Sidney's Michigan lawsuit

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

It appears that this will be the argument:

1 - Dominion machines were rigged to overcount Hiden's votes and undercount Trump's. I think she will claim that every Hiden vote was counted for more than 1 vote, and every Trump vote was counted for less than 1 vote.

2 - Even with this rigging, Trump had enough votes to win. Trump supporters broke the algorithm.

3 - Counting mysteriously stopped once they realized what had happened.

4 - So they had to introduce new votes for Hiden. That was done in the dead of night after all counting was done.



5 - Affidavits from statistical experts claiming multiple voting irregularites which were mathematically impossible.

As you can see, her lawsuit does indeed have affidavits. Shockingly, @Nolec didn't know what he was talking about.

My guess is much of this will be presented on Tuesday at the public hearing in MI.

Two-pronged attack: Prove the voter fraud to the state legislation, and pressure them to follow the Constitution and have the state's electors vote for Trump.

At the same time, present the lawsuit in court making the same claims.

Win in either attack, and Trump wins state. I think this will be more or less the approach in MI, PA, WI, AZ and GA at least. Maybe NV and VA as well.

 

[gator1776]

Yeah but with the press pretty much ignoring this and continuing the propaganda campaign that Biden is president elect, can I just continue to ignore it? I mean theoretically they only have to make it through December 8?

 

[Nolec]

It appears that this will be the argument:

1 - Dominion machines were rigged to overcount Hiden's votes and undercount Trump's. I think she will claim that every Hiden vote was counted for more than 1 vote, and every Trump vote was counted for less than 1 vote.

2 - Even with this rigging, Trump had enough votes to win. Trump supporters broke the algorithm.

3 - Counting mysteriously stopped once they realized what had happened.

4 - So they had to introduce new votes for Hiden. That was done in the dead of night after all counting was done.

View embedded media

5 - Affidavits from statistical experts claiming multiple voting irregularites which were mathematically impossible.

As you can see, her lawsuit does indeed have affidavits. Shockingly, @Nolec didn't know what he was talking about.

My guess is much of this will be presented on Tuesday at the public hearing in MI.

Two-pronged attack: Prove the voter fraud to the state legislation, and pressure them to follow the Constitution and have the state's electors vote for Trump.

At the same time, present the lawsuit in court making the same claims.

Win in either attack, and Trump wins state. I think this will be more or less the approach in MI, PA, WI, AZ and GA at least. Maybe NV and VA as well.

Already shut down in the 3rd District in Pa. ( a trump judge BTW). See how many of those affidavits are admitted into evidence. A million affidavits does by stat experts does not constitute any proof of fraud. Affidavits from poll workers feelings, and traffic observations will never overturn an election. Futile , embarrassing, ill-conceived, unorganized.... count me not surprised, since the real law firms knew to pull out.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Already shut down in the 3rd District in Pa.

"On to SCOTUS!"

Never ever NEVER listen to @Nolec on ANY topic.

 

[Nolec]

View embedded media

"On to SCOTUS!"

Never ever NEVER listen to @Nolec on ANY topic.

I download 200 legal affidavits from the legal form site. Filled them out that Ghost welched on a bet. My friend is a notary, I showed the posts where Ghost made the permaban bet, so I got that one notarized. See it is my profound belief that Ghost entered into that wager so I signed an affidavit. Loon probably has 1000s of affidavits of his alien encounters. Until entered into a court as evidence... they won't mean squat. Kind of like welcher's word.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

Yeah but with the press pretty much ignoring this and continuing the propaganda campaign that Biden is president elect, can I just continue to ignore it? I mean theoretically they only have to make it through December 8?

clock can work both ways ...if enough electors are sidelined then it goes to the house where Trump has the delegations to win.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I download 200 legal affidavits from the legal form site. Filled them out that Ghost welched on a bet. My friend is a notary, I showed the posts where Ghost made the permaban bet, so I got that one notarized. See it is my profound belief that Ghost entered into that wager so I signed an affidavit. Loon probably has 1000s of affidavits of his alien encounters. Until entered into a court as evidence... they won't mean squat. Kind of like welcher's word.

That's great. But you were still completely wrong about that being the end of the PA case, and you were completely wrong when you claimed Sidney's lawsuits had no affidavits.

Normal day for you. LOL

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

BTW dems could hold just a 5 vote majority in the house. Gonna be hard go to get through socialist new deals if there are more than 6 defectors and some dems aint gonna for that. Forget packing court Manchin is a no and doubt it clears the house either.

 

[jfegaly]

I download 200 legal affidavits from the legal form site. Filled them out that Ghost welched on a bet. My friend is a notary, I showed the posts where Ghost made the permaban bet, so I got that one notarized. See it is my profound belief that Ghost entered into that wager so I signed an affidavit. Loon probably has 1000s of affidavits of his alien encounters. Until entered into a court as evidence... they won't mean squat. Kind of like welcher's word.

No caps or bold so you must only somewhat believe this

 

[BlueEyedGator17]

Already shut down in the 3rd District in Pa. ( a trump judge BTW). See how many of those affidavits are admitted into evidence. A million affidavits does by stat experts does not constitute any proof of fraud. Affidavits from poll workers feelings, and traffic observations will never overturn an election. Futile , embarrassing, ill-conceived, unorganized.... count me not surprised, since the real law firms knew to pull out.

Ok. So let’s look at Democratic logic here. If 10-20 women accuse a person of sexual assault then they must be telling the truth. Regardless if they have additional evidence. BUT.... a million affidavits mean nothing. Lol ok snowflake!
@Nolec is getting nervous. Haha

 

[Nolec]

View embedded media

"On to SCOTUS!"

Never ever NEVER listen to @Nolec on ANY topic.

By this time next week, Roberts will announce that SCOTUS will not take up the Pa. case. There is no Federal case there, no allegation of 2nd. amend rights denial, and no evidence of voter fraud plus the rest is all state law anyway. DONE.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Ok. So let’s look at Democratic logic here. If 10-20 women accuse a person of sexual assault then they must be telling the truth. Regardless if they have additional evidence. BUT.... a million affidavits mean nothing. Lol ok snowflake!
@Nolec is getting nervous. Haha

Dems: "We must believe the woman!"

Tara Reade: "Thank you! My goodness you don't kno..."

Dems: "Shaddup, ya lying bitch!!"

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

An undeniable truth: If Biden is sworn in, 72 million voters will know he is illegitimate.

 

[gator1776]

An undeniable truth: If Biden is sworn in, 72 million voters will know he is illegitimate.

Suspect it is ever more than that given Dominion

 

[fatman76]

Already shut down in the 3rd District in Pa. ( a trump judge BTW). See how many of those affidavits are admitted into evidence. A million affidavits does by stat experts does not constitute any proof of fraud. Affidavits from poll workers feelings, and traffic observations will never overturn an election. Futile , embarrassing, ill-conceived, unorganized.... count me not surprised, since the real law firms knew to pull out.

You do know the firm in PA that quit is taking legal action against the SOS? If you can show me one that quit without being harassed I’m all ears.

Please brush up on your talking points

And the Legislature is immediately acting on a resolution to dispute the election results in PA. Timing seems to indicate their displeasure with the circuit court not hearing the case. If they put their foot down the Gov nor the state SC can override them. (Plus the dismissal might indicate the court knows what the Constitution says and doesn’t want to get involved unless there’s no other choice)

It’s not over in PA. And hearings granted in two more swing states. Sidney has filed three cases now and more to come. Just cornpop up a snack, rub your leg hair, have some kids jump on your lap and enjoy the show. It just got started.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

Or Alito announces that they will hear the case. SCOTUS may rule that there is proof that an unknown but substantial amount of ballots were spoiled and unconstitutional because they did not follow legislative procedures when cast. Whole election in Pa is unconstitutional and the Pa legislature must produce a remedy before federal deadline. Pa legislature has a pair and sends electors for Trump or they punt and send no one. Trump is then one State away from denying Biden 270 and a House vote or two more states away from an outright victory.

 

[Nolec]

Or Alito announces that they will hear the case. SCOTUS may rule that there is proof that an unknown but substantial amount of ballots were spoiled and unconstitutional because they did not follow legislative procedures when cast. Whole election in Pa is unconstitutional and the Pa legislature must produce a remedy before federal deadline. Pa legislature has a pair and sends electors for Trump or they punt and send no one. Trump is then one State away from denying Biden 270 and a House vote or two more states away from an outright victory.

It is unlikely that 4 SC Justices will vote to hear an appeal from the 3rd Dist. Chief Roberts has shown no inclination . There was no allegation of 2nd amend. denial made in the case, the rest was Pa. state law. Might be possible to appeal to Pa. Supreme Ct., but with no hard evidence of voter fraud it's unlikely.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

It is unlikely that 4 SC Justices will vote to hear an appeal from the 3rd Dist. Chief Roberts has shown no inclination . There was no allegation of 2nd amend. denial made in the case, the rest was Pa. state law. Might be possible to appeal to Pa. Supreme Ct., but with no hard evidence of voter fraud it's unlikely.

Trump spent the day playing golf.

 

[BillCutting4585]

It is unlikely that 4 SC Justices will vote to hear an appeal from the 3rd Dist. Chief Roberts has shown no inclination . There was no allegation of 2nd amend. denial made in the case, the rest was Pa. state law. Might be possible to appeal to Pa. Supreme Ct., but with no hard evidence of voter fraud it's unlikely.

I think you’re missing the point here. PA legislature is heading to picking its own electorate. I have a very hard time believing that majority (Republicans) will agree there was no fraud. This won’t see the SCOTUS.

If Pennsylvania goes to Trump then you’ll see the domino effect with the rest of the states going Trumps way.

Now, before you’ll say this will never happen, keep in mind how divided this country is and what parties control the legislation.

 

[Nolec]

I think you’re missing the point here. PA legislature is heading to picking its own electorate. I have a very hard time believing that majority (Republicans) will agree there was no fraud. This won’t see the SCOTUS.

If Pennsylvania goes to Trump then you’ll see the domino effect with the rest of the states going Trumps way.

Now, before you’ll say this will never happen, keep in mind how divided this country is and what parties control the legislation.

Trump met with the Pa. Legislative leadership and afterwards they stated there has been no evidence to provide legal justification for usurping the voters in Pa. by decertifying the election. With the legal cases going against Trump, it makes it even less likely.

 

[BillCutting4585]

Trump met with the Pa. Legislative leadership and afterwards they stated there has been no evidence to provide legal justification for usurping the voters in Pa. by decertifying the election. With the legal cases going against Trump, it makes it even less likely.

1. That is not what was said today out of Pennsylvania. In fact, the legislation is voting on decertification of the election and electing their own electors.

2. We’ve already established that affidavits are evidence.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

1. That is not what was said today out of Pennsylvania.

It's @Nolec. You just assume everything he says is wrong.

 

[jfegaly]

Trump met with the Pa. Legislative leadership and afterwards they stated there has been no evidence to provide legal justification for usurping the voters in Pa. by decertifying the election. With the legal cases going against Trump, it makes it even less likely.

Smdh. Obviously yoh don’t believe this. It’s not bolded or capitalized

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Smdh. Obviously yoh don’t believe this. It’s not bolded or capitalized

@Nolec is a massive jinx. Every time he lies about how bad things are for Trump, he gets another massive legal win!

@Uniformed_ReRe what's the count now, 0-225? LOL

 

[BlueEyedGator17]

By this time next week, Roberts will announce that SCOTUS will not take up the Pa. case. There is no Federal case there, no allegation of 2nd. amend rights denial, and no evidence of voter fraud plus the rest is all state law anyway. DONE.

Someone’s drunk posting again! Lol.

 

[Nolec]

1. That is not what was said today out of Pennsylvania. In fact, the legislation is voting on decertification of the election and electing their own electors.

2. We’ve already established that affidavits are evidence.

Pa. House speaker stated yesterday, thereis no plan to address this proposal on MOnday, thge last day of the session.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Someone’s drunk posting again! Lol.

He's getting almost as desperate as @LizardGrad89 is LOL

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Pa. House speaker stated yesterday, thereis no plan to address this proposal on MOnday, thge last day of the session.

Two words: Special Session.

 

[fatman76]

Pa. House speaker stated yesterday, thereis no plan to address this proposal on MOnday, thge last day of the session.

I’m not even sure why I’m trying to enlighten someone who can’t process anything that doesn’t fit what they already believe - but the PA Legislature is deeply concerned and fighting to regain their constitutional right to select electors.

I can’t imagine where you get your news, but this is from the source. Unfiltered by MSM. You do have to follow the three tweet thread to get it all.