Exactly! and people from the great state of Florida! haha
Barr on Hunter and Trump.
- Thread starter kalimgoodman
- Start date
Here’s me, a month earlier, disagreeing with now-Democratic presidential candidate RFJ Jr., and speaking in favor of the COVID vaccine.
Post in thread 'Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Pfizer & Moderna COVID Vaccine Nanoparticals Coated With Toxic Chemical That Could Prove Deadly'
https://florida.forums.rivals.com/t...al-that-could-prove-deadly.97381/post-1850824
BTW, didn't we see this same thing with the Braggs indictment? I seem to remember Braggs also withheld key information that would have likely resulted in the Grand Jury not delivering the indictment.
This is all about getting the sheep riled up. Another crash and burn.
That's great. What was Trump saying at the time?
Bottom line is you didn't get the shot while Trump was president and pushing for them, did you?
I don't think you would have.
Now if you have asthma, that makes it more understandable that you would get the shot in late 2020 or very early 2021, since there was massive fear mongering at the time about how even a mild case of covid makes it extremely difficult to breathe.
But my point is, I don't think you would have gotten the shot if you thought Trump wanted you to. I think you hate Trump that much even though you did want the shot.
Sorry, you posting history here is what I base that opinion on.
“Sorry, you posting history here is what I base that opinion on.”
Clearly, my posting history is NOT what you are basing your opinion on, since my posting history is pro-vaccine going back into 2020.
What in God's name are you talking about?
Barr is a proven political hack who has an axe to grind with the guy who fired him. If he's your source you need to find another one, he's not leading you down the right path. His goal with the interview with Bream was maximum political damage. Nothing he's said is reflected in the PRA or the precedent set by judge Jackson.
It's laughable this is all you have...in this thread alone there are solid sources completely refuting what Barr said.
Very late 2020. Which was around the time that the left was morphing from 'don't take the shots, they are evil cause Trump is evil' into 'the shots are perfectly safe MUST TAKE THE SHOTS!'
And you know that. Just like you know why I have, based on your posting history, obvious skepticism that you would get the shots if you thought Trump supported them and the left did not.
Based on what you've posted here, it seems when you first got the shot, the left had morphed its position to favoring the shots.
1) Who appointed the Special Counsel?
2) Who does that person report to?
3) Name one example where that person held a democrat liable for anything. Ever.
And grand juries are citizens, but only one side gets to present their case. There's no defense present at all. That's why the phrase "you could indict a ham sandwich" exists.
You don't understand any of this, do you?
Remember, the maximum time is 4 hours. If it lasts longer than that please seek medical assistance.
Barr is proven hack for the REPUBLICANS! Barr resigned because Trump lost the election and he was out anyway. Barr said that himself. He knew that in 3 months, Biden was firing him anyway. He doesn't have an axe to grind.
We shall see, I am not for fighting over something that we can just let play out.
What did Barr do to benefit the REPUBLICANS? He did literally zero of the things he said he wanted to do as AG, and his concealment of the Hunter Biden investigation prior to the election did material harm to Trump's reelection chances.
And there's no fight, you're tilting at windmills because your bias won't let you see pertinent facts.
You have offered no reasonable argument.
It's only the #1 document that deals with Presidential Records (Passed to specifically deal with Presidential and VP Records as before 1980, they ALL were considered the private property of that President), so of course he won't be able to bring it up.
Funny, that Smith is trying to use the Espionage Act of 1917, which prohibited obtaining information, recording pictures, or copying descriptions of any information relating to the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information may be used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation. There is no evidence that the former President, who took documents and actually has 5 years to review, per statute, had ANY INTENT to use any of them to INJURY the USA. The Judge should have tossed the indictment.
A judge can not stop a Defense that involves/uses a Federal Statute.
I WAS going to comment that "you could NOT POSSIBLY be this stupid"...then I realized I did not want to lie on theses boards..so I refrained.
Only a glorified IDIOT could post this. Why? Because Biden had classified documents FOR DECADES. From when he was a Senator. He moved them around the Country MANY times. And had no right to have them in ANY case.
Gpa anything coming your mouth should be refrained at all times, the truth ain’t in ya
Very true. DAs do NOT show any evidence that favors the Defendant. They will not allow any type of talk about legal defenses, etc. A grand jury is NOT a trial, its only a mechanism for the DA to determine whether or not HIS evidence is sufficient enough to charge the person and what specific crimes they can charge.
You forgot, the Special Counsel is a Democrat who donated to the Biden Campaign.
Literally everything he did benefitted the Rs, then he didn't believe in the BS about the election after looking into it, so now he's bad? so hilarious.
He didn't conceal anything on Hunter. He literally opened the investigation!
You have this odd thing of calling opinions, facts. Yet, we shall see
Hey Kal
when you get home get your note pad out and take some notes
when you get home get your note pad out and take some notes
Man you need to stay away from these scam sites there has to be malware and other viruses, the wolves prey on sheep be careful.
LOl. He never fired Barr. You’re thinking is Sessions, who authorized the Russia Investigation.
LOL. These guys act like they understand the law. They heard some rondo talking head on TV and now think he has an air tight defense. Like the prosecutor never heard of the Clinton sock drawer or whatever.
And didn't his wife have something to do with that puff piece on Netflix on the obamas?
What integrity the democrats have!
Your boy Jack has a history of stretching the law and getting slapped down. One time SCOTUS ruled against him 8-0.
But I’m sure you know all about his history.
Why do you say things that are so easy to prove wrong?
Barr Concealed Hunter Biden Probe Before Election - The Crime Report
Attorney General William Barr has known about a set of investigations involving Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings since at least this spring and worked to avoid their public disclosure during the heated election campaign.
thecrimereport.org
WSJ News Exclusive | Barr Worked to Keep Hunter Biden Probes From Public View During Election
Attorney General William Barr has known about a set of investigations involving Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings since at least this spring, a person familiar with the matter said, and worked to avoid their public disclosure during the election campaign.
www.wsj.com
Barr Worked to Keep Hunter Biden Investigations from Public During Election: Report | National Review
Attorney General Barr did not budge under pressure from Congressional Republicans who pressed him for more information into the investigations.
www.nationalreview.com
What did Barr do that actually benefited Republicans? He talked a good game but he didn’t do much, if anything.
You really are ignorant. Sessions didn't have anything to do with that. He just recused himself from the faux case.
Wow, I suppose ignorance is bliss. 😂😂😂( I feel the winds of an alert are brewing!!!!) Cat 5!!!
What did you prove wrong? I said that he opened the Hunter investigation. What was wrong about that comment?Why do you say things that are so easy to prove wrong?
Barr Concealed Hunter Biden Probe Before Election - The Crime Report
Attorney General William Barr has known about a set of investigations involving Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings since at least this spring and worked to avoid their public disclosure during the heated election campaign.
WSJ News Exclusive | Barr Worked to Keep Hunter Biden Probes From Public View During Election
Attorney General William Barr has known about a set of investigations involving Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings since at least this spring, a person familiar with the matter said, and worked to avoid their public disclosure during the election campaign.
Barr Worked to Keep Hunter Biden Investigations from Public During Election: Report | National Review
Attorney General Barr did not budge under pressure from Congressional Republicans who pressed him for more information into the investigations.
What did Barr do that actually benefited Republicans? He talked a good game but he didn’t do much, if anything.
Similar threads
