Your whole argument ITT reeks of someone with an emotional investment in the topic that's clouding your judgment or at least your ability to see the argument being presented by others.
Same. You still haven’t even answered the one question. At this point, I don’t believe you will, and I get why. Because it cannot be reconciled with your previous position on “judgement”
Interesting side note: When the movie Gone With the Wind aired in theaters, when Clark Gable uttered the line 'Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn', him saying the word 'damn' drew audible gasps from the crowd.
Yep. End up in court either way. And the point is?
Yes sir. Nailed it. That’s the point.
Yes, why do they need to be involved from a legislative perspective on marriage. Said it numerous times now. For whatever reason you’re hungup on child custody battles, that as you already mentioned will end up in court regardless of….sexual orientation (gay, straight, etc) or regardless of marital status. So….again, why does marriage need to be legislated by the Government, when as a believer, it began and IS defined in Genesis?
Correct the property must be divided in all those situations. As has been confirmed by you, the courts are going to be involved regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. As I have stated, and can be confirmed by just a little homework, the best thing people can do to assist them regardless of their situation is through a will that states their preferred choice of guardianship. Is it full proof? Nope, but neither is a document stating legally married with government approval.
Yes, I do see the issue, which is why I stand where I stand. Secular government legislation on a moral issue that is already defined by God, has assisted in eating away at the moral fabric of America. And here we are today going….what did we do wrong to end up here. Why are there so many mental health issues, violence, behavioral issues etc….. So, yes, I do see the issue with taking marriage as defined by God, out of his hands.
huh? One man one woman. Pretty simple requirement.
again, see above. As confirmed by you, the courts will get involved regardless of marital status or sexual orientation in matters of custodial dispute. No one is questioning that. There are solutions to assist that are already in place to assist. It’s not my fault you don’t like the number 1 thing people can do to help them with it.
Last post on the subject as it does seem you’re a little too emotional to discuss this topic. In post number 88 you acknowledged that you were emotionally invested in the topic. In my last post I tried to acknowledge your emotional tie (that you acknowledged), and tried being sympathetic to you giving my own life examples where I have had conflict in an attempt to have a cordial discussion that showed we had similar life experiences, and you respond by name calling. Calling me a bigot, and karen, and saying it was a dick move? All because someone believes differently than you? Wow, how ironic.
DGAF if you’re pissed or not now. Why should I? Your post 88 was in response to ghost saying you your posting comes across as someone emotionally invested in the topic.
There it is sir. Now go look at ghosts post that you were replying to, and be pissed
Goodness. Only one person ITT is pissed off, raging, and name calling. Yet he is, but isn’t emotionally invested. Which should I believe? Post 88 or the recent ones where you’re pissed? Or the ones where you say you aren’t emotionally invested?
You put words on the board, I quoted them, you got emotional on a topic that you have an emotional tie to, but don’t have an emotional tie to. Confusing posts are confusing.
Just using your own words sir. Is the topic emotional for you or not? Pretty sure anyone reading this would be confused AF by now.
Believe it or not, I really don't care or pay much attention to any personal details anyone shares on these boards. As you well know, we have both seen people who made claims in this and other boards about their lives that we later learned were complete fabrications.
Ok. So next thing, are you done with me, or not? Do I trust your word on that or not? YOU keep doing this. Saying one thing, then contradicting it. No need to put words in your mouth, folks can read sir. Are you done posting on this topic? Or you gonna say I put those words in your mouth as well? Again, there is one person in this thread name calling. Which, would lead to an interesting discussion on “horrible person”. Just sayin.
