We are talking about the same sources that claimed for 4 years that Trump was a Russian agent.
You people are insane.
Under Pressure, Trump Lawyers Quit in Pennsylvania
- Thread starter kjfreeze
- Start date
We are talking about the same sources that claimed for 4 years that Trump was a Russian agent.
You people are insane.
so you’re a liberal hack. Good to know
@LizardGrad89 claims 60 Minutes has professional journalists. When Lesley Stahl interviewed President Trump, he reminded her that obama spied on his campaign. Stahl said that wasn't true.
In November of 2016, during his transition, then head of NSA Mike Rogers in doing routine electronic surveillance, discovered that Trump Tower where Trump was doing his transition meetings, was bugged. Rogers did not advise obama that he had learned this, he instead shared it with Pres Trump, who immediately moved his transition team to Florida.
obama then tried to fire Rogers. @LizardGrad89 is hearing all of this for the first time, but critical thinkers that get their information from professional journalists, knew about it 4 years ago.
How did @LizardGrad89 miss it? Because lying by omission is still a lie. And his 'professional journalists' do it every day.
Biggest one to me is the platinum programs to rebuild the inner cities and help young entrepreneurs of color.
To believe that the MSM would have had to shown some semblance of respect for the truth for the past 4 years.
So do you believe there’s really nothing on those laptops? Was Trump a Russian asset? Did Putin steer the results of the 2020 election? Did Trump leverage the Ukrainian PM for dirt on his opponent? Was the Dossier true, did Trump hire hookers to pee on a bed?
You don’t get to sit there and tell the other side that they are being fed a diet of lies after all that. It was all BS, the media all went along in lockstep and you didn’t question it for a second.
You don’t hold the high ground here.
You honestly don't see the bias from the MSM? Seriously, you don't?
Until you can unshackle yourself from the absurd belief that our media is after the truth as apposed to political activism, you will never understand us. And @LizardGrad89 it is painfully obvious that 90%+ of our media shills for the left.
I'll go a step further and this may be something that you can get behind...
If you're tired of whacko tweets driving the news for some, then you should demand a return to some semblance of a fair and impartial MSM. The bullshit on the evening News, and almost all other news, is what is driving alternative news...much of which is bullshit. But your evening news is often bullshit too. A half truth is no more truth than an entire lie.
So it's your position that none of the organizations that you just listed have ever purposely mislead their readers or viewers?
@LizardGrad89 the fact that you agree with their politics and therefore enjoy reading their bullshit does not excuse their bullshit. The reverse is true for us...Rudy and Bannon's bullshit isn't ok because it is what we want to hear.
Now, where do we go from here? The ONLY answer is a fair and impartial MSM. As difficult as that may be, it's the only solution.
Do you ever consider that it may be something else?
Seriously, you never see a circumstance where you stop and think, "well that does seem a little biased?" That never happens for you?
If it doesn't then you are no less of an ideologue than those you try to mock on this board.
Those aren't lies for @LizardGrad89 because it is what he wants to hear.
And lies from journalists with journalism degrees are > lies from people without journalism degrees. Because they....format properly???
The MSM is biased. This is something that I take into consideration while reading.
But there is a difference between being biased and credulously spreading unverified conspiracies or straight-up lies. This is the difference between Chris Wallace FOX and Sean Hannity FOX. This is the difference between the Wall Street Journal and the Gateway Pundit, or various people on social media.
But there is a difference between being biased and credulously spreading unverified conspiracies or straight-up lies. This is the difference between Chris Wallace FOX and Sean Hannity FOX. This is the difference between the Wall Street Journal and the Gateway Pundit, or various people on social media.
You can be a homer and still break news. Sean Hannity does it all the time.
You can be biased and still be an objective journalist. Fox contributor Mollie Hemmingway does it every day. Chris Wallace never has.
The WSJ has some very good journalists. Kimberly Strassel is one you should follow, you might learn something.
A lie by omission is a lie all the same. That, more than anything else, is what your MSM does. Half the country will not tolerate it. What will be the result if it continues? Honestly, your guess is as good as mine...but I don't think it will be positive. Do you?
Best guess...wackos on social media will continue to gain traction while the "professionals" continue to lose traction. IMO that will eventually come to a head.
You didn't see the ad. This kid is SEVENTEEN. His entire life is ahead of him. Ask CNN about "nothing to see, move along with Sandmann." That kid will never get another blister in his life. 🤣
Thought you might want an update on the Kyle Rittenhouse case.
Spoiler alert: Sheep hoodwinked again.
Seems like most of the prosecution witnesses are helping the defense lawyer.
no reasonable prosecutor should have ever brought this to trial
but at least we aren't trying to threaten and tamper with the jury to get the result we feel is right and just...
The local news in Kenosha reporting about the trial, blantantly lied last night. They reported that Grosskreutz said he was shot while his hands were up. Said nothing about him admitting that his hands were down and he was pointing his gun at Kyle.
It's like they are purposely throwing gas on the fire so when Kyle is found not guilty, riots and protests and burning will happen.
my God that's just evil
I love scolling up and reading all the defenses of the MSM...while there's more truth in the cesspool of Twitter
The second video the prosecutor is literally head in hands because he knows it's over...
I know I am wrong, but it almost seems like the prosecuter is throwing the case. His witnesses helped the defense much more than help him.
Sometimes the truth is so overwhelming, there's no way to spin it.
Right
You have witnesses, once you take it to trial you call them up or the defense will. Case wasn’t ever there and this is just a riot starter.
It’s gross.
Only in libtard land when a riot ensues, it's clear as day that justice has been served.
NBC news (favorite of @grandhavendiddy) main takeaway from Grosskreutz's testimony was "I felt like I was about to die".
This is how sheep get manipulated. This is how sheep believe that 'hands up, don't shoot!' really happened.
Because their MSM sources literally lie to them and play to their biases. And they never think to question.
The jury will side with Rittenhouse, the dems will immediately fly to Kemosha and tell their zealots to 'burn this MFer down!' and the sheep will bleat their obedience.
Love me some Lester, to be sure, lol
"bleat their obedience" - that's just funny.
They may, but then what will happen, as we saw in Virginia, is that suburban women will have a strong negative reaction against it. It is not a winning strategy for Democrats.
Man, I wish I could get on the Dem Talking Point email list.
You have the least self awareness that a person could have.
There's no way this is real. Just like there's no way the sheep would question if it was.
Sorry, Fatty,, You don't see me peddling these crazy election fraud ideas like you nut cases.
Last edited:
Similar threads
