Ghost you care comment on this???Trump posted some of her old tweets yesterday on TS. Bad stuff. She tweeted in like 2014 "How do you know if an advance is unwanted until you try?", others about how to seduce men, dominate them, etc.
Ghost you care comment on this???Trump posted some of her old tweets yesterday on TS. Bad stuff. She tweeted in like 2014 "How do you know if an advance is unwanted until you try?", others about how to seduce men, dominate them, etc.
You do realize that a vast majority of Trump voters NEVER watch CNN, don't you?Thought I’d drop this off to you but I bet you already saw it yourself
Two words.Ghost you care comment on this???
The verdict said that he did something but there wasn't enough evidence to say that it was rape. It's not that difficult to understand.I don't even understand what you're saying, and I don't think you do either.
Her claim is he shoved her into a dressing room and raped her.
If the jury doesn't believe that's what happened they don't believe her. If they were to find him guilty for something else then that means the jury is creating the story.
Being ok with that is "weird". She was either telling the truth or she wasn't, and they clearly didn't think she was.
You're right, it's really easy.The verdict said that he did something but there wasn't enough evidence to say that it was rape. It's not that difficult to understand.
For some it is especially Trump lovers they accrued brain fogThe verdict said that he did something but there wasn't enough evidence to say that it was rape. It's not that difficult to understand.
This doesn't make sense.For some it is especially Trump lovers they accrued brain fog
I am not convinced of anything. I am just stating what the jury found him liable of.You're right, it's really easy.
She said he violently raped her in the dressing room of a crowded dept store, and left without anyone noticing. There were no witnesses. There is no evidence.
The jury didn't believe her.
But TDS so they decided he had to be guilty of something.
You're really convinced he did something wrong, are you going to be equally quick to exonerate him when this dies upon appeal?
You talking about the time she wrote a book and called her African-American husband an 'ape'?The verdict said that he did something but there wasn't enough evidence to say that it was rape. It's not that difficult to understand.
Yes, but you don't.I am not convinced of anything. I am just stating what the jury found him liable of.
It also isn't that confusing. The jury is told what each charge is and what evidence is needed to convict of that charge. The jury decided that they believed something happened but there wasn't enough evidence to say it was rape. Just finding someone guilty of manslaughter or 1st degree murder.
Do you not know how the system works?
So her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?You're right, it's really easy.
She said he violently raped her in the dressing room of a crowded dept store, and left without anyone noticing. There were no witnesses. There is no evidence.
The jury didn't believe her.
But TDS so they decided he had to be guilty of something.
You're really convinced he did something wrong, are you going to be equally quick to exonerate him when this dies upon appeal?
Just like he isn't interested in talking about Tarah Reade.You talking about the time she wrote a book and called her African-American husband an 'ape'?
Or have you ignored her blatant racism cause she is attacking the pub you don't like?
Ok I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that you’re just flat out stupid just damn dumbSo her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?
Again, celeb in a crowded store. No one noticed him, no one noticed her screams?
I bet @gatorspeed believes every word of it. Better get your politics out of the center of your life, bro.
None of them are, because their politics are the deciding force in their lives.Just like he isn't interested in talking about Tarah Reade.
"Muh politics"
Here’s your godly man ghostSo her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?
Again, celeb in a crowded store. No one noticed him, no one noticed her screams?
I bet @gatorspeed believes every word of it. Better get your politics out of the center of your life, bro.
You show us proof goober? Do you have a copy of her diary?? No I bet you don’tNone of them are, because their politics are the deciding force in their lives.
Show me proof that Trump molested a child, especially one of his own, and I will be the first to admit he should be in jail.
We can't even get the dems here to admit that Ashley's diary is real.
I knew you didn’t have guts, I’ll answer for you, God is of peace and anyone who truly loves him. Trump well it’s easy he’s the master of Confusion. I.E. lier, fornicator, cheats on his wives, insults anyone and everyone, I can keep going but I’d be typing for hours but you get my pointSo her story is that a celebrity took her into a crowded dept store, forced her into the dressing room, and raped her?
Again, celeb in a crowded store. No one noticed him, no one noticed her screams?
I bet @gatorspeed believes every word of it. Better get your politics out of the center of your life, bro.
Not true, it's simple but you are making this difficult. They clearly believed that he did something to her but I'm done about this.Yes, but you don't.
Your example shows how ignorant you are here...first, a person is dead in that example. This is a civil suit, so the threshold is much lower than that of a criminal trial (preponderance of evidence vs beyond a reasonable doubt). The lowering or raising of a charge is based on intent and circumstances. But the actual death of a human is the starting point.
Here she claimed she was violently raped and the jury only found him liable of battery. So they didn't believe her, but they didn't like him enough to let him off...essentially inventing a new crime so they could find him liable for something.
And the "evidence" was laughable. It was literally a he said/she said. Trump said he'd never met the woman, and there's no proof that he had.
This was a political hit job wrapped up into a money grab, and it'll die on appeal. But that doesn't matter, the NYT's got their headline and liberals like yourself got your talking point.
The jury said he didn't rape her. The jury said she didn't prove her case.Not true, it's simple but you are making this difficult. They clearly believed that he did something to her but I'm done about this.
You always bail when you can't find your way out of a corner.Not true, it's simple but you are making this difficult. They clearly believed that he did something to her but I'm done about this.
No, we are just at an impasse. It's stupid to keep going. Once again, it's simple.You always bail when you can't find your way out of a corner.
You do the exact same thing when I ask what good or service Joe Biden provided to earn the $10MM in payments from foreign governments (some of which are our enemies).
She said he raped her. The jury did not find that he raped her. Point blank.
He did that dirty old fart just got snitched onNot true, it's simple but you are making this difficult. They clearly believed that he did something to her but I'm done about this.
By a woman he's never met regarding an incident that happened 27 years ago and had zero witnesses.He did that dirty old fart just got snitched on
He ignores that the woman was a raving racist, even though he claims to care about racism in this country. He also ignores that the jury said that Trump didn't rape her.You always bail when you can't find your way out of a corner.
You do the exact same thing when I ask what good or service Joe Biden provided to earn the $10MM in payments from foreign governments (some of which are our enemies).
She said he raped her. The jury did not find that he raped her. Point blank.
speed is on record that he doesn't care if Trump committed a crime, he just wants him in jail. Then he added that OTHER posters need to read scripture.By a woman he's never met regarding an incident that happened 27 years ago and had zero witnesses.
Seems fair.
He's terrible at it.He ignores that the woman was a raving racist, even though he claims to care about racism in this country. He also ignores that the jury said that Trump didn't rape her.
He's just a troll. speed at least understands he's being a hypocrite, that's why he gets so defensive about his hypocritical position. kalim is just a bad troll.
Ghost you and your takes lol you beat everything you know itHe ignores that the woman was a raving racist, even though he claims to care about racism in this country. He also ignores that the jury said that Trump didn't rape her.
He's just a troll. speed at least understands he's being a hypocrite, that's why he gets so defensive about his hypocritical position. kalim is just a bad troll.
I see you’ve been drinking again: and for the record since you’re keeping it, trump deserves to go to jail, that tub has gotten away with more crap than a serial killer bookmark this please! TRUMP LOCK HIM UP!!!!speed is on record that he doesn't care if Trump committed a crime, he just wants him in jail. Then he added that OTHER posters need to read scripture.
A good troll is rooted in believably. This is what our trolls here have never figured out. None of them are believable, all have been busted lying multiple times.He's terrible at it.
He needs to spend more time with BSC.
Well this is noteworthy coming from the biggest Troll on the board, you posted Ah we’ve finally got Joe Biden the other day! And now look!!A good troll is rooted in believably. This is what our trolls here have never figured out. None of them are believable, all have been busted lying multiple times.
So when they try a troll, we immediately spot it and mock them for it, and they are too dumb to realize they are being mocked. They think since they got a reaction, that the troll worked.
We really do have the dumbest trolls on the internet. I really wish we had at least one good one.
You have no idea if he met her or not, ZERO. I really don't get you guys.By a woman he's never met regarding an incident that happened 27 years ago and had zero witnesses.
Seems fair.
Those investigations are not met to find stuff, it is met to make the far right feel good about what they already believe.Well this is noteworthy coming from the biggest Troll on the board, you posted Ah we’ve finally got Joe Biden the other day! And now look!!
Huge waste of taxpayers dollarsThose investigations are not met to find stuff, it is met to make the far right feel good about what they already believe.
Those investigations are not met to find stuff, it is met to make the far right feel good about what they already believe.
Fat is brainwashed and bleached out, boy probably sleeps with his MAGA hat on at nightYou have no idea if he met her or not, ZERO. I really don't get you guys.
Well that does it, a mis-named liberal blog site says he did nothing wrong.Well this is noteworthy coming from the biggest Troll on the board, you posted Ah we’ve finally got Joe Biden the other day! And now look!!
This means a bunch from someone like you, son.....Ok I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that you’re just flat out stupid just damn dumb
He said he hadn't.You have no idea if he met her or not, ZERO. I really don't get you guys.
Sometimes, I wonder if you are really DMF...its the comma thingy....He did that dirty old fart just got snitched on
You have no idea if he met her or not, ZERO. I really don't get you guys.
You really have to wonder when someone posts stuff like this...did they make it past 3rd grade? Because none of his family have REAL jobs...so why did they recieve money? For WHAT? Are you really THIS stupid...or does your politics blind you? Because Stevie Wonder can see this!Well this is noteworthy coming from the biggest Troll on the board, you posted Ah we’ve finally got Joe Biden the other day! And now look!!