Anyone Watching These Hearings Today
- Thread starter BSC911
- Start date
Great. Now we've got trolls libsplaining what we really think.
antifa member John Sullivan filmed himself entering the capitol. He was seen wearing Trump gear.
Viking man and his two buddies that the media told @fsu939913 was 'QAnon' was photographed participating in BLM rallies in Michigan.
Video was shown of cops removing barriers, opening the doors to the capitol, and inviting people in.
There's nothing to 'think'. The evidence tells us what happened.
I think you are overestimated Ghost though. He truly is that delusional.
SO CONFUSING. Was the Jan. 6 mostly peaceful protest: 1. A planned insurrection; or 2. This happened because of Trump’s speech and call for his followers to March to the Capital. It can not be both. Trump had not even finished his speech when the protest began. OH, I GET IT, it’s whatever will cause the most political damage to Trump.
Actually it can be both. Certainly some came well armed and preplanned the attack. Others were incited by Trump and others once the ball got rolling. It’s group dynamics.
So, you’re wrong. It can be some of both.
And now we have Officer Harry Smollett, err....Dunn
National Police Association slams Jan. 6 probe as ‘dog and pony show,' calls for investigation of Floyd riots
The National Police Association on Wednesday slammed Congress’ investigation of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot as a politically motivated “dog and pony show” that has no intention of uncovering the truth of what really happened that day.
You damn sure are a snowflake, and also one hell of an idiot if you are happy with Hiden as President. You have to be a Seminhole fan.
Idk the what Pelosi did or didn't do. What I do know is saying she was in charge is inaccurate. That part is debunked and is being made political. Questioning the board is ok, why didn't the board decide to send more cops but to single out her is disingenuous. Also, Cheney and Adam K said they will investigate that but the investigation won't be about that like McCarthy and crew wants it to be.
I don't recall the Capitol being breached doing the summer of 2020. Provide link?
The officers told their account with body cams to support it. I know one officer was said to be lying about saying he had kids comment but that was proved that he did say that. Saying what they saw and heard is important testimony. You don't think say? People have gotten death penalties because someone seen or heard them commit/plan a crime. We've learned/learned yesterday that people directly said Trump send them and they were there to stop the steal. We've learned/confirmed that it wasn't peaceful as some was saying, we learned/confirmed that mindset of some of the people there. We learned/confirmed that it wasn't Antifa/BLM. Alot was learned yesterday besides the emotional stuff.
Ghost definitely isn't a troll. I wouldn't be shocked if he was there on Jan 6th. He fits that mindset.
Yep. Every hearing, the dem's star witness is outted as a massive liar.
Sounds like he is a massive racist too. I'll connect the dots and guess he's also a dem.
Sheep hoodwinked once again...
Biden? It's like shitting your pants and then deciding to change your shirt. No matter how you justify the insanity, this is your end result.
Adam. Lol. Seriously! Do u think if gop ppl came to riot or take over the capital they wouldn’t be armed ? This was planned by some antifa/white Supremacists. This wasn’t mega cause if it was we wouldn’t have a problem taking it over with. Lol. This is how dumb u and ur party is. U actually think trump started this. If trump wanted us to fight for him and take over the capital there isn’t shit u or ur party could do to stop it. Just look at how many attend his rallies. So stfu with trump instigated this. That’s dumb.
Last edited:
Adam! U have Biden’s jizz in ur chin. Wipe it off! Hahaha
Wait a minute. Haven’t the Dems, BLM, etc. been attacking the police for a decade now.
What's a LEO? I never ever attacked police officers and never will.
What do that have to do with this or me? I'm anti BLM and Antifa like you but one wrong doesn't make another wrong ok.
I agree but Republicans are home of the Blue Lives Matter for the most part. Guess it goes away if that Blue life is Blue 🤫🤔
Nope. It’s if they are being truthful and not posing with the leader of the house. Lol.
Why does that matter? Cops pose with plenty of politicians on both sides. So you're basically saying if a cop pose with a democrat then that's one reason not to care about them?
I just saw his post. Yeah, you’re right.
the lack of police presence and coordination is on multiple agencies, the DC Mayor and Pelosi.
On the other side, if Ghost really thinks he can deduce that it was all Antifa, then he has lost it.
Correct, I did. I did so to point out that he reported directly to Pelosi. Not a committee...to Pelosi. Those are the house rules. It's not a gray area; this is black and white.
I purposely picked a liberal fact checker that would verbatim tell you that the House Majority Leader (in this case Pelosi) was in fact who the SAA reported to. The SAA was and is responsible for House security. That ends this debate.
Yes, politifact called it mostly false. What did they call false? That Pelosi was in charge of the Capitol Police...which is something that no one is claiming. So they fact checked something that isn't be claimed ='s red herring.
This is too stupid to be an actual debate. On that note, 2+2 does actually = 4. That's not up for debate either.
Last edited:
Only a narcissist would say something like the above.
I'm not saying it but YOU know it's what I believe?
Do you know how easy it would be for me to flip this crap back on you? Because I KNOW what you really think even if you won't say it?
You're an idiot.
The claim was made that it was fake news that the Majority Leader is in fact in charge of House Security. The SAA is relevant to that debate.
If you do not wish to discuss the SAA, stop lying about Pelosi's role. Seems simple imo.
If it was relevant to another lie that you and your liar buddy were telling, absolutely.
Fake news...and already debunked. You read as much from a liberal fact checker...so you know you are lying. Here it is again...
No, Capitol security is not only Pelosi’s responsibility, but she bears some
IF YOUR TIME IS SHORT
- Capitol security is not solely the responsibility of the House speaker. It is provided by the sergeants-at-arms of the House and Senate, and by the Capitol Police.
- The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker, or Pelosi at the time of the attack. The Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader — on Jan. 6, Sen. Mitch McConnell.
It's in black and white from politifact, a left leaning website. I'm not sure why you can't read and understand it.
You are making claims and not backing them up. I am making claims and backing them up...using politifact ffs. But you can't understand why I don't believe your feelings over my fact.
Haha
You were the viking boy, just be honest. Also, viking boy was at trump rallys and posting pro trump stuff all over social media for yrs.
Kalim - I am with the other side on this. If she does not have the majority responsibity, why was she able to get the capitol police chief to resign?
Did Pelosi Reject Security Help at the Capitol on Jan. 6th? - Headline USA
Since the Democrat impeachment team backed away from questions and calling witnesses during the Senate trial, Republican committee leaders on Monday inquired with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., about the failure to protect the Capitol against trespassers on Jan. 6. “The Speaker is...
headlineusa.com
Before Congress convened on Jan. 6, Chief of the Capitol Police Steve Sund asked the Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who reports to Pelosi, for permission to activate the National Guard.
Irving denied the request, stating that neither the “optics” nor preliminary reports about potential violence justified the activation.
“Did Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving get permission or instruction from your staff on January 4th prior to denying Chief Sund’s request for the national guard?,” the Republicans asked.
After Jan. 6, Pelosi fired Irving and forced Sund to resign without consulting House Republicans.
It's like any other business. The guy may report to her but that doesn't mean that she's involved with day to day operations or operations at all (Which people have already said that she isn't). At my job, my boss has no idea what we do daily. She trust me to do my job and if it's not correct, ill be held accountable. This is pretty standard.“The Speaker is responsible for all operational decisions made within the House,” Republican Reps. Jim Jordan, Rodney Davis, James Comer, and Devin Nunes wrote in a letter.Did Pelosi Reject Security Help at the Capitol on Jan. 6th? - Headline USA
Since the Democrat impeachment team backed away from questions and calling witnesses during the Senate trial, Republican committee leaders on Monday inquired with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., about the failure to protect the Capitol against trespassers on Jan. 6. “The Speaker is...
Before Congress convened on Jan. 6, Chief of the Capitol Police Steve Sund asked the Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who reports to Pelosi, for permission to activate the National Guard.
Irving denied the request, stating that neither the “optics” nor preliminary reports about potential violence justified the activation.
“Did Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving get permission or instruction from your staff on January 4th prior to denying Chief Sund’s request for the national guard?,” the Republicans asked.
After Jan. 6, Pelosi fired Irving and forced Sund to resign without consulting House Republicans.
