ADVERTISEMENT

Proprietary COVID-19 and Vaccine thread

Wife and I were just talking about how amazed we are that Fauci has not been assassinated.

Let's revisit what we know to be true:

Fauci is part owner of the lab in Wuhan China, from which the virus was released, either purposely or accidentally. It did not come from bats in the Wuhan wet markets.

Fauci has been shown to be linked to "gain of function" research on Covid. That's just a pretty way of saying "making the virus viable".

His complicity has come out in drips and drabs, but he has been involved for quite some time.

He has been the mouthpiece for and face of how to combat the virus.

There is likely much more that we don't know or at least I don't know.

Dude has been given a free pass for all of his inaccurate info and bad medical advice.
Media sells him as our greatest hero. Didn't one of the magazines name him Sexiest Man Alive?

Media has taken a villain and convinced half the nation he is a hero.

After they spent 2016-2020 taking a hero and convincing that same half of the nation that he was a villain.
 
Media sells him as our greatest hero. Didn't one of the magazines name him Sexiest Man Alive?

Media has taken a villain and convinced half the nation he is a hero.

After they spent 2016-2020 taking a hero and convincing that same half of the nation that he was a villain.
People wear t-shirts celebrating the man.

Think about that for a second...
 
FLCCC is pleased to help announce the release of Challenges In the Pandemic — A Multi Disciplinary Approach.
As the human race navigates through life with the COVID-19 virus, this timely book is a comprehensive reference resource for healthcare workers, offering them solutions and strategies to help deal effectively and efficiently to bring about best results for patients suffering from COVID 19.


==========

I-MASK+ Prevention & Early Outpatient Treatment Protocol for COVID-19​


=====

Ivermectin can keep you from getting it.

Ivermectin can cure you if you do get it, especially if used early on.

Ivermectin, best of all, won't kill you.....
 

India Removes Ivermectin From Covid Clinical Guidelines​


October 1, 2021
Ivermectin is commonly used as a veterinary medicine.Ivermectin is commonly used as a veterinary medicine.
India's governing medical body has endorsed a new policy ending the use of ivermectin as for managing COVID-19
SCIENCE | THE WIRE – The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), India’s leading medical research body, has revised its ‘Clinical Guidelines’ for COVID-19.

Specifically, it removed mention of two drugs that a panoply of experts and non-experts had widely used and promoted both in India and worldwide, and which had also been ceaseless sources of controversy: ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).

The previous version of the national COVID-19 treatment protocols, dated May 17, 2021 (the one from which ICMR dropped the use of convalescent plasma) suggested that ivermectin and HCQ “may” be used despite “a low certainty of the evidence”.

This feeble cautionary note did nothing to dampen the ill-founded enthusiasm for the use and promotion of both drugs.

With the new revision, ICMR – and India – are now in line with accepted good practice vis-à-vis managing COVID-19, at least on the count of these two drugs. The guidelines of the US National Institutes of Health, the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and the WHO all negatively recommend ivermectin and HCQ.

“The fascination with and support for ivermectin as a prophylactic agent against COVID-19 is hard to explain.”


In addition, both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency have said that ivermectin is not an antiviral drug, much less an anti-COVID drug.

But within India, the consensus hasn’t been so well-defined, and the official treatment recommendations themselves have been polarising.

India Today reported as far back as June 7 that the Directorate General of Health Services, a body under the Union health ministry, had dropped ivermectin and doxycycline – a broad-spectrum antibiotic – from its recommendation.

But some news reports also suggested that Indian government experts and advisers were still debating among themselves as to whether ivermectin should be used.

This may explain why ICMR took so long to come around and exclude ivermectin from the guidelines – more so since it is well-known today that ICMR also deferred to political interests through the length of the pandemic. Ivermectin’s proponents through the pandemic have made many dubious claims … READ MORE.

India’s New Policy Is Hardly A Surprise


Headline Health has covered claims surrounding ivermectin use for Covid on many occasions:
  • “Ivermectin did not reduce the duration of symptoms in patients with mild cases of Covid-19.” – Reported 9/24/2021
  • “Myths and beliefs around [ivermectin] have taken on a life of their own…” – Reported 9/20/2021
  • “There’s just not any good evidence right now suggesting [ivermectin] is a good treatment for treating or preventing COVID-19.” – Reported 9/8/2021
  • “Ivermectin has gained a ‘weird cult following,’ even though data shows the drug is not effective in treating coronavirus.” – Reported 9/8/2021
  • “A large Egyptian study of ivermectin for COVID-19 patients has been retracted over concerns of plagiarism and serious problems with their raw data, the publisher confirmed to MedPage Today.” – Reported 9/8/2021
 
Official government disinformation

What our government is telling physicians is just plain idiotic.
Read the following in a publication aimed at doctors.

This was just reported:

“Due to the Omicron variant and the short supply of COVID therapeutics, NIH recommends certain therapies over others for patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID, said federal officials on a call with clinicians Wednesday [January 12].
In order of preference, clinicians should use the oral antiviral nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid), the monoclonal antibody sotrovimab, the IV antiviral remdesivir (Veklury) and finally, the oral antiviral molnupiravir, said Alice Pau, PharmD, of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines panel.
While the drugs were ranked from 1 to 4, she noted that nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, sotrovimab, and IV remdesivir three times a day all had similar clinical efficacy, with a relative risk reduction of 88%, 85%, and 87% in hospitalizations and deaths, respectively, versus placebo. However, molnupiravir, with its 30% efficacy, should be used only if the other three choices are not available, Pau noted.”
Here are the main reasons why the NIH list of preferred COVID treatments should not reassure the public:

1. The first preferred action, using the Pfizer drug Paxlovid, makes little sense because there is nearly no availability of it. And even if people could get prescriptions filled, would they be acting fast enough to get benefits. In the clinical trials people had to start the drug within three days of symptoms; even though they now talk of starting within five days, that too is totally impractical and unrealistic. Few people would be able to distinguish symptoms being COVID and not the flu or a bad cold quickly, getting an appointment with the doctor quickly and getting a prescription filled quickly. And the safety has not been adequately assessed.

2. The monoclonal antibody sotrovimab is nearly impossible to get because of extremely limited supply. And here too, a sick person would have to get medical attention quickly, that is extremely difficult. Even your local hospital might not have it.

3. The very expensive drug remdesivir has a terrible history of being both ineffective and having terrible side effects. It is mostly given to very ill patients in hospitals.

4. Then you get to the absolutely ludicrous fourth option, the new Merck antiviral that has a terrible level of effectiveness and that has not been proven safe. An absolutely awful choice.

What is most obscene about what NIH tells doctors is that it still refuses to include ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine as treatment options. It ignores the extremely successful treatment protocols of frontline doctors like Dr. Fareed and Dr. Zelenko that do NOT include any of the four NIH preferences. (iG - follow the money, here and apparently now in India)

What a waste of US taxpayer money on the evil and criminal Fauci’s organization.


Do not trust the government to effectively protect your life.
Public health protection in the US is a disgrace.
What NIH is saying is really insulting disinformation.

Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and many articles and podcasts on the pandemic, worked on health issues for decades, and his Pandemic Blunder Newsletter is on Substack. As a full professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, he directed a medical research program between the colleges of engineering and medicine. As a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association, he directed major studies on health-related subjects; he testified at over 50 US Senate and House hearings and authored hundreds of articles and op-ed articles in major newspapers. He has served as an executive volunteer at a major hospital for more than 10 years. He is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and America’s Frontline Doctors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3

India Removes Ivermectin From Covid Clinical Guidelines​


October 1, 2021
Ivermectin is commonly used as a veterinary medicine.Ivermectin is commonly used as a veterinary medicine.
India's governing medical body has endorsed a new policy ending the use of ivermectin as for managing COVID-19
SCIENCE | THE WIRE – The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), India’s leading medical research body, has revised its ‘Clinical Guidelines’ for COVID-19.

Specifically, it removed mention of two drugs that a panoply of experts and non-experts had widely used and promoted both in India and worldwide, and which had also been ceaseless sources of controversy: ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).

The previous version of the national COVID-19 treatment protocols, dated May 17, 2021 (the one from which ICMR dropped the use of convalescent plasma) suggested that ivermectin and HCQ “may” be used despite “a low certainty of the evidence”.

This feeble cautionary note did nothing to dampen the ill-founded enthusiasm for the use and promotion of both drugs.

With the new revision, ICMR – and India – are now in line with accepted good practice vis-à-vis managing COVID-19, at least on the count of these two drugs. The guidelines of the US National Institutes of Health, the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and the WHO all negatively recommend ivermectin and HCQ.

“The fascination with and support for ivermectin as a prophylactic agent against COVID-19 is hard to explain.”


In addition, both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency have said that ivermectin is not an antiviral drug, much less an anti-COVID drug.

But within India, the consensus hasn’t been so well-defined, and the official treatment recommendations themselves have been polarising.

India Today reported as far back as June 7 that the Directorate General of Health Services, a body under the Union health ministry, had dropped ivermectin and doxycycline – a broad-spectrum antibiotic – from its recommendation.

But some news reports also suggested that Indian government experts and advisers were still debating among themselves as to whether ivermectin should be used.

This may explain why ICMR took so long to come around and exclude ivermectin from the guidelines – more so since it is well-known today that ICMR also deferred to political interests through the length of the pandemic. Ivermectin’s proponents through the pandemic have made many dubious claims … READ MORE.

India’s New Policy Is Hardly A Surprise


Headline Health has covered claims surrounding ivermectin use for Covid on many occasions:
  • “Ivermectin did not reduce the duration of symptoms in patients with mild cases of Covid-19.” – Reported 9/24/2021
  • “Myths and beliefs around [ivermectin] have taken on a life of their own…” – Reported 9/20/2021
  • “There’s just not any good evidence right now suggesting [ivermectin] is a good treatment for treating or preventing COVID-19.” – Reported 9/8/2021
  • “Ivermectin has gained a ‘weird cult following,’ even though data shows the drug is not effective in treating coronavirus.” – Reported 9/8/2021
  • “A large Egyptian study of ivermectin for COVID-19 patients has been retracted over concerns of plagiarism and serious problems with their raw data, the publisher confirmed to MedPage Today.” – Reported 9/8/2021
So a governing body just issues a statement, which happened in Sept, with no link to any studies and that’s that huh?

We know for a fact IVM was part of the protocol used before and at the time Uttar Pradesh made incredible strides in lowering death rates. Not conclusive but neither is a government entity just issuing a statement. Certainly noteworthy.

proof IVM was part of their protocol:
 
So a governing body just issues a statement, which happened in Sept, with no link to any studies and that’s that huh?

We know for a fact IVM was part of the protocol used before and at the time Uttar Pradesh made incredible strides in lowering death rates. Not conclusive but neither is a government entity just issuing a statement. Certainly noteworthy.

proof IVM was part of their protocol:
Pretty obvious @Illegal-shift is being paid by big pharma to post here.

So diabolical. Right, @Uniformed_ReRe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
As more data rolls in, these vaccines are not faring well. Remember the Denmark study that showed negative efficacy @Illegal-shift and you said that was total BS?

Well we are now starting to see it in actual numbers. It’s not looking good for the shot cheerleaders.

 
As more data rolls in, these vaccines are not faring well. Remember the Denmark study that showed negative efficacy @Illegal-shift and you said that was total BS?

Well we are now starting to see it in actual numbers. It’s not looking good for the shot cheerleaders.

Yeah but, educated people like @Illegal-shift don't care about actual data and science....they care about COMMENTARY from the 'medical community'.
 
Yeah but, educated people like @Illegal-shift don't care about actual data and science....they care about COMMENTARY from the 'medical community'.
More bad news. It’s a good thing cheerleaders don’t care about the score.

 
  • Wow
Reactions: instaGATOR
I wouldn't take a horse tranquilizer for pain (or for recreation as some did in the past).
I also wouldn't take vet supplied Ivermectin intended for horses or cattle.

I have taken human Ivermectin, as has an older sibling with a positive CoV test.
We are both fine now with a quick recovery, and both still unvaxed.

Ivermectin can keep you from getting it, (the vax won't).

Ivermectin can cure you if you do get it, especially if used early on, (the vax won't).

Ivermectin, best of all, won't kill you,,, (while the vax can and has).

PS
I'm totally against either the Vax or Ivermectin being mandated by anyone.
My medical choices are mine and mine alone, each to their own choices....
 
Last edited:
Please keep vaccinating your young children

I’m sure there’s a doc lurking that’ll tell you there’s no causal link.

And this kid carried literally zero risk of dying of Covid, and the vaccines wouldn’t stop her from contracting or spreading the virus.

Welcome to insanity.
 
I wouldn't take a horse tranquilizer for pain (or for recreation as some did in the past).
I also wouldn't take vet supplied Ivermectin intended to horses or cattle.

I have taken human Ivermectin, as has an older sibling with a positive CoV test.
We are both fine now with a quick recovery, and both still unvaxed.

Ivermectin can keep you from getting it, (the vax won't).

Ivermectin can cure you if you do get it, especially if used early on, (the vax won't).

Ivermectin, best of all, won't kill you,,, (while the vax can and has).

PS
I'm totally against either the Vax or Ivermectin being mandated by anyone.
My medical choices are mine and mine alone, each to their own choices....
You don’t need a vet, IVM is over the counter because it’s so deadly.
 
You resident libtards are being very well repped.

Out with a cloth mask that according to science has no affect in stopping the spread of ANY virus while years ago the CDC stated N95 masks would not protect you from smoke during any type of wildfires.




 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
This is evil. This administration is evil.

They are making political points with people's lives. Delta is still out there.

 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
You resident libtards are being very well repped.

Out with a cloth mask that according to science has no affect in stopping the spread of ANY virus while years ago the CDC stated N95 masks would not protect you from smoke during any type of wildfires.




I wonder if she cares as much about all the rapes Baylor covered up under Art Briles as she does us all wearing a worthless face diaper in a wal-mart?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
This is insane data. I'm sure there's no causal link, just a "random" tripling of the cancer rate amongst healthy young people being tracked by a mandatory active Federal database.

How long before we hear about this database being "fixed"?

@Illegal-shift - this isn't VAERS. This is a closely monitored gov't database. He's giving these statistics under oath. Care to comment?



 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gator Fever
Yep you are just paying a bunch extra getting it from a doctor as the horse paste works just fine and was only 7.99 at the feed store near me.
My insurance covered it, and I'd rather have the small human dosage tabs instead of the horse paste, but each to his own standards and ability to pay.... 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gator Fever
OANN tomorrow night (Wed) from 8 to 11 PM for a full disclosure panel on CoV.
==========

NH Bill Would Allow Ivermectin Without a Prescription​

By Michelle Edwards - January 24, 2022

Lawmakers in New Hampshire have introduced a bill that would permit pharmacists to dispense the drug Ivermectin without first getting a prescription from a doctor. The proposed legislation, titled HB 1022, “AN ACT permitting pharmacists to dispense the drug Ivermectin by means of a standing order,” was first introduced on Oct. 29, 2021, by eight Republican representatives who are taking a firm stand against the war on inexpensive, repurposed drugs like Ivermectin.

“Ivermectin is a Nobel prize-winning drug that has been registered for human use since 1987. And in 1988, a massive campaign was implemented in Africa to deliver Ivermectin to millions of people to combat river blindness. Ivermectin was shown over the next 33 years to be extremely effective and well-tolerated. It has been shown to be useful in the treatment of a variety of parasites and also to have broad application as an antiviral.

Dr. Pierre Kory Treated 200 Members of Congress With Ivermectin.

Indeed, the broad consensus of countless experts is that if Ivermectin had been readily available sooner as an early at-home prophylactic treatment for COVID, we would have prevented hundreds of thousands of deaths.

For the rest of the article go here:

 
Last edited:
Gates, Fauci, Daszak & UK Officials Charged with Crimes Against Humanity.

Following his urgent appeal to humanity last year, former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon joined a group of lawyers, activists, and whistleblowers in filing a stunning complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) on behalf of citizens of the United Kingdom (U.K.). The group accused a long list of significant players in the COVID-19 narrative of genocide, noting statistics on the impact of the experimental “vaccines” and policies imposed under the pretense of “mitigating COVID.”

As reported by UncoverDC, in May 2021, Yeadon, a U.K. citizen, issued what he described as his “final warning to humanity,” outlining the horrendous and ongoing damage caused by COVID-19 gene therapy “vaccines.” Furthermore, he pleaded there might be an objective in play that exceeds far beyond forced vaccinations, opening the door to complete government control via a social credit system initiated by the use of vaccine passports.

For the rest of the long article including the list of those accused go here:

 
British Medical Journal Demands Raw Data "Now" on CoV Vaccines & Treatments

The prominent British Medical Journal (BMJ)—a weekly peer-reviewed trade journal in the United Kingdom—published an article this week titled, “COVID-19 vaccines and treatments; we must have raw data, now.” Presented by senior editor Peter Doshi, the BMJ asserts data from vaccine and therapeutics manufacturers “should be fully and immediately available for public scrutiny.”

Nonetheless, we continue to lack crucial data from drug manufacturers supplying the “accepted” treatments for COVID-19 (Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca for “vaccines” as well as Regeneron and Gilead Sciences for therapeutics, to name a few). Stating that “the errors of the last pandemic are being repeated,” the journal reminded:

The errors of the last pandemic are being repeated. Memories are short. Today, despite the global rollout of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, the anonymized participant-level data underlying the trials for these new products remain inaccessible to doctors, researchers, and the public—and are likely to remain that way for years to come. This is morally indefensible for all trials, but especially for those involving major public health interventions.”

Peter Doshi, Senior Editor for BJM is an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, criticized medical journals for not holding pharmaceutical companies accountable. He also denounced government regulators in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for “being complicit in data secrecy.” He wrote:


For the rest of the article go here:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Gator Fever
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT