So your issue is you don’t think I’m showing enough unwarranted hysteria over this?The fact that this is a “small” pandemic does not make it easier for the 3,000,000 (and counting) families who have lose a loved one. To brush it off as a minor blip is just callus. (One on this site called 4,000 deaths a day in India insignificant.) Many thousands are disabled from it and since they are not dead they are not counted. Many hundreds of thousands lost two weeks or more having to be out of work due to the illness. Many on this site decry the economic impact that the restrictions caused. Imagine the impact if the virus had spread unchecked. But it’s just a flu, no worries.
The economic impact had it spread unchecked, as you put it, would’ve been far more minimal as I discussed in that article. The reason it would’ve been far more minimal is because this is a minor pandemic comparatively. That means by shutting everything down we unnecessarily hurt the economy when the impact still would have been relatively minimal from a minor pandemic.
. When you discuss these things at this level you have to divorce yourself from unwarranted hysteria and passion and embrace rational thought. It doesn’t mean I don’t care about the people that I personally try to save who did not survive, because I do. I have seen more than 100 people die from coronavirus ranging in age from 18 to 102. The average age of these people was definitely in the 60s. I have had to talk to their families and deal with their love ones. At the bedside I am an empathetic understanding physician with the same normal human feelings we all possess. But that kind of emotion has little business and a discussion of a pandemic on a global epidemiological standpoint.
I’m sorry if in your personal judgment I don’t seem to care enough. But that is a subjective measurement.
Life has casualties, we all die eventually, but
the cure should never be worse than the disease.
Last edited: