ADVERTISEMENT

More bad news from Jan 6

That's a cop out, don't be a coward.

It's an interview. Just listen to the interviewee.
It's not that at all. Tucker is known to lie and present "evidence" to please his crowd. No different than Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, etc. I am sure that I can send you "interviews" from Rachel Maddow that "proves" Trump is a Russia agent. I don't trust any of the opinion reporters. I have said that repeatedly.
 
It's not that at all. Tucker is known to lie and present "evidence" to please his crowd. No different than Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, etc. I am sure that I can send you "interviews" from Rachel Maddow that "proves" Trump is a Russia agent. I don't trust any of the opinion reporters. I have said that repeatedly.
You're too afraid to actually challenge your opinions and you're hiding behind "fear of Tucker". Pretty soy boy of you. Adults can look at information they disagree with and parse the BS from what is - or could be - real, even if it triggers them.

So, here are a bunch of tweets with some of the same video evidence that's presented in the interview you're so terrified of. It would be alot more succinct and easier if you could man up and watch the interview, but here you go. All the same questions apply - but the biggest one is - why are the two top guys of the group that is the "face of white supremacy" and the first group that started the "insurrection" not being arrested, charged or even interviewed? Does that square with the 500 arrests of people that are still rotting in solitary for just entering the building (some who were arrested never even went in)?

Why were barricades removed? Why were magnetic doors unlocked?

We know from congressional testimony that it was clear three days prior to the riot that it was going to occur - which is why Trump authorized the national guard. Why didn't Pelosi call them in? How did Democrat leadership react to this incident days after, and specifically what does Joe Biden say is the biggest threat to the country today?

There's fvckery abound, it's unavoidable.













 
You're too afraid to actually challenge your opinions and you're hiding behind "fear of Tucker". Pretty soy boy of you. Adults can look at information they disagree with and parse the BS from what is - or could be - real, even if it triggers them.

So, here are a bunch of tweets with some of the same video evidence that's presented in the interview you're so terrified of. It would be alot more succinct and easier if you could man up and watch the interview, but here you go. All the same questions apply - but the biggest one is - why are the two top guys of the group that is the "face of white supremacy" and the first group that started the "insurrection" not being arrested, charged or even interviewed? Does that square with the 500 arrests of people that are still rotting in solitary for just entering the building (some who were arrested never even went in)?

Why were barricades removed? Why were magnetic doors unlocked?

We know from congressional testimony that it was clear three days prior to the riot that it was going to occur - which is why Trump authorized the national guard. Why didn't Pelosi call them in? How did Democrat leadership react to this incident days after, and specifically what does Joe Biden say is the biggest threat to the country today?

There's fvckery abound, it's unavoidable.













Ok. Just ignore my true feelings and call it fear. If you don't believe me then why even waste our time?

Lastly. You're mind is made up on this, so you're clearly looking from a biased mindset. You're looking for ways to justify this and give those people a pass. How many CNN, Rachel Maddow, etc segments have you watched on this? How my liberal people have you followed on Twitter about this? Did you post the article that came out recently, that detailed how involved some Republicans were with setting up, including offering blanked pardons? Let's not play naive. You don't truly care about what happened, you're just looking for justification and following your leaders. Hope you find what you're looking for.

Everything with you is one-sided and you try to present it as "research".
 
Ok. Just ignore my true feelings and call it fear. If you don't believe me then why even waste our time?

Lastly. You're mind is made up on this, so you're clearly looking from a biased mindset. You're looking for ways to justify this and give those people a pass. How many CNN, Rachel Maddow, etc segments have you watched on this? How my liberal people have you followed on Twitter about this? Did you post the article that came out recently, that detailed how involved some Republicans were with setting up, including offering blanked pardons? Let's not play naive. You don't truly care about what happened, you're just looking for justification and following your leaders. Hope you find what you're looking for.

Everything with you is one-sided and you try to present it as "research".
You're changing the argument. Back to the point please.
 
All the same questions apply - but the biggest one is - why are the two top guys of the group that is the "face of white supremacy" and the first group that started the "insurrection" not being arrested, charged or even interviewed? Does that square with the 500 arrests of people that are still rotting in solitary for just entering the building (some who were arrested never even went in)?

Why were barricades removed? Why were magnetic doors unlocked?

We know from congressional testimony that it was clear three days prior to the riot that it was going to occur - which is why Trump authorized the national guard. Why didn't Pelosi call them in? How did Democrat leadership react to this incident days after, and specifically what does Joe Biden say is the biggest threat to the country today?
WHY, because they are just TOO BUSY spending ALL Their time going after Bannon and Trump White House Staffers.
 
Insurrection -- a violent uprising against an authority or government:
Pretty hard to have a real one without any weapons present, per the FBI.

A mostly peaceful march to address 'the steal' is not an insurrection, except to the Rats, their sheep, and their bought and paid for fake media propagandists.
(imo all involved in the setup are traitors to the Republic of the united States under the Constitution)

Unlike the Rat's widely pushed and supported so-called 'Summer of Peace' violent riots and insurrection, that was busy murdering people and burning towns down.

On Jan 6th, nothing got burned,
(except for the Constitution's principles) and the only one murdered with a weapon was an unarmed female US Military Veteran, by a jack-booted thug that's still hiding and un-prosecuted under Federal Rat protection.

Critical and Necessary Question:

When the votes/elections are stolen so that the citizens can no longer make changes at the polls, what method is left for the citizens that wish to remain FREE of traitors and tyrants?
(a full review of the 2nd Amendment might be needed by some at this point)

It is my strongly held opinion that you have yet to see any actual insurrection by those that have sworn to support and defend the Constitution, but it's certainly on the table now days, or soon will be if things don't change for the better.
 
Last edited:
Insurrection -- a violent uprising against an authority or government:
Pretty hard to have a real one with any weapons present, per the FBI.

A mostly peaceful march to address 'the steal' is not an insurrection, except to the Rats, their sheep, and their bought and paid for fake media propagandists.
(imo all involved in the setup are traitors to the Republic of the united States under the Constitution)

Unlike the Rat's widely pushed and supported so-called 'Summer of Peace' violent riots and insurrection, that was busy murdering people and burning towns down.

On Jan 6th, nothing got burned,
(except for the Constitution's principles) and the only one murdered with a weapon was an unarmed female US Military Veteran, by a jack-booted thug that's still hiding and un-prosecuted under Federal Rat protection.

Critical and Necessary Question:

When the votes/elections are stolen so that the citizens can no longer make changes at the polls, what method is left for the citizens that wish to remain FREE of traitors and tyrants?
(a full review of the 2nd Amendment might be needed by some at this point)

It is my strongly held opinion that you have yet to see any actual insurrection by those that that have sworn to support and defend the Constitution, but it's certainly on the table now days, or soon will be if things don't change for the better.
Did you say something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
You’re quite mad, you know.

Mad as hell is a fact. It comes with being aware of what is happening to my beloved country.

Which is much better than being one of the 2 things that you obviously are.

1. A complete village idiot moe-ron that is out of touch with reality...
OR (and much more likely)
2. An evil asshat that would be best handled by the use of U.S. Code 2381....
 
Last edited:
Mad as hell is a fact. It comes with being aware of what is happening to my beloved country.

Which is much better than being one of the 2 things that your obviously are.

1. A complete village idiot moe-ron that is out of touch with reality...
OR (and much more likely)
2. An evil asshat that would be best handled by the use of U.S. Code 2381....
Mad as in

“They're coming to take you away, ha ha, he he.“
 
Ducky would bitch-slap you for even saying that....
(this ignorant idiot twit will never get the reference I'm betting)
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
I'm not changing anything. You won't use me to help you feel better about Jan 6th. Do better research.
I’m showing you video and providing facts that you’re choosing to ignore while telling me to do better research.

You’re gaslighting, which is learned behavior.

And you’re triggered, which is also learned.

You fit the bill as an “independent” perfectly.
 
I’m showing you video and providing facts that you’re choosing to ignore while telling me to do better research.

You’re gaslighting, which is learned behavior.

And you’re triggered, which is also learned.

You fit the bill as an “independent” perfectly.
You're showing me propaganda from Tucker. Trying to make people like you believe that the FBI started it, so you can feel better. I already know what they are trying to do. You seriously don't think the FBI have undercovers in the proud boys, oath keepers, etc? They had people in the black panthers, KKK and nation of Islam. Having a CI, doesn't mean anything. It's part of the process.

Watch the HBO special. Trump supporters admit to breaking down the barriers and hitting cops with video.
 
You're showing me propaganda from Tucker. Trying to make people like you believe that the FBI started it, so you can feel better. I already know what they are trying to do. You seriously don't think the FBI have undercovers in the proud boys, oath keepers, etc? They had people in the black panthers, KKK and nation of Islam. Having a CI, doesn't mean anything. It's part of the process.

Watch the HBO special. Trump supporters admit to breaking down the barriers and hitting cops with video.
Wait, are these guys still trying to claim it wasn’t nut job Trumpers who instigated this? I swear, these people live in an alternate universe. They’ll believe anything as long as it fits into their preconceived desires, which is what Tucker and the others cater to.

They are truly lemmings.
 
You're showing me propaganda from Tucker. Trying to make people like you believe that the FBI started it, so you can feel better. I already know what they are trying to do. You seriously don't think the FBI have undercovers in the proud boys, oath keepers, etc? They had people in the black panthers, KKK and nation of Islam. Having a CI, doesn't mean anything. It's part of the process.

Watch the HBO special. Trump supporters admit to breaking down the barriers and hitting cops with video.
You do this every time you get triggered, which is too often for a grown man. You're afraid that everything you've been told is total BS and you can't man up enough to even review information someone provides.

There's another link to another story below. MSM media isn't covering this. You can come up with your own reasons why. It doesn't matter. There's video evidence, witnesses and documentation (such as the FBI's editing of their most wanted list). You don't have to fully trust the source when you can see it for yourself. But you won't even look at it because, like most liberals, you care more about your narrative than the actual truth.

And what we're discussing here isn't whether Trump supporters pushed down barriers and - at least the initial group - pushed their way to the doors. And some Trump supporters (I assume they weren't plants too) did hit Cops, others were helping cops. The issue is - were they incited by an FBI plant (or both Oathkeepers leaders, actually) who were there to help execute the plan of getting rioters into the building so the event could be leveraged against Trump supporters ad nauseum? Both of those guys should be in solitary and charged with conspiracy, so far neither are even persons of interest.

We know the same thing happened in the Whitmer kidnapping plot - there were more FBI plants than actually crazy people. The alphabet agencies are aligned to demonize a political movement. That's not good for any of us. 1/6 was awful, but it certainly looks like it was a setup.

 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
You do this every time you get triggered, which is too often for a grown man. You're afraid that everything you've been told is total BS and you can't man up enough to even review information someone provides.

There's another link to another story below. MSM media isn't covering this. You can come up with your own reasons why. It doesn't matter. There's video evidence, witnesses and documentation (such as the FBI's editing of their most wanted list). You don't have to fully trust the source when you can see it for yourself. But you won't even look at it because, like most liberals, you care more about your narrative than the actual truth.

And what we're discussing here isn't whether Trump supporters pushed down barriers and - at least the initial group - pushed their way to the doors. And some Trump supporters (I assume they weren't plants too) did hit Cops, others were helping cops. The issue is - were they incited by an FBI plant (or both Oathkeepers leaders, actually) who were there to help execute the plan of getting rioters into the building so the event could be leveraged against Trump supporters ad nauseum? Both of those guys should be in solitary and charged with conspiracy, so far neither are even persons of interest.

We know the same thing happened in the Whitmer kidnapping plot - there were more FBI plants than actually crazy people. The alphabet agencies are aligned to demonize a political movement. That's not good for any of us. 1/6 was awful, but it certainly looks like it was a setup.

What is that word, hmm, oh yah, ENTRAPMENT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCandtheUTBand
You do this every time you get triggered, which is too often for a grown man. You're afraid that everything you've been told is total BS and you can't man up enough to even review information someone provides.

There's another link to another story below. MSM media isn't covering this. You can come up with your own reasons why. It doesn't matter. There's video evidence, witnesses and documentation (such as the FBI's editing of their most wanted list). You don't have to fully trust the source when you can see it for yourself. But you won't even look at it because, like most liberals, you care more about your narrative than the actual truth.

And what we're discussing here isn't whether Trump supporters pushed down barriers and - at least the initial group - pushed their way to the doors. And some Trump supporters (I assume they weren't plants too) did hit Cops, others were helping cops. The issue is - were they incited by an FBI plant (or both Oathkeepers leaders, actually) who were there to help execute the plan of getting rioters into the building so the event could be leveraged against Trump supporters ad nauseum? Both of those guys should be in solitary and charged with conspiracy, so far neither are even persons of interest.

We know the same thing happened in the Whitmer kidnapping plot - there were more FBI plants than actually crazy people. The alphabet agencies are aligned to demonize a political movement. That's not good for any of us. 1/6 was awful, but it certainly looks like it was a setup.

I'm not triggered, I just don't care for your propaganda. I've seen plenty of stuff on this. There were several points of entry. Not every point of entry had a "FBI-plant". So explain the violence at the other point of entry?

Also watch the HBO special. You see oath keepers openly talking about doing what you said they were "set-up" to do. Like l said earlier, do better research or not "justification" research.
 
Wait, are these guys still trying to claim it wasn’t nut job Trumpers who instigated this? I swear, these people live in an alternate universe. They’ll believe anything as long as it fits into their preconceived desires, which is what Tucker and the others cater to.

They are truly lemmings.
Yes, unfortunately yes. He is determined to believe it was a setup. He is trying to make himself feel better about his people going super crazy on January 6th. He's a puppet and he's letting Tucker pull his strings.
 
Yes, unfortunately yes. He is determined to believe it was a setup. He is trying to make himself feel better about his people going super crazy on January 6th. He's a puppet and he's letting Tucker pull his strings.
Here’s the thing. I think we realize that CNN and others on the left give a distorted view of reality. That’s why I watch Fox and read the “RedState” links posted on here to get a balanced view. But these dorks truly live in an echo chamber and believe every single conspiracy theory and slanted opinion piece they can get their hands on. You can tell by what they post that they have no interest in any opposing views and their entire worldview comes down to Trump good, everyone else bad.

I used feel sorry for them as their thinking makes them an outcast in the rational world, but it seems their numbers are growing so I’m truly worried about where this country is heading. A year later and they still can’t accept the fact that Trump lost.
 
Here’s the thing. I think we realize that CNN and others on the left give a distorted view of reality. That’s why I watch Fox and read the “RedState” links posted on here to get a balanced view. But these dorks truly live in an echo chamber and believe every single conspiracy theory and slanted opinion piece they can get their hands on. You can tell by what they post that they have no interest in any opposing views and their entire worldview comes down to Trump good, everyone else bad.

I used feel sorry for them as their thinking makes them an outcast in the rational world, but it seems their numbers are growing so I’m truly worried about where this country is heading. A year later and they still can’t accept the fact that Trump lost.
We are in the same boat. I watch both sides to give me balance. Now when people only provide the right then I know they are in an echo chamber. The right lies and manipulate its viewers, just like the left. It's a game of ratings. Right wing media is all in on making people feel like Jan 6th was nothing. There is so much video and even people there saying that is a big deal.

I'm still shocked at how much this Trump lost hurt these people. It's really sad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSC911
You're too afraid to actually challenge your opinions and you're hiding behind "fear of Tucker". Pretty soy boy of you. Adults can look at information they disagree with and parse the BS from what is - or could be - real, even if it triggers them.
Bingo. He doesn't care to learn the truth, he's memorized the dem talking points, and that was hard enough for him.

Dems can defend the talking points, but they can't argue or explain them.

If he was confident that he knew the truth, he would have zero problem exploring alternate viewpoints. But as you said, he's scared to death he might learn that his talking points....are just that.
 
Yes, unfortunately yes. He is determined to believe it was a setup. He is trying to make himself feel better about his people going super crazy on January 6th. He's a puppet and he's letting Tucker pull his strings.
😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Holy shit, you're big mad this time! Making up things I didn't say and running to @BSC911 crying is a new high point for you my man! This is awesome.

I shouldn't risk triggering you further, but it feels like I need to restate what I said in smaller sentences and shorter words, so you can understand what I've stated above more clearly. Because this is important.

1) I never said "Trumpers" didn't riot in the Capitol, and I'm on record that the whole thing made me sick. But there's no "feeling better" about Jan 6th, or the entire summer of 2020. It was all terrible.
2) You're doing what you always do - you don't want to talk about the main point so you try to make the argument about something else. It's a tired and transparent tactic at this point.

So let me try again: The issue at hand is whether or not the FBI had plants at the speech, the Capitol and rallies the night before to incite the crowd into entering the Capitol. They clearly did, it's about what role they should or shouldn't play.

You're essentially saying you think the FBI's role in our country is to incite violence that can be used for political purposes. If that's how you feel it's fine, we live in a free country, but you're a totalitarian fascist. And this isn't the first time we've seen this - the CIA and FBI lied to a FISA court to spy on a political campaign. Lois Lerner leveraged the IRS to deny 501c3 status to PAC's of only one political party. And there are many more examples, all headed in one direction.

Summary Statement: I find it highly problematic that the alphabet agencies are being weaponized against Conservatives. That's how things work in countries like Cuba. Which again, is how a totalitarian fascist wants it. But eventually, when they're done with Conservatives, that turret will get pointed towards the rest of the population.
 
😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Holy shit, you're big mad this time! Making up things I didn't say and running to @BSC911 crying is a new high point for you my man! This is awesome.

I shouldn't risk triggering you further, but it feels like I need to restate what I said in smaller sentences and shorter words, so you can understand what I've stated above more clearly. Because this is important.

1) I never said "Trumpers" didn't riot in the Capitol, and I'm on record that the whole thing made me sick. But there's no "feeling better" about Jan 6th, or the entire summer of 2020. It was all terrible.
2) You're doing what you always do - you don't want to talk about the main point so you try to make the argument about something else. It's a tired and transparent tactic at this point.

So let me try again: The issue at hand is whether or not the FBI had plants at the speech, the Capitol and rallies the night before to incite the crowd into entering the Capitol. They clearly did, it's about what role they should or shouldn't play.

You're essentially saying you think the FBI's role in our country is to incite violence that can be used for political purposes. If that's how you feel it's fine, we live in a free country, but you're a totalitarian fascist. And this isn't the first time we've seen this - the CIA and FBI lied to a FISA court to spy on a political campaign. Lois Lerner leveraged the IRS to deny 501c3 status to PAC's of only one political party. And there are many more examples, all headed in one direction.

Summary Statement: I find it highly problematic that the alphabet agencies are being weaponized against Conservatives. That's how things work in countries like Cuba. Which again, is how a totalitarian fascist wants it. But eventually, when they're done with Conservatives, that turret will get pointed towards the rest of the population.
Calling me triggered doesn't make me triggered. I've said repeatedly that i could care less about the FBI involvement and what's on Tucker show.

1.) You also have no real point.
2.) Yes you are trying to make it seem like the FBI "incited" or "started" the entire thing. Therefore, its not entirely on the Trumpers and you can feel better. You are looking for someone to turn your "anger" on. It's so CLEAR what you're trying to do.
3.) Lastly, I am still waiting on you to explain the violence in the other areas, where no FBI people were.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSC911
Calling me triggered doesn't make me triggered. I've said repeatedly that i could care less about the FBI involvement and what's on Tucker show.

1.) You also have no real point.
2.) Yes you are trying to make it seem like the FBI "incited" or "started" the entire thing. Therefore, its not entirely on the Trumpers and you can feel better. You are looking for someone to turn your "anger" on. It's so CLEAR what you're trying to do.
3.) Lastly, I am still waiting on you to explain the violence in the other areas, where no FBI people were.
3) I have, and neither do you, any clue whether or not there were any in other places. Seems to be alot of video evidence (unless your claiming that Tucker faked those videos for his show) that there was this one guy, who was initially wanted, but then never arrested and thrown in jail, like the other 400 or 500 idiots. If there was one, chances are there were more.

You also keep saying over and over again that we all claim Trump supports weren't involved. Noone here has said that. We all beleive that the Trump supports who entered and caused damage or comitted violence are idiots. BUT, not ALL of the people arrested did that, in fact, MOST arrested didn't have any part in that. There are videos out there showing police removing barriers and waving people in. There are videos showiing the doors open with police standing by while people walked in. That was never explained by anyone.
 
You do this every time you get triggered, which is too often for a grown man. You're afraid that everything you've been told is total BS and you can't man up enough to even review information someone provides.

There's another link to another story below. MSM media isn't covering this. You can come up with your own reasons why. It doesn't matter. There's video evidence, witnesses and documentation (such as the FBI's editing of their most wanted list). You don't have to fully trust the source when you can see it for yourself. But you won't even look at it because, like most liberals, you care more about your narrative than the actual truth.

And what we're discussing here isn't whether Trump supporters pushed down barriers and - at least the initial group - pushed their way to the doors. And some Trump supporters (I assume they weren't plants too) did hit Cops, others were helping cops. The issue is - were they incited by an FBI plant (or both Oathkeepers leaders, actually) who were there to help execute the plan of getting rioters into the building so the event could be leveraged against Trump supporters ad nauseum? Both of those guys should be in solitary and charged with conspiracy, so far neither are even persons of interest.

We know the same thing happened in the Whitmer kidnapping plot - there were more FBI plants than actually crazy people. The alphabet agencies are aligned to demonize a political movement. That's not good for any of us. 1/6 was awful, but it certainly looks like it was a setup.

This is why I said to those that say there might come a time to take up arms that two things MUST happen.

1.)It must be like the Romanian revolution. No civil war and gubmint alone was targeted. It was pretty easy for them as they only really had 2 people to deal with.

2.) any such group engaged in such an endeavor must compartmentalize to mitigate infiltration. You can not prevent it. Having autonomous and anonymous agents is critical. It is clear from reading about Epps and Stewart that they did not try and protect identities and should have been suspect all along.

The FBI had their inside guy, Epps, and most of the agency did not know. Only his handlers knew everything. This is compartmentalization.

Many in the crowd sniffed him out none the less.

That is why he ended up on the most wanted list but is now being swept under the rug.

So lil ole me, my plan is to head to the woods to be left alone.
 
This is what a 'Summer of Peace' peaceful march looks like, according to the Socialist/Marxist Rat's Propaganda Fake News.

What it really is, is a violent insurrection by Socialist/Marxist Rats and their BLM/ANTIFA Brown Shirts.

Now compare that to Jan 6th and tell me why Jan 6th is investigated with many held in Solitary Confinement for months, while the Summer of Peace has been all but forgotten by the Rat's Propaganda Fake News, the Federal Bureau of Instigation, and the No-Justice Dept.? (crickets)

shops-and-buildings-set-on-fire-in-tottenham.jpg



If the above statements confuse you, then you need to read 'The Big Lie' by Dinesh D'Souza

Yes, there is a fascist threat in America—but that threat is from the Left and the Democratic Party. The Democratic left (Socialist/Marxists) has an ideology virtually identical with fascism and routinely borrows tactics of intimidation and political terror from the Nazi Brownshirts.

To cover up their insidious fascist agenda, Democrats loudly accuse President Trump and other Republicans of being Nazis—an obvious lie, considering the GOP has been fighting the Democrats over slavery, genocide, racism and fascism from the beginning.

Abe Lincoln with the Abolitionists founded the Republican Party.


While the RAT's BIG LIES will return you to slavery,,, the TRUTH can still set you FREE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
It's not that at all. Tucker is known to lie and present "evidence" to please his crowd. No different than Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, etc. I am sure that I can send you "interviews" from Rachel Maddow that "proves" Trump is a Russia agent. I don't trust any of the opinion reporters. I have said that repeatedly.
He asked you to listen to what Tucker's guest said, not Tucker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
Yes, unfortunately yes. He is determined to believe it was a setup. He is trying to make himself feel better about his people going super crazy on January 6th. He's a puppet and he's letting Tucker pull his strings.
And now you're trying to make this personal hoping you will piss @fatman76 off and he will drop asking you to watch the interview. Which of course he won't do, cause he's smart enough to see through what you are doing.

Are you REALLY that scared of addressing what was said in that interview?
 
Calling me triggered doesn't make me triggered. I've said repeatedly that i could care less about the FBI involvement and what's on Tucker show.

1.) You also have no real point.
2.) Yes you are trying to make it seem like the FBI "incited" or "started" the entire thing. Therefore, its not entirely on the Trumpers and you can feel better. You are looking for someone to turn your "anger" on. It's so CLEAR what you're trying to do.
3.) Lastly, I am still waiting on you to explain the violence in the other areas, where no FBI people were.
See? I told you that trying to make it personal to get @fatman76 to stop asking you to watch the interview wouldn't work. He's smarter than you are.

And you still refuse to watch the interview. What a coward indeed. Just watch the interview and address the claims. Stop running.
 
😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Holy shit, you're big mad this time! Making up things I didn't say and running to @BSC911 crying is a new high point for you my man! This is awesome.

I shouldn't risk triggering you further, but it feels like I need to restate what I said in smaller sentences and shorter words, so you can understand what I've stated above more clearly. Because this is important.

1) I never said "Trumpers" didn't riot in the Capitol, and I'm on record that the whole thing made me sick. But there's no "feeling better" about Jan 6th, or the entire summer of 2020. It was all terrible.
2) You're doing what you always do - you don't want to talk about the main point so you try to make the argument about something else. It's a tired and transparent tactic at this point.

So let me try again: The issue at hand is whether or not the FBI had plants at the speech, the Capitol and rallies the night before to incite the crowd into entering the Capitol. They clearly did, it's about what role they should or shouldn't play.

You're essentially saying you think the FBI's role in our country is to incite violence that can be used for political purposes. If that's how you feel it's fine, we live in a free country, but you're a totalitarian fascist. And this isn't the first time we've seen this - the CIA and FBI lied to a FISA court to spy on a political campaign. Lois Lerner leveraged the IRS to deny 501c3 status to PAC's of only one political party. And there are many more examples, all headed in one direction.

Summary Statement: I find it highly problematic that the alphabet agencies are being weaponized against Conservatives. That's how things work in countries like Cuba. Which again, is how a totalitarian fascist wants it. But eventually, when they're done with Conservatives, that turret will get pointed towards the rest of the population.
Reminder: All this started from one poster asking a dem poster (@kalimgoodman) to watch a short interview that apparently included information that might affect their view of what happened on Jan 6th.

This is how dems typically react when you ask them to intelligently consider information that doesn't pertain to their talking points. They cannot handle it, and have a break down. They go on the attack and hurl insults. They deflect, spew venom and rant. Anything to keep from watching the video.

All because someone asked them to educate themselves.

You've got him scared to death. Please continue, this is awesome, and we both know you're about 2 more replies from joining me on kalim's Fake Ignore list.
 
3) I have, and neither do you, any clue whether or not there were any in other places. Seems to be alot of video evidence (unless your claiming that Tucker faked those videos for his show) that there was this one guy, who was initially wanted, but then never arrested and thrown in jail, like the other 400 or 500 idiots. If there was one, chances are there were more.

You also keep saying over and over again that we all claim Trump supports weren't involved. Noone here has said that. We all beleive that the Trump supports who entered and caused damage or comitted violence are idiots. BUT, not ALL of the people arrested did that, in fact, MOST arrested didn't have any part in that. There are videos out there showing police removing barriers and waving people in. There are videos showiing the doors open with police standing by while people walked in. That was never explained by anyone.
You also keep saying over and over again that we all claim Trump supports weren't involved. Noone here has said that....I never said that. I said you guys are looking for justification and excuses for your people being involved. Trying to find a way to say they were setup or it's not all on them. Pretty much change the narrative and anger towards the FBI, Antifa, BLM, etc.

MOST arrested didn't have any part in that...Trespassing is Trespassing. Once again, more excuses to feel better

There are videos out there showing police removing barriers and waving people in...This is true and that's why people suspect that some of the people were involved. Hence talk of inside job. The committee is looking into that. Sounds like you want the committee too. 🤔
 




Its pretty clear this clown was put up to inciting people by the feds. The fake news won't touch this.
 



Haven't checked into this one but if that is true it reminds me of how that crooked Ukranian born Colonel was used with that impeachment nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: instaGATOR
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT