ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone Watching These Hearings Today

They broke into private property. No excuses. You're a cop, you should know better. If i break into your house and just walked around and looked at your family pics, will i still get arrested and charged? or will you say, he peacefully broke it.

I'm a cop and I should know better?

Kindly quote the sentence that lead you to believe that I don't actually know better.

I have no idea what you are getting at with this post. But let's play...

A building is not a home. Typically breaking into a home (legally often referred to as a dwelling) is an entirely different, and more serious, crime than breaking into a building. However, both are criminal acts and anyone doing either should absolutely be arrested.
 
In certain areas it was certainly less peaceful. The comparison that you make below is disingenuous. The worst I saw from the crowd were windows smashed whereas with antifa and BLM it actually got MUCH more violent. Like orders of magnitude more violent.

And why is that the important thing? That was a telling phrase from you imho.




In those protests, they killed people and burnt thousands of buildings to the ground. Sometimes they tried for months to burn federal buildings down.

Your comparison is ludicrous. No reasonable person would actually compare the two.
You must not have listened to the police officers who testified.

And the difference is that was where our elected leaders were holding a vote to decide the next president. So, yes, comparing that to shops and stores getting burned IS ludicrous. Your partisanship is showing again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatorspeed
Hate to tell you this but Pelosi is not in charge of the security. Thats a right wing talking point that the right was sure that it believers wouldn't actually check for themselves.

Either way she refused the Republican nominations.
 
Hey Adam! Why is it that ur party released the violent protesters and even raised money to bail them out? We haven’t seen anything to whats going on with the Jan 6th protest. Those who didn’t even do an damage or harm are being held and convicted. So democrats get a pass while republicans don’t I see. Also, why were the ppl allowed to walk right in ? Why were the police just standing by and allowing everything to go down? Also, it was a big group who did the damage. It was a small group and video can be seen where the police just sat by and watched while mega ppl were stopping those who tried to damage the building.
so this is nothing like the Blm riots. Those actually really harmed a lot of ppl and burned cities down. Funny how the arm of the law doesn’t apply.
I agree about BLM BUT this doesnt apply. The Jan 6th people took property, pissed and throw feces all over the building. It wasn't all of them, trust that i know that but it was alot of them.

The police need to be investigated as well. Why did they do nothing in some areas? Were they involved? we need those answers, hence the committee!
 
Hey Adam! Why is it that ur party released the violent protesters and even raised money to bail them out? We haven’t seen anything to whats going on with the Jan 6th protest. Those who didn’t even do an damage or harm are being held and convicted. So democrats get a pass while republicans don’t I see. Also, why were the ppl allowed to walk right in ? Why were the police just standing by and allowing everything to go down? Also, it was a big group who did the damage. It was a small group and video can be seen where the police just sat by and watched while mega ppl were stopping those who tried to damage the building.
so this is nothing like the Blm riots. Those actually really harmed a lot of ppl and burned cities down. Funny how the arm of the law doesn’t apply.
Nice try Captain Deflection.

if it were me, I’d be OK if all of the violent protestors, BLM or MAGA, were locked away for good. That would teach them.
 
I'm a cop and I should know better?

Kindly quote the sentence that lead you to believe that I don't actually know better.

I have no idea what you are getting at with this post. But let's play...

A building is not a home. Typically breaking into a home (legally often referred to as a dwelling) is an entirely different, and more serious, crime than breaking into a building. However, both are criminal acts and anyone doing either should absolutely be arrested.
I mentioned that because of all of the people on here, i cant believe that you would try to justify people who break the law and people who hurt cops! I feel like this is one of those topics in which you shouldn't be with your Trump people, kind of like the doctor with the vaccines. Guess you're more Trumpie then I thought. 🤷‍♂️
 
I agree about BLM BUT this doesnt apply. The Jan 6th people took property, pissed and throw feces all over the building. It wasn't all of them, trust that i know that but it was alot of them.

The police need to be investigated as well. Why did they do nothing in some areas? Were they involved? we need those answers, hence the committee!
It actually does, and if ppl did what ur saying with kissing and feces ( 1st I’m seeing that ) it isn’t even close to being worse than Blm riots. Gross for sure.
What happened on Jan 6th is like a picnic to the many riots all over the country by Blm. The law isn’t the same for republicans. As for mega protest n rallies, name one where mega ppl started the riot. U can’t. Only Jan 6th and those weren’t mega ppl.
 
You must not have listened to the police officers who testified.

And the difference is that was where our elected leaders were holding a vote to decide the next president. So, yes, comparing that to shops and stores getting burned IS ludicrous. Your partisanship is showing again.

In our initial exchange ITT, I was mostly agreeing with you. Was my partisanship showing then? Dumbass.

Murdering people who were protecting their homes, businesses and neighborhoods, on top of burning thousands of buildings down, is no more violent than January 6th? Ok BSC.
 
Good one Trumper. Any other comments about something you haven’t watched and know nothing about? I’m enjoying mocking your ignorance.
U mocking me? Haha. U realize ur bs has no weight here right? U can’t back ur shit up and u look for ur snowflakes to help u out. They haven’t before and can’t now.
 
U mocking me? Haha. U realize ur bs has no weight here right? U can’t back ur shit up and u look for ur snowflakes to help u out. They haven’t before and can’t now.
Hey, I’m not the one embarrassing himself by commenting on something he won’t even watch because it hurts his feelings.

So yes, I’m mocking you. You best run to your little Trumper buddies for support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatorspeed
Shhh. Let them live in their little NewsMax bubble.

You two are being intellectually dishonest again. The Sargeant-at-arms was responsible for security and he reported directly to Pelosi.

Pelosi absolutely had, and used, authority over security that day. So you are correct, she wasn't the person in charge of security...she was his boss.

Liars lie, it's what they do.
 
In our initial exchange ITT, I was mostly agreeing with you. Was my partisanship showing then? Dumbass.

Murdering people who were protecting their homes, businesses and neighborhoods, on top of burning thousands of buildings down, is no more violent than January 6th? Ok BSC.
You started out OK but then shit the bed by going straight to the Trumper BLM deflections. Youd have been better off had you stayed on point.

Notice I have never defended the BLM protests. Of course they were more widespread. That’s not even debatable. The point is Jan 6 tried to overturn The very heart of our Democratic system. So yeah, that’s more important than shops and stores. Sorry.
 
You two are being intellectually dishonest again. The Sargeant-at-arms was responsible for security and he reported directly to Pelosi.

Pelosi absolutely had, and used, authority over security that day. So you are correct, she wasn't the person in charge of security...she was his boss.

Liars lie, it's what they do.
So if one of Trumps reports commits a crime, then Trump is at fault as well? LOL.

I guess he was responsible for Russian election interference after all. Lock him up with the rest of them.
 
LOL. It’s all Nancy’s fault!

You're clearly getting emotional. Calm down Mr. Pelosi because I never said it was her fault.

OTOH, she would have lost her freaking mind if Republican leadership rejected her nominations in a Republican lead house. Tell me I'm wrong, haha.
 
You're clearly getting emotional. Calm down Mr. Pelosi because I never said it was her fault.

OTOH, she would have lost her freaking mind if Republican leadership rejected her nominations in a Republican lead house. Tell me I'm wrong, haha.
No, like the rest of the Trumpers, you just tried to deflect from the real guilty parties.

It’s a classic Trumper Whataboutism.

I don’t really GAS who appoints the Sargent at Arms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatorspeed
You started out OK but then shit the bed by going straight to the Trumper BLM deflections. Youd have been better off had you stayed on point.

Notice I have never defended the BLM protests. Of course they were more widespread. That’s not even debatable. The point is Jan 6 tried to overturn The very heart of our Democratic system. So yeah, that’s more important than shops and stores. Sorry.

What you meant to type was, "I was wrong when I stated that your partisanship was showing."

Apology accepted.

And I never went to the BLM deflection. I commented on it as others, including yourself, were commenting on it.
 
The point is Jan 6 tried to overturn The very heart of our Democratic system. So yeah, that’s more important than shops and stores. Sorry.

PS...that was never going to happen no matter how it turned out so you can unclutch those pearls, Margaret.

At best, the loonies could have delayed the vote. You have said so yourself. It was stupid and without purpose.
 
What you meant to type was, "I was wrong when I stated that your partisanship was showing."

Apology accepted.

And I never went to the BLM deflection. I commented on it as others, including yourself, were commenting on it.
No, you just can’t see it. That’s OK. Many are the same way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatorspeed
Hey, I’m not the one embarrassing himself by commenting on something he won’t even watch because it hurts his feelings.

So yes, I’m mocking you. You best run to your little Trumper buddies for support.
Lol. Dude! I don’t embarrass myself handing u ur ass. Lol. Pure fun
Do u even know what mocking means? Lol. Not sure u do. Lol
 
For those that still want to talk about how the police were just letting in the protestors, and that poor woman, you might want to read this. Just kidding, I know you won’t,


Yeah! He’s gonna die from unarmed protesters. Lol.
 
No, like the rest of the Trumpers, you just tried to deflect from the real guilty parties.

Is that what I did? Go back and give it another read. I'll wait here for your real apology.


I don’t really GAS who appoints the Sargent at Arms.

Well that's convenient. She didn't just appoint him. He reported directly to her.

And if you don't care, stop saying she had no security responsibility because that's clearly not true (meaning it was a lie). A purposeful lie that you and @kalimgoodman told. We should be used to it i guess.
 
So if one of Trumps reports commits a crime, then Trump is at fault as well? LOL.

I guess he was responsible for Russian election interference after all. Lock him up with the rest of them.

😂🤣😂

Surrender accepted.
 
No, you just can’t see it. That’s OK. Many are the same way.

I can't see what? Are you off your meds?

I've repeatedly said the people who entered the Capitol should have been arrested. I even stated that, if I was on a security detail to protect members of the house, I would probably have fired my weapon once people began coming through the broken security glass.

So what can't I see you freaking dolt?
 
For those that still want to talk about how the police were just letting in the protestors, and that poor woman, you might want to read this. Just kidding, I know you won’t,



In some cases they did. They literally walked beside the protesters or right in front of them.

Clearly in other cases, the scene was different and much more violent.

And FTR (looking at you @BSC911 and @kalimgoodman ), neither scene is ok and neither scene should be tolerated...ever, by anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
Sure, separate the peaceful protestors from the ones that were causing harm and property damage. But the important thing is that it was a violent mob. If you study mob psychology, it feeds upon the most violent offenders.

Just like the BLM protests. Many were peaceful. Many were violent. To imply otherwise is just being ignorant.

This is where YOU brought up the BLM protests to me btw.

Notice that it wasn't the other way around. Apology accepted...again.
 
In some cases they did. They literally walked beside the protesters or right in front of them.

Clearly in other cases, the scene was different and much more violent.

And FTR (looking at you @BSC911 and @kalimgoodman ), neither scene is ok and neither scene should be tolerated...ever, by anyone.
Finally. You’re forgiven.
 
I mentioned that because of all of the people on here, i cant believe that you would try to justify people who break the law and people who hurt cops! I feel like this is one of those topics in which you shouldn't be with your Trump people, kind of like the doctor with the vaccines. Guess you're more Trumpie then I thought. 🤷‍♂️

Are you freaking serious right now?

Again, can you PLEASE show me where I justified people breaking the law or hurting cops. Do that now @kalimgoodman .

You are either the dumbest, most illiterate person on this board or you are lying on purpose. I never have and never would do either.

This is the second time that you have said this ITT. I've corrected you both times.

People who will not read have no advantage over those who cannot read.
 
Are you freaking serious right now?

Again, can you PLEASE show me where I justified people breaking the law or hurting cops. Do that now @kalimgoodman .

You are either the dumbest, most illiterate person on this board or you are lying on purpose. I never have and never would do either.

This is the second time that you have said this ITT. I've corrected you both times.

People who will not read have no advantage over those who cannot read.

He is the dumbest, and most illiterate. When he finally gets caught and pinned down, he will claim he was trolling. Dude is literally a clown, and not worth the time.
 
This thread is an instant classic. This is the hardest I've seen the socks work to try to get a troll attempt off the ground since the impeachment hearings.

On a serious note, has anyone checked on @Uniformed_ReRe? Or is he in a corner having PTSD-induced hot flashes watching the hearings?
 
You two are being intellectually dishonest again. The Sargeant-at-arms was responsible for security and he reported directly to Pelosi.

Pelosi absolutely had, and used, authority over security that day. So you are correct, she wasn't the person in charge of security...she was his boss.

Liars lie, it's what they do.
Get your facts right

 
Are you freaking serious right now?

Again, can you PLEASE show me where I justified people breaking the law or hurting cops. Do that now @kalimgoodman .

You are either the dumbest, most illiterate person on this board or you are lying on purpose. I never have and never would do either.

This is the second time that you have said this ITT. I've corrected you both times.

People who will not read have no advantage over those who cannot read.
No you have been defending Jan 6th. You are playing both sides to try to down play it. You're trying to be the well everyone wasn't bad or everyone wasn't violent. Like I said earlier, what difference does it make? Everyone in the capital that day broke the law. Just like with BLM/Antifa, anyone who walked into a looted store broke the law,, whether they took something or not.. To even start a debate with @BSC911 or myself over this, is a sign of defending. That's my point, you don't have to directly say you support them but you definitely are dropping hints. I'm so tired of this I didn't say it directly bs. We all know you can imply something without saying it and that's what you did and you're doing. You're clearly siding with the Trumpers on this 'besides a few bad apples, it was peaceful". Why would a cop take sides with people who hurt cops is imaginable. Did you listen to those cops today? They definitely don't think it was a few bad apples.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSC911
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT