ADVERTISEMENT

Let “The Great New York City Boycott” Begin

Of course you do, you no different than the cancel culture libs. All snowflakes
Boycott: We aren't buying your product or using your services until you reverse a decision we don't agree with.

Cancel Culture: We aren't buying your product, using your services and nobody else should either and you're a bad person and we are going to do illegal stuff like doxx you and try to our very best to put you out of business by any means necessary.

This is why we think you're a chess playing pigeon.
 
Of course you do, you no different than the cancel culture libs. All snowflakes
You’re right.

We should just let a state confiscate $355MM for absolutely no reason and do nothing so you don’t call anyone a snowflake.

This isn’t cancelling someone for not using the correct pronouns, this is fighting communist seizures of assets for political purposes. But as a fascist liberal I wouldn’t expect you to get that.

In a way, it’s actually good for NYC in the long run.
 
Boycott: We aren't buying your product or using your services until you reverse a decision we don't agree with.

Cancel Culture: We aren't buying your product, using your services and nobody else should either and you're a bad person and we are going to do illegal stuff like doxx you and try to our very best to put you out of business by any means necessary.

This is why we think you're a chess playing pigeon.
Bring back BSC

He at least made me think every once and awhile
 
Boycott: We aren't buying your product or using your services until you reverse a decision we don't agree with.

Cancel Culture: We aren't buying your product, using your services and nobody else should either and you're a bad person and we are going to do illegal stuff like doxx you and try to our very best to put you out of business by any means necessary.

This is why we think you're a chess playing pigeon.
You need to ask your buddy about this NY lawsuit where there are no victims. Money borrowed and paid back. WTF is exactly the plaintiff here again? This is a political witchhunt. If Trump overvalued his properties, then he paid way too much in taxes. I am no attorney but don't you need to have economic damages to sue someone for fraud? Please report back Lord Sock, and phone a friend, 😁
 
You need to ask your buddy about this NY lawsuit where there are no victims. Money borrowed and paid back. WTF is exactly the plaintiff here again? This is a political witchhunt. If Trump overvalued his properties, then he paid way too much in taxes. I am no attorney but don't you need to have economic damages to sue someone for fraud? Please report back Lord Sock, and phone a friend, 😁
Roger that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
What happened to Trump in NYC is the stuff of the Soviet show trials: Show me the man and I'll show you the crime. If the government doesn’t like your politics, they can concoct some excuse to steal your stuff and call it “justice.”

But this behavior always has consequences. There’s a reason companies won’t invest in Venezuela or Cuba: When the rule of law is arbitrary and politicized and property rights are weak, doing business becomes unsafe.

I am rooting for a mass exodus of investor capital and businesses from New York City. But there’s no reason to stop there. For as long as New York insists on being a judicial rogue state, red states should stop acknowledging the rulings of its courts.

Democrats have shredded our Constitution and our legal norms just to destroy Donald Trump. But they’d do well to remember that we can hit back. Ship every illegal into New York, and ship every dollar out.

 
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco
You need to ask your buddy about this NY lawsuit where there are no victims. Money borrowed and paid back. WTF is exactly the plaintiff here again? This is a political witchhunt. If Trump overvalued his properties, then he paid way too much in taxes. I am no attorney but don't you need to have economic damages to sue someone for fraud? Please report back Lord Sock, and phone a friend, 😁
I’ll leave a more complete answer to sock’s contact, but I believe it’s a legal principle called disgorgement.

Basically taking advantage of the system by lying and getting excessive profits directly from the lies….in this case excessive inflation of asset valuation to get better interest rates on loans because they were more secure.

It doesn’t require a plaintiff to claim damages. The state can just go after you if they want to. The suit was brought by Letitia James.

And it’s not $354M, it’s $465M. He hit Trump with $100M in back interest. The worst part is Trump has to put the full amount OH with the court to even appeal.

From Jonathan Turley:
“Under New York law, Trump cannot appeal this ruling without depositing the full amount, including interest, in a court account. Even for Trump, $455 million is hard to come by. Likewise, a bond would require a company to guarantee payment for a defendant who has been barred from doing business in New York and is facing the need to liquidate much of his portfolio.”

It’s truly communist banana republic stuff.
 
Last edited:
You’re right.

We should just let a state confiscate $355MM for absolutely no reason and do nothing so you don’t call anyone a snowflake.

This isn’t cancelling someone for not using the correct pronouns, this is fighting communist seizures of assets for political purposes. But as a fascist liberal I wouldn’t expect you to get that.

In a way, it’s actually good for NYC in the long run.
What does it mean when the boards biggest snowflake calls others...a snowflake? I think it cancels itself out?
 
I’ll leave a more complete answer to sock’s contact, but I believe it’s a legal principle called disgorgement.

Basically taking advantage of the system by lying and getting excessive profits directly from the lies….in this case excessive inflation of asset valuation to get better interest rates on loans because they were more secure.

It doesn’t require a plaintiff to claim damages. The state can just go after you if they want to. The suit was brought by Letitia James.

And it’s not $354M, it’s $465M. He hit Trump with $100M in back interest. The worst part is Trump has to put the full amount OH with the court to even appeal.

From Jonathan Turley:
“Under New York law, Trump cannot appeal this ruling without depositing the full amount, including interest, in a court account. Even for Trump, $455 million is hard to come by. Likewise, a bond would require a company to guarantee payment for a defendant who has been barred from doing business in New York and is facing the need to liquidate much of his portfolio.”

It’s truly communist banana republic stuff.
This is a lot like civil asset forfeiture. They take it from you and you have to go to court to get it back.

He has to put that money in escrow that he doesn't control to even start the appeals process.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: NavigatorII
This is a lot like civil asset forfeiture. They take it from you and you have to go to court to get it back.

He has to put that money in escrow that he doesn't control to even start the appeals process.
Which will nearly bankrupt him and make running for President really hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordofallSocks
Which will nearly bankrupt him and make running for President really hard.
Seems that requirement that due process requires an excessive bond would be unconstitutional. I would challenge the law and get it before SCOTUS then once the bond requirement it found unconstitutional file the appeal.

Win the appeal which should happen if SCOTUS is on the job. Then counter sue NY for violating his rights with some monetary component for the ban from his own business. Next shutter the NY businesses, let the buildings rot and tax revenue dry up.

He owes them nothing but they owe him a lot.
 
Seems that requirement that due process requires an excessive bond would be unconstitutional. I would challenge the law and get it before SCOTUS then once the bond requirement it found unconstitutional file the appeal.

Win the appeal which should happen if SCOTUS is on the job. Then counter sue NY for violating his rights with some monetary component for the ban from his own business. Next shutter the NY businesses, let the buildings rot and tax revenue dry up.

He owes them nothing but they owe him a lot.
I'm not sure it works that way.

He's been deemed guilty of breaking a state statute and he only challenges the details of the penalty afterwards? And he was given a "fair" trial, isn't that enough due process for SCOTUS?

Asking these questions ignorant AF about the actual law...
 
  • Angry
Reactions: nail1988
I'm not sure it works that way.

He's been deemed guilty of breaking a state statute and he only challenges the details of the penalty afterwards? And he was given a "fair" trial, isn't that enough due process for SCOTUS?

Asking these questions ignorant AF about the actual law...

Evidence obtained thru an illegal search is deemed inadmissible by reasons of being poisonous fruit from a poisonous tree.

Every ten years or so some state or another stays all executions while they investigate if the death penalty violates the states constitution or the 8th amendment.

Either could apply if the penalty for a statutory crime is an unreasonable fine it's unconstitutional, or if the penalty on its own is deemed an excessive fine then it is also unconstitutional.

The framework for SCOTUS judicial review, let's see what the appellate court does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
You’re right.

We should just let a state confiscate $355MM for absolutely no reason and do nothing so you don’t call anyone a snowflake.

This isn’t cancelling someone for not using the correct pronouns, this is fighting communist seizures of assets for political purposes. But as a fascist liberal I wouldn’t expect you to get that.

In a way, it’s actually good for NYC in the long run.
Even the VIEW said it was an exorbitant sum. The VIEW!!

There was NO victim here. James is a Marxist.
 
Evidence obtained thru an illegal search is deemed inadmissible by reasons of being poisonous fruit from a poisonous tree.

Every ten years or so some state or another stays all executions while they investigate if the death penalty violates the states constitution or the 8th amendment.

Either could apply if the penalty for a statutory crime is an unreasonable fine it's unconstitutional, or if the penalty on its own is deemed an excessive fine then it is also unconstitutional.

The framework for SCOTUS judicial review, let's see what the appellate court does.
My concern is - he has to park a half a trillion dollars to even have an appellate court hear his appeal.

Even for Trump that’s an insane amount of money.

And if he can’t come up with the sum, James is already talking about asset seizures.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT