Hyperbole gonna hyperbolic.By your metric Saban apparently never ever loses a game or is just pretty average. OK it seems titles, bowl wins, playoffs and NC don't factor much if you happen lose a game. Gottcha. You likely never even watch games since a 7 point dog can't have any chance to win.
I understand what iffs. So fair point. But until that happens, then let's table the discussion. If it DOES happen, we can reopen that discussion then. But until then, it is stupid and unlikely speculation.What if Tech runs the table the rest of the way and wins its bowl game (8-5) AND FSU does the same (13-1). Is 4-loss Fisher still lurking in the bushes?
Clemson's even being given credit for beating a "better than its record, Georgia Tech."
http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...08/ncaa-football-rankings-clemson-ohio-state#
To be fair, they WILL play Ga Tech at the end of the year, the team that just beat FSU. That has to count for something, right? And unlike Ga Tech, UGA is actually ranked right now and AND they have a winning record.Georgia plays two teams that are currently ranked. Alabama destroyed them and gators are the other one. But oh oh, the other SEC teams on their schedule are viable simply because they are, well, SEC teams. Correct??
Talk about delusional. If Bowden had retired a few years earlier, say around 2003 or so, there's a good chance that 2006 and 2008 doesn't happen for you.
I understand what iffs. So fair point. But until that happens, then let's table the discussion. If it DOES happen, we can reopen that discussion then. But until then, it is stupid and unlikely speculation.
Wayne McGahee writes, "The Florida State offense has ran 76 offensive plays inside the redzone since the Texas State game. Nearly half, 35, have been negative plays. The Seminoles have had 11 runs for no gain or negative yards, 5 penalties, 26 incomplete passes, 2 sacks, and 1 interception. The Seminoles have lacked the execution and discipline needed to succeed in the redzone."
Why is it ridiculous? I know you don't like it, but you're 1-4 against Jimbo. Why is it ridiculous to suggest that a coach that has been lights out in rivalry games has a ~70% chance to beat a rival at home? You seem to think it's still 2006.
Glad to hear you are happy with him...Fisher has been head coach starting in 2010. He has completed 5 seasons and is currently 7 games through his 6th. In his first two seasons, he lost 4 games each. In the next three seasons, he lost a total of 3 games. So...in a majority of his tenure he's averaged one loss per year. That's actually most years. While you have excluded seasons to reach your conclusion, I've included them all.
In fact, it took 3 complete seasons and 7 games to lose a total of 4 games after his first two seasons.
Among head coaches of “Power Five” conference teams, Fisher’s 58 wins in his first five seasons are the most in history.
Clap clap clap clap
did you read my post on their board last night after you posted and how I always get attacked like im an absolute joke AND a female btw now to fit their narrative. Singlegshot SAYS im trolling but then responds to everything I say with insults and pretends im a fraud and a troll but treats me like im a real poster, pick one if you know so much about football and pretty much everything about life better than everyone else while putting everyone down like me in the process... That guy does nothing but make excuses while calling me little brother and saying im looking for acceptance LMAO
I wonder how many coaches out there would likely be getting more out of this FSU roster of 4 and 5 stars?
I would imagine many. I understand/except that no team will win every game, but I wonder how many elite programs have suffered 67% (8/12) of their losses to unranked, vastly inferior teams. Why is it Jimbo can win the big ones, but drops the "gimmes"?
I believe Jimbo has only lost four games to ranked opponents; 2010 OU, 2011 OU (what a game!), 2012 UF and 2013/14 Oregon. All of these "pre 2013 losses" can be explained/defended as "lessons learned" by a new coach and justified by the 2013/14 seasons. GT had BETTER be a fluke and not a sighting of "4-loss Fisher". He really needs to win 4 of the next 5 (and that one loss can't be against Cuse, NCS, or the Mocs.)