ADVERTISEMENT

LMFAO

Igloo be like

59516036.jpg
1418976734948.jpg
 
By your metric Saban apparently never ever loses a game or is just pretty average. OK it seems titles, bowl wins, playoffs and NC don't factor much if you happen lose a game. Gottcha. You likely never even watch games since a 7 point dog can't have any chance to win.
Hyperbole gonna hyperbolic.

When was the last time a Saban coached team lost to a vastly inferior 2-5 team?

You guys are so Wyattdamned delusional, it is quite amusing.
 
What if Tech runs the table the rest of the way and wins its bowl game (8-5) AND FSU does the same (13-1). Is 4-loss Fisher still lurking in the bushes?

Clemson's even being given credit for beating a "better than its record, Georgia Tech."

http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...08/ncaa-football-rankings-clemson-ohio-state#
I understand what iffs. So fair point. But until that happens, then let's table the discussion. If it DOES happen, we can reopen that discussion then. But until then, it is stupid and unlikely speculation.

As an example, some of you FSU fans still give the 2008 Mighty Gator team a hard time for losing to Ole Miss. But that Ole Miss team turned out to be pretty good and ended the year ranked. They also beat LSU in Baton Rouge that year. So the preconception of losing to Ole Miss late in the year was different than losing to them early in the year.

But understand this; Ga Tech has 5 losses. The best they can be is 8-5. That Ole Miss team ended up 9-4 and ranked in the top 20.
 
Georgia plays two teams that are currently ranked. Alabama destroyed them and gators are the other one. But oh oh, the other SEC teams on their schedule are viable simply because they are, well, SEC teams. Correct??
To be fair, they WILL play Ga Tech at the end of the year, the team that just beat FSU. That has to count for something, right? And unlike Ga Tech, UGA is actually ranked right now and AND they have a winning record.
 
Gotta love nole speculation.

If a meteor the size of Rhode Island strikes Earth in 2005, 2006 and 2008 don't happen for us either.
 
How bad is Jimbo Fisher and the FSU offense? Ripped from WC

Wayne McGahee writes, "The Florida State offense has ran 76 offensive plays inside the redzone since the Texas State game. Nearly half, 35, have been negative plays. The Seminoles have had 11 runs for no gain or negative yards, 5 penalties, 26 incomplete passes, 2 sacks, and 1 interception. The Seminoles have lacked the execution and discipline needed to succeed in the redzone."
 
We will see how "good" FSU is in their remaining games.. as of now their opponents they have played are 21-29 with two teams with a winning record (both at 4-3). The rest of their schedule is a combined 27-8 with 4 out of 5 games against a team with a winning record. Clemson, NC ST, Chatt. and UF. FSU WILL lose 2 of their last 5 games, possible 3 just because NC ST seems to play a close game against FSU
 
Why is it ridiculous? I know you don't like it, but you're 1-4 against Jimbo. Why is it ridiculous to suggest that a coach that has been lights out in rivalry games has a ~70% chance to beat a rival at home? You seem to think it's still 2006.

Not what I'm talking about
 
In the current College Football Playoff format, the relative strength of each Power 5 conference is under more scrutiny than ever. Nonconference matchups have an impact on individual teams and on the perception of conferences as a whole.

Through three weeks, the SEC is the top conference in the nation, according to ESPN Stats & Information’s conference power rankings. The SEC has posted an FBS-best 23-4 record in nonconference play (4-2 versus other Power 5 teams). The Big 12 is gaining ground on the SEC; seven of 10 Big 12 teams are undefeated, including two – Oklahoma and Texas Tech – that beat SEC opponents on the road.
 
Fisher has been head coach starting in 2010. He has completed 5 seasons and is currently 7 games through his 6th. In his first two seasons, he lost 4 games each. In the next three seasons, he lost a total of 3 games. So...in a majority of his tenure he's averaged one loss per year. That's actually most years. While you have excluded seasons to reach your conclusion, I've included them all.

In fact, it took 3 complete seasons and 7 games to lose a total of 4 games after his first two seasons.

Among head coaches of “Power Five” conference teams, Fisher’s 58 wins in his first five seasons are the most in history.

Clap clap clap clap
Glad to hear you are happy with him...
 
did you read my post on their board last night after you posted and how I always get attacked like im an absolute joke AND a female btw now to fit their narrative. Singlegshot SAYS im trolling but then responds to everything I say with insults and pretends im a fraud and a troll but treats me like im a real poster, pick one if you know so much about football and pretty much everything about life better than everyone else while putting everyone down like me in the process... That guy does nothing but make excuses while calling me little brother and saying im looking for acceptance LMAO

Were you trying to tell them the LSU fake field goal play was illegal?
 
I wonder how many coaches out there would likely be getting more out of this FSU roster of 4 and 5 stars?
 
I wonder how many coaches out there would likely be getting more out of this FSU roster of 4 and 5 stars?

I would imagine many. I understand/except that no team will win every game, but I wonder how many elite programs have suffered 67% (8/12) of their losses to unranked, vastly inferior teams. Why is it Jimbo can win the big ones, but drops the "gimmes"?

I believe Jimbo has only lost four games to ranked opponents; 2010 OU, 2011 OU (what a game!), 2012 UF and 2013/14 Oregon. All of these "pre 2013 losses" can be explained/defended as "lessons learned" by a new coach and justified by the 2013/14 seasons. GT had BETTER be a fluke and not a sighting of "4-loss Fisher". He really needs to win 4 of the next 5 (and that one loss can't be against Cuse, NCS, or the Mocs.)
 
Last edited:
I would imagine many. I understand/except that no team will win every game, but I wonder how many elite programs have suffered 67% (8/12) of their losses to unranked, vastly inferior teams. Why is it Jimbo can win the big ones, but drops the "gimmes"?

I believe Jimbo has only lost four games to ranked opponents; 2010 OU, 2011 OU (what a game!), 2012 UF and 2013/14 Oregon. All of these "pre 2013 losses" can be explained/defended as "lessons learned" by a new coach and justified by the 2013/14 seasons. GT had BETTER be a fluke and not a sighting of "4-loss Fisher". He really needs to win 4 of the next 5 (and that one loss can't be against Cuse, NCS, or the Mocs.)

Go behind the wins.

4 and 5*-stockpiled fsu has underwhelmed going back to last year.

I expect 99% of the fsu fans who post here to take issue, but IMO, fsu was a product of their schedule last year, never looking like a top 10 team despite top 5 talent. This year, same thing, top 5 talent, fringe top 20 production. The fsu we saw vs GT is the same mediocre fsu we saw vs. BC, Wake, and Miami. FSU has had two "impressive" halves of football in 2015, 2nd half vs. USF and 2nd half vs. Louisville. I don't see any progression week to week. I would be concerned if I'm fsu but I'm a Gator, so I'm thrilled.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT