Hell of it is there's probably a pee tape video of Hunter and Ukranian hookers on his laptop too. Somehow Trump will get blamed.
 
Uniformed_ReRe said:
The Biden campaign has probably concluded that even if the story is false, denying it would just draw more attention to it. And the voters who think it’s all true are probably voting for Trump anyway.
Click to expand...

So you think Biden didn't do any of this, but no one wants to admit that, cause then more people would know about it?

IOW you're saying no one would believe Biden. That I can agree with you on.
 
NavigatorII said:
Strange isn't it? This bastard brags about it and the MSM..........crickets. But defeat the fascist Hildibeast and by god, we're going to cook up a bunch of fake Russian shit. Wow. Leftards are so delusional, it is just a shame Jim Jones didn't take them ALL to Jonestown with him.
Click to expand...
Another totally uncalled for sh__ty remark.,,,,,jim
 
The amazing thing is the same sheep that can't see how Biden did anything wrong or why anyone in his family (esp his crackhead son) WOULD do anything wrong.....are the same sheep that will tell you that they can clearly see that Trump and Putin are working together.

And not bat an eye doing it.
 
Uniformed_ReRe said:
It wasn’t just Biden. The prosecutor was under fire by the international community for refusing to investigate corruption.

Biden, allies, pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases
www.google.com

Explainer: Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases

Trump has claimed Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor in order to benefit his son. Former diplomats say the prosecutor wasn't doing his job.
www.google.com
Click to expand...

I love that the title of your link is 'Explainer'. It's like talking points for sheep.

"Are you a Biden supporter? Are you sick of having Trump supporters claim that Biden blackmailed Ukraine to keep his crackhead son out of jail? Well fear not, here we EXPLAIN to you what REALLY happened! Now you can link to US the next time a MAGAT slaps you upside the head with facts! F*** their facts! We have TALKING POINTS!"
 
BSC911 said:
Well, done Nikita. Your handlers came through for you.

But seriously, how can you remember those guys and have never posted. I hope you stick around. . It’s all in fun. Well, mostly anyway.
Click to expand...

The blue board became a cess pool and it got old.
 
Uniformed_ReRe said:
The Biden campaign has probably concluded that even if the story is false, denying it would just draw more attention to it. And the voters who think it’s all true are probably voting for Trump anyway.
Click to expand...
That makes zero f’n sense. They’re being allowed to stay silent on it because even in a town hall 48 hours later it isn’t brought up. But less than 24 hours after Trump’s tax stuff is leaked it’s been brought up over and over again.

With actual Election Day right around the corner, this should be a much bigger issue and clarification and validation should be driving the news cycle.

As you seem to be a skeptic of the Biden email credibility wouldn’t you want to hear from at least a staff member confirming it isn’t true or real? What if it turns out to be true and/or the Biden’s admit they’re legit emails? Seems to be an awful lot of preparatory shoulder shrugging on this from the pearl clutching crowd that faints every time Trump is being mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IrishPokerDog, BamaFan1137, jfegaly and 1 other person
BSC911 said:
Because the IMF funding was depending on them cleaning up corruption. That’s not Biden. That’s an independent agency.
Click to expand...

So after Biden got the prosecutor fired, then magically all the corruption got cleaned up?

Don’t you think Biden’s quid pro quo in itself is a sign of corruption?

Regardless of the billion or not, Russia still invaded Crimea and I could have sworn that billion was to fund the Ukrainian army, not to appease the IMF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IrishPokerDog, BamaFan1137, jfegaly and 2 others
fsumc said:
That makes zero f’n sense. They’re being allowed to stay silent on it because even in a town hall 48 hours later it isn’t brought up. But less than 24 hours after Trump’s tax stuff is leaked it’s been brought up over and over again.

With actual Election Day right around the corner, this should be a much bigger issue and clarification and validation should be driving the news cycle.

As you seem to be a skeptic of the Biden email credibility wouldn’t you want to hear from at least a staff member confirming it isn’t true or real? What if it turns out to be true and/or the Biden’s admit they’re legit emails? Seems to be an awful lot of preparatory shoulder shrugging on this from the pearl clutching crowd that faints every time Trump is being mean.
Click to expand...

Denying it won’t change anyone’s mind. Personally, I don’t need to hear an official denial because the more I learn about the story the more I realize how implausible and amateurish it is. Journalists and techies apparently came to the same realization, which is why they are treating it as BS. There are endless conspiracy theories bubbling up from fringe outlets and publicly denying them all would inadvertently legitimize them by even dignifying then with a response.

I don’t know how the NYTimes got Trump’s tax info. Personally, I loathe the NYTimes and their sanctimonious grandstanding, but I acknowledge that they have higher standards than straight-up garbage like the NYPost. It’s unlikely the the NYTimes would have gone with the tax story unless they were confident that they had solid sources.

And Trump has already acknowledged the key claims. He said that owing 400 million to a foreign creditor is no big deal to someone with his assets and that he is a businessman who wants to pay as little tax as he can get away with.
 
When the 4th largest print news outlet unleashes a story like this it comes across as intellectually dishonest to throw it in the category as fringe conspiracy. We watched over three years of news outlets falling over themselves to break news about collusion that never happened.

Is the amateurishness of this that a politician and/or someone close to them could be so careless? We have seen people in power and those close to them act carelessly for millenniums. It’s how they get busted. They feel invincible. Clinton was bleaching and destroying phones, computers, and servers. Pretty brazen stuff. This isn’t that different.

Also, it just broke that one the people on the emails has confirmed it’s real and “the big guy” is Joe Biden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GhostOfMatchesMalone, IrishPokerDog, nail1988 and 2 others
Uniformed_ReRe said:
I expect crackheads to make bad decisions, but there too many problems and extraordinary coincidences surrounding the provenance of the computer for me to find it credible.
Click to expand...

No offense intended but your incredulity may also be aided by the fact that you don't wish to believe it. In fairness, I'm certain that I lend it more credibility because I do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly and nail1988
Uniformed_ReRe said:
Denying it won’t change anyone’s mind. Personally, I don’t need to hear an official denial because the more I learn about the story the more I realize how implausible and amateurish it is. Journalists and techies apparently came to the same realization, which is why they are treating it as BS. There are endless conspiracy theories bubbling up from fringe outlets and publicly denying them all would inadvertently legitimize them by even dignifying then with a response.

I don’t know how the NYTimes got Trump’s tax info. Personally, I loathe the NYTimes and their sanctimonious grandstanding, but I acknowledge that they have higher standards than straight-up garbage like the NYPost. It’s unlikely the the NYTimes would have gone with the tax story unless they were confident that they had solid sources.

And Trump has already acknowledged the key claims. He said that owing 400 million to a foreign creditor is no big deal to someone with his assets and that he is a businessman who wants to pay as little tax as he can get away with.
Click to expand...

Again, your desire to believe or not believe a story seems to be a big factor. Your assumptions are based in large part on your preferences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IrishPokerDog, jfegaly and nail1988
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R

Further info reveals Trump’s mob planned for hostage-taking and assassinations

Replies
16
Views
1K
The Parking Lot
NavigatorII
NavigatorII
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back