Specifics on what was wrong with TTV’s research please.
Provide those or admit it is accurate.
Trumper Bots Have Ruined This Board
- Thread starter BSC911
- Start date
Provide those or admit it is accurate.
There are not 81 million Americans stupid enough to vote for the nightmare in which we find ourselves. Anyone who has slept through a course in physics knows it. The US average IQ is a paltry 98, not 68.
And 2,000 Mules was using the most 'conservative numbers' to get to 2,000.
There were likely more in the range of 5-10 K mules on a smaller scale than the very conservative one that was used.
A documentary covering True the Vote’s video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states.
These states showed more illegal votes from this strategy alone than Biden’s winning margin, based on True the Vote’s high bar in defining a mule (at least 10 visits to drop boxes). If the bar is lowered to count those making at least 5 visits, the estimated affected votes increases by more than double.
>> And that's just in those 5 states, not the entire country.
electionfraud20.org
There were likely more in the range of 5-10 K mules on a smaller scale than the very conservative one that was used.
A documentary covering True the Vote’s video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states.
| State | Mules Identified | Drop Boxes | Estimated Illegal Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | 1,150 | 45 | 275,000 * |
| Michigan | 500 | 50 | 125,000 |
| Wisconsin | 100 | 28 | 14,000 |
| Georgia | 250 | 24 | 30,000 * |
| Arizona | 200 | 20 | 20,000 * |
| TOTAL | 380,000 |
These states showed more illegal votes from this strategy alone than Biden’s winning margin, based on True the Vote’s high bar in defining a mule (at least 10 visits to drop boxes). If the bar is lowered to count those making at least 5 visits, the estimated affected votes increases by more than double.
>> And that's just in those 5 states, not the entire country.
2000 Mules – Election Fraud at a Glance
A documentary covering True the Vote’s video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Texas.
See my earlier post which addresses the movie.
Let’s face it, there is literally nothing that would convince you nut cases that Trump didn’t win the election. You guys suffer from such an extreme case of cognative dissonance that your feeble brains can’t accept it. Therefore you cling to these crazy conspiracy theory and huckster promoters. That’s a scientific fact.
Last edited:
The polls are biased. That’s what I heard for four years.
Everything was going well under Trump??????? LOL.
Last time I checked, everything WAS going GREAT under President Trump.......take a look......
Bias will swing a few points, maybe 10.
80/20 isn't bias, it's near consensus.
And yes, nearly every aspect of American life was better, save some mean Tweets. I'm sorry that you want different things for the country than normal, sane people do, but that's your problem not mine.
*Cognitive
I'm not going to dig for an earlier post from you.
Repost it, I'd love to hear what's wrong with the research. Honestly, I would.
Dems can repeat the talking points, they can't defend them. As you're about to see once again.
The polls are still biased. When the sampling breakdown differs significantly from the general populace, that alone tells you the results will be skewed.
Seriously, do you simply have no ability to critically think for yourself? How is this confusing you?
I think he knows. He won't engage for a reason.
People who don't pay their Rivals bill on time have ruined this board.
I wouldn’t say follow, more of an observation on my end. I don’t need to post frequently but I mention you and like magic, you arrive. It’s like you can’t help yourself, kind of like a junky. It’s adorable that you can’t help yourself.
To be fair, NOTHING would convince you that it was stolen.
It’s amazeballs.
He asks for proof, he’s provided irrefutable proof…so he gaslights and calls people names.
BS-C911 💩 at his usual nonsense, with nothing to actually refute the reality of an obviously STOLEN ELECTION....
There are those who are outraged thinking people question 81 million stupid enough to vote for a shrub who is the Mexican drug cartel's best ally to ever adorn the Oval Office.
LOL. I stopped after the first one, since more jobs were lost than created during his administration. Like you Trumpers, this list is FOS.Last time I checked, everything WAS going GREAT under President Trump.......take a look......
I have serious doubts that even this would convince you. And provide the names of all the fraudulent voters? GMAB...this is the kind of ridiculous crap I was referring to in the post that you responded to. If you can show that fraud occurred and you can show that it swung the race, that's a high enough standard. If you can prove who was behind it, you can prosecute. Two separate issues and two separate cases.
Here's the issue with the standard that you set forth (prove the cheating in the courts). In the history of republics, this isn't how this sort of of "discrepancy" has been settled. Instead it turns to violence. I'm really hoping that we can do better than that. To be honest, most of us would be good if we could just get assurances that it can NEVER happen again.
The only thing even close to this that was actually settled in court was the dangling chad debacle in Florida...and that debate was a pimple on an elephants azz compared to this one.
Because 22MM jobs were lost in March and April of 2020 due to a pandemic. I'm guessing that meme was from the Spring of 2019, that's about when Trump hit the +7MM mark.
You take out March and April of 2020 and there were 84% more jobs added during his term than Obama's second.
And then you give Biden credit for "creating" jobs that were just people being allowed to return to the workforce.
I think we all know who's FOS around here...here's the data in case you want to see actual facts.
Fact check - BSC is being very misleading and his comments lack critical context.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
data.bls.gov
Because 22MM jobs were lost in March and April of 2020 due to a pandemic. I'm guessing that meme was from the Spring of 2019, that's about when Trump hit the +7MM mark.
You take out March and April of 2020 and there were 84% more jobs added during his term than Obama's second.
And then you give Biden credit for "creating" jobs that were just people being allowed to return to the workforce.
I think we all know who's FOS around here...here's the data in case you want to see actual facts.
Fact check - BSC is being very misleading and his comments lack critical context.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
He knew. He was just being intellectually dishonest. It's what he does and it's who he is.
Given that it's BScuck, your modifier is much too generous. 😂
While US soldiers are in war, battling for their lives, Bsuck would want the soldiers to ask the members of Al Queda for their names to confirm that they are enemies before we shoot them.
I think you should start a disinformation bureau, and make sure only your truth gets told!
It 100% explains EVERYTHING.
1. You really do not love America
2. You prefer socialism
3. You have been below average and your family probably is too
4.llying cheating and stealing is perfectly acceptable to fulfill your agenda, or to keep, or steal power
5. You THINK you are smarter than you really are...and it is NOT close
He knows they cheated. He doesn't care.
When will we realize that dems are not nice people? The party attracts the sludge of society.
So did @CFAGator
Dems throw the country in a massive hole, dems silent as we fall.
Dems then dig us back 25% out of the hole, and this is praised as 'remarkable growth' by the sheep.
The most disingenuous thing I have ever seen posted here was @CFAGator claiming that record high inflation under Hiden was great cause it meant spending had spiked.
AKA, the $1 gallon of milk under Trump now costs $5. So spending is way up. Sign of a 'great' economy.
Am I the only one here that saw this GIANT incongruity (inappropriate containing disparate or discordant elements or parts?
The BS-C911 💩 has determined that the entire list is FOS, after reading the first item and then ignoring the other 76 items.
Typical of socialist Rats that hate a FREE America and 'Can't handle the TRUTH.'
Last edited:
In Psychodrama rather than an individual talking about their problems, it is played out as a drama. This is in a group setting with a therapist (or a moderator). 😉
People are selected to play different parts in the person’s drama, There is some interaction based on the descriptions given. The person plays themselves - thought they may have a ‘shadow’ who will articulate their feelings.
So real interaction is used to help the person experience and get insight into their life and also to try different interactions with people in their life. The therapist may direct you to express your feelings to your father for example.
It is powerful because of our ability to enter roles like that, because it is live - but safe - interaction. Works for those with low ability to gain from talk therapy - like in prison (or msg-brds) - but can gain insight and change behavior through actual interactions.
We all make mistakes, and we do so with regularity. Some errors are small, such as, “No, we don’t need to stop at the store; there’s plenty of milk left for breakfast." Some are bigger, such as, “Don’t rush me; we have plenty of time to get to the airport before the flight leaves.” And some are crucial, such as, “Life is much better now that 'mean tweets' is gone.”
Some people refuse to admit they’re wrong, even in the face of the overwhelming 2,000 Mules evidence: what about when a person does push back against the facts, when they simply cannot admit they were wrong in any circumstance? What is it in their psychological makeup that makes it impossible for them to admit they were wrong, even when it is obvious they were? And why does this happen so repetitively—why do they never admit they were wrong?
Some people have such a fragile ego, such brittle self-esteem, such a weak "psychological constitution," that admitting they made a mistake or that they were wrong is fundamentally too threatening for their egos to tolerate. Accepting they were wrong, absorbing that reality, would be so psychologically shattering, their defense mechanisms do something remarkable to avoid doing so—they literally distort their perception of reality to make it (reality) less threatening. Their defense mechanisms protect their fragile ego by changing the very facts in their mind, so they are no longer wrong or culpable.
>>> As a result, they come up with statements, such as, "This list is FOS."
People who repeatedly exhibit this kind of behavior are, by definition, psychologically fragile. However, that assessment is often difficult for people to accept, because to the outside world, they look as if they’re confidently standing their ground and not backing down, things we associate with strength. But psychological rigidity is not a sign of strength, it is an indication of weakness. These people are not choosing to stand their ground; they’re compelled to do so in order to protect their fragile egos. Admitting we are wrong is unpleasant, it is bruising for any ego. It takes a certain amount of emotional strength and courage to deal with that reality and own up to our mistakes. Most of us sulk a bit when we have to admit we're wrong, but we get over it.
But when people such as BS-C911 💩 are constitutionally unable to admit they’re wrong, when they cannot tolerate the very notion that they are capable of mistakes, it is because they suffer from an ego so fragile that they cannot sulk and get over it—they need to warp their very perception of reality and challenge obvious facts in order to defend their not being wrong in the first place.
How we respond to such Socialist Rats is up to us. The one mistake we should not make is to consider their persistent and rigid refusal to admit they’re wrong as a sign of strength or conviction because it is the absolute opposite—psychological weakness and fragility.
BS, my well earned fee/bill is in the mail, so please pay it on time,,,, this time.... 🤣
People are selected to play different parts in the person’s drama, There is some interaction based on the descriptions given. The person plays themselves - thought they may have a ‘shadow’ who will articulate their feelings.
So real interaction is used to help the person experience and get insight into their life and also to try different interactions with people in their life. The therapist may direct you to express your feelings to your father for example.
It is powerful because of our ability to enter roles like that, because it is live - but safe - interaction. Works for those with low ability to gain from talk therapy - like in prison (or msg-brds) - but can gain insight and change behavior through actual interactions.
- Some people refuse to admit they’re wrong, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, due to a fragile ego.
- If one cannot psychologically handle being wrong, they may attempt to deny facts in order to defend their actions or beliefs.
We all make mistakes, and we do so with regularity. Some errors are small, such as, “No, we don’t need to stop at the store; there’s plenty of milk left for breakfast." Some are bigger, such as, “Don’t rush me; we have plenty of time to get to the airport before the flight leaves.” And some are crucial, such as, “Life is much better now that 'mean tweets' is gone.”
Some people refuse to admit they’re wrong, even in the face of the overwhelming 2,000 Mules evidence: what about when a person does push back against the facts, when they simply cannot admit they were wrong in any circumstance? What is it in their psychological makeup that makes it impossible for them to admit they were wrong, even when it is obvious they were? And why does this happen so repetitively—why do they never admit they were wrong?
Some people have such a fragile ego, such brittle self-esteem, such a weak "psychological constitution," that admitting they made a mistake or that they were wrong is fundamentally too threatening for their egos to tolerate. Accepting they were wrong, absorbing that reality, would be so psychologically shattering, their defense mechanisms do something remarkable to avoid doing so—they literally distort their perception of reality to make it (reality) less threatening. Their defense mechanisms protect their fragile ego by changing the very facts in their mind, so they are no longer wrong or culpable.
>>> As a result, they come up with statements, such as, "This list is FOS."
People who repeatedly exhibit this kind of behavior are, by definition, psychologically fragile. However, that assessment is often difficult for people to accept, because to the outside world, they look as if they’re confidently standing their ground and not backing down, things we associate with strength. But psychological rigidity is not a sign of strength, it is an indication of weakness. These people are not choosing to stand their ground; they’re compelled to do so in order to protect their fragile egos. Admitting we are wrong is unpleasant, it is bruising for any ego. It takes a certain amount of emotional strength and courage to deal with that reality and own up to our mistakes. Most of us sulk a bit when we have to admit we're wrong, but we get over it.
But when people such as BS-C911 💩 are constitutionally unable to admit they’re wrong, when they cannot tolerate the very notion that they are capable of mistakes, it is because they suffer from an ego so fragile that they cannot sulk and get over it—they need to warp their very perception of reality and challenge obvious facts in order to defend their not being wrong in the first place.
How we respond to such Socialist Rats is up to us. The one mistake we should not make is to consider their persistent and rigid refusal to admit they’re wrong as a sign of strength or conviction because it is the absolute opposite—psychological weakness and fragility.
BS, my well earned fee/bill is in the mail, so please pay it on time,,,, this time.... 🤣
The barometer for testing if people like cucky boy is full of shit is if Trump pulls off what Biden did in 2020 for the 2024 election. If he stomps around like a little girl, you’ll know he’s full of shit. If he doesn’t, then just maybe he doesn’t care. In the end, all I know is pounding his wife is a lot of fun.
It goes back to what I said in the 2000 Mules thread about the Dems and Libtards and why they ignore, and downplay, talks about election fraud, voting fraud, etc—it’s not because the won’t answer questions about it, it’s because they Can’t answer them. They never expected to be caught so soundly in the cheating scam that they have absolutely no way to answer the complaints. So the Dems/Libtards and media go to the Dems default mode—lie, deny, deflect. And the media is their blanket of protection.
