ADVERTISEMENT

Trump liable of sexual abuse

I don't even understand what you're saying, and I don't think you do either.

Her claim is he shoved her into a dressing room and raped her.

If the jury doesn't believe that's what happened they don't believe her. If they were to find him guilty for something else then that means the jury is creating the story.

Being ok with that is "weird". She was either telling the truth or she wasn't, and they clearly didn't think she was.
The verdict said that he did something but there wasn't enough evidence to say that it was rape. It's not that difficult to understand.
 
The verdict said that he did something but there wasn't enough evidence to say that it was rape. It's not that difficult to understand.
You're right, it's really easy.

She said he violently raped her in the dressing room of a crowded dept store, and left without anyone noticing. There were no witnesses. There is no evidence.

The jury didn't believe her.

But TDS so they decided he had to be guilty of something.

You're really convinced he did something wrong, are you going to be equally quick to exonerate him when this dies upon appeal?
 
You're right, it's really easy.

She said he violently raped her in the dressing room of a crowded dept store, and left without anyone noticing. There were no witnesses. There is no evidence.

The jury didn't believe her.

But TDS so they decided he had to be guilty of something.

You're really convinced he did something wrong, are you going to be equally quick to exonerate him when this dies upon appeal?
I am not convinced of anything. I am just stating what the jury found him liable of.

It also isn't that confusing. The jury is told what each charge is and what evidence is needed to convict of that charge. The jury decided that they believed something happened but there wasn't enough evidence to say it was rape. Just finding someone guilty of manslaughter or 1st degree murder.

Do you not know how the system works?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatorspeed
The verdict said that he did something but there wasn't enough evidence to say that it was rape. It's not that difficult to understand.
You talking about the time she wrote a book and called her African-American husband an 'ape'?

Or have you ignored her blatant racism cause she is attacking the pub you don't like?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
I am not convinced of anything. I am just stating what the jury found him liable of.

It also isn't that confusing. The jury is told what each charge is and what evidence is needed to convict of that charge. The jury decided that they believed something happened but there wasn't enough evidence to say it was rape. Just finding someone guilty of manslaughter or 1st degree murder.

Do you not know how the system works?
Yes, but you don't.

Your example shows how ignorant you are here...first, a person is dead in that example. This is a civil suit, so the threshold is much lower than that of a criminal trial (preponderance of evidence vs beyond a reasonable doubt). The lowering or raising of a charge is based on intent and circumstances. But the actual death of a human is the starting point.

Here she claimed she was violently raped and the jury only found him liable of battery. So they didn't believe her, but they didn't like him enough to let him off...essentially inventing a new crime so they could find him liable for something.

And the "evidence" was laughable. It was literally a he said/she said. Trump said he'd never met the woman, and there's no proof that he had.

This was a political hit job wrapped up into a money grab, and it'll die on appeal. But that doesn't matter, the NYT's got their headline and liberals like yourself got your talking point.
 
You're right, it's really easy.

She said he violently raped her in the dressing room of a crowded dept store, and left without anyone noticing. There were no witnesses. There is no evidence.

The jury didn't believe her.

But TDS so they decided he had to be guilty of something.

You're really convinced he did something wrong, are you going to be equally quick to exonerate him when this dies upon appeal?
So her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?

Again, celeb in a crowded store. No one noticed him, no one noticed her screams?

I bet @gatorspeed believes every word of it. Better get your politics out of the center of your life, bro.
 
So her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?

Again, celeb in a crowded store. No one noticed him, no one noticed her screams?

I bet @gatorspeed believes every word of it. Better get your politics out of the center of your life, bro.
Ok I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that you’re just flat out stupid just damn dumb
 
Just like he isn't interested in talking about Tarah Reade.

"Muh politics"
None of them are, because their politics are the deciding force in their lives.

Show me proof that Trump molested a child, especially one of his own, and I will be the first to demand he should be jailed.

We can't even get the dems here to admit that Ashley's diary is real.
 
So her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?

Again, celeb in a crowded store. No one noticed him, no one noticed her screams?

I bet @gatorspeed believes every word of it. Better get your politics out of the center of your life, bro.
Here’s your godly man ghost
 
None of them are, because their politics are the deciding force in their lives.

Show me proof that Trump molested a child, especially one of his own, and I will be the first to admit he should be in jail.

We can't even get the dems here to admit that Ashley's diary is real.
You show us proof goober? Do you have a copy of her diary?? No I bet you don’t
 
So her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?

Again, celeb in a crowded store. No one noticed him, no one noticed her screams?

I bet @gatorspeed believes every word of it. Better get your politics out of the center of your life, bro.
I knew you didn’t have guts, I’ll answer for you, God is of peace and anyone who truly loves him. Trump well it’s easy he’s the master of Confusion. I.E. lier, fornicator, cheats on his wives, insults anyone and everyone, I can keep going but I’d be typing for hours but you get my point
 
Yes, but you don't.

Your example shows how ignorant you are here...first, a person is dead in that example. This is a civil suit, so the threshold is much lower than that of a criminal trial (preponderance of evidence vs beyond a reasonable doubt). The lowering or raising of a charge is based on intent and circumstances. But the actual death of a human is the starting point.

Here she claimed she was violently raped and the jury only found him liable of battery. So they didn't believe her, but they didn't like him enough to let him off...essentially inventing a new crime so they could find him liable for something.

And the "evidence" was laughable. It was literally a he said/she said. Trump said he'd never met the woman, and there's no proof that he had.

This was a political hit job wrapped up into a money grab, and it'll die on appeal. But that doesn't matter, the NYT's got their headline and liberals like yourself got your talking point.
Not true, it's simple but you are making this difficult. They clearly believed that he did something to her but I'm done about this.
 
Not true, it's simple but you are making this difficult. They clearly believed that he did something to her but I'm done about this.
You always bail when you can't find your way out of a corner.

You do the exact same thing when I ask what good or service Joe Biden provided to earn the $10MM in payments from foreign governments (some of which are our enemies).

She said he raped her. The jury did not find that he raped her. Point blank.
 
You always bail when you can't find your way out of a corner.

You do the exact same thing when I ask what good or service Joe Biden provided to earn the $10MM in payments from foreign governments (some of which are our enemies).

She said he raped her. The jury did not find that he raped her. Point blank.
No, we are just at an impasse. It's stupid to keep going. Once again, it's simple.
 
You always bail when you can't find your way out of a corner.

You do the exact same thing when I ask what good or service Joe Biden provided to earn the $10MM in payments from foreign governments (some of which are our enemies).

She said he raped her. The jury did not find that he raped her. Point blank.
He ignores that the woman was a raving racist, even though he claims to care about racism in this country. He also ignores that the jury said that Trump didn't rape her.

He's just a troll. speed at least understands he's being a hypocrite, that's why he gets so defensive about his hypocritical position. kalim is just a bad troll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
He ignores that the woman was a raving racist, even though he claims to care about racism in this country. He also ignores that the jury said that Trump didn't rape her.

He's just a troll. speed at least understands he's being a hypocrite, that's why he gets so defensive about his hypocritical position. kalim is just a bad troll.
He's terrible at it.

He needs to spend more time with BSC.
 
He ignores that the woman was a raving racist, even though he claims to care about racism in this country. He also ignores that the jury said that Trump didn't rape her.

He's just a troll. speed at least understands he's being a hypocrite, that's why he gets so defensive about his hypocritical position. kalim is just a bad troll.
Ghost you and your takes lol you beat everything you know it
 
speed is on record that he doesn't care if Trump committed a crime, he just wants him in jail. Then he added that OTHER posters need to read scripture.
I see you’ve been drinking again: and for the record since you’re keeping it, trump deserves to go to jail, that tub has gotten away with more crap than a serial killer bookmark this please! TRUMP LOCK HIM UP!!!!
 
He's terrible at it.

He needs to spend more time with BSC.
A good troll is rooted in believably. This is what our trolls here have never figured out. None of them are believable, all have been busted lying multiple times.

So when they try a troll, we immediately spot it and mock them for it, and they are too dumb to realize they are being mocked. They think since they got a reaction, that the troll worked.

We really do have the dumbest trolls on the internet. I really wish we had at least one good one.
 
A good troll is rooted in believably. This is what our trolls here have never figured out. None of them are believable, all have been busted lying multiple times.

So when they try a troll, we immediately spot it and mock them for it, and they are too dumb to realize they are being mocked. They think since they got a reaction, that the troll worked.

We really do have the dumbest trolls on the internet. I really wish we had at least one good one.
Well this is noteworthy coming from the biggest Troll on the board, you posted Ah we’ve finally got Joe Biden the other day! And now look!!
 
You have no idea if he met her or not, ZERO. I really don't get you guys.

And you have no idea that he did.

We prefer evidence. What's not to get?

FWIW, I don't want Hunter or Brandon to be convicted or be liable for a civil verdict with zero tangible evidence either. I'm a law and order guy...so we're different I guess. This stuff matters. Or it should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
Well this is noteworthy coming from the biggest Troll on the board, you posted Ah we’ve finally got Joe Biden the other day! And now look!!
You really have to wonder when someone posts stuff like this...did they make it past 3rd grade? Because none of his family have REAL jobs...so why did they recieve money? For WHAT? Are you really THIS stupid...or does your politics blind you? Because Stevie Wonder can see this!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT