ADVERTISEMENT

shifty schiff was colluding with twitter

It's beginning to look a lot like election interference....

House gonna be busy this Spring, assuming they can ever decide on a Speaker.
The whole McCarthy thing is kind of baffling to me. There is always internal infighting in both camps. But this seems to have gone beyond personal differences. Democrats seem to believe McCarthy is "one of them". I think that is quite delusional on their part. 😂
 
The whole McCarthy thing is kind of baffling to me. There is always internal infighting in both camps. But this seems to have gone beyond personal differences. Democrats seem to believe McCarthy is "one of them". I think that is quite delusional on their part. 😂
Well Trump met with them last night and apparently gave them their marching orders to back McCarthy. We'll see what happens in a couple of hours.
 
Does that really surprise anyone. He was caught 2 or 3 times, manipulating, changing "evidence" in the various investigations over the last 4 years.
 
Adam Schitis no less than an unamerican lying POS. How could he for 4 years claim to have SEEN evidence of Russian collusion....and the whole time KNOW the whole thing was made up by Hillary and her campaign...yet walk away untouched? He should be impeached, and kicked out of ANY public office
 
And as always Schiffty-Schiff gives that Kanye West-shrug like.....
tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
Well Trump met with them last night and apparently gave them their marching orders to back McCarthy. We'll see what happens in a couple of hours.
Crap.

McCarthy isn't the worst option ever, he backed some MAGA candidates that won - but when the chips are down he's a swamp rat. I was hoping the more conservative side of the party would not back down and put some cracks in the uniparty monopoly. Even if it didn't change anything RINO's need to get the message.
 
Fr
Crap.

McCarthy isn't the worst option ever, he backed some MAGA candidates that won - but when the chips are down he's a swamp rat. I was hoping the more conservative side of the party would not back down and put some cracks in the uniparty monopoly. Even if it didn't change anything RINO's need to get the message.
Freedom Caucus aint backing down, we go to a fifth vote. McCarthy actually lost a vote this time.
 
Fr

Freedom Caucus aint backing down, we go to a fifth vote. McCarthy actually lost a vote this time.
Boebert just went in dry. Apparently she got him 218 if he'd agree to bring to a vote:
1) Term limits
2) Border Wall
3) Balanced budget amendment

McCarthy told her to pound sand.

She also dismissed MTG's comment that she took nearly $2MM from McCarthy to win her race. She said she didn't get a dime.
 
Crap.

McCarthy isn't the worst option ever, he backed some MAGA candidates that won - but when the chips are down he's a swamp rat. I was hoping the more conservative side of the party would not back down and put some cracks in the uniparty monopoly. Even if it didn't change anything RINO's need to get the message.
Trump knows McCarthy will NEVER win. That was a smart play by The MAGA King!
 
Boebert just went in dry. Apparently she got him 218 if he'd agree to bring to a vote:
1) Term limits
2) Border Wall
3) Balanced budget amendment

McCarthy told her to pound sand.

She also dismissed MTG's comment that she took nearly $2MM from McCarthy to win her race. She said she didn't get a dime.


Term Limits? Didn't the SC already tell the states you cant do that with US congessman without amending the constitution?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Term Limits? Didn't the SC already tell the states you cant do that with US congessman without amending the constitution?
Whether you're right or not, Boebert is nice to look at but let's not pretend she's the sharpest knife in the drawer.

At least you can count on her for sticking to principles her constituents care about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
Term Limits? Didn't the SC already tell the states you cant do that with US congessman without amending the constitution?
I'm not aware of your point, that my bad. What is mind boggling though is that these people come to DC as paupers and leave (if ever) as mega multi-millionaires. If that doesn't tell you something, there is no hope for us.
 
Term Limits? Didn't the SC already tell the states you cant do that with US congessman without amending the constitution?
You need 2/3rds house and senate to send it to the states for ratification. Its not going to pass but it puts people on record.

COS is a better idea and its been slow rolling for years. You need 34 states to convene and 38 to pass any amendment.

Also it starts the discussion and educates people on what needs to be done. Last poll I saw was that 80% of the people want term limits. Most have no clue on how it could/would be done.
 
You need 2/3rds house and senate to send it to the states for ratification. Its not going to pass but it puts people on record.

COS is a better idea and its been slow rolling for years. You need 34 states to convene and 38 to pass any amendment.

Also it starts the discussion and educates people on what needs to be done. Last poll I saw was that 80% of the people want term limits. Most have no clue on how it could/would be done.
Constitutional amendments scare the eff out of me. Florida is a MAGA red state, save the dipshit urban rat areas (and commie state school counties), and we have some utterly retarded voter referendum constitutional amendments hit the ballot ever so many years. The signature bar to get on the ballot is extremely low and quite fraudulent, frankly. We are a constitutional republic, even on the state level. There's a reason the retarded sheep don't need to be voting directly on ANY damned thing. :mad:
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT