ADVERTISEMENT

Leftists ok w a Dual Justice System are scum

You just want us to understand the depths of your victimhood.

We get it man...poor Ray.

Says the constantly crying conservative... šŸ¤£

Are you going to whine & cry about the 2 tier justice system and how unfairly its treating donald trump today? šŸ˜¢
 
I just did a search for the term 'two tiered justice':


Pretty specific term, but I see pubs here mentioning it all the way back to 2019.

Guess who I don't see mentioning it? Glad you and ray ray have finally woken up.


All the way back in 2019? šŸ¤£

malone is now a believer in CRT which is what's really funny in all of this conservative outcry about a two tired justice system

CRT asserts there's 2 systems of justice in practice

malone bitterly hates CRT concepts until those truths benefit his political narrative and donald trump azz in court šŸ¤£

And just for fun...here's a Glenn Greenwald piece on a two tiered justice system that came well BEFORE your 2019 citation

You guys all love Glenn Greenwald when he shows up on FOX to attack Obama & Biden, right?

https://www.salon.com/2009/01/28/prosecutions_3/
The definition of a "two-tiered justice system"
Ordinary people who commit petty, nonviolent crimes rot for decades in inhumane prisons. High political leaders who commit serious felonies receive full-scale immunity
By GLENN GREENWALD
PUBLISHED JANUARY 28, 2009 11:56AM (EST)



So a two tiered system isn't attacking trump....he's just a rich high political leader who's too stupid to use the advantage the system unjustly affords people like him.

When was the last time a supposed rich elite couldn't "buy" the outcome they wanted?

Even OJ figured it out...donald? Not so much. šŸ¤£
 
Last edited:
Subpoena for court? It's possible that I could be arrested for ignoring such a Subpoena. It's more likely that I'd get my a$$ chewed out and they would reissue and reschedule.

If in a case where the Subpoena was for documents, but the ownership of the documents was in dispute and I was POTUS and I alone got to determine if those documents were mine or not then no, I wouldn't expect to be arrested.

x1 million if in the lead up to an election where I was the leading candidate for the opposition.
This is another example of your politics interfering with your judgement. Trump never fought the subpoena or tried to argue that the documents were his. He just ignored it. There is a process and a legal way to fight a subpoena, which I am sure you are aware of.

Just focusing on the facts of the case, you would see a subpoena issued and ignored.
 
When Hillaryā€™s emails were subpoenaed - regarding classified information on an unsecured server - and she smashed blackberries and hired a company to use BleachBit on a server, Iā€™m sure she got hit with 310 years too, right?

And I sure youā€™re still seething over it all.
This is a bad example, here's why
  1. Garland is the AG, not Lynch, Sessions or Barr. SO what they did wrong/right is not Garlands problem
    1. Therefore, you can't claim that they politicized the DOJ with Hilary decision, than get mad at Garland for not politicizing the DOJ.
    2. If you want to take the politics out of the DOJ, then why keep bringing up Hilary?
    3. Lastly, As Barr stated. If you only care about Law and Order and you thought that Hilary should have been charged (which you clearly do) than you should support Trump being charged because this shows true law and order and restoring the DOJ to being non-political.
 
This is a bad example, here's why
  1. Garland is the AG, not Lynch, Sessions or Barr. SO what they did wrong/right is not Garlands problem
    1. Therefore, you can't claim that they politicized the DOJ with Hilary decision, than get mad at Garland for not politicizing the DOJ.
    2. If you want to take the politics out of the DOJ, then why keep bringing up Hilary?
    3. Lastly, As Barr stated. If you only care about Law and Order and you thought that Hilary should have been charged (which you clearly do) than you should support Trump being charged because this shows true law and order and restoring the DOJ to being non-political.
1) It politicized in the same direction - in favor of one party, the Democrat party. I'm am mad that Garland IS politicizing the DOJ by using lawfare to eliminate the opposition party's leading presidential candidate. You aren't making sense.
And I never said it was Garland's problem, but he's an extension of the same corrupt line of prosecutors.

2) What does my bringing up Hillary have to do with the politics in the DOJ? I'm pointing out the hypocrisy (hierarchy) of how the law is applied. If you're a Dem SOS with no classification powers you can smash electronic devices and wipe illegal servers, mishandling tens of thousands of classified emails. If you're a Rep running for office they want you to die in jail over 37 documents (that you had every right to take and keep).
The fact that doesn't bother you is insane, and partisan AF.

3) I've shown you six ways to Sunday what the legal precedent and PRA say about Trump having those documents. He had every right to take them. Congress had legally subpoenaed Hillary's emails on her illegal, unsecured (and likely hacked) server before she decided to delete and destroy anything that could incriminate her.
And she missed a dozen or so classified emails (4 labelled Top Secret), and her buddy Comey still didn't indict and prosecute.

So you're wrong, it's the perfect example.
 
1) It politicized in the same direction - in favor of one party, the Democrat party. I'm am mad that Garland IS politicizing the DOJ by using lawfare to eliminate the opposition party's leading presidential candidate. You aren't making sense.
And I never said it was Garland's problem, but he's an extension of the same corrupt line of prosecutors.

2) What does my bringing up Hillary have to do with the politics in the DOJ? I'm pointing out the hypocrisy (hierarchy) of how the law is applied. If you're a Dem SOS with no classification powers you can smash electronic devices and wipe illegal servers, mishandling tens of thousands of classified emails. If you're a Rep running for office they want you to die in jail over 37 documents (that you had every right to take and keep).
The fact that doesn't bother you is insane, and partisan AF.

3) I've shown you six ways to Sunday what the legal precedent and PRA say about Trump having those documents. He had every right to take them. Congress had legally subpoenaed Hillary's emails on her illegal, unsecured (and likely hacked) server before she decided to delete and destroy anything that could incriminate her.
And she missed a dozen or so classified emails (4 labelled Top Secret), and her buddy Comey still didn't indict and prosecute.

So you're wrong, it's the perfect example.
You are saying that the law was applied to Hillary incorrectly then, so therefore it is being applied to Trump correctly, now? You just hate that in both cases it benefitted the democrats? What? haha
 
You are saying that the law was applied to Hillary incorrectly then, so therefore it is being applied to Trump correctly, now? You just hate that in both cases it benefitted the democrats? What? haha
Man you're dense.

I'm saying that Hillary was guilty, even if you ignore the BleachBit and blackberry hammers, just what she missed should have resulted in an indictment. She had no classification rights and no protection from the PRA....because the wasn't and never will be the President.

With Trump - NARA had no right or ability to compel Trump to turn over anything. I've spelled that out at least 3 times, but I guess you don't understand basic legal concepts.

I cannot make this any clearer, and you understand it, you're just trolling.
 
BLM was founded on the belief an unequal justice system

You've been pro-BLM all this time?
BLM is a racist, Socialist organization that grifts off poor Blacks & wealthy Corporationsā€¦

Iā€™m 100% against BLM and their corruption. Always have been always will be against their racism.
 
All the way back in 2019? šŸ¤£
Years longer than you have been here. Hell I doubt you will be here another 19 days with the way you disregard site rules.

Am glad you finally figured out we have a two-tiered justice system in this country. I knew eventually you would wake up.
 
Man you're dense.

I'm saying that Hillary was guilty, even if you ignore the BleachBit and blackberry hammers, just what she missed should have resulted in an indictment. She had no classification rights and no protection from the PRA....because the wasn't and never will be the President.

With Trump - NARA had no right or ability to compel Trump to turn over anything. I've spelled that out at least 3 times, but I guess you don't understand basic legal concepts.

I cannot make this any clearer, and you understand it, you're just trolling.
Remember when Comey came out and said that NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR would have indicted hillary over her handling of classified documents?

Comey just gift-wrapped the Trump Team their entire defense.
 
Man you're dense.

I'm saying that Hillary was guilty, even if you ignore the BleachBit and blackberry hammers, just what she missed should have resulted in an indictment. She had no classification rights and no protection from the PRA....because the wasn't and never will be the President.

With Trump - NARA had no right or ability to compel Trump to turn over anything. I've spelled that out at least 3 times, but I guess you don't understand basic legal concepts.

