Once again I don't disagree but to say that he never did as if it was factual (as you did) is hilarious.He said he hadn't.
She said he had.
See the issue?
Once again I don't disagree but to say that he never did as if it was factual (as you did) is hilarious.He said he hadn't.
She said he had.
See the issue?
Bama to rescue....And you have no idea that he did.
We prefer evidence. What's not to get?
FWIW, I don't want Hunter or Brandon to be convicted or be liable for a civil verdict with zero tangible evidence either. I'm a law and order guy...so we're different I guess. This stuff matters. Or it should.
She called her black husband an 'ape'. You ignore it.You have no idea if he met her or not, ZERO. I really don't get you guys.
It's because he believes Trump over her. Just like the NY jury did.Once again I don't disagree but to say that he never did as if it was factual (as you did) is hilarious.
Bama to rescue....
but 25 years late is dangerous
I can live with civil but 25 years criminally for a rape charge with all hearsay evidence would be really bad.I've been commenting on this subject for a while now...so maybe take a step back on this particular deflection tactic.
And absolutely ridiculous sans evidence.
If he did it and she can prove he did it, I would support her effort. That isn't the case here.
I can live with civil but 25 years criminally for a rape charge with all hearsay evidence would be really bad.
FYI, Most civil cases are hearsay or lack definite evidence from what I've learned, that is why they are civil.
"Sorry your hero takes advantage of girls"Once again I don't disagree but to say that he never did as if it was factual (as you did) is hilarious.
It's not hearsay....my goodness you struggle with basic concepts.I can live with civil but 25 years criminally for a rape charge with all hearsay evidence would be really bad.
FYI, Most civil cases are hearsay or lack definite evidence from what I've learned, that is why they are civil.
For anybody to write that you have no idea whether he met her or not, zero, but who ALSO has no idea to that fact just shows you the intellectual valley he has working for him. IQ of a cumquat.And you have no idea that he did.
We prefer evidence. What's not to get?
FWIW, I don't want Hunter or Brandon to be convicted or be liable for a civil verdict with zero tangible evidence either. I'm a law and order guy...so we're different I guess. This stuff matters. Or it should.
Partisan, Partisan (said with Jim Mora emphasis), I thought he was Independent. LOL.It's not hearsay....my goodness you struggle with basic concepts.
It came directly from her mouth, because there were zero witnesses. And it happens every day, super famous guy violently assaults a random woman in broad daylight in public and no one sees it.
But this is the most amazing post ever - you're admitting the case is weak AF. If you really believed he did it you'd want 25 years regardless, and so would I. Rape is one of the most awful things you can do to someone.
Every day you dig that partisan hack hole just a little deeper...you don't care about justice, or fairness, or any of that...it's just politics for you.
He's left of MDF and RayRay...but at least they're honest about it.Partisan, Partisan (said with Jim Mora emphasis), I thought he was Independent. LOL.
No it's sad
Did I ever say the case was strong or weak?It's not hearsay....my goodness you struggle with basic concepts.
It came directly from her mouth, because there were zero witnesses. And it happens every day, super famous guy violently assaults a random woman in broad daylight in public and no one sees it.
But this is the most amazing post ever - you're admitting the case is weak AF. If you really believed he did it you'd want 25 years regardless, and so would I. Rape is one of the most awful things you can do to someone.
Every day you dig that partisan hack hole just a little deeper...you don't care about justice, or fairness, or any of that...it's just politics for you.
You said a ton more than that. You started the thread assuming she’s right and he’s not.Did I ever say the case was strong or weak?
I just stated a fact that he was found liable of sexual abuse. Is that incorrect?
You're trying to argue the case with me, when at no point did I argue the case. It's pointless because the jury already made their decision.
Does it say of? No it doesn't, it's written in effing English.
Federal jury in NYC said Trump not liable for rape, is liable for sexual abuse, defamation
I believe you actually titled the thread Trump found guilty of sexual abuse. Then you had to change the title after you did your exhaustive research and figured out what the case was actually about.Did I ever say the case was strong or weak?
I just stated a fact that he was found liable of sexual abuse. Is that incorrect?
You're trying to argue the case with me, when at no point did I argue the case. It's pointless because the jury already made their decision.
That's what he was found liable of. Everything I stated is what the jury said by their verdict.You said a ton more than that. You started the thread assuming she’s right and he’s not.
You said you wouldn’t support jail, insinuating the case was weak.
You said he “takes advantage of girls”, again insinuating he’s got a problem and this is another example of that problem.
You can lie to yourself but you should probably not lie when the evidence is in writing in the same thread you’re lying in.
Is this the same jury that found that Trump didn't rape this woman? Or a different one?That's what he was found liable of. Everything I stated is what the jury said by their verdict.
He’s really good at getting away with it then.Trump is on the record bragging about grabbing women by the 🐈 and intentionally walking in on Miss Teen Universe contestants while they were undressed. His own wife Ivana accused him of raping her and ripping out handfuls of her hair. That’s not even touching the myriad other accusations from women.
If you want to say that you are voting for the Trump’s policies, not the man, that’s on you. But don’t act like you don’t know he has been abusing women his entire life.
So it won’t see an appeal?You are writing, as if this case is still being deliberated. It's over, she won.
So according to the libs here, Trump raped Carroll, even though a NY jury ruled he did not. And the Durham Report did NOT exonerate Trump, even though it said the FBI had no basis to launch an investigation into Trump colluding with Russia.He’s really good at getting away with it then.
I don’t know the facts, obviously I wasn’t there for any of these incidents, but going 70+ years as a serial rapist and molester and still ending up being president is shocking.
Is it possible that these are all unfounded accusations, or are you sure they are all true?
The Durham report literally said the DOJ, FBI and CIA never had any evidence, the justice system was asymmetrical, the media knowingly lied (as did several appointed officials like Brennan), the Clinton campaign started the whole thing, and standards and SOP were not followed by any agency involved.So according to the libs here, Trump raped Carroll, even though a NY jury ruled he did not. And the Durham Report did NOT exonerate Trump, even though it said the FBI had no basis to launch an investigation into Trump colluding with Russia.
They literally live in a fantasy world of their own making.
This is SO WEAK. Your guy is getting paid off in MILLIONS by our enemies...and THIS is what you bring here?? A 27 year old BS case? AGAIN..you lefties are our worst enemy. Not even close to what I consider good Americans. You are not even good POS's to meTrump is on the record bragging about grabbing women by the 🐈 and intentionally walking in on Miss Teen Universe contestants while they were undressed. His own wife Ivana accused him of raping her and ripping out handfuls of her hair. That’s not even touching the myriad other accusations from women.
If you want to say that you are voting for the Trump’s policies, not the man, that’s on you. But don’t act like you don’t know he has been abusing women his entire life.
Ghost text Trump and tell him to keep his mouth shut before this lady breaks the Bank!Is this the same jury that found that Trump didn't rape this woman? Or a different one?
IQ of a cumquat.
She won't get a dime and you know it.Ghost text Trump and tell him to keep his mouth shut before this lady breaks the Bank!
Ghost it doesn’t matter in long run, not here to bash trump just wish he would calm down with all the nonsense but he’s not, that’s the biggest thing hurting him with making a second run at the WH
The left's paid tweeters stepping in it again. Trump is referencing the claim Carroll made in her own book.
I brought up the same claim here and the dems didn't care.
"hurting" him?? You must not follow the polls? LOL Let me tell you with 100% accuracy who has ZERO chances to win....your boy Brandon. He will NOT be re elected. So maybe a little bit of refocusing your concerns to the socialist/communist/fascist...who you support!Ghost it doesn’t matter in long run, not here to bash trump just wish he would calm down with all the nonsense but he’s not, that’s the biggest thing hurting him with making a second run at the WH
I don't think he does. He knows whatever lefty media tells him. That's why he didn't address Carroll's blatant racism toward her black husband, cause he'd never heard of it.She won't get a dime and you know it.
Capt I guess your just getting old and senile, and enlighten you while I’m spending wasted time with you, Trump won’t be president either, he had his hot run in 2016 I unfortunately voted for him, didn’t make that mistake in 2020, Gpa you need to know 40 percent of folks who voted for him in 2020 won’t be voting for him in 2024 he only has what’s left of his Cult followers that will vote for him and that’s a lot smaller margin now"hurting" him?? You must not follow the polls? LOL Let me tell you with 100% accuracy who has ZERO chances to win....your boy Brandon. He will NOT be re elected. So maybe a little bit of refocusing your concerns to the socialist/communist/fascist...who you support!
That’s irrelevant ghost and you know that, I just wonder how you shuffle all the mishaps your Donnie’s facing on a daily basis?🤷♀️I don't think he does. He knows whatever lefty media tells him. That's why he didn't address Carroll's blatant racism toward her black husband, cause he'd never heard of it.
Trump will be President WAY before the old SOB who cannot complete sentences. Whos own party DO NOT want him. Want any bets? ( you are a lib..therfor a liar...so I would NEVER bet you. Your morals and ethics are WAY off base for me.)Capt I guess your just getting old and senile, and enlighten you while I’m spending wasted time with you, Trump won’t be president either, he had his hot run in 2016 I unfortunately voted for him, didn’t make that mistake in 2020, Gpa you need to know 40 percent of folks who voted for him in 2020 won’t be voting for him in 2024 he only has what’s left of his Cult followers that will vote for him and that’s a lot smaller margin now
My only question to you...and the other little sissy snowflakes. LAST time....you all said the same BS...yet I 100% remember ALL of you looking up at the sky...screaming and crying like little kindergartners. My question to you today. When he wins..will you do the same this time? I want to record EVERYONE I can doing this. I got SUCH a kick watching CNN in 2016 when everyone was celebrating at Hillary's acceptance "party" That was AMAZING!! I stayed up until 4AM watching the meltdown. I was drinking Trump Chardonnay CELEBRATING!! I think I will order a few bottles in preparation!! LOLOLOLCapt I guess your just getting old and senile, and enlighten you while I’m spending wasted time with you, Trump won’t be president either, he had his hot run in 2016 I unfortunately voted for him, didn’t make that mistake in 2020, Gpa you need to know 40 percent of folks who voted for him in 2020 won’t be voting for him in 2024 he only has what’s left of his Cult followers that will vote for him and that’s a lot smaller margin now