Actually, we do not materially disagree here and I think is a KEY difference which I had not thought about in full until now (benefit of open dialogue!)I respectfully disagree here. Partly. As long as federal money is used..it IS my business. And then lets talk about the point where it IS murder. I actually believe we are closer now to a real compromise than we have ever been. Let me explain. Republicans not long ago were pro life....THE END. NO abortions. They have moved considerably on that stance. And the left has also moved...more to the left. They want unobstructed abortions. That will NEVER happen federally. Lets pick an acceptable time that they are allowed...and pass that...and let states work inside that guideline.
Republicans - we want to get the government out of the decision making process and we need to focus our health care spending. If there is true health emergency, then the ACA, Medicaid and Payors will figure out what is covered and what is not. If health clinics want to provide charity care, etc., absolutely their choice.
Democrats - we want full abortion rights and for the government to pay for everyone's right to exercise.
Difference? Republicans are about choice. Democrats - centralized government spending.
On the final point, I think that was what Roberts was trying to get at with Dobbs. I think if you have somewhere between 20-22 weeks (point of viability outside the womb), most (not all) will agree with that. Past that (which is VERY rare) you are 99% of the time dealing with significant health issues. Are there example where a single mother freaks out? Sure. This is also where you need to start thinking about family support on adoption. Bring in the Pence argument (which is a good one).
Do all of that? You have a reasonable position that 60-70% of the country full agrees with.