I cannot make this any clearer, and you understand it, you're just trolling.
SO you are saying that they are different cases with different circumstances? One had protection from NRA and other didn't?

That's why I asked previously, why are you bringing up Hilary? These cases have nothing in common other then them being white politicians. Even you admitted that.

This is what we call a red herring.
 
BLM is a racist, Socialist organization that grifts off poor Blacks & wealthy Corporationsā€¦

Iā€™m 100% against BLM and their corruption. Always have been always will be against their racism.


And what do you think is said about trumpism?

They're racists who grift off poor whites & white grievance tyoes
 
Years longer than you have been here. Hell I doubt you will be here another 19 days with the way you disregard site rules.

What does that have to do with anything? šŸ¤£

Am glad you finally figured out we have a two-tiered justice system in this country. I knew eventually you would wake up.



Says the guy whos benefitted from the unjust system

donald trump is the last person who could claim unfair treatment from the justice system :rolleyes:




https://chicago.suntimes.com/2023/6...system-fairness-prosecution-dean-strang-op-ed
Yes, we have a two-tiered justice system ā€” but not like Trump claims
Our countryā€™s enforcement apparatus is used exclusively against unwanted outsiders, not against insiders, a Loyola University law professor writes. Former President Donald Trump, in a real sense, had to try hard to get charged with crimes.

By Dean Strang Jun 20, 2023, 7:02am EDT

90


Reacting to the federal indictment of former President Donald Trump, many of his supporters argue the criminal charges prove the U.S. Justice Department is being ā€œweaponizedā€ for political purposes and that this is illegitimate.

Almost none claim he is innocent; they claim only that he should not be prosecuted. Some add the United States now has a two-tiered criminal justice system, one for Trump and the other for President Joe Biden and his family and allies.

There well may be two tiers to our criminal enforcement. But if so, Trump, Biden, and almost everyone they know are together in the top tier.

These Trump supporters unintentionally reveal a different assumption about our criminal enforcement apparatus: That it will be used exclusively against unwanted outsiders, not against insiders; that it will be reserved for the poor, the weak and the unwanted, rather than used to punish the rich, the strong and the valued.
 
SO you are saying that they are different cases with different circumstances? One had protection from NRA and other didn't?

That's why I asked previously, why are you bringing up Hilary? These cases have nothing in common other then them being white politicians. Even you admitted that.

This is what we call a red herring.
Race has absolutely nothing to do with these cases.

Both cases involve the handling of classified documents. As President, Trump had nearly complete authority to declassify anything he wants. So there's almost no chance to bring a winnable case against him for that. As Comey told us, NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR would attempt such.

Hillary, as Sec of State, did NOT have such protections. Further, she stored classified information on an unsecure server, putting national security at risk. Her careless mishandling of classified documents could have easily resulted in the death of Americans, and may have.

These cases aren't related at all. There IS no case against Trump, and hillary should be in jail. At minimum.

Completely different cases.
 
Race has absolutely nothing to do with these cases.

Both cases involve the handling of classified documents. As President, Trump had nearly complete authority to declassify anything he wants. So there's almost no chance to bring a winnable case against him for that. As Comey told us, NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR would attempt such.

Wrong. Take a look at his charges...document classification is not relevant to this case AT ALL


Hillary, as Sec of State, did NOT have such protections. Further, she stored classified information on an unsecure server, putting national security at risk. Her careless mishandling of classified documents could have easily resulted in the death of Americans, and may have.

trump "stored" his in the bathroom of Mar-a-Lago...a place that has been infiltrated by foreign national spies

Bedminster isn't secure either

trump's recklessness in regards to government documents is like no other official in our history





These cases aren't related at all. There IS no case against Trump, and hillary should be in jail. At minimum.

Completely different cases.

Yeah they're completely different

Hillary was cleared...trump is indicted for illegal retention, obstruction of justice, and espionage
 
And what do you think is said about trumpism?

They're racists who grift off poor whites & white grievance tyoes
I donā€™t doubt you say thatā€¦. You are a Leftist - we all know your track record w the truth!

Trump won!
 
I donā€™t doubt you say thatā€¦. You are a Leftist - we all know your track record w the truth!

Trump won!
The truth and Trump won are winners in the category of
ā€œWhich of these things is not like the otherā€
 
BLM is a racist, Socialist organization that grifts off poor Blacks & wealthy Corporationsā€¦

Iā€™m 100% against BLM and their corruption. Always have been always will be against their racism.
They were crying about the system as well...
 
https://straightarrownews.com/opinions/trump-grifts-maga-supporters-for-their-money-and-vote/
Trump grifts MAGA supporters for their money and vote
MONDAY


https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/26/nyregion/wall-building-scam-trump-allies.html
Judge Sentences Trump Allies in ā€˜We Build the Wallā€™ Scheme
Andrew Badolato was sentenced to three years in prison and Brian Kolfage four years and three months, after being accused of channeling donor contributions into their own pockets.



https://news.yahoo.com/trump-bucks-scam-swindles-thousand-211000766.html
'Trump Bucks' Scam Swindles Thousand of Dollars From Unsuspecting Investors
Nikki Main
June 1, 2023Ā·3 min read

The online retailer ClickBank shut down sites boosting ā€œTrump Bucks,ā€ which promoted a fabricated currency that would allegedly earn subscribers thousands of dollars if Donald Trump is elected in the 2024 presidential election. An investigation conducted by NBC News revealed several Colorado-based companies had created the scam which promised prospective investors of a get-rich-quick scheme if the former president was reelected.

The companies reportedly advertised what were called ā€œTrump Bucksā€ which have Trumpā€™s face plastered on them and claimed anyone who invests in the fake currency would become ā€œreal patriotsā€ and become rich when they finally cash in. NBC News identified the companies behind the scam as Patriots Dynasty, Patriots Future, and USA Patriots which advertised the currency on platforms like The Telegram, and suggested that they were endorsed by Trump.
 
SO you are saying that they are different cases with different circumstances? One had protection from NRA and other didn't?
I'm so excited I finally got you to come around and admit Trump had every right to have those documents!

This might be the first time I've successfully flipped a liberal message board troll on a major political event.

Now, let's fix the system and stop allowing the lawfare against political opponents to continue.
 
I'm so excited I finally got you to come around and admit Trump had every right to have those documents!

This might be the first time I've successfully flipped a liberal message board troll on a major political event.

Now, let's fix the system and stop allowing the lawfare against political opponents to continue.
I literally said "so you're saying". I was repeating what you said. Stop with the silly games.
 
I literally said "so you're saying". I was repeating what you said. Stop with the silly games.
Not letting you get away with that one.

You said these were different cases, a 'red herring', because Trump had the protection of the PRA and Hillary didn't. You scolded me for bringing her up. That only makes sense if you think it's true.

If not the cases are similar and should be compared.
 
To us? Yes. But when we say that, people like @Uniformed_ReRe claim we are crazy conspiracy theorists....cause the sites they get all their 'information' from, is telling them something different.

Okaayyyyyyy. Gonna be fun seeing who got it right.
He doesn't say that.

His schtick is to accuse us of wanting penis and hooker and drug pics.

That's the LAST thing I want to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Not letting you get away with that one.

You said these were different cases, a 'red herring', because Trump had the protection of the PRA and Hillary didn't. You scolded me for bringing her up. That only makes sense if you think it's true.

If not the cases are similar and should be compared.
Come on man. I was saying based off your words. It's a red herring.

I think it's a red herring for other reasons.
 
Of course you do.

Hopefully someday youā€™ll bestow the board with your vast knowledge and understanding.

Until then weā€™ll just toil in our ingnorance.
This is honestly like living in a Monty Python skit except Kal thinks his input is according to script. šŸ˜‚ Is the other lunatic still posting? Crib notes? šŸ˜‚
 

HOW MUCH MORE needs to come out before our UN AMERICAN leftists admit that their party and followers are criminals to our Country?


How much longer before you admit to being a Looney Toons cartoon character?

7qa1u1.jpg
 
  • Wow
Reactions: nail1988
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